Hey porn fans. Let's remember that porn is not truly mainstream. Yeah, it is becoming more popular but it's rate of popularity is very very gradual. Name one well known porn actresses in the 90s besides jena Jameson and Ron Jeremy. There are still large segements of our society that think vivid video (which is called couples porn) is absoltuely revolting. Large segments of people find blow jobs, ass eating, anal sex, pussy eating disgusting and I. Bill Clinton was deplored by many not just because he was getting some from Monica but because he was getting head.
I bet I can't tell most people where I work or even strangers how much I enjoy watching two hot women eating each others pussy. I can but I will get looks. If that is true folks why are we fooling ourselves into thinking that even the most couple oriented films in porn are really mainstream.
For an example, Feet fetishes are seen as strange and revolting to most so is anal sex. Porn can not be truly mainstream because the acts involved in it are seen as revolting to large segements of society. Ask most men or women about toe sucking they will look at you as if you are wierd or think you are revolting. If society can understand the fascination with this mild fetish how do you think they are going to respond to people who verbally admit they like assfucking. Howard Stern is seen as a pig for a reason.
I love porn but I don't think my parents would be game if I told them I watched porn a lot and was thinking about being a porn star. I hear a lot of porn actresses whose parents have no problems with this. I think they are very few.
Daylight Savings Time, is it really Necessary? 972 Posts 3/04
Posted - May 12 2004 : 4:39PM
Though a little off topic but I knew a girl in H.S. who was a slut and her parents bought her condoms. She always said that she was tramatized from seeing her parents haveing orgies when she was young but I think she just wanted the cock and her parents supported her. I would be pissed if my 17 year old was fucking. I'd pull that "bad boys 2" crap on any guy who showed up..lol (can't wait).
Anyway I have never thought of porn as mainstream. I mean the production is lower, you never see an anal cream pie in hollywood (at least on screen), and well I doubt you'll see batman yanking his wank out to jizz all over his woman's face. Now though I think that would increase ticket sales on batman 5 it won't happen! But I do think that porn is getting around more or maybe just the same people are voicing themselves more.. LOL
Look man, I am not saying I would enjoy imagining my daughter having a gangabang with 100 guys. However, if I am going to have any integrity I would have to allow her to do that since I would not have a problem with my son having a gangbang with a couple of women. I would be concerned about STDS but I would be hypocritical to say my angel daughter can have the same sexual prowess as my son. I would never be comfortable with it but I would have to respect her desire to celebrate her sexual prowess.
Daylight Savings Time, is it really Necessary? 972 Posts 3/04
Posted - May 12 2004 : 5:49PM
Hmm, I'm trying to figure out if your being funny...Hmmm.. Actually I wouldn't be pleased if my son was getting it on with 100 guys either! Women for that matter. I was simply stating that it is strange that parents wouldn't care if their daughter was having sex that young. Maybe I'm in the minority but I feel that as a parent that thing would piss me off. Needless to say it happens and will happen but I guess it's better to try and make sure she doesn't get a bun in the oven.
You may have been right if you added 3 words in your sentence: porn is not truly mainstream IN THE USA.
One thing that really upsets me when I read most yankees writings is that they think that their country is the whole fucking world. All the explanation you gave are right only for the USA. If a European politician receives a blowjob from a 20 years old big titted stageist, if you see any affection in his popularity it would be on the plus side. Come to Europe, visits town like Amsterdam, Hamburg, Berlin (just to name the most blatant cases) and tell me whether porn is not mainstream. Europe is full of cases of former porn starlets that went mainstream (movies, tv, music) and no-one gives a damn about it. Presently in Italy there's a reality show on one of the most popular networks. One of the main characters of the reality show is former porn star Selen. Each week the public votes one the characters to be ejected from the show. Guess what: after more than 2 months, she's still in while other 8 had been kicked out. This means that the majority of the Italian public does not see her as a negative character. Here people talk about porn at work without any problem.
So please specify: porn is not mainstream *in your country* ruled by integralist bigots.
The idea that people should wait for six years after reaching sexual maturity before they have sex is a very modern fetish. I sometimes wonder if that is why this rule is now enforced with such rabid ferocity.
Humans have been having sex without the benefit of this weird idea for most of the last three million years.
I don't know for a fact if porn is more mainstream in Europe.But unfortunately, I would say the same superficial admiration of porn as an art also exist in Europe. Hopefully, I am wrong.
What does intergralist bigots mean? I just think our country like many others has an asthetic disgust for percieving sex within a soveriegn context. Tragically the confuse their asthetic disgust(i.e. man orally servicing another man) with moral disgust.
Let me correct myself, most families find it less offenseive if their sons were getting it on with many partners. If you find homosexuality revolting, I can see why you would find him involved in a gay gangbang disgusting.
Just curious what age would you feel comfortable with your daughter having sex?
Daylight Savings Time, is it really Necessary? 972 Posts 3/04
Posted - May 13 2004 : 5:29PM
I am not trying to arue with you I'm just saying that from a parents view they normally don't want their kids having sex (for obvious reasons) until they move out. I know there are people out there that disagree but this is what I believe and have seen from 99 percent of all families and parents I have known. We all have had sex in our teens but when you think about your child usually it is not so three dimensional. I'm not a parent but I can see where this whole idea spawns. I have several friends who are parents and have had this same discussion with them arguing that their kids will have sex at a young age but they just said NO they won't. I guess it's a protective thing or some sort of ignorance. I don't know. I really don't know why my opinion spawns so much debate..
I'm just happy to get any porn. We in Oklahoma have to drive to Texas to get it. ... We can't buy porn in OK. I hate this state. Don't get me started on stripping... let's just say no nipple or butt cheeks.
[Link]
major sharp Deactivated User
246 Posts 2/04
Posted - May 15 2004 : 8:47PM
I just came back from the Motor city comic con just to see Julie Benz. And they had about a half dozen nude models in fact they had Traci lords last year which caused some what of a commotion when a few charities with drew from the con I don't know it says anything one way or another.But the con gets bigger and bigger every year with about 15,000 attendee's last year.
I understand clearly. I agree, parents should NOT want their kids to have sex in their teens and should be protective to a degree. I am just saying that parents are very uncomfortable with the idea that their 21 year old is sexualized.
Didn't mean to argue with you. I will try to be less confrontational.