| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| ydrill New Member 5 Posts 3/10 | Not sure this is the right place to post, but I couldn't find a better suited spot. "Schoolgirls Fucked" "Young Girl Pyjama Party" "Latex Lovers' Lair" These are a few fictional titles I just came up with, any relation to real movies is unintentional. I made them for the purpose of drawing an example. Lately it's been bugging me that when purchasing movies with titles like above or similar, you don't actually get what's in the title. You start the movie and a scantily clad appears, awesome! 2 minutes in though, all clothes are off and you're left with the standard 5-6 sex-position porn movie ending in an underwhelming cumshot that you might as well have downloaded from a "reality porn" site. There are deviants of this, such as creampies or maybe the movie features extreme gagging or maybe 2 more mins of anal action than the others, but most seem to limit themselves to this simple recipe. Maybe it's just me having a uniform/clothed-female fetisch, but for me, any completely nude boy/girl scene with the usual positions becomes bland and uninteresting. In my opinion, in order to stand out it requires holding true to the theme of the movie, like the schoolgirl not going completely nude or the pyjama party actually contain women having sex in pyjamas. Short of that, some female pornstars having either physical or personality characteristic which sets them apart from the rest, but I find that many female pornstars are indistingushable from others. As another example, it wouldn't be unusual for me to find a girl wearing very little, sexier than a girl wearing nothing. Am I just rambling or have others had similar ideas? [Link] |
| backdoorman Senior Member Shake for me girl... I wanna be your backdoorman ! 2776 Posts 10/07 | |
| Dracula Member Women's necks are too damned sexy for me! 756 Posts 3/06 | I recommend noting the studios that offer more truth in their advertising and buy from them and let the deadwood drop away. When you've watched a lot of porn, the really only difference is the actors and the level of energy they bring to their scenes anyway. Some stars deliver, no matter what the title, like Jenna Haze and Tori Black for example. Follow the stars and studios and use caution with titles. If you buy online, I recommend buying from stores that offer screen shots of the movie so you can see a sample of what's inside. Another pet peeve is how some old porn movies get resold as new, but they're still 2000-2007! You see this on cable TV a lot. The movie is edited or repackaged in 2010 so it's now suddenly listed as a 2010 movie. Another way to make sure you're getting what you pay for is to read any reviews, or write some of your own warning buyers of what you found. |
| BlackSix All-Star Member pornography wasn't sex but fantasies of an impossibly hospitable world 12377 Posts 9/07 | |
| Len801 Deactivated User 754 Posts 9/07 | Mostly attributed to "misleading" advertising, lack of imagination to think up of more suitable titles, to spice up the "product", etc. You may pick up a movie that contains "cotton panties" in the title, and yet there is little of none of that and the panties come off as you blink your eyes and never to be seen again. The same thing for MILF movies in the past few years. Many of the female performers were only doing "teen" or playing regular roles only a couple of years earlier. All of a sudden they are "mature", MILFs, cougars and what have you. If you go back to the early 1990's when Rosebud came out with several anal-themed movies that had "anal" practically in every title, not all of the performers did anal and you never knew which one until ypu bought/rented the movie and seen it for yourself. So if you saw Samantha Strong in the the cast list, it did not mean she would be doing anal (much to your chagrin and a few bucks spent for nothing!). |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |