two questions: (1) I've paid to follow a couple of pornstars and both had all their ovideo's of 5 minutes or less...if that the norm for all the girls??? (2) does anyone else find it annoying when you check you're twitter feed and find about 50 tweets of: "another fan renewed their membership!" is this done automatically or do the girls tweet this out every time someone renews their membership???
^I wish I could speak with knowledge but it's impossible for me to do so because I have never joined an "Only Fans" page and I never will. That said I can offer my general views regarding "only Fans" pages. 1-There is no set price on "only Fans" pages. I have seen some charge as little as 10$ and others charge as much as 25$ so you can't use price as a way to gauge the value of the content. 2-You can't view the content unless you join. That means you have no way of knowing if you will be happy or pissed after joining but seeing as you don't have any idea what is in the videos, how long they last or if they are even watchable then I fear pissed is the most common feeling people feel after joining. 3-It seems line every performer has an "Only Fans" page and that includes women who have only been in the industry for a couple of months (if that) and that feels more like a way for women to earn money by doing very little work to earn it or frankly having shown what they can do. *If I had to summarise my feeling on "Only Fans" pages then it would be that they feel a lot like the solo model sites that your favorite 90's to early 2000 model had and being one of your favorite you wanted to join. I know because I joined quite a few and not a single one of them was worth it. They all had cute front pages but not way to know what was inside the members area. Of course you quickly discovered why they didn't show you what was inside the members area. There wasn't anything. You could literally surf and download the entire content in under an hour and often for a lot less time and I can assure you that you rarely downloaded their videos because they weren't worth it.
That answered none of his questions. 1.) Some performers put whole scenes on there, some do limit themselves to shorter videos. I don't think the 5 minutes is a platform limitation, and it mostly just depends on the performer. 2.) From what I've heard, it does those tweets automatically, and the performer has to turn them off. I believe it used to be that it was all or nothing with them (i.e. either it posted every single notification [new follower/new tip/new content posted] or none at all), but from what I've seen recently it's gotten a little more granular than that.
1. No its whatever they decide to do. I was subbed to Nikki Sexx Onlyfans page and she didn't limit herself to 5 minute videos. 2. The tweets are done automatically. ----Dread's Twitter----
I have totally given up on trying to subscribe to my favorite star's onlyfans page the price she's charging is somewhat on the high side without being able to see the content and for me .. the QUALITY of the content without a preview or knowing if I can download the content . I will pass and move on I am still waiting for the custom video I ordered as well.
[Link]
A_Fan Deactivated User
1187 Posts 9/16
Posted - May 21 2018 : 1:56PM
^the lack of preview is a detriment to their business model. Does anyone know if this is a limitation of the platform, or if the performers are choosing to not have previews. I have picked some here and there with known performers that I know will give value. But sometimes there is a lesser known person or someone I would like to support but without previews I have no idea if my 10 - 15 dollars is going for unique content or for her doing 3 minute videos of her eating breakfast. It is a good concept and allows performers with established fan based to build a recurring side income; but no previews is slowing growth .We all know we spend money usually when we see something that turns us on... a blank page does not even if the name on the page is a performer we like. Girls who join it when the first enter the industry might not get more than a couple of subs... need to have a fan base motivated to pay. The twitter notifications are also detrimental. I don't have a twitter feed, but I do the instagram with performers. I can imagine I would be unsubscribing from several feeds if I was seeing "I got an onlyfan"20 times a day from my different performers I am following. So, I understand the twitter people finding this a hassle and pretty much spam. I prefer the Patreon model. Subs can be offered at different teirs to appeal to different budgets and there are previews, comment sections, and a lot of interaction in the creation of content. Unfortunately they don't accept porn content. Onlyfans should consider moving to a patreon style of platform.
^I think the lack of previews is about the only way these people make any money on their "Only Fans" page because unless I am way out in left field. The vast majority of the content is simply not worth the amount you will be expected to pay to see it so they have created a system where fans hope that their 10$, 20$ or whatever amount will be the key to the porn Eldorado they think they are about to discover. Sadly for most of them that gold is Fool's Gold and not worth anything. That's why the people behind "Only Fans" will never allow previews because if they were to do that then their sales would plummet to near zero. Would you pay 10$ or more to see a newbie masturbate for 5 minutes when you can pay 15$ and see her fuck for 30 minutes and more? I also don't think it's a great way for performers to connect with their fans because you have to pay to connect so that leaves a lot of people that simply aren't willing or able to do that and worse the ones who do pay can become really pissed when they realise that they have just gotten shafted with the terrible content so instead of gaining fans. Many performers are losing them.
^ At some point, you're going to realize that not everyone is looking for "the best value" and they just want to support the performers they like, and this is a very simple way of doing that. Also, while the site itself doesn't do previews, as far as I can tell, there's nothing stopping performers from putting the videos and pictures they put on OnlyFans in other places, so that people can see what type of content they're getting. I've seen performers that offer basically the same videos on their Onlyfans and their manyvids pages, which means that the only difference is whether you want to pay for the videos individually or subscribe to see them as they come out.
Being as onlyfans is an AMAZING site, with one giant downfall being the total lack of previews of content making it so you literally have no idea what you're getting until you pay for it... it might be nice to have this be a thread where we can recommend people to follow I've followed about 15 people total maybe. I've actually found the male stars to have the best accounts as they frequently post bts footage and footage of their personal life where they're having lots of sex with lots of women. Danny Mountain, Chris Strokes, and Johnny Castle are all good examples of this. They post a lot, and they all have full length videos on there. Mia Malkova has some good videos of her rimming on her only fans as well, somethig that is rare for you to see anywhere else.
[Link]
A_Fan Deactivated User
1187 Posts 9/16
Posted - May 22 2018 : 1:38AM
I have hopped around doing a month or two of various performers over the last year. Always felt there was good content.. Romi Jasmine Jae London Keyes Charlotte Sartre Adriana Checkik Mia Isabella Just a few examples. I think it is part new content and part just supporting a performer (cue the white knight accusations.. lol). If there were previews I would have picked up more along the way, but that is their business model.
The worst part of the "no preview" aspect is... it lets you see the total # of vids and pics they've posted but there's no indication of how frequent they update or when the last update was. I signed up for someone only to find out they hadn't been active in months and the videos they had posted in the past were all available free on their pornhub channel. I'll have to go look at my account history to see if I can remember who it was. For the most part I've been satisfied, but can confidently say that some content providers are way more worthwhile than others.
My argument is that since you can't see what you are buying then there is no way to know what you are getting. You may get great value but because you don't know ahead of time then paying for that unknown product is basically like going to a restaurant and giving the waiter 20$ and telling him/her to bring you something to eat. You may like his/her selection but if you don't then you have wasted that 20$ and you will still be hunger as you leave the restaurant. If your ultimate intention is to support a performer you like then you should simply buy one of her gifts from her Amazon wish list or buy her an Amazon gift card. Either way she will be significantly happier with that because she didn't have to do anything to earn it and she may be willing to give you something in return that is far better than anything you would have gotten from her "Only Fans" page.True but they aren't doing that because if they did then they would not get as many people willing to join their "Only Fans" page. I will repeat what I said previously. The only way this works is if you don't know what you are getting. This is the business plan of "Only Fans" and they aren't going to change it and I'm certain they explain that to the performers who use their system. Now that doesn't mean that a performer can't do what you describe and have the same content on two platforms but I would argue that unless you know that you are getting the exact same video on her "Only Fans" page that you are getting with "Many Vids" then you are more likely to go the MV route over the OF route because you know what you are getting. Edited by - pat362 on 5/22/2018 9:59:59 AM
Since you have first hand information on these performers "Only Fans" page then can you tell us what you get for your money and which one you think is worth returning to.
Amazon wish lists have died/are dying out because Amazon has taken to occasionally and randomly closing the wishlists/accounts of people they find out are working in porn/the sex industry. And "she may be willing to give you something in return that's better than her onlyfans page"? Not when you donate the amount that an onlyfans sub usually is. You're not gonna find a lot of performers that are giving out anything that resembles a meaningful gift to fans that "donate" $10-20 to them other than maybe a personal/premium snapchat page, which is very similar to access to an onlyfans page. And "the only way this works is if you don't know what you're getting"? That's bullshit. This works by getting as many people to subscribe to it as possible, which can be done with previews or without. Creating said previews is more work, which is why most performers aren't going to do it, not necessarily because they make more money without it. This works basically like performer websites have worked since they started becoming a thing (which is why you don't like this or find it valuable, because you don't see any value in performer websites in the first place, which you already admitted in your first post). All onlyfans really is, in the end, is something that gives performers the ability to upload content and set a recurring price for said content without having to go through the entire process of setting up their own domain/website. Also, for performers that set up both an onlyfans and a pay-per-video option, the pay-per-video option is generally a much worse deal compared to the onlyfans (to the point where, for some, a single video costs more than onlyfans sub). Just like how DVDs generally cost more than subscribing to the site for the same content, or the few membership sites that have done pay-per-video options also are a much worse value than buying a subscription.
[Link]
A_Fan Deactivated User
1187 Posts 9/16
Posted - May 23 2018 : 10:24AM
^Amazon is dumb to be deleting wishlists. They made a lot of money over the years on porn girls and their wishlists.
[Link]
A_Fan Deactivated User
1187 Posts 9/16
Posted - May 23 2018 : 10:29AM
Well let's see... Romi was solo stuff. I like Romi alot so I was cool with it for a couple of months. Jasmine Jae was not as good as I suspected, mostly hanging out type of things, I just did a month London Keyes ; was really good but she has stopped shooting and I wouldn't even begin to know what she does now on onlyfans, it is probably tumbleweeds Charlotte Sartre - best one i ever subbed too, as long as you like pissing (it is in the majority of videos I saw). SHe did some great stuff with Dredd too. Adriana - not bad at all, lots of solo, piss drinking, anal toys, etc Mia Isabella - really good, she shoots actual scenes and the such, so it was a good value I also did a couple of months with Jynx Maze around the time she did this puking videos and that scat one. The overall setup at that time was good with lots of content; although the puke and scat is a niche product, I dont know if she still does that. With the lack of previews, I have not tried some of my other favorite performers. I have contemplated Asa but with her boyfriend forbidding any sex scenes, I am not sure watching her shower 10 times a month is that big of a deal. While the onlyfans is only 10 bucks in most cases, give or take, it all adds up. When we are paying for site subs, and all our other porn content, it is hard to commit to onlyfans without knowing what you are getting.
I don't know how long you've been surfing for porn but I have done so for 15 years and the one thing that I know for certain. If you don't know what you are buying than you are guaranteed to be disappointed. There are no arguments that you can give me that will make me think differently because I joined dozens of solo model sites in the last 15 years and everyone that had no preview sucked. We don't buy anything without first seeing what we are about to buy and more often than not we want to try it first. You and I both agree that the only way this works for performers is if they get more people to join their "Only Fans" page but I think that in the long run if "Only Fans" wants to survive then they will have to offer at the very minimum a preview of what you get for your money because as it stands the only info you can see is the number of photos and the number of videos you get for your money. You don't know what the photos are about, you don't know what the videos are about and you also don't know how long they last. Let me give you a concrete example of what the problem "Only Fans" faces as a business model if they continue down the path they have chosen. Hannah Hays has been doing porn for under a year and isn't a very prolific performer but somehow she has a 25$ "Only Fans" page that has 22 photos and 3 videos. Let me give you another one. Gia Derza has been doing porn for about a month and she already has an "Only Fans" page but her page includes 95 photos and 52 videos for 10$. Which of these two pages is worth joining? By price and number you would say Gia but since you really don't know what either performers is actually doing in those photos and videos then Hannah's might be the better deal. Then again both might be a bad deal but Hannah being the more expensive is the worse one of the two.
are you able to download the videos from that site and what type of quality are the videos 1080p / 4k etc ??
[Link]
SirPudge Deactivated User
160 Posts 7/15
Posted - May 23 2018 : 12:05PM
No you cant download the vids. At least I never saw that option. I was subscribed to Mia Malkova page and it was good but didnt think it was worth the price. This was back in the day when she was with Danny. I hear now she's posting more frequently and longer scenes. She had some scene that went longer than 5mins but the majority were very short.
[Link]
A_Fan Deactivated User
1187 Posts 9/16
Posted - May 23 2018 : 1:26PM
Previews matter in porn to a huge degree because there is so much out there. I am a legal porno customer and I probably end up spending 40 - 80 dollars a month depending on the scenes and my available time. If they did not have previews, I would have no way of picking what scenes I want and I would probably send up spending zero. Ive got one month subs on various sites after seeing a trailer of a performer I liked (for example, when A Chechik did the analized.com scene, I loved the trailer so I bought a month, and then enjoyed a few other scenes too, i would not have spent that without the preview). Previews matter if you want to make lots of sales. The "instabuy" fan based only on the performer name is very small in number; most people need a reason. Alot of people are hesitant on onlyfans because they don't want to put down 10 to 15 bucks for a sub only to find it is is a bunch of 20 second clips of the girl saying good morning and eating breakfast.
But that's exactly the niche that performer personal sites and now Onlyfans are targetting, so it doesn't really matter if their promotion model isn't sensible for more general offerings. This whole discussion reminds me of people who cannot fathom that Vivid and Wicked productions ever sold well. 95%+ of the people posting on ADT aren't the target audience for something like Onlyfans. Edited by - shalalin on 5/23/2018 4:21:43 PM
^I agree that in the short term a no preview business model can work well enough to earn the various parties decent amounts of money because there are at least 10% to 20% of porn fans who are willing to take the bait and spend 10$ to join one of their favorite performer's "Only Fans" page. The problem with that business model is that you may get those same fans to join a variety of "Only Fans" pages but at some point they will stop doing that as each and every time they discover that there is nothing behind the curtain but smoke and mirrors. I think reading A_Fan's post is the best way to know what you get because he sampled a variety of performers "Only Fans" pages. I will finish by saying that the lack of downloadable content is possibly one of their biggest detractors because most porn fans are okay with paying for their porn but they want to download it to watch again and again and not have to keep paying for the same video all the time.
^ Most porn nowadays is consumed on mobile devices, many of which don't have enough space to download more than a few videos at a time. People in general are not as hung up on downloads as some people think they are.
^ Yes, I think that's another area in which ADT is wildly unrepresentative, considering it largely consists of former or current DVD buyers ("buy to own" by definition), and "power porn fans" who follow a lot of different performers and/or download lots of scenes. If no-downloading was such a deal breaker and the only way to get downloadable porn was to pay for it, tube sites wouldn't have become such a big deal. (Not to mention that DVD renting used to be a thing, too.) There's no reason to believe that there isn't also a large number of people who do pay for porn but aren't hung up on ability to download. Aside: Onlyfans content shows up in the usual piracy places as well, so it's apparently not impossible to download, just not straight-forward. I say apparently because I've never been subscribed to one to check their video delivery mechanism myself. The legality of making personal copies of content that's only authorized for streamed delivery is another matter, of course. Edited by - shalalin on 5/23/2018 10:38:04 PM
[Link]
A_Fan Deactivated User
1187 Posts 9/16
Posted - May 24 2018 : 10:47AM
Actually this place IS the target market. The dedicated fan of a specific performer who will instabuy their creations is likely someone who is on a forum. My point is, without previews,they are only getting the instabuy fan,and that severely limits the growth of their subscriptions. I am sure the performers want more, right? I like the onlyfans concept, I feel they are losing out on subscriptions by locking everything down to a blank screen. I fail to see how this compares to the vivid/wicked discussion or how a few people who dont understand the buying public would be shocked they sold well. Edited by - A_Fan on 5/24/2018 10:49:25 AM
^^&^ I have to disagree with you guys because I don't believe that the most people watch porn on mobile devices unless you consider portable computers mobile devices(I don't). I mean we have entire threads dedicated to video resolution and people who keep asking for 4K porn and even if your smartphone or tablet is able to properly depict those kind of resolution. Your biggest screen is still going to be half the size of most computer screens and these are tablets. Smartphone screen are so much smaller. While I agree with you that many ADT members are people that used to buy their porn on DVD and I suspect many of them are like me and used to rent/buy it on VHS/Beta. They like me have long since moved on to downloadable internet porn. I haven't bought a dvd or BluRay porn movie in over 5 years because I no longer see the point when the movie will be available for download right away and in multiple video resolutions.
Actually, that type of fan is much more likely to be directly subscribed to their favourite performer's social media channels these days. ADT is primarily still used by people with broad interests in porn, not narrow interests like a fascination with one or a small handful of performers. There are a lot more of the latter type than of the former.No offense intended, but that you fail to see how it compares proves my point: You don't understand the buying public for Onlyfans either. You may have subscribed to a bunch of Onlyfans accounts, but you're clearly not their typical customer.And yet another comment that displays a failure to understand that ADT is not in any way representative of the porn-watching public at large. The smartphone generation largely thinks that forums are yesterday's news, why would they be discussing their porn habits and interests here? And older people who watch porn on their mobile devices often do so mostly because they're not computer-savvy enough, also not a great starting point for forum usage. Edited by - shalalin on 5/24/2018 2:11:07 PM
^Why would anyone want to watch porn on a screen that is so small that you can barely see what is happening when you can watch it on a screen that is at least 4 to 5 times bigger? Unless porn watchers are very different today than we watch porn to masturbate and we use mobile devise because we enjoy them at the office or going to and from work. None of these things are conducive to masturbation.
^ Because people value the convenience of the mobile device (it's something you always have on you, and you can basically pull things up and watch them anywhere you'd like) over any clarity or size issues.
[Link]
A_Fan Deactivated User
1187 Posts 9/16
Posted - May 25 2018 : 12:13AM
^^^why are you taking shots at me? MY ONE MAIN POINT is that having no previews will prevent more growth of their subscriptions. Why does this bother you so much and you find it so disagreeable? The non ADT fan, the general fan, needs to be turned on to dig into their wallet. The "instabuy" is someone who will buy no matter what and that kind of person is on a forum because they are a dedicated fan of certain performers, not a random person surfing on their phone. This should not be getting you so worked up. NO PREVIEWS means some people will not bother putting out 10 - 20 dollars blindly. It keeps their sub numbers lower than it should be. This is common sense.
I always figured onlyfans was for the dedicated fan, for the fan with an above-average interest in a particular performer. I wouldn't expect "just more porn" at an onlyfans site. I would expect something different, something more personal, something 'authentic' (even if it's fake authentic), something that regular porn producers don't/can't offer. I would expect something a bit more niche-like or a bit more fetish-like. Most of the onlyfans I've seen are relatively inexpensive, in the $10 range. It's inexpensive enough that a true fan will be willing to take the gamble. You can always cancel if it turns out to be disappointing. The less-dedicated fan and the casual fan are not the target audience. Sort of like clips4sale. $1 per minute is considered outrageous highway robbery for the 'average porn consumer'. But for those of us who are seeking scenes which the porn producers are unable/unwilling/clueless/uninterested about making, $1 per minute is the only game in town. Edited by - ninja1 on 5/25/2018 9:58:45 PM
That's the bait the people behind "Only Fans" use to lure men/women into buying a membership because like it or not we have hope that what is behind the door is going to be magical and while it's true that 10$ is not a lot of money. Few people will be thrilled when all that was behind the door was a bunch of 2 minute videos of the model doing stuff that is boring and non-sexual in nature. Granted some fans will still be happy but even they will admit that they were hoping for a lot more. I don't think of myself as a less dedicated fan so much as a more educated one. I was there when performers were doing the exact same thing with their own solo model site. The fan in me had hope that my 20$ would open up a world of wonder that my favorite model created for me. It never happened no matter how much I hoped it would because if there had been anything of value inside then it would have been visible in the preview of the site. Granted the prices that many clips4sale stores charge for their videos is outrageous but they at least give you a trailer of what your money is buying. It may be a short one and it may not show a lot but you have a good idea of what you are buying and more importantly. If you feel cheated then the fact that you forked over 20$ for a 15-20 minute video will probably mean that you will never buy anything else from that store and they will die. The fact that it's only 10$ entices many people who feel cheated by one of their "Only Fans" purchase to buy another one. At some point even they will say that's it's not worth it but how many 10$ will they have spent before they do that????
Shortly after leaving Danny, she seems to have found either a new BF or just fuck buddy, because she's been uploading a solid amount of BG content all with the same dude. Lots of anal, and a handful of rimjob videos. I liked her content, although she seems to take a week or two off randomly.
It's built on a horrendous platform. If you sign up to one where she (or he) posts videos/images every single day, going back through the feed is an utter nightmare. Firefox ends up crashing if you go too far down. Image quality is also terrible, it's just a way for performers to make a bit more dosh on a premium version of Twitter. The only one I liked was Jesh, but he's messed his customers about too much getting the actual website up and running.
Agree with the above post about scrolling through past videos, starts to crash and seems to use up a lot of battery as well. Not been a member of many girls onlyfans and the few I have were usually pretty disappointing, full of poor quality 3 min videos shot on mobile phones. Jynx Maze did try to give her fans some outrageous stuff but was forced to take those scenes down and then seemed to lose any interest in it. Recently joined Diverse Stacy onlyfans and she has some good stuff on there but again it is largely mobile phone footage. Does have plenty of piss content and some nastier stuff like puke blow jobs which you can't get to see her do anywhere else. The scrolling thing is an issue though and phone starts really overheating. Some onlyfans pages seem to be set up so that you can see what is posted on there even if you're not a member (no previews but at least you can see vid descriptions) others don't allow you to see anything unless you sign up.
Everyone has a story. Im choosing to write mine now 56 Posts 3/18
Posted - Jul 30 2018 : 10:15AM
Onlyfans as well as fancentro are a gamble. Depending on performer it's been a hit n miss. I was so disappointed in Brooklyn Chase onlyfans and fancentro. I opted out of onlyfans for update reasons. In 30 days I believe 2 updates. Granted 1 was a 20 min clip. As for fancentro, the month prior, Brooklyn did put me on her account at no charge, which I was very thankful for. But once the whole Fancentro promo push, it went to shit. I even started paying for my premium in hopes it would improve. Nope, it got worse. I was one of her biggest fans since 2014. Through promo push on social media, support because I believe in paying for my porn. As well as spoiling her from her wishlist. I misspoke and used her actual 1st name referring her to someone in the business and I guess for that I was placed on the outcast. I have my Theory as to why. Then I have Tiffany Watson premium and that girl is on top of her premiums. New stuff everyday. Personal DMs. Live Fucking. And it's always something new, funny, asking fans for ideas and advice. So really.. it's a gamble George Flores
#1 Chloe Amour fan / More blowbangs! / #DPTM = Suck the cocks clean after a DP 1013 Posts 7/18
Posted - Jul 30 2018 : 10:27AM
Anyone sub to Emily Willis only fans? I have the same concerns as others regarding previews. Would love to hear anyone's experience. Seems like she and Sami Parker are friends and appear in each other's vids a lot.
^I don't and never will because I refuse to pay for something that I don't know what I'm getting for my money but the one positive thing I can say about Emily is that you at least get a tiny description of her videos. I don't know if she has any with Sami because I haven't seen any mentions in the description. I don't buy anything without knowing what it is I'm buying so why would change that view when it involves porn.
For some porn, it's basically a monopoly...if you really really have a severe crush on a particular performer, and her only outlet is onlyfans or patreon or such preview-less sites, then it's not so easy for me to take a "no exceptions" approach. Combined with the inherent flakiness of the amateurs/camgirls. (Here today, gone tomorrow), there is a real risk of totally missing out.
^Don't get me wrong. I recognize the appeal of "OF" because I once joined many solo model sites for similar reasons and that is why I can say with experience that the chances that you find a black pearl in those oysters of "OF" pages is about the same as in nature so 1 in 10,000. Name me one product you buy without knowing anything about it? That's exactly what "OF" is and that is the only business model they can use if they want to survive because the day is coming where more and more people will feel cheated once they have forked over their money and discover that all they got is a few 2-3 minutes video of the model doing semi-nude things and nothing else.
I think that "OF" killed porn. I know its very dramatic to say that and porn is not really dead, but since "OF" came up their used to be more scenes and more showcases by the big ones. With big ones i mean girls like Nikki Benz, Alexis Texas, Mia Malkova... etc. Now they don't need to shoot as much scenes as they used to be, because with "OF", Fancentro and co. they have an easier way to make the same or more money as they would get to shoot for a companie. The content can be produced cheap. But the biggest problem are not the performers who are using it. It's the "Fans" who pay for it.
Anna Bell Peaks has a good onlyfans page. Frequent updates and bts stuff. A few fetish models i follow have good ones that arent expensive too. I joined Sophie Dees for a month, but she was just posting stuff from her website i already had/seen and pics from er shoots, but t was sporadic at best. So it's hit or miss. ----Dread's Twitter----
^^ Yeah, the idea that studios are begging to shoot these performers, but they're being turned down so that the performers can shoot for their Onlyfans page instead is pretty ridiculous. Yes, I'm gonna refuse money up front so I can shoot this content for free (or possibly even pay to shoot it) on the chance that enough people are gonna sign up for my page to make it worth the hundreds of dollars I turned down by not shooting a scene for a third party. If I really wanted to deconstruct things, I'd argue that what people are saying they want is for performers to be more desperate for money so they're forced to shoot more for professional studios. Performers being able to make money on the side with stuff like Onlyfans is a good thing, and more than likely leads to more performers sticking around than would right now if these options were not available (because many of them would probably just fade away because they aren't getting booked enough to make good money).
Whats up everyone, I'm a porn producer and I post Raw behind the scenes footage from my Video shoots, Snapchat stories, Amateur Content, and even several Full length videos with major porn stars Such as Sarah Vandella, Virgo Peridot, Layla Price, Alycia Starr, Stefania Mafra, Zoey Reyes and so many more models all on my onlyfans page. For only $10/month its honestly a steal. If anyone is interested in a free trial, sign up with onlyfans and shoot me an email to FreakMobMedia@gmail.com and Ill grant you a 1-day free trial to Onlyfans.com/FreakMobMedia. I currently have over 90 full videos on my page. [mod edit: image removed. see the image policy. No erect cocks.] Check out my OnlyFans page here Follow me on twitter @FreakMobMedia Edited by - killbillvol69 on 8/3/2018 2:42:39 AM
Interestingly enough, now apparently Elegant Angel (i.e. a Studio) now also has an Only Fans account... WTF? What's the difference to a normal site membership?
^I agree but the again Elegant isn't by any stretch of the imagination the studio it once was. In fact it's only a studio by name since they produce little to any porn and none of it is downloadable.
