New Pornstar Interviews - [more]
Wisconsin Tiff Interview

"The most guys was for a backdoor challenge and that was 50 guys."
All Forums > Tech Talk > Tech Talk Forum Page 35 > Playing/organizing music files on XP
AuthorPost
conquistador
Deactivated User

Hellhamster.
2947 Posts
10/03
Posted - Apr 15 2007 : 3:01PM
Hello
I was just wondering which programs people favoured for listening to music with their computers and which version (that's important)


I have tons of music on my computer but due to some careless hardware upgrading all of my stuff is all over the place. When it was all in one place I would use Media Player Classic to make playlists for myself depending on what I wanted to hear. Now not.

Some CDs that I had ripped long ago also refused to play unless I downloaded and played them on the new M$ Media Player. I haven't heard them since.

I am totally disorganized with a collection spread across too many drives in weird file structures and it is hard for me to find anything. Obviously I *could* go through and organize this issue manually but that would be mind piercing for me.

I know that "jukebox" (like itunes or musicmatch) style programs can scour my drives for all of my music and consolidate it but that is pretty much all I know.

Also if I use this program for things like ripping a CD or album I do not want any gimping or DRM on my files that will prevent other players from using them in the future or if I switch around my hard drives again.

Any insight would be appreciated.

Also so you know I am not using any special sound hardware, just the on-board REALTEK AC97.

jayo All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

2117 Posts
7/04
Posted - Apr 15 2007 : 7:21PM
I was going to ask something similar. To make a long story short, I can't run my favorite DVD player anymore (it just doesn't work and it's not supported, so I'm stuck). I've tried a couple of video players but so far I haven't found anything I really liked.

For audio and MP3s I still like WinAmp, but for some reason it doesn't love me anymore (system crashes).

kukm4
Member

so-cal
212 Posts
9/04
Posted - Apr 15 2007 : 7:37PM
DrP0rn0
Senior Member

1836 Posts
5/04
Posted - Apr 16 2007 : 10:20AM
I think ITunes is an incredible product. It does everything that I want in a music player. It's simple to use, you can make as many play lists, of whatever type that you want, including "smart" playlists that auto populate. It has simple but powerful search functionality. It rips CDs easily into the format of your choice. AAC is the default, but WITHOUT any DRM, so no need to worry about that. You can easily tell it to rip CDs as MP3 instead if you'd prefer.

As you said, you can tell ITunes to import music from one or more folders. If you set a preferences option called "Keep ITunes Library Organized", it will *copy* all the songs it finds into it's central library and structure the folders by artist, album, etc, and rename the files to reflect song title and other things. As long as your music has complete ID3 tags, you're all set. I would think in an hour or two, you could import all of your music into ITunes and then delete all of the originals, since they will by then, already be in the ITunes library (just a directory inside your user directory).

Now, all that being said, some people REALLY dislike ITunes. The primary complaints are that ITunes is totally driven by ID3 tags. There's no easy way to browse lists of file names. You actually look at the music by artist, album, song title, etc. If you are very used to using winamp or other players, this might irritate the hell out of you. Ditto if your music has no ID3 tags, or missing ID3 tags, as you won't be able to find your music.

ITunes also lacks the ability to "monitor a directory" where you put new music that you (ahem) acquire. People that download a lot of music have been asking for this feature for years. I think they are primarily people stealing music, but there may be some legit people that acquire music legally, en masse, in this manner.

Other than those things, I rarely hear other complaints about ITunes. It's free and it works really well.

Note: Be VERY aware of your preferences when importing music. VERIFY that ITunes has done what you expected by either putting it into the ITunes Library directory, or not, based on your preferences. This can get confusing if you don't keep track of what your settings are when you import music.

Dr. P

pinc_noiz
Deactivated User

758 Posts
6/05
Posted - Apr 16 2007 : 12:10PM
My opinion regarding downloadable music is a lot like [ invalid url ]'s, but I guess I'm the more 'organised' one here : my music files are all in one map (using several sub-maps).

I use either an 'iTunes'-look-alike prog on one music-'server' (not used very often), a manufacturer's 'MCE2005'-add-on, or systems consisting of either MCE2005 or Vista Ultimate MediaCenter software (adding primarily the Burwen Bobcat DHD RE/ AudioSplendor audio software suite, ExactAudioCopy audio-software with 'LAME 3.97 SBR' (RazorLame 1.1.5 front-end), Foobar2000 v.0.8.3 (with 'SRC-24/96 upsampler'-plug-in), and using an alternative Windows-ASIO to bypass Windows-KMIXER)

All kinds of codecs (if any) are used, but preferably WAV/AIFF; FLAC is OK also, or MP3 @ 320kbps or 320kbps VBR (min. 192kbps). All downloadable formats are in their infant-years, and a lot of work need to be done on them to have them offer some alternative to original files when replay-quality is concerned.

p_n

 
RandomPrecision
Senior Member

Enjoy!
8175 Posts
3/06
Posted - Apr 16 2007 : 3:00PM
Well, this might not be the best proggie for you but I like Foobar2000. It's chief advantage is that you can do almost anything you desire with it (eventually). It has plugins for pretty much every format you can imagine. Ont he downside, it's interface is pretty ugly when you first install it. It's complex and takes a lot of work to get it looking how you want it. But you can lift the hood and get your hands dirty if you like that sort of thing. It's mindlessly configurable. And, best of all, last I heard it was open source. And of course, it's freeware. Sounds nice too...although I have to say that I never heard much (if any) difference in media players.
pinc_noiz
Deactivated User

758 Posts
6/05
Posted - Apr 16 2007 : 4:56PM
Shared thought.

Seen in context with eg. hardware build-Q (electrical/ mechanical & layout) and 'compression-format and -configuration' (to name but two), different media-players aren't a primary-factor when talking about 'hearing differences (if any) in replay-Q'.

When taking care of your basic file-system (being it photos, documents or music), and filing each new item with care and attention, I think nothing will get lost nor will settings deteriorate. Windows MediaPlayer as default player appears to me like a very acceptable prog for what it does.

p_n

conquistador
Deactivated User

Hellhamster.
2947 Posts
10/03
Posted - Apr 16 2007 : 7:36PM
Dr. P -

I have been hearing from iTunes users that they haven't updated their players (sometimes in years) to avoid something related to the updated versions. What is it?

Have you heard of prople denying the auto-updates?

Should I look at older versions of iTunes?

Also from my own library I discovered with (some version?) of iTunes that if a song had a really soft intro-outtro it would be missing from the ripped music file from my CDs. Like some of the Crucifucks songs have spoken bits at the beginning and the end and they were gone after the rip from CD. This couldn't possibly be considered a useful feature because it sucks, so it was probably my fault somehow through settings error( I would never have meant to do such a thing). Or do some versions of Itunes delete some of the space at the beginning and end of tracks or have some other clunky issues with ripping?

Edited by - conquistador on 4/16/2007 9:59:48 PM

jayo All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

2117 Posts
7/04
Posted - Apr 16 2007 : 9:54PM
DrP0rn0
Senior Member

1836 Posts
5/04
Posted - Apr 17 2007 : 12:45AM
Several years ago, someone figured out that ITunes DRM protection for PURCHASED music was added by ITunes itself. Music actually came to ITunes without DRM in the file. Someone wrote a perl or python front end that pretended to be ITunes and would receive purchased music "in the clear" with no DRM applied. It was an interesting hack, but obviously Apple and the Music Companies were NOT amused. Shortly thereafter, the whole purchased music scheme was changed and an ITunes update was required to play *any* of your purchased music. Perhaps this has something to do with what you are hearing about? Other than that, I've considered every ITunes update to be an incremental upgrade. Nothing seems "slow" or "broken" from release to release.
I'm only guessing here, but I think the default "crossfade" setting might be biting you. By default, ITunes is set to use a 5 or 6 second crossfade from song to song. So when going from one song to the next, the two will be mixed together for a few seconds. This would mask really low level sounds at the beginning of a new song or the end of the one you are currently listening to.

Dr. P

pinc_noiz
Deactivated User

758 Posts
6/05
Posted - Apr 17 2007 : 3:18AM
When using a carefully thought-out file-system, and maintaining it (do not let the system decide where to file things/ do not let the system install things before notifying you first), I think you're save.
iTunes is a replay and management tool; the rip-function isn't important for Apple at all, so it's more of an after-thought in daily practice. ExactAudioCopy let you rip bit-exact: it makes copies, not interpretations ... One of the best tools in 'CE digital-music'-land IMO (shameless plug).

p_n

DrP0rn0
Senior Member

1836 Posts
5/04
Posted - Apr 17 2007 : 10:47AM
EAC is a great piece of software. It was inspired by the CD Paranoia library which some Linux programs use, including GRIP, which was a bad ass ripper and converter years ago.

However, I think you're being unintentionally unfair to ITunes ripping capabilitites. True, on damaged CDs, with the default settings, ITunes will introduce pops or clicks when it fails to read a bit (or block or whatever) from the CD. However, there's an option called "Use Error Correction when importing Audio CDs", which helps combat this.

Is it as good as EAC? I doubt it and I haven't tested it. I can give you anecdotal evidence though: I have imported (ripped) around 175 of my own CDs with ITunes. I can recall somewhere between 2 and 5 SONGs out of those where I've heard an audio problem related to improper import (clicks and pops). I'd say that's a pretty darned good record. Oh, and I do NOT have the error correction setting turned on, as I've had so little trouble that I was never motivated to activate it, and it slows importing down a bit.

Dr. P

pinc_noiz
Deactivated User

758 Posts
6/05
Posted - Apr 17 2007 : 2:04PM
To me, having replay-Q as main concern, when there's even the smallest risk of damaging original data (mainly the "iTunes will introduce pops or clicks when it fails to read a bit" & iTunes' signal-recognizing/ fading issues), it pays of taking some extra time ripping. Taking both the most perfect copy/ rip possible and the most perfect replay option, instead of both ripping 'as is' and replaying 'as is' (ie. 'taking care') does pay of when using a discriminative sound-replay system.

Even taking account for conquistador's remark "not using any special sound hardware", I'm of the opinion at least providing yourself with as perfect a copy/ rip as possible, as the rip-file will be stored, and we don't want to re-rip when more special/ discriminative sound equipment eventually will be used ... (the decision how to rip keeps its intrinsic consequences over time).
I've done quite some comparative auditions myself lately (most recently done around [ invalid url ]), between ripping-tools/ codecs(-executions)/ replay-tools/ overall system-layout (in a media-(music-)server context), and my decision to use the exact set-up as stated earlier was based on this. As these were my auditions, everybody is advised to execute his/ her own when feeling the need, and of course I'm very interested in learning how eg. iTunes turns out, comparatively, in different auditions.

Concerning the original questions: all music-files on the current system (no matter how "all over the place" ...) can be found using 'instant search' (MediaPlayer v.11: library> instant search> music) or manually (taken from MediaPlayer's [help]-function, in case you didn't know already ... ):

folders to add to MediaPlayer 'monitoring' library:
- click, in MediaPlayer, the arrow below the Library tab, and then click Add to Library.
- in the Add to Library dialog box, click one of the following folders
- click Advanced Options, and then click Add, and specify the location of the folder.
(to prevent files that are smaller than a certain size from being added to the library, enter the file size limits in the Audio files and Video files boxes)
- close and re-open MediaPlayer

One piece of advice *not tried by myself*, is using Advanced WMA Workshop 2.2 on the files considered not-readable now, and use its batch conversion to refresh all tags (is there a share-ware alternative, anybody?).

p_n

conquistador
Deactivated User

Hellhamster.
2947 Posts
10/03
Posted - Apr 17 2007 : 2:34PM
p-n:

No more microsoft product for me if I can help it, I would be way happier with iTunes then Media player 9+ (which I feel are crippled softwear). I am just not happy with M$ programs based on how often they want to "call home".

(M$ have even claimed that the crashes in recent versions of works are a "feature")

I use
Media Player Classic
though. Excellent program.

pinc_noiz
Deactivated User

758 Posts
6/05
Posted - Apr 17 2007 : 4:11PM
Shoot: you use Media Player Classic, as you clearly stated in your first post ... and I absolutely overlooked and thought you were using MS Media Player ... Damn: sorry for the confusion .

Did you track down all music files by now? And able to play them again?

p_n

 
conquistador
Deactivated User

Hellhamster.
2947 Posts
10/03
Posted - Apr 17 2007 : 10:31PM
p_n: Not Yet.

I looked into the iTunes consolidation feature for my music but it turns out I don't actually have the drive space for it to do it's copying routine. Because if I'm reading this stuff right, until I delete my original music files after iTunes has copied them I will have twice as much of my drive space filled with music.

I have (at rough estimate) 50GB of music on this computer on the various drives. And only 16GB of free space on my whole system right now (I have to do some serious house-keeping to do) I have a 300 GB drive for games and video projects, a 300 GB drive for "everything else" and a "seriously old" 80GB drive that my OS is running on that is otherwise filled with the detritus of being the brains in 3 computers since 2003.

Also, if I send iTunes running around my system I am worried that I will, along with my music, have a iTunes playlist *filled* with sounds from all of the games that are on my machine. I've seen this happen, page upon page of "music" that iTunes finds actually being bits of gaming dialogs or sfx. Any way to avoid this? Aside from doing it manually.

So I probably have some work ahead of me if I ever want all this music in one place. Just about all of it is replaceable, in that I could rip/digitize it again. But there lots of old cassettes and records of mine that I digitized in a marathon session last summer. That was a boring process and I don't want to do it again.

pinc_noiz
Deactivated User

758 Posts
6/05
Posted - Apr 18 2007 : 9:17AM
This morning I spoke to Hermstedt, a German company that provides products and software for Mac computers and is OEM of high-acclaimed music-servers (using an user-interface very similar to that of iTunes, with Apple's Rendezvous/ Bonjour technology and acting in a network like a 'standard' iTunes server/client). For file-management and -editing they recommend using FixTunes (free trial for a max of 50 songs, or $24.95 full-use), with MP3tag and Tag & Rename as possible alternatives. Have it your way.
I'm not an iTunes user, use a Hermstedt-build music-server, but mainly as source-equipment and so haven't, 'from the top of my head', much trustworthy knowledge relating your questions ... (I did read the FixTunes page, and it looked to me like possibly answering your questions indeed)

p_n

conquistador
Deactivated User

Hellhamster.
2947 Posts
10/03
Posted - Apr 18 2007 : 9:37AM
p_n: Thanks for the suggestions. I think I'll give fixtunes a try. 25$ will be a small price in the long run if it works well.

cobalt60
Knuckle Dragger

2046 Posts
2/03
Posted - Apr 18 2007 : 11:29AM
For giggles, if you want to go a completely different route - for Windows systems, I install:

1. wampserver - this gives you Apache, PHP and the MySQL database server.

2. jinzora - this creates a streaming media server on your nifty wampserver you just installed

Then I can get to the jinzora page from any machine in the house by going to http:\\mp3server

You can save the m3u files the jinzora creates as playlists. You can even get to your stuff over the Net if you punch the right holes in your firewall at home. You can stick movies (avi, mov, etc.) in there, too, not just mp3 files.

I use "Artist Name\Album Name\Track Number - Track Title.mp3" in my CDex when I rip my audio CDs and my eMusic.com download manager is set to name them the same way.

eMusic is great because they have non-DRM plain old MP3 files you can put on CDs, hard drives, portable players, no limits. Beware, some files are encoded at 128 but c'mon that's good enough for casual listening.

It's all pretty straightforward and works great! Mail me if you're interested. I haven't ever heard back from you so I guess I pissed you off or offended you somehow? Sorry about that if I did. Wasn't my intention.

pinc_noiz
Deactivated User

758 Posts
6/05
Posted - Apr 19 2007 : 3:06AM
Funky! I'm afraid though, one has to have some IT-knowledge to master a set-up like this, ruling me out (even to 'punch the right hole in my firewall' I need assistance ...).

eMusic is great indeed, and I've found some other locations like them during last months (mostly pointed towards), making 'downloadable music' (the concept) somewhat easier to chew.

Do you stream files over your network and listen to your PC, or do you have it enriched with clients and output your music into some sort of sound-device (eg. media-engine, DMP)?

p_n

cobalt60
Knuckle Dragger

2046 Posts
2/03
Posted - Apr 19 2007 : 11:30AM
Someday some howtos might magically appear in this forum. Who knows? Maybe some one or the other of you other lazy bastards who knows as much or more than me - help me out here.

(This calling out of "lazy bastards" generally has had the opposite of desired effect in the past, yet I continue to throw it out there...)

Edited by - cobalt60 on 4/19/2007 5:16:21 PM

Hardware All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Your other left
14606 Posts
3/02
Posted - Apr 20 2007 : 1:22AM
In your shoes, I would use Windows search. Assuming your music is all in mp3 format, a *.mp3 on all your drives will discover everything. Of course, those game sounds will be there as well, but the file structure should be enough to tell you which ones those are. Just grab the ones you want and shove them into a new folder (or folders). Done.
All Forums > Tech Talk > Tech Talk Forum Page 35Playing/organizing music files on XP

Previous topic: Post your desktop/notebook specs
Next topic: Network issues



Jump To: