One thing I dislike about today's scenes compared to the golden gonzo era, is the increase of female foreplay. The pussy licking scenes can sometimes go on LONGER than the blowjob scenes. Most of the time in the Anabolic, Diabolic, and Zero Tolerance movies of old they cut out female foreplay. I think that makes the scene a lot more spontaneous, and it tests to see if the girl is really into it. Can she get aroused just by sucking dick, instead of having to be prepared for the sex by the man. TeamSkeet's been doing no female foreplay in a lot of their scenes, do you know of any other companies that do this? It decreases scene length(good) and feels more natural to me.
I am more into stuff like pussy eating and if girl's ass is rimmed its an instant boner for me, the thing i fast forward in porn is blowjobs. i am not seeing cocks being focused in porn not my thing.
[Link]
fanman44 Deactivated User
474 Posts 1/13
Posted - Jan 11 2014 : 7:51PM
scenes are SOOO Long with Pussy Eating. If you get rid of the female foreplay you get scenes down to like 20 min
oh my fucking god. Get off the internet and have sex with a real woman. Women don't get wet by sucking dick dude, girls in porn aren't being for real when they say that. Most women need the foreplay to get wet and a real man enjoys giving a woman pleasure and turning her on.
^ This dude says it all. If you prefer less female satisfaction you can always watch gay porn.
[Link]
fanman44 Deactivated User
474 Posts 1/13
Posted - Jan 12 2014 : 12:30AM
I get hard from giving a chick oral, so i assume some chicks can get wet from oral. I like the no oral on the women because it shows how much they are REALLY into it
that makes no sense! Your assumption is wrong. Women are REALLY into having their clits played with, that's the whole fucking point of a clit! I'd like to know where you got this idea that girls are only REALLY into sex if they don't get their pussies eaten or foreplay. It makes no sense and if you knew anything about sex (that's not in porn) you'd get what I'm saying. If a girl is 'cumming' when you haven't even touched her clit then she's probably FAKING. This is a fact, there have been studies done, the percentage of women who can cum without clit stimulation is very low. Yes it's possible, but it's NOT common for women. So if you're cool with chicks faking it all the time, then by all means let's completely skip over all oral and foreplay. Listen, you don't care about watching the foreplay so just admit that, don't make up some bullshit about it being some sort of test to see if they're 'really into it' Edited by - mike23 on 1/12/2014 1:00:38 AM
[Link]
fanman44 Deactivated User
474 Posts 1/13
Posted - Jan 12 2014 : 12:59AM
never said that. It just shows how aroused they are if they dont need foreplay to have sex
In the golden era 2000-2008 there wasnt a lot of a pussy eating and the chicks got off fine. Obviously not every chick will get wet from giving oral, just like not every man will get hard from giving oral. In a lot of mid 2000's gonzo there were no cuts aside from before insertion. Which i assume lube was applied. Lube is like ED pills for the guy, its fine if the women take it. There's no need for the pussy licking anyway if they aren't aroused. Edited by - fanman44 on 1/12/2014 2:57:07 AM
[Link]
fanman44 Deactivated User
474 Posts 1/13
Posted - Jan 12 2014 : 1:50AM
Im not a huge IR fan, but the lack of pussy eating in most films speeds the scene up to a nice 20-25 min tops
a tongue in a twat is foreplay? How about a little chew of the taint or a finger up the ass? That still warming her up? 8) doesn't anybody kiss (oral) anymore? A philosophical question for the members: When does foreplay end and whatchacallit comes next begin?
[Link]
fanman44 Deactivated User
474 Posts 1/13
Posted - Jan 17 2014 : 1:51PM
Killergram has it right. No pussy licking and short scenes
Why don't you fast forward? What's so special about 20 minutes? If the scene holds my interest, the running time is irrelevant. And/but anyway, I can always fast forward. Why don't you fast forward?
[Link]
fanman44 Deactivated User
474 Posts 1/13
Posted - Jan 19 2014 : 7:01PM
20 minutes is the perfect time for a porn scene. BJ-Vag-Anal-Finish. All in a great 20 min package.
[Link]
fanman44 Deactivated User
474 Posts 1/13
Posted - Jan 20 2014 : 3:49AM
Noticed this new company spizoo is doing this, im glad to see it back in action. Also almost all the Monsters of Cock scenes are no foreplay. Suprising enough. You'd think the scenes with the BIGGER dicks would have MORE foreplay
[Link]
IRLover91 Deactivated User
1091 Posts 11/13
Posted - Jan 20 2014 : 5:33PM
^ Shawn Michaels goes down on girls, not for long, but he goes down on them.
It would be boring if each scene had a set time limit and used the exact same formula in each scene imo. Also, you can just fast forward like someone mentioned lol.
[Link]
fanman44 Deactivated User
474 Posts 1/13
Posted - Jan 22 2014 : 12:40AM
his scenes are skippable
[Link]
IRLover91 Deactivated User
1091 Posts 11/13
Posted - Jan 22 2014 : 6:35AM
^ hit or miss for me, he's getting too old to give it to the girls right. Check out D.T. from Mofos, guy's funny and he munches like he hasn't eaten in days.
[Link]
fanman44 Deactivated User
474 Posts 1/13
Posted - Feb 12 2014 : 8:33PM
IR barely has pussy eating, and I think they have it right. The dick should be wet from the blowjob. That should be enough lube
The problem with having a lot of foreplay in a porn movie is that foreplay is softcore porn. Having a lot of softcore porn is okay, if that's what the movie title promises and that's what you mostly want to see. But when the movie title suggests raging hardcore sex, then having to wade through half an hour or more of softcore foreplay before you get there can be disappointing. Because you might masturbate yourself to orgasm before the film shows you what you want to see. It also doesn't quite make sense to show a lot of softcore foreplay after the first scene. Because the viewer watching the second and subsequent scenes probably already has a raging erection and he needs to see more hardcore, rather than return back to softcore. It ends up being a total mismatch between viewer's increased lust and the film's decreased heat. A lot of softcore foreplay might be necessary to prepare the lady and the guy, but there is no reason why they can't do most of it behind the scenes, before the filming starts.
Edited by - Dan on 2/16/2014 11:10:18 PM
[Link]
fanman44 Deactivated User
474 Posts 1/13
Posted - Feb 17 2014 : 10:16PM
agreed
[Link]
earthwindfire Deactivated User
257 Posts 10/12
Posted - Feb 17 2014 : 11:46PM
yeah, we wouldn't want to see a scene where the guy does something for the woman. It's all about us guys!!!! :) You could fast forward that part of the scene and just watch the stuff you like, no?
Getting my woman more aroused by foreplay gets me more aroused. If a porn scene can convince me that the foreplay is accomplishing the same thing for both parties through its (very) limited vocabulary then I'm fine with it. Trouble is that most pornographers aren't very good at conveying female arousal. Too many of them seem to think that 'Make some noise' covers it, and that's assuming they can be bothered to make the attempt in the first place.
^ Perhaps the problem with foreplay in porn is that it's called foreplay rather than sex-play. Because this word limits unnecessarily what the porn makers feel free to do in their scenes. When you call it foreplay, then this automatically means that you must organize the sex action in a slow progression from softcore to hardcore. It creates an impression that the participants don't have much desire or passion for each other at first, and they have to work at it to create and stimulate their desire and passion. Which makes the sex boring to watch. Lack of passion is always boring. But when you call it sex-play, then the guy can go straight-to-anal on the lady and play her pussy with his hand, while he is at it. He doesn't have to separate and segregate softcore from hardcore sex-action in such a scene. He can do it all at the same time. Which is a sign of real lust and passion. When the guy goes straight to anal on the lady and starts kissing her only after he is inside her and banging away, then this is true lust and passion. A truly passionate guy doesn't forget and neglect softcore sex-play with his lady. He does it as much as any other guy. The only difference is that the passionate guy doesn't wait to penetrate. He goes hardcore on the lady right away and then adds softcore sex-play for her on top of it and does both at the same time.
^ Massaging the lady's pussy with a well-lubricated hand works a lot better than cunnilingus for pleasing the woman and making her orgasm. Because the human hand is especially made for gentle and sensitive touching and massaging, among other things. While the human mouth and tongue are designed mostly for another purpose, which is eating food and not so much licking it endlessly. I think it's ridiculous to use inferior techniques to please the lady, when you can do it much better in a different way.
^ My ideas come from my sexual experience with a number of women. I wouldn't be able to describe in detail what happens during the sex that I'm talking about, if I didn't have personal experience with it. I'm so sure about what I say, because I know it from my experience. Edited by - Dan on 2/18/2014 12:55:14 PM
^ There is no need for guessing, when it comes to knowledge based on experience. Because anybody can check it out for themselves by setting up a similar experience and going though it to see if that's the way it works or not. This is how virtually all modern knowledge comes about. It's based on repeated experiments, rather than on belief in someone's authoritative knowledge.
Posted - Jan 10 2014 : 1:20PM