I am not like that. But I would like it for the stars to try out everything atleast a few times. About anal, Brooklyn Chase tried anal a couple of times and decided not to pursue doing it. Condoms are a big turnoff for me.
Yeah, I'm an anal junkie too. I watch some vaginal porn, but always in the hope that the girl will do anal in the future. I don't even entertain the possibility of following non b/g girls like Malena Morgan, who I admit is the most gorgeous thing I've seen. Anal is my porn fulfilled.
Personally I only want to see Anal if it's a girl with an amazing ass like Jada Stevens, Ryan Conner or even Asa Akira. A lot of times the all anal scenes ruin the scene for me. Diamond Jackson's scene with Johnny Sins is a perfect example of a scene that suffered from being all anal. Many of Shyla Stylez scenes also suffered from unnecessary anal sex. Shyla obviously prefers vaginal over anal so to have an over saturation of all anal Shyla scenes never made sense to me.
You gotta have rules, or else you'd go broke buying everything. My rules: No heels = no watch. No stockings/pantyhose/shapely legs = no watch. Skinny chicks = no watch. Teen theme = no watch. POV = no watch. Obnoxious-style gonzo = no watch. Certain studios = no watch. Certain dudes = no watch. Certain directors = no watch. Certain women (Austin Taylor, Caroline Pierce for example) trump all of the rules above. I'm sure that every serious porn viewer has their own set of rules to simply the decision-making.
Yes, once you get to like anal porn, then pussy sex can be frustrating to watch. Because the sight of the lady's ass automatically reminds you of anal sex, after you've watched a lot of anal porn scenes. But your anal fanstasies for the lady go totally unfulfilled during pussy sex. Pussy sex, from the point of view of an anal-porn-fan, is like an anal tease, where the lady isn't willing to please. Because the lady shows you her ass but doesn't let you have it. Which is frustrating indeed.
Not actually rules but for some reasons I put some studios/sites or performers in my black list only few , very few selected performers may overrule the blockade. There are performers I can't stand watching mostly females. Other rules are: renowned assholes or scumbags = no buying talents unable to get a wood = no buying Talents smaller than me = no buying Too inked starlets = instant refusal but I overruled this many times Implants = instant refusal but I overruled this plenty of times there are stars whose presence overrules everything
Agreed. Nowadays, there are so many anal scenes available, and not that much time to watch, so if there is no anal, it's not worth watching. Other things make a scene unwatchable for me, too. I won't watch a scene with multiple dudes. I won't watch the part of a scene with squirting, milk enemas, food inserted in the gal's butt, or prolapse. I just don't find those things erotic. People can watch what they want, so I don't watch stuff that doesn't appeal to me.
I'm like that, too. I take a pass on otherwise absolutely perfect girls like Alexis Texas or Isis Taylor because they don't do anal or do so rarely. I can still remember the first anal scene I ever saw: Tanya Foxx fucked over a butcher's block by (I think) Tom Byron. Her ass just looked so big and soft and doughy and pillowy getting plowed, and when Tommy pulled out, it left such a cute little round gape. I've been hooked every since then. Then along came Ms. Lana Sands and everything got compounded even more so for the same reasons, plus that incredible golden brown skin of hers. And when I started having actual sex, I learned that I liked the smell, too.
[Link]
oldboi Deactivated User
205 Posts 3/10
Posted - Mar 8 2014 : 8:07PM
No anal = no watch Condom = no watch Dark lighting = no watch
Not at all for me. Anal is great, but great chemistry and energy is the most important for me. Not to single them out, but that's why I hated Anabolic and Diabolic movies except for a very select few back in the day. Lots of anal, but it was completely robotic and gangbangs were like assembly lines. In other words, if two or more performers are really into each other or fake it extremely well, I'm there.
When the lass has a nice-looking ass, but her guy doesn't event try to go anal on her, then this obviously implies to many viewers that either the guy doesn't want the lady's ass, or the lady doesn't like the guy enough to spread her ass for him. Lack of anal implies that either the guy isn't attracted to the lady enough, or the lady doesn't like the guy enough to drop her anal inhibitions with him. I don't think you can divorce anal sex from chemistry and attraction. Because anal sex is still the forbidden fruit for many guys with their ladies. It's something guys are supposed to want, and it's something ladies are supposed to say 'no' to, unless they have some real chemistry and attraction going on.
If anal adds to the scenes overall hotness then I'm all for anal. The funny thing for me is that when I look at someone like Jada Stevens who does quite a bit of anal and I think of her hottest scene I think of her scene with Emy Reyes where they roleplay and she's a reporter and they're the Miami heat players etc. now that scene there is no anal at all. Then I ponder on my all time favorite scenes and 90% of them are girls who have done anal but not in that scene. I safely conclude then that I rate a scene by the hotness of it and not purely on anal or not. I don't understand the mentality of. O anal no watch, I mean are you just out for the satisfaction of knowing she was ploughed in her ass or are you after a really hot and sexy scene? I guess our reasons for watching porn are different.
^ I'd say that anal porn is an acquired taste, and not very porn fan has acquired it equally. It took me years of watching porn to get to the point where I wanted to see the lady get nailed in the ass every time. And this is probably true for many other porn fans too. When you start out watching porn at a younger age, then basically every sex act is a novelty to you, and everything looks hot. But over the years, the most common and the most routine sex acts become boring to watch. Because people naturally get tired of watching the same thing again and again. They want something different, and this is where anal sex comes in. This kind of thing happens not only for porn fans but also for couples in real life too. Couples need to change their routine and do something different after a while. Or else they lose their desire for each other, and their sex life goes down the drain.
I like anal and with certain performers I prefer it but I'm fine without in many cases. Anal doesn't always enhance the scene and make it better. Some girls can make anal sex look great and others make it look ackward and unpleasant. I tend not to like anal scenes were the vaginal sex is fast, hot and heavy then the anal portion starts and things slow to a crawl. In those cases I'd rather there not be any anal. I mostly like to see anal if there's a certain level of intensity involved. With me there are girls who can do great scenes without anal and there are some that need to do anal to make the scene worthwhile. Girls who can't or choose not to anal I'm okay with because if they aren't totally into it or have to struggle with it I'd just as soon they don't do it. All anal is not alike and automatically good.
I agree 100% with Pornosmurf. I've seen lots of hot scenes with anal and I've also seen just as many hot scenes without it. Some girls just don't like anal and I'd rather them do a scene doing what they are 100% into than doing something forced. Personally, I think vag belongs in just about every BG scene and anal should be something a bit more special (not rare, but special). An all anal scene always seems weird to me.
I'd say that how well the anal sex goes depends more on the guy than on the lady. This you can check out for yourself by watching the 'Anal Freaks' film. There are four un-circumcised guys and one circumcised. The anal sex goes really well with the ladies for all four un-circumcised guys. But the circumcised guy has so much trouble with anal, that he ends up banging his lady's pussy a lot in what's supposed to be an anal film. It's not always obvious which guy is circumcised and which one is not. Because un-circumcised guys often try to hide their foreskin by rolling it back. But during sex, the loose skin around an un-circumcised cock reduces friction for the lady a lot. Because the guy's cock ends up moving mostly within it's own loose skin, without much friction for the lady. That's the purpose of the foreskin, among other things. It makes sex for the lady more comfortable by reducing friction for her.
I agree with that. There's got to be at least some vag. I don't know how much. Maybe at 25% to 50% of the scene should be vag? (just the in-and-out part - not the foreplay). Whatever the time divided up between Vag and Anal is fine. Just as long as it's a decent time for each. Vag and Anal in the same scene is the ideal IMHO.
^ I suppose this shows that porn makers can't please everyone with any single porn film. They need to make different porn films for different groups of people.
only liked 1 anal scene in my life (and I watch porn since 1999) and it was Gina Ryder and Randy Spears from 2002. it really added to the scene. if there is a must see performer and anal I just skip forward until the coast is clear.
You are right about mixing things up to make it more entertaining. But going ass to pussy is unhealthy for the lady. It's far better for the guy to stay anal with his cock and play the lady's pussy, tits, and nipples with his hands. The lady's goodies are there for the taking during her anal sex with the guy. There is nothing to stop the anal guy from being just as quick and bold and active with his hands on the lady's pussy, tits, and nipples as he is with his cock inside her ass. The lady has two tits, two nipples, and one pussy. While the guy has only two hands. All he needs to do is juggle the lady's goodies with his fingers and hands during his anal ride with her, and the viewer will be well entertained. Some of the latest anal films are addressing this issue of repetitiveness. Anal guys are starting to insert their fingers inside their lady's pussy and massage her clit once in a while. Perhaps soon they will put some lube on their fingers and start moving those fingers in and out of the lady's pussy to make it truly and fully a one-man DP for her. The advantage of such a handy DP is that there is a lot more for the viewer to see, when the guy lifts his hand off the lady's pussy and plunges it back inside. Even more handiwork for the anal lady would be even more entertaining to watch. There is no reason why the guy can't be all hands all the time with his lady during his anal ride with her. Being behind the lady gives the guy perfect access to her pussy, tits, and nipples. He can do all kinds of imaginative things with her goodies to the viewer's delight, even while he rides her ass with his cock. Edited by - Dan on 3/10/2014 9:43:20 AM
I love anal too. Though I don't need it in every scene (just most) and I like a little mouth and pussy fucking in there too. Ass to pussy is the best, btw. Totally agree on condoms. I will not watch or pay for ANY scene with ANY performer if a condom is used. Period.
Why you think the net was born? Porn, Porn, Porn! 363 Posts 8/09
Posted - Mar 10 2014 : 1:45PM
Wouldn't limiting your viewing to anal only, mean that you may be missing out on some really wonderful girls that don't do anal but are great performers? Personally I like scenes that include anal, however; my porn viewing revolves around favourite girls and not a particular act/fetish so I won't necessarily pass a scene from a girl I like simply because it doesn't include anal.
[Link]
La Lunitica Deactivated User
Zenogias 181 Posts 6/13
Posted - Mar 10 2014 : 1:46PM
This is ADT, isn't the majority of members here No Anal No Watch? Heck, Anal is vanilla around here, then it's all about dp and ir next.
Perhaps this kind of thing depends on how many porn stars you like. I like the looks of most past and present female porn stars. Which includes thousands of women. There is no way I can watch all of their scenes, unless I add another condition, such as a lot of anal sex for the lady every time. When you like only a few women, then it makes sense to watch all of their scenes. Because you are hungry for these women, no matter what they do. But when you like thousands of women, and they are all there for the taking. Then you become depraved in your wishes and desires. The ladies' pussies don't satisfy you any more. You want their asses every time.
Yeah I'm an anal junkie. Sometimes there'll be some standard sex in the anal scene and I'll just keep beatin' (TMI haha) and I can dig that a bit. An exception is bukkakes. Sometimes I go in for that a little. Not often though. Oh yeah and I can only really get down with bareback anal too unfortunately. For me it's a case of I do not like condoms. They look weird, make the cock look weird and.. I don't fully know why but I can't get down with that. Actually I go chick surfin' on eurobabeindex sometimes, lookin' for broads I've not watched before or ones to rediscover ones I've not watched in a long time, new ones etc. Anyway, I click on a picture of a hot babe, and look at the info. If there are no anal scenes - outta' there! Sometimes I'll see a picture and get all excited "Ohhhh wow she is gorgeous" and then what is most prominent on my mind is "please do anal please do anal". Much to my disappointment, some of the most gorgeous women I've seen pictures of on eurobabeindex, I saw they didn't do anal.. at that point I just say "What a damn shame!" and don't look her up or anything. If she doesn't do anal then I'm not gonna' watch her. ...ohhh there's this one who's a magnificently 10/10 gorgeous blonde, wearing I believe a black cowboy hat in her picture, got so excited when I first saw her picture but - no anal. And she started quite a few years ago and didn't do much so I assume she's finished up now. Such a shame. Edited by - Electric_Logan on 3/11/2014 2:20:38 PM Edited by - Electric_Logan on 3/11/2014 2:27:49 PM
Her name is Jennifer Ellison. I remember because I used to have a crush on her when she was on some British tv soap when I was a kid. She made it into movies, albeit b-movies and such, and there she is.