Reviewers Recommend
Seductive Angie Craves Hot SexSeductive Angie Craves Hot Sex - review by Danielmayu33216
Starring: Milan Ponjevic, Angie Faith. Read review
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 626 > Make porn studs liable for bad cum-shots! > Make porn studs liable for bad cum-shots! (page 2)
Page 2 of 2 First
AuthorPost
Aplus
Senior Member

1431 Posts
5/05
Posted - Jun 11 2005 : 4:11AM
I guess we can agree to disagree. I don't get why it really matters that much to so many guys. I can understand the female performer wanting it, since she's actually there. Personally I think these guys have enough pressure on them as it is, especially when you figure in the fact that the female won't help him, doesn't actually like him, or especially doesn't like the way he fucks. I'd love to be able to do it, but I couldn't honestly imagine it.

With over 10,000 adult films being made a year, just how do you expect this to happen? When I think of the queer numbers involved, it seems impossible.

Loraine
Senior Member

1559 Posts
3/04
Posted - Jun 12 2005 : 5:12AM
I think part of the problem is the lead up to the cum shot -- endless grunting sport fucking at exactly the same pace, accompanied by the high pitched whiny sounds of our starlet in apparent rapture -- goes on and on and on -- until the viewer is literally begging it to be finished, thereby placing extra emphasis on the finish itself, which in proportion to the lead up needs to be nothing less than a fire hose blast.
Phlogiston
Deactivated User

Whore-loving Thought Criminal
92 Posts
6/05
Posted - Jun 12 2005 : 8:38AM
I believe the American League in baseball has provided us a solution.

Quite simply, we need a "designated ejaculator".

Should the primary pornstar not be able to deliver sufficient "coverage" to a young starlet's face, the D.E. steps in and delivers the gooey goods.

Failing that, the guy could perhaps just fire a squirt gun filled with half-and-half out of frame.

Aplus
Senior Member

1431 Posts
5/05
Posted - Jun 12 2005 : 12:20PM
I think they've tried that many of times over the years when the guy simply had nothing left in him. No editer can really make it look real and the fake cum almost always looks fake. It looks so fake, that its kind of amusing at best.

Edited by - Aplus on 6/12/2005 12:21:42 PM

 
Phlogiston
Deactivated User

Whore-loving Thought Criminal
92 Posts
6/05
Posted - Jun 12 2005 : 5:05PM
I think you are right. I seem to recall reading that GGG supplements their cum with Pina Colada mix or something. It looks like thinned white housepaint.

I suppose people who are disappointed by weak cumshots can always buy from Peter North. That guy might drown someone someday.

VincentVanGauge
Former Fucking Virgin

Paying trib-ute to SinncentVanSage
1412 Posts
12/04
Posted - Jun 13 2005 : 2:19PM
I think it's nonsense to do more than one scene a day, at least for a guy. It's only natural they can't deliver properly if they do several scenes per day. Maybe studios should think about engaging more guys or slowing down their production a little. With a given number of guys there's also a given maximal amount of JPTU (jizz per time unit), and it's up to the producers on how many scenes they choose to allocate it. So sometimes releasing less means releasing more.

I don't think guys who can neither perform nor deliver will be booked very often. For guys who are great performers otherwise but can't deliver much naturally there's still the option of engaging a stunt dick for the finish. That would make sure we wouldn't have to see the guy's face when he cums, too.

Faking cumshots is lame. Period.

To pluck a duck will chuck the cluck, but suck and fuck for buck means luck.

Zartyr
Member

700 Posts
7/04
Posted - Jun 13 2005 : 2:53PM
edit: nothing of interest

Edited by - Zartyr on 6/13/2005 2:54:08 PM

Baggio
Member

451 Posts
7/04
Posted - Jun 14 2005 : 12:03PM
we all know the 1 guy that would pay the most.

hint he's on a weathervane

SwallowFan
Member

Santa Cruz, CA.
40 Posts
6/04
Posted - Jun 14 2005 : 1:31PM
Cyberchicken wrote:

"If this thread can accomplish just one thing, hopefully it will send a message to directors that cum swallowing fans want to see big cum shots.
There's nothing impressive about a girl swallowing cum, if the amount couldn't even fill up a thimble."

MY SENTIMENTS EXACTLTY!!!!!!

That's where I thought/hoped this thread was heading... but it has gotten kind of out of hand.

What it comes down to is cum swallowing fans (or cum fans in general) WANT BIG THICK PLENTIFUL CUMSHOTS!! Brandon seems to understand this, but he is one of the few (keep rocking it, Brandon - you rule!)

The latest trend in swallowing vids, namely Swallow My Pride and Down The Hatch has been WEAK WATERY LOADS :-( Both of these series started off with a BANG and really defined the genre. Now with director changes and I assume talent changes the loads are fewer and cum quality is WAY down... Disappointing for sure. I used to really love both these series, but DTH 16 and SMP 5 & 6 have been a real let down.

People are into these videos becuase they want to see lots of CUM SWALLOWED not weak spurts that are barely even cumshot at all.

I can only assume this is because male talent are doign multiple scenes/day and their cum is just diluted from cumming too much. I think this is where Brandon shines yet again by hiring more regular-joe type people because these people have the big loads!! I would much rather see a regular-looking average guy deliver a FAT THICK load into a willing mouth vs. a "big buff porn stud" deliver a weak watery joke-of-a-load.

OK, soapbox mode, OFF :-) I have been sitting on this for a while so this thread was finally a chance to get my frustration out :-)

Mienhagen
aka Shameless deactivated again

Europe
696 Posts
6/04
Posted - Jun 19 2005 : 3:03AM
This sounds like quite a good solution, indeed. Especially as no camera will show their face when he cums. Excellent! But of course I think the performers with cumming problems (we all know who they are...) should pay the stunt dick from their own pocket.
Endless Loop
Senior Member

Tomatometer
1129 Posts
8/04
Posted - Jun 19 2005 : 5:26AM
I second this motion.

Now where do the stunt dicks sign up?

VincentVanGauge
Former Fucking Virgin

Paying trib-ute to SinncentVanSage
1412 Posts
12/04
Posted - Jun 19 2005 : 6:59AM
I'd do it for free. But then we'd need to have another stunt dick for size.

There's no 'I' in fuck, bang, screw or shag but two of 'em in virgin.

Cock Choke Me
Member

378 Posts
9/04
Posted - Jun 19 2005 : 7:15AM
you guys! some of us love to see the guys face when he cums. if he is super alive. :)

~ Well behaved women never make history. ~

TonyC
Comstock Films

2523 Posts
8/03
Posted - Jun 19 2005 : 7:17AM
Haven't you learned yet? You don't count.
 
Mienhagen
aka Shameless deactivated again

Europe
696 Posts
6/04
Posted - Jun 19 2005 : 8:28AM
Dont worry Vincent, camera angles can solve this, I think.
You just need to shoot a good load and preferably not miss the girls face/other body part by more than 50%.

Edited by - Mienhagen on 6/19/2005 8:29:03 AM

VincentVanGauge
Former Fucking Virgin

Paying trib-ute to SinncentVanSage
1412 Posts
12/04
Posted - Jun 19 2005 : 7:25PM
I'm not so sure. Some guys have in inches what I have in centimetres...
I guess with complete abstinence for two or three days, dancing on the edge of orgasm for three hours before the scene and eating a dozen raw eggs I should be able to deliver at least a tropic of Cancer load if North Pole is best. And I'd have a personal interest of not missing her face so that should be no problem.

There's no 'I' in fuck, bang, screw or shag but two of 'em in virgin.

cursive
Member

Your inquisitveness is infectious...
586 Posts
4/05
Posted - Jun 21 2005 : 4:35AM
I just love the brevity of that response.
Cock Choke Me
Member

378 Posts
9/04
Posted - Jun 24 2005 : 9:06AM
i hear it all the time. every time i put in a video. indeed. doesnt mean i wont scream about what I do like. :)

~ Well behaved women never make history. ~

Page 2 of 2 First



Jump To: