So the domineering bf pushed her into and then out of the industry. Might've lasted a bit longer IF she learned some English and was able to get away from him and shoot her a couple of times.
I ♥ the male gaze (and Palestine). 8737 Posts 11/13
Posted - Nov 18 2016 : 6:10PM
Jessie Rogers claimed that she hated what she was doing, yet her scenes constitute "good porn" imo. That's one example, but there are other ex-pornstars who did good work yet have claimed that they didn't enjoy any of their scenes. So, I'd suggest that Lucie's problem was that she lacked talent as a performer.
^ Yeah, look at Kendra Sunderland and Megan Rain. They're both, I might be mistaken, but both came into the industry when they were 18 years old. I do not see any hesitancy whatsoever on either of these girls part. They look ravenous, lust-filled, and completely dick hungry. Lucy looked like a scared mouse in all of her scenes. Never looked like she was into it and was almost mentally counting the seconds before the scene was over.
But were they any good?!?!?!? I mean if they were she could've made quite the name for herself just doing girl/girl scenes. Like Dani Daniels it could've at least given her more time and experience in the adult industry before pushing into other genres. But it sounds pretty clear that her boyfriend had his foot on the gas. Who the hell throws a sigh young woman into the adult industry and starts them off with LegalPorno?!?!??!?!?
[Link]
Pennywize Deactivated User
310 Posts 8/16
Posted - Nov 18 2016 : 10:08PM
The whole story can be found on Woodman's site under the Lucie Wilde thread.
You have got to imagine that Lucie could easily have made a shed load of money without resorting to porn - that innocent look, slim body and absolutely killer breasts means that with something even approaching the right management she could have shot softcore for any publication on the planet multiple times. Got to also agree that the badly shot circus porn that Legal Porno shoots would be a long-way last if ever I wanted to revisit any of her work - they simply think that cramming the most meat in any available hole in the most robotic sterile fashion = quality porn. God knows what Erik Everhad thinks of being a part of their output as he was in my eyes one of the great performers directors not so long ago ...
I ♥ the male gaze (and Palestine). 8737 Posts 11/13
Posted - Nov 19 2016 : 12:24AM
^Perhaps Erik has a different opinion than you, just as fans of Legal Porno do. Personally, I rarely encounter scenes on that site that I'd describe as robotic and sterile. Maybe you watched different scenes than I have, or maybe we perceived some of the same scenes differently.
^ This is the second such assinine statement I've seen him lately. Are people with no morals or common sense finding this website now? That's just an absolutely inappropriate statement even if he did make it up.
No, I was making the comments to the person who made such heinous statements. Even if it were true that's not something you spit out in public and act like you're scooping something and you're a journalist. If it is true he should've done what you said and reported it to the authorities.
I agree. Although I don't think her performances were quite as bad as some here, I think if she was marketed correctly she would've been a big deal. She was totally wrong for LEGAL PORN because fans of that site seem to be more into that type of hardcore action instead of how the girl looks. A girl who can deliver that type of sex will do well with that audience and looks aren't a priority. For Lucie her looks were/are her main selling point. If she had started with a studio like SCORE where the audience consists of big boob lovers and the sex is considerably tamer she would've been a bigger star and would've probably had a much better porn experience. She absolutely could've gotten away with doing softcore stuff also. Sad to hear she's gone from porn and what she had to put up with. I don't think she was a dynamic performer but I still like watching her scenes because her looks made up for her so-so performances. Plus, I think her DDF BUSTY stuff wasn't that bad. That was much more in line with the type of porn she should've been making. Edited by - draxxx on 11/19/2016 4:56:18 PM
[Link]
Goobernaut Deactivated User
11 Posts 11/16
Posted - Nov 19 2016 : 7:03PM
I read a year or two ago someone sent her family videos of her scenes and caused her much drama. I don't get why evil people would do that.
Because an 18 years European girl may be sexually more open to try certain things that her North American counterpart but she isn't that open to having a bunch of men pile drive into her vaginal and anal cavity on day one of her porn career. I know that if you use LP has your baseline than of course every 18 years old European girl is thrilled to do anal, dp and DAP right away but that is simply not true. The reason why every young women should get eased on into trying more hardcore things in porn is because they need to get used to what porn sex is all about before they attempt the more extreme kinds of sex exist. We will never know how long Lucie would have stayed in porn but it would certainly have been more than a few months if for no other reason that the more softcore/midcore sites would have hired her for glamour shoots but that sort of became null when she went the exteme route.
I ♥ the male gaze (and Palestine). 8737 Posts 11/13
Posted - Nov 20 2016 : 3:00PM
^What does being "thrilled" by the sex act have to do with it? It's a job and a performance. A pornstar could never shoot anal at all and still spend her career without being "thrilled" by her work. It's a wonderful thing when a pornstar is thrilled by the sex or some other aspect of a scene, but do you really believe that pornstars commonly view being "thrilled" as a necessary prerequisite for shooting a scene? It's work. You're talking about personal sexual openness as if these young women are deciding what they're willing to do with a guy on a first date, but that's their personal life. Porn is their job.
She's one of those girls who make me wonder what her life must've been like looking the way she does. Pretty much anything she wears is gonna look sexy because of her body. Is she constantly hit on? Are people constantly staring?
^I think the fact that she got into porn at 18 and did anal and DP right off the bat shows that she probably dealt with more than just looks and stares growing up.
^^ felipealou if those pics came from a personal social media account and not one associated with her porn identity then I am going to have to ask you to take them down. Thank you. If not, then please provide the link to her porn social media where you got the pics, so other people can follow her too.
^I think the key word is managed because I don't think she had that. What she had was a boyfriend who sold her on the idea of porn and his first choice was DDF which basically transitioned to LP within a short amount of time. After that there wasn't much that could happen.
Lucie Wilde @ AEBN
Posted - Nov 18 2016 : 5:29AM
Damn fast typing fingers 
