I think the rotated angle in the first shot is putting you in female perfomers perspective, she's in complete delirium, as in pleasurble craziness. She has no control of the performance.
[Link]
Jado3Dhead Deactivated User
564 Posts 3/16
Posted - Aug 16 2016 : 1:43PM
^ (The Legend) It would be great to see Dani in Hard X, but it's going to be pretty difficult top the outstanding performance she did in Dani Daniels Dare.
pornography wasn't sex but fantasies of an impossibly hospitable world 12377 Posts 9/07
Posted - Aug 16 2016 : 2:07PM
Have to respectfully but strongly disagree. These are typical 'meat shots' that were common during the gonzo era. I dislike them because they emphasize penetration and genitals over the performers and the full beauty of the woman's body. Mason's use of full body shots is one of the things that distinguished her from the gonzo pack from the beginning.
i didn't tell Mason to change her style. adding more angles is always a good thing. Mason is skilled enough to please everybody but i sometimes forget how intolerant of other people's taste nazi-porn fans can be.
I'm not saying it's a direct correlation, but I noticed how this Riley trailer dropped and Jules dropped the trailer for his new Mandingo movie. I see eyes have been watching each other since Dingo has returned. But hey, the more Mandingo movies, the better. I'm curious who the other three girls will be if this is Meet Mandingo 2 or some new title?
Would love to see a Vol. 2 of Teen Cum Surprise with girls like: Alexa Grace Scarlett Sage Jill Kassidy Lily Rader Jade Jantzen Chloe Amour Anya Olsen Elena Koshka Naomi Woods Kate England Melissa Moore Bella Rose Edited by - The Viking on 8/16/2016 9:39:36 PM
I was just wondering that the other day. I know she has shot some 3 ways with Tori Black and Asa Akira (from Tori Black is Pretty Filthy). I'd really like to see some 2v2 if not 3v3 IR orgies for DarkX.
I like both angles, the skewed one Mason leans toward, and the level one you suggest. But I especially love Mason's camera movement. And when she shoots cowgirl =
Also, I wanted to add to Jado's comment about conveying the female perspective. IMO if a director really wanted to do this, then we would get some shots coming from over the female's shoulder. I actually would like to see a lot more of this concept of exchanging views in porn in general.
Hardx and Mason, book these girls for Super Cute 6!! Layla London(XLaylaLondonX) Violet Starr(@VioletStarrXXX) Plz make it happen!!
[Link]
Jado3Dhead Deactivated User
564 Posts 3/16
Posted - Aug 17 2016 : 12:29PM
But placing the camera over her shoulder will have her back to us, and we all want to see the front of her, not the guy. So that would be impossible really.
[Link]
Bayman Deactivated User
136 Posts 11/14
Posted - Aug 17 2016 : 12:58PM
hopefully nobody will forget the milf edition ! Romi Rain, Peta Jensen, Layton Benton, Jade Aspen, Brook Ultra, Kagney linn, Lana Rhoades, Keisha Grey, Leah Gotti, Lucy Doll, Brianna Banks, Luna Star, Valentina Nappi. P.S. : Bridgette deserves another !
Plenty of gangbangs, blowbangs, and dp's. Also a bunch of F/F/M which is basically in all of her showcase films and other series like Car Wash Girls and Battle of the Asses but as far as B/G content, no real orgies or group scenes on file unless I missed something. And I've been hoping for DarkX to get a different look. EVERY scene has been B/G save for a few dp's. Not even one B/G/G yet so I doubt a group scene(like a swap scene), orgy, or reverse gangbang is on the horizon for that site. I have money sitting in the bank, ready to spend, but until something really WOWS me, I guess it'll sit there until I get an impulse to buy some new sneakers or something
^ We probably won't see a B/G/G scene on DarkX until they do their first showcase. All of the HardX B/G/G threesomes thus far have been in showcase movies. I would imagine it's some kind of budgetary restriction, because B/G/G threesomes were pretty plentiful across all releases from Mason back during the Elegant Angel days.
I've said it once and I'll say it again- Mason needs to shoot me :) Pretty please with a cherry on top? Contact macimayxo@gmail.com Twitter @Maci_MayXO
I'd rather not to have to wait for a showcase; only on the condition that it is someone mindblowing, totally out of left field, that is an IR first like Rachel Starr, Audrey Bitoni, Veronica Rodriguez, or Nekane
^ I mean, what you or I would rather have happen is kind of irrelevant. I'm just telling it like it is. So far B/G/G threesomes have been exclusives to showcases. It would be great if that changed and they became a regular occurrence, but I wouldn't hold my breath. Edited by - Mister Fahrenheit on 8/20/2016 2:00:07 AM
Really wish to see you performing intense anal scene with Manuel Ferrara
[Link]
Dragon Sign Deactivated User
3381 Posts 12/13
Posted - Aug 21 2016 : 4:04AM
Talking prior to scenes is something I feel belong to the BTS, nowadays I have a problem here because I'm more into stalking prior to scenes, as in camera following the chicks around teasing the same camera, outside area, inside area, ending up fucking around somewhere. In latest Super Cute Kimmy Granger is standing with her back up against the camera. Same cameraangel for a long period of time, nothing happens for so long and no moving or teasing, TV on mute and it's just totally lame andd here you have a formerv stripper doing the best of teasing if she's allowed to. Just talk, talk, talk, till you lose your patience here. Mason laugs about a comment from Kimmy from schooldays and says "tell me about it", like if she was some teacher and the student now had something smart to say to lead the class further on in their enlightening matter of educational acchievements. I would appreciate some other strategy of filming and this is just me, but I can't sit around to be enlightened about something that I don't really care much about at all.
[Link]
StarGrek Deactivated User
Under the moonlight. 1763 Posts 10/11
Posted - Aug 21 2016 : 1:25PM
You talking about camera angles and performers... I couldn't hold on to myself and I had to add a few comments... So forgive me in advance... Some adult viewers think that if they get a camera and a bunch of liberated people, who agree to expose in front of it, makes them instantly adult directors. Well, I can't blame them, this is what I thought too many years ago, but it turned out that I was completely wrong. You see, directing and capturing sex is a total different thing. Although many male viewers don't need much to get aroused, the adult director, even in the simplest form of gonzo, is before everything else a creator. A creator who construct a story and uses three types of language to narrate it to his audience. Eroticism: create the general mood of the scene and build up each "character" and the chemistry between the performers, Choreography: use each performer's natural skills and body language to set up the positions and the sexual energy Photography: use angles and light to create visual impressions. These "languages" are intermixed with one another and one affects the other. Most viewers understand some "languages" more than the others (some prefer sensuality, others intensiveness and others beauty). So, in order all viewers to understand him very well, the sexual messages the director broadcasts should be strong and clear in all languages. There are times though, in the course of the scene, where the creator might sacrifice one in order to expose another (e.g. He sacrifices the mechanics for a better view, or the opposite). Speaking specifically about Photography, every type of angle the director applies, weather is wide, close up, side, skewed, POV or perspective has certain characteristics and send specific messages. The same applies with lighting, zooming, filtering etc etc... ....
[Link]
StarGrek Deactivated User
Under the moonlight. 1763 Posts 10/11
Posted - Aug 21 2016 : 1:26PM
Speaking about angles I can reference some... A wide full body shot confirms the identity of the performer and exposes her natural gifts. (Dude, this is indeed... Lana Rhoades... in all her natural glory. Check the beauty of her face, her delectable curves, her marvelous body.). But if you use it too much you are risking to "vanillize" the scene and decrease its hardcore level. (Are you sure that this is porn? Where the hell I put the magnifying glass... ) A closeup shot confirms the level of hardcoreness and discloses the specific sexual action (Holly mama, look how her holes are stretched as she is getting double filled!). Still, if you use it too much you are risking to make it blunt and boring. There are others dangers as well... (Ahhh dude, do you remember that pic of the great close up ass we saw on the internet? Well, I am sure you don't want to see the rest when he turns around ) A side shot usually emphasizes on exposing the outline of the body figure of the performer. It works very nicely when the girl's torso is close to vertical position (Check the beautiful arc her body does when she leans slightly back ) and sometimes fixes the mechanics (the guy takes more effective positions, he does not need to twist aside). Too many usage of side angles though may obscure visual confirmation of the specific sexual action. (I am telling you this is anal, no... wait, it is not... yes it is... then again...) A guys POV shot puts you in the guys "clothes" as he is interacting with his female partner (Check what Mick Blue sees when he is taking her doggy style). POV shots though have obvious visual limitations and they don't have much pornographic sense in many sexual positions (cowgirl or reverse, spoon etc) or actions (DPs) (for 15 mins now I am watching this guys belly... ). A perspective view is when the camera is focusing a specific body target (usually the action area) but is enough wide to include the rest of her figure. (That is my favorite coverage ) The problem is that sometimes the directors in their attempt to stay on focus they mess up with the mechanics (Gee this guy's dick twisted so much he can barely fuck..) There are other view types like skewed, view from the high top (not POV) or view from the floor bottom. They have their own pros and cons. There is also a girls POV which it would be interesting to see since it is very rare. I guess the female population might be thrilled about it (woman: Finally, there is a camera angle made for us ) but there are homophobic men who might feel "scared" a bit (man: Damn, I feel like I am being invaded). ... Edited by - StarGrek on 8/21/2016 1:27:31 PM Edited by - StarGrek on 8/21/2016 1:29:00 PM
[Link]
StarGrek Deactivated User
Under the moonlight. 1763 Posts 10/11
Posted - Aug 21 2016 : 1:33PM
... The director can creatively use a series of angles to assemble his story. Every little detail the director inserts into or omits from each frame affects the story and creates different impressions. Using...
you see a big black cock stuffing some girl's tight vagina. This information alone is the beginning of a story, but that is not all. The detail which makes the big difference is the presence of the girl's head and particularly the facial expression she makes, as she watches the huge pole invading her body. Now there are a number of other details which could fit in the frame too if the positions permits it. (Perhaps her stimulated nipples or a passionate kiss as his is leaning his head towards her...). But lets unfold a possible scenario which exploits a series of angles to immortalize the moment and progressing in hardcoreness. The plot starts from a side view, a beautiful, almost artistic shot where you see the outlines of their attractive figures into a picturesque complex (side shot). There is a steady motion implying that there is an intercourse but you cannot see anything yet. This could be a scene from a softcore movie but as he lifts her leg a little bit up you discover that there is a rigid black fleshy stick that disappears and reappears. You still can't see clearly the penetration until the guy leans back and the camera moves a little inwards topping at his eye height (guys POV shot) disclosing what he sees. Her body in full view as his big pole is sliding in and out of her snatch. He twists a little bit to the side, the camera goes lower, levels with the penetration axis but moves back a bit in order to include most of her body (perspective shot). Rotating a little bit the camera maximizes the surface her body takes on the screen (skewing capture). But he is not very comfortable in this pose so he leans forward, towards the girl. His body is blocking the view but his static gets better. This results in deep long intensive strokes. The aw in her face starts to form as she is watching the huge cock stretching her love box (optional girls POV shot). And this is when the camera goes low behind them to expose us in close up shot the awesomeness of the moment as the black stud plants his enormous pale balls deep into her slit (close up). Finally, the camera goes a little back to give us a panoramic view of the event (wide shot). I used the certain pic as a sample. I could use others. Of course, the order of angles can change at director's will, at position or action. (e.g. usually in first anal or first DP a close up insertion shot is a must!). You see now how you can construct a visual story using a series of angles and how important each of them is in the visual outcome. Of course in practice as a lot more difficult than just writing. if there are too many quick camera shifts the spectator might get dizzy. In order not to get dizzy the director needs to extend each position duration, but this is not always practical for the economy of the scene. Again I am sorry for writing too much but I feel that some things have to be mentioned. Meanwhile... Explore Sexuality!
^ Fascinating stuff. Any chance of you giving Pierre Woodman some coaching!
[Link]
jeffandersonn Deactivated User
1605 Posts 3/13
Posted - Aug 21 2016 : 3:00PM
my main problem with this angle is the fact that is not a natural view. why rotating the camera so much that you have to break your neck to watch it straight? i know lots of people like it or simply do not care, i can tolerate it , but ducth angle is overused. this is why i was suggesting to shoot some more action keeping a straight horizon. i'm not obsessed with girls face, and in that position sometimes could be nice to focus 20-30 sec just on her ass/pussy being fucked my 2 cents.
[Link]
StarGrek Deactivated User
Under the moonlight. 1763 Posts 10/11
Posted - Aug 21 2016 : 9:22PM
@jeffanderson: Actually I used this pic as a close up sample to talk about the benefits of using many angles and zooms. But I see you are going a bit far and talk about proper rotation. I don't have issue with the rotation in that certain pic (for me is a slight one) but I admit there are times where the angles are awkward and can get someone dizzy. Gee, I sense either you are a cursed perfectionist... like me either you like a specific angle too much and you want this to be presented in perfect way. In either case you are in trouble (I am just kidding). Anyway, take a time and think of what happened when this pic was taken. The person who hold the camera, could be Mason or someone else (there are scenes where the camera holder and the director are different persons) had to bend his back very low along with the camera trying to find the visual key hole between their bodies in order to capture the action. (No you can't use zoom from far, the certain angle is low). Plus he had to be careful not to bump into some actors limp. That is a physically intensive effort and happens in short time. (Suffice to say that many directors avoid low angles because they get tired, and that is one of the reason they mess up with certain positions). Under these circumstances it is not always easy to find the horizon. (Mind that in porn most of the cameras are handheld and the moves the cameraman does are spontaneous). Meanwhile... Explore Sexuality!
[Link]
Bayman Deactivated User
136 Posts 11/14
Posted - Aug 22 2016 : 1:07AM
forget to say, that's beautiful to see all the girls from facialized 3 in bodysuit/slingshot. awesome idea