Porn titles should be chosen with more respect

Author	Post
Rumplestilt Skin Deactivated User 931 Posts 7/02	Posted - Nov 4 2002 : 3:39AM @Dumblonde - Just read your review of the Tricia Deveraux dvd, and I agree, the title is a little offensive, consideing Tricia is a respected member of this forum and in the porn world in general. I don't like the title of that movie. It's wrong. Regards, Rump. [Link]
Cyberchicken Member 900 Posts 4/02	Posted - Nov 4 2002 : 6:52AM Your post doesn't make any sense. Please include a link to the thread you are talking about. Cyberchicken [Link]
Rumplestilt Skin Deactivated User 931 Posts 7/02	Posted - Nov 4 2002 : 7:36AM Ahem...if you care to read the "REVIEWS", I think you'll find it will make more sense. Like I said, I was refering to a review, not a thread. [Link]
Saki At-Large 2087 Posts 11/99	Posted - Nov 4 2002 : 8:46AM http://adultdvdtalk.com/reviews/read_review.asp?sku=4350 - Saki [Link]
BIGmike B-I-G-m-i-k-e 2335 Posts 3/01	Posted - Nov 4 2002 : 10:55AM I agree. The title alone is the reason keeping me from buying those compilation DVDs from Anabolic. I don't particularily care for such titles, which is why I don't buy them, a little better naming and more people are sure to buy them. -If I look hard enough into the settin' sun My love will laugh with me before the mornin' comes- [Link]

RonK Big Double Everything Fan Poor Turkey running for her life with Christmas Hat 3713 Posts 9/01	Posted - Nov 4 2002 : 11:02AM I don't have this comp because I have all the scenes from the original releases except for the Nasty Girl scene. The purpose of the title is to sell videos and if the producers believe that being PC will bring more sales, they will be PC. If being obnoxious brings more sales, then being obnoxious is it. Simply a business decision. Anabolic clearly believes that the non-PC title will increase sales of comp stuff. I avoid all of Anabolic comp stuff because I will probably have all the scenes I want from the original releases. Anyway, comps should be priced accordingly and I do not buy comps at full price. Ron [Link]
Rumplestilt Skin Deactivated User 931 Posts 7/02	Posted - Nov 4 2002 : 12:07PM @Mike Cum Slurpers featuring Tricia Deveraux would have be a more apt title. [Link]
RonK Big Double Everything Fan Poor Turkey running for her life with Christmas Hat 3713 Posts 9/01	Posted - Nov 4 2002 : 12:20PM Probably an accurate title is: Compilation of all the Anabolic scenes with Tricia Devereaux -- some scenes are good and are not. Note: this video should be sold for half the asking price because we have already made our profit from these scenes, but we want to maximize profit and so will ask the full price. Needless to say, this title will not sell well and the buyers will demand a discount. Ron [Link]
Hardware All-Star Member Your other left 14595 Posts 3/02	Posted - Nov 4 2002 : 12:27PM Considering the fact that they are compilations of a single actress's work, I don't see the need for the title. Only those people who are already interested in her are likely to purchase it anyway. [Link]
dumblonde Senior Member 2352 Posts 7/00	Posted - Nov 4 2002 : 12:31PM Ronk wrote: "Anabolic clearly believes that the non-PC title will increase sales of comp stuff. " That must be it, but if true, I think it's pretty sad. Just from a business standpoint, I really think they're wrong about this, however. Since these and similar titled compilations all feature a particular star, most of the buyers are going to be fans of hers. Granted, most fans will buy it anyway, but as one member told me "I don't like the title, but it is Tricia afterall." And it's not only Tricia, but many other female stars have gotten the same treatment. Take J & M Productions aka: Filthy Whore series. Tera Patrick, who has enormous mainstream appeal, has had the My Plaything in the top ten price searches here for as long as I can remember. A compilation of her scenes would sell extremely well, but a lot of people are not going to touch something calling her a Filthy Whore. It's insulting, to the actress and to her fans. [Link]
Joey Starr Senior Member Still wanking after all these years. 8082 Posts 10/00	Posted - Nov 4 2002 : 1:00PM Not to play Devil's advocate here but "Cum Sucking Whore" would have been deemed an adequate title by porn standards. It's the association of the words " A Cum Sucking Whore" with "Named Tricia Deveraux" that raises questions, notwithstanding the fact that Tricia Deveraux is a screen name. It's all in very poor taste, but hey it's porn what do you expect? The main problem I have with this is that Anabolic should have asked Tricia if she was OK with the title of this compilation, apparently they did not. [Link]
Hardware All-Star Member Your other left 14595 Posts 3/02	Posted - Nov 4 2002 : 1:22PM "It's the association of the words " A Cum Sucking Whore" with "Named Tricia Deveraux" that raises questions, notwithstanding the fact that Tricia Deveraux is a screen name." __________________________________________________________________________ I agree that there's a market there for the type of attitude expressed by that title, but to suggest that it's the only one is wrong. In fact, there's a substantial number of porners who are offended by any woman being denigrated in the title or the action portrayed. [Link]
momojames Member 9 Posts 4/01	Posted - Nov 4 2002 : 1:37PM Joey Starr wrote: Not to play Devil's advocate here but "Cum Sucking Whore" would have been deemed an adequate title by porn standards. Click to expand I think the title is appropriate for the content in the DVD? I understand if there is a title named "Julia Roberts: A Cum Sucking Whore" would be unappropriate cuz' she's a mainstream actress. BTW there are alot of worse named titles out there, that are offensive to men, women and one's race or nationality. p.s. Is just the word "whore" where the problem lies? I mean is'nt there cock sucking in the vid? are there facial cumshots? Edited by - momojames on 11/4/2002 1:43:02 PM [Link]
aybesea Senior Member Caroline Cage - Hungarian Hottie! 1485 Posts 5/02	Posted - Nov 4 2002 : 1:45PM Joey Starr wrote: Not to play Devil's advocate here but "Cum Sucking Whore" would have been deemed an adequate title by porn standards. It's the association of the words " A Cum Sucking Whore" with "Named Tricia Deveraux" that raises questions, notwithstanding the fact that Tricia Deveraux is a screen name. Click to expand True - We all love Tricia around here! But, I would think (and did think) that this title was obnoxious without the Tricia D. edition coming into play. [Link]
tricia_devereaux Evil Angel DVD Patience is a virtue, but who wants to be virtuous? 4283 Posts 4/00	Posted - Nov 4 2002 : 3:52PM Anabolic also did this comp name for Missy, Sabrina Johnson and Francesca Le. Sabrina Johnson was REALLY pissed. I don't like the title. Cum-sucking is fine, although a little unsophisticated. It's the whore part that bothered me. They may as well have called it "A Porn Bitch Named Tricia". It would have had the same connotation. [Link]

DenverDon Benevolent Firmly Embedded in Depravity 5914 Posts 7/02	Posted - Nov 4 2002 : 4:21PM I always viewed the title "A Cum Sucking Whore" as pure studio hype. It's their attempt to catch the eye and interest, and increase sales. It's like reading the DVD cover text and trying to determine whether the DVD is good or not. Pure Hype! Also you learn pretty quickly that it's a composition DVD. DenverDon [Link]
P-Knuckle Member 309 Posts 11/01	Posted - Nov 4 2002 : 4:21PM I remember a title by EVIL ANGEL called Fame is a Whore on Butt Row with the tag line 'welcome to prime time, bitch!' Or the wonderfully titled evil angel products, Fresh Meat, Service Animals, and Animal Trainer. Are women just meat? Or are they just for serving men? Maybe I can come to the conclusion from these titles that women are dumb beasts? Yeah, these are just as offensive I would think, except for this distinction... What Anabolic did though was make it personal by using the performers name after the improper tag line. Its tacky, as is titles like 'tera patirck aka filthy whore,' and other such titles. But then again, this is porn. Do we really expect it to be any less offensive? I don't. Search by disgusting names; 94 titles with 'whore' in the name and then search by 'slut' (around 164 titles on some websites.) Okay, lets search for 'bitch.' Hmmm, 49 titles. Using vile language to describe women in porn is as typical as the money shot and pretty much the same as I see it. They both are examples of degradation, which is quite popular thematically. Its only when porn viewers make a emotional connection to a performer that we start to realize that its kinda nasty. Tricia is a popular person on here, so we all feel slighted. This is because we see her as more than a sexual object; but no one has complained about any other title name and I have seen many a performer called some despicable things here at ADT (a particular performer was called a 'skank' by 'someone' in the forum, I find it peculiar that this 'someone' has issues with Tricia being labeled a 'whore.') Thats hypocritical; we either respect all women and men in the industry or stop nit-picking on one title... Edited by - P-Knuckle on 11/4/2002 5:20:41 PM Edited by - P-Knuckle on 11/4/2002 5:53:00 PM [Link]
rjk13 Member peace, love and revolution 321 Posts 10/02	Posted - Nov 4 2002 : 7:36PM I think its a healthy thing to be offended every so often. The world would be pretty boring without it. [Link]
dumblonde Senior Member 2352 Posts 7/00	Posted - Nov 4 2002 : 7:57PM FYI P-Knuckle: We dicussed this very topic in a thread long before this title was released, and I expressed my revulsion then about the aka: Filthy Whore series, so it's not just about Tricia, nor is it hypocritical. I can't remember the thread heading, and I can't get the search to work, but it was in World News I think. But are you seriously suggesting that calling someone, who isn't even a member, a skank in an offhand comment in a message board thread one friggin time is the same thing? You do plenty of mud slinging yourself, we all do, but it's not the same thing. As for Evil Angel, they do not name a performer in the title, and I don't think Tricia had anything to do with the naming anyway. [Link]
tricia_devereaux Evil Angel DVD Patience is a virtue, but who wants to be virtuous? 4283 Posts 4/00	Posted - Nov 4 2002 : 11:01PM I myself have never been thrilled with the Fashion Sluts name, and Service Animals, and even Animal Trainer used to bother me. (I've since changed my mind on Animal Trainer because it is talking about the sexual appetites are like animals.) You're right, though, there have been some questionable titles from Evil Angel. I voice my opinions fairly loudly, but all in all, I'm just an employee. Funny how the Fashion Sluts bothers me, but Fresh Meat never has. Go figure. We even have a recent one where the tagline is "Bitches, they come, they go." I protested quite a bit, but it wasn't my decision to let it go. [Link]
cal444 Independent Editor CalCutterPost.com 927 Posts 10/01	Posted - Nov 5 2002 : 12:20AM It's not intended to be personal it's just a title. As a matter of fact in the context of the material we deal in every day I'd consider it a compliment. Not many ladies are good enough or have stood the test of time needed to make the grade for these compliations. Tricia your one of the greats! Cal Somewhere [Link]
tricia_devereaux Evil Angel DVD Patience is a virtue, but who wants to be virtuous? 4283 Posts 4/00	Posted - Nov 5 2002 : 1:05AM I've always considered the people at Anabolic very good friends. I'm not upset at them personally. It's just that sex is such a wonderful thing. It makes me cringe that most of society thinks that a woman who enjoys sex as much as someone who would be "honored" with a compilation all her own would have to be a slut or whore, as "normal" women would never be that overtly sexual. To be considered in the same league as Missy, yes, that is a true compliment. It's just a shame that the only comp so far that was devoted entirely to me has a title that I can't even repeat the name to my mom!!!! Well, looks like I'll have to go ahead with an Evil Angelology: Tricia Devereaux! !!!!! [Link]
Rumplestilt Skin Deactivated User 931 Posts 7/02	Posted - Nov 5 2002 : 7:47AM Whore is a nasty name out of context; sometimes it's okay when used in jest and WITHIN a scene, but not in this case. [Link]
lindi Senior Member 12345 3205 Posts 9/02	Posted - Nov 5 2002 : 9:45AM I have to agree with Rump, but there is still some irony here. A man who is sexually experienced and enjoys sex is called - a man. A woman who is sexually experienced and enjoys sex is a woman. The word slut might be used in a complimentary way to refer to someone who has somehow managed to overcome repression and express herself. Or some jackass might think it means she's 'dirty'. Maybe we need a name for women who don't enjoy sex, instead. As far as the word 'whore' goes, it is generally derogatory. Any one of us could be in a car wreck tomorrow and lose our spouse, end up paralyzed, an amputee, or with burns over 70% of our bodies. If that ever happens to you, you will call prostitutes angels, not whores. There are legions of people for whom prostitutes are a lifeline to feel validated and whole. Whether the act of prostitution is 'dirty' or not depends on what's on you guys' minds. Prostitutes are perhaps less lucky than porn stars, but I fail to see why any sex worker should feel superior to, or insulted to be compared to, another. [Link]
P-Knuckle Member 309 Posts 11/01	Posted - Nov 5 2002 : 11:19AM Heres a funny double standard in titling, on one hand we have 'A cum sucking whore named Adrian Sage,' and if your a guy, its 'A Cum Shooting Stud named Rocco.' I still stand by my remark that we either respect all members of the porn community or stop nit picking on the titles. My point about the skank remark is that we are responsible for the names and labels we give performers, and when they are based out of stereotypes over looks rather than merit, it becomes rather ridiculous. And I do think it shows a level of bias when you can call a performer a 'skank' based on her looks and then can be upset when a performer is labeled a 'whore.' I am of the opinion that BOTH comments are ABSURD and come from a thinking pattern that women who love sex are somehow 'dirty.' [Link]

lindi Senior Member 12345 3205 Posts 9/02	Posted - Nov 5 2002 : 11:26AM step 1: decide whether it's a positive thing for women to enjoy sex step 2: realize that you don't get to decide. [Link]
dumblonde Senior Member 2352 Posts 7/00	Posted - Nov 5 2002 : 12:49PM I agree, there's a lot of porn and titles that are offensive, and if I could take back thoughtless comments I would, but just because we can't fix everything we might like to, doesn't mean we shouldn't try to make things better, a little step at a time. There IS a double-standard unfortunately. What is the male equivalent of 'whore' or 'slut'? There isn't a word in the English language for such a thing, and it's a shame that it's commonly used to describe women who enjoy sex. Someone asked if there's cock sucking depicted - so does that mean women who suck cock are thought of as whores? Hmmm... I'll have to remember that. And Cal, please, I almost choked on my morning coffee! A Cum Sucking Whore is a COMPLIMENT? Maybe I should go back to bed... is it me? what is this love/hate thing all about? i really think this attitude will end up hurting more than just the performers, when it starts spilling over into everyday relationships. "well, looks like ill have to go ahead with an evil angelology: tricia devereaux! !!!!! " tricia, please, dont tease! well, okay, go ahead...but can i pre-order one, like now? < is it me? what is this love/hate thing all about? i really think this attitude will end up hurting more than just the performers, when it starts spilling over into everyday relationships. "well, looks like ill have to go ahead with an evil angelology: tricia devereaux! !!!!! " tricia, please, dont tease! well, okay, go ahead...but can i pre-order one, like now? << is it me? what is this love/hate thing all about? i really think this attitude will end up hurting more than just the performers, when it starts spilling over into everyday relationships. "well, looks like ill have to go ahead with an evil angelology: tricia devereaux! !!!!! " tricia, please, dont tease! well, okay, go ahead...but can i pre-order one, like now? < is it me? what is this love/hate thing all about? i really think this attitude will end up hurting more than just the performers, when it starts spilling over into everyday relationships. "well, looks like i'll have to go ahead with an evil angelology: tricia devereaux! !!!!! " tricia, please, don't tease! well, okay, go ahead...but can i pre-order one, like now? [[[[[[ [Link]
aybesea Senior Member Caroline Cage - Hungarian Hottie! 1485 Posts 5/02	Posted - Nov 5 2002 : 1:05PM dumblonde wrote: There IS a double-standard unfortunately. What is the male equivalent of 'whore' or 'slut'? There isn't a word in the English language for such a thing, and it's a shame that it's commonly used to describe women who enjoy sex Click to expand I went to college with a guy who truly was a male-slut! He used to call himself MS which stood for, you guessed it, male slut! He wanted to get a license plate that conveyed the thought, but was told by the DMV that it was inappropriate! I'm not sure that the double standard can be fixed with a term. Fact is that when guys are loose and wooly, they display this like a male peacock displays his tail! Edited by - aybesea on 11/5/2002 1:05:48 PM [Link]
DenverDon Benevolent Firmly Embedded in Depravity 5914 Posts 7/02	Posted - Nov 5 2002 : 1:23PM I'm not sure that the double standard can be fixed with a term. Fact is that when guys are loose and wooly, they display this like a male peacock displays his tail! Click to expand Guys were told "to sow their wild oats", while girls were told "to save themselves for marriage". A term for the guys would be like a status symbol, or badge of honor, and the opposite for the girls. DenverDon [Link]
snowden porn Member London 648 Posts 11/01	Posted - Nov 5 2002 : 1:41PM I have real mixed feelings on this. To be completely honest, if Anabolic continued this line (which i don't think they will - the last release was in 2000) and came up with a "cum sucking whore named Shyla" I would buy it. Not because I'm a sick fuck who gets off on these titles but because I like the performer. I couldn't give a shit what the title was. But I do understand where everyone is coming from and understand how performers can't exactly be proud of having their name alongside such a title. I think Anabolic just like 'shock tactics'. I've noticed Anabolic/Diabolic constantly refer to Lexington Steele as 'The Black Bastard' - Is this respectful? Maybe Lex is OK with this alias, maybe Lex even thought it up! either way it doesn't bother me - just as long as he keeps performing. [Link]
cal444 Independent Editor CalCutterPost.com 927 Posts 10/01	Posted - Nov 5 2002 : 2:58PM Lex came up with the alter ego "the black bastard". Let's get real, how many copies do ya'all think a title called "Nice Ladies that Enjoy Intercourse would sell? It's porno folks politically correct is incorrect. All normal rules don't apply. Shock value is a good thing. Cal Somewhere eating raw rat brains Edited by - cal444 on 11/5/2002 3:04:00 PM [Link]
Ramsey Senior Member Trina Michaels fan 10332 Posts 10/02	Posted - Nov 5 2002 : 3:08PM I know such titles sell but I feel bad about the fact that a classy lady like Tricia is being called a whore. When I think (porn)whores I think of Mila, Candy Apples and Bisexual Britni for example, not Tricia. [Link]
skronker Notable Legendary Icon Scopophiliac 9780 Posts 9/02	Posted - Nov 5 2002 : 3:12PM Maybe I'm insensitive, but it IS porn ... and to some degree the raunchy, explicit titles represent absolute truth-in-advertising. Sometimes they are witty, like "Weapons of Ass Destruction" (not exactly a box cover I'd have laying around in plain view! But I like the joke), and sometimes they're merely crass. I think one title I recall was "Fuck My Dirty Shithole!" Yeah, it felt real good going up to the teenage video store clerk to check that one out! (I had an Erika Bella fixation at the time ... but, no, it really wasn't worth the embarrassment). And, truth is, I don't generally buy or rent videos from Extreme, and that's part of the reason. (Or maybe it was a brief glimpse of "Cocktails" that turned me off). Ditto Max Hardcore, whose stuff I find unwatchable. But ... there's endless shelves of smut out there to look at, some tasteful and some degrading. Free market, your choice. I think most porn viewers appreciate some hearty all-American vulgarity in their titles, as long as its not mean-spirited. [Link]
Michael Saint Photographer Alexis Texas is always lovely 1062 Posts 2/01	Posted - Nov 5 2002 : 6:37PM I did go ahead and get this DVD because it was Tricia. Is our attitude over this just because it is Tricia? Would DB have had the same reaction to the title with Aurora Snow's name in it? Who knows, I would like to think she would as would I. My opinion on this really has nothing to do with the title itself merely the attitude it implies towards the women themselves. Porn Performers IMHO get enough narrow minded attitudes from society in general without the industry giving them some more. [Link]
DenverDon Benevolent Firmly Embedded in Depravity 5914 Posts 7/02	Posted - Nov 5 2002 : 6:57PM Porn Performers IMHO get enough narrow minded attitudes from society in general without the industry giving them some more. Click to expand Well said Lee. DenverDon [Link]

Pontus Maximus Senior Member Man of Steel, meet your match. 1346 Posts 9/02	Posted - Nov 5 2002 : 10:33PM Smartblonde: so does that mean women who suck cock are thought of as whores? Click to expand Smartblonde, hearing you talk like that made me cum in my pants. Pontus [Link]
cal444 Independent Editor CalCutterPost.com 927 Posts 10/01	Posted - Nov 6 2002 : 1:12AM You want to know what pisses me off in a title? I bought a compilation once, yes, I still buy porn every now and then, it was from a very well known company titled, "Redheads", a few girls into the tape they slipped in a blonde, not a strawberry blonde a platinum blonde. That's what chaps my ass. Cal Somewhere swimming in a pool of urine, the backstroke. [Link]
Rumplestilt Skin Deactivated User 931 Posts 7/02	Posted - Nov 6 2002 : 3:42AM Lee Carver wrote: "Is our attitude over this just because it is Tricia?" In answer to that, NO. Tricia or anyone else, the title of that dvd is wrong and offensive. Just because it's porn it doesn't mean "we" have to stoop to offensive name-calling. All it takes is a little before thinking. A title can be erotic and horny, making you wanna pick it up and buy it without debasing the main performer in it. [Link]
dumblonde Senior Member 2352 Posts 7/00	Posted - Nov 6 2002 : 12:36PM Well said, Rumple. I've spent the last hour searching manually for that thread in which I brought up the aka: Filthy Whore series, but I don't even remember who started it, or which forum it was in. Anyway, at first I was of the opinion that actresses who signed to do them shouldn't complain, but Steph explained that they were all comps, and therefore the actresses didn't have any say in the matter. That's even worse, and makes a BIG difference to me. So, the only reason I wrote up the Tricia comp is because I wanted to see it, but it applies to anyone as far as I'm concerned. I realize Cal444 doesn't pick the names, though his Nice Ladies That Enjoy Intercourse suggestion is a hoot, and would be even more shocking in the sea of smut. At any rate, he has his hands full elsewhere on the board ;-) I just wanted to voice my opinion and maybe get them to think about how this is perceived. From replies in this thread, even among the people who are ambivalent, I didn't hear anyone say that this is actually a selling point, or that they wouldn't buy a comp of their favorite star with a less shocking title, so I would think a better title would benefit everyone, the studio, the star, and the fans. [Link]
spanx Member Nightswimming 15 Posts 10/02	Posted - Nov 6 2002 : 12:55PM SB, I also thought that 'Nice Ladies that Enjoy Intercourse' had it's own pervy and funny appeal. I can only imagine the box cover. Might be a must-have for my collection. Edited by - spanx on 11/6/2002 12:57:56 PM [Link]
tbone Member 18 Posts 3/02	Posted - Nov 6 2002 : 1:04PM Yes, the title of that movie is truly a consumer conundrum. I hate the first part of the title, but adore the last two words - so, yes, I bought it. And, Tricia, I truly hope you're serious about putting out your own anthology. Another question for Tricia: I assume that you get no residuals, etc., from any of these compilations you're beginning to appear on - or the badly named one? Or is there some provision in any of your past contracts for that? [Link]
tricia_devereaux Evil Angel DVD Patience is a virtue, but who wants to be virtuous? 4283 Posts 4/00	Posted - Nov 6 2002 : 2:50PM tbone - actually, except for a VERY FEW of the contract stars (people like Jenna Jameson or maybe Juli Ashton), no porn girls get residuals for ANY of the movies we do. It's just the way it's been done for years and years, and we're used to it. Instead, the business-wise girls take their newly-found fame and make money off of it by feature dancing around the nation (or world) and selling their videos and merchandise to fans. I'm not worried about studios making extra money off of me. It keeps my name out there in the public. But Steph and blondie are right about us not knowing ahead of time exactly what the content or theme of comps will be. Heck, even with the normal videos, alot of times they got changed before release. I did one video that was supposed to be called In the City, and it got released as City Whores. [Link]
tbone Member 18 Posts 3/02	Posted - Nov 6 2002 : 7:29PM I figured as much about the advance knowledge of titles, and I'm not surprised there aren't residuals. Those contracts must be something! Would it be too much to ask you and others to give the going rates for various performances/acts/etc? tbone [Link]
Haze Deactivated User 769 Posts 7/04	Posted - Mar 15 2007 : 3:05PM "Sack the wetback" comes to mind. [Link]
the unknown pervert Deactivated User I'd like to stay but I've got a plane to catch. 3243 Posts 5/06	Posted - Mar 15 2007 : 3:30PM I guess we can leave this thread off of the ADT threads that get the porn industry's ear list. [Link]
DtotheJ Member 190 Posts 8/06	Posted - Mar 15 2007 : 7:28PM millions of titles come out ....at least hundreds ship each month.... companies are going with the "catchy" attention grabbing titles....to catch your attention as you go through the aisles or shop online.... The thinking is....we'll attract EVERYBODY's attention.....many will pick it up, others won't but they will all NOTICE the title.... I was a big Crown Princess fan back in the day...but I just plain refused to buy a title with her on the cover that read "Crack whores of America"..... Just not my thing, but I'm sure others dig it... Don't even get me started about some of the Black "titles"..... It's all good...these companies know what they're doing... lowest common denominator... [Link]
Learned Hand Member 175 Posts 2/06	Posted - Mar 16 2007 : 4:34AM I think the problem here is by saying "a whore...named...X" it takes away the thin patina of acting that is present in porn. Another poster pointed out that "Cum sucking whore" would have been an ok name for a movie. The difference is that a title there clearly refers to the role that the girl plays rather than to the actress herself. When the actresses name is in the title we are clearly no longer talking about a role that, however questionably, could be called fiction. Now we are directly degrading the actress. It is the difference between discussing "Pretty Woman" and saying "Julia Roberts played such a skank" and "Julia Roberts is such a skank." I am down for all sorts of hardcore, raincoater action. Nonetheless, the first time I saw one of those Cum sucking Whore titles, I was put off a lot. Even now they make me uncomfortable. I don't think it is appropriate. [Link]
Drew Black broken crankshaft 8011 Posts 9/99	Posted - Mar 16 2007 : 2:55PM Some of these ancient threads are entertaining. [Link]
phatbasey Senior Member 1390 Posts 1/05	Posted - May 12 2008 : 3:22PM I am bumping this because of a recent post in the Tricia thread and I find this topic interesting. [Link]
Creampie Caper Member Hot bitches cum filled................. 59 Posts 2/08	Posted - May 12 2008 : 3:28PM Just a quick webster check whore Audio Help /hɔr, hoʊr or, often, hʊər/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[hawr, hohr or, often, hoor] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation noun, verb, whored, whor·ing. –noun 1. a woman who engages in promiscuous sexual intercourse, usually for money; prostitute; harlot; strumpet. [Link]
wcw43921 Senior Member Look Into My Eyes-- 1252 Posts 4/08	Posted - May 12 2008 : 3:38PM My general thoughts on this subject. _________________________________________________________ "There can never be too many beautiful women Hypnotized for our pleasure." [Link]