Reviewers Recommend Big Wet Asses 34 - review by Captain Jack Director: Pat Myne Starring: Vince Karter, Zac Wild, Summer Vixen, Lilith Grace, River Lynn, Victor Ray, Tessa Thomas, Jay Romero. Read review
I know it's been some time, but I came across the original trailer for Romains of the Day starring Alice Romain, Sandra Romain, and Danny D. Since I've seen several scenes with sisters prior to and after that trailer I figured that it would have been released by now.
I don't understand why others have released theirs with no problem, but there's a problem with releasing Romains of the Day.
While you may have seen other scenes with sisters eating each other's pussies on other sites, you have not seen that on Brazzers.
They purged all of their content that was in any way 'questionable'. Non-consent, drug use, violence, all sorts of stuff. And you have to imagine that if they have a list somewhere of what's definitely not going on their site, sisters eating each other out is on that list.
Some have asked why haven't they released it without any of the sister-on-sister action? Well, two things:
1. There might be too much sister-on-sister action that no lengthy edit is possible with it removed, but also 2. Because we have already seen the trailer, if it was released all cut up with no sister-on-sister action in it, the uproar would be so, so much greater than the complaints they currently face over not having released it.
And finally a few people have asked why they don't release it on another platform? Well, if they did, it would create a deluge of requests for them to create more content like that. And that's obviously not the direction they're going. People who are ok with current Brazzers content would suddenly be not happy unless more sister-on-sister content came out.
So there's no upside to them pursuing it. It's better left at the bottom of the lake.
But my theory is that they wanted to shoot a sister scene, and contracted so-and-so to shoot it; but they weren't expecting the Romain sisters to go quite as far as they did. Maybe even the director didn't expect it, but while shooting it they thought it was gold. So the scene was shot, trailer uploaded, and then one of the higher-ups saw it for the first time and yanked the plug. I imagine the execs don't watch every trailer before it goes up.
Now, they should have had better mechanisms in place to make sure this didn't happen, but sometimes people fuck up. I think it's as simple as that.
You could be right. I'm hoping that someone from Brazzers or other people that are privy to exactly what the situation was explains it here. It's been an absolute head-scratcher for me for quite some time.
If I were the person in charge and legality isn't an issue, I would put out a site release stating that since the scene was shot, and the trailer was released, we'll go ahead and post the scene. However, this will be the first and only time such content will be on this site. So don't bother requesting that type of scene because it will be ignored.
I guarantee you, the day they ever decide to do that, their subscription numbers will increase.
[Link]
HellMax Deactivated User
12 Posts 6/21
Posted - Jun 18 2021 : 1:40PM
It should be released in the Europe they will not face any legal issues. Fans are waiting for this epic scene.
Think about a similar type of thing: a girl does an anal scene, and then decides no more anal. Are most people happy about it, or do they whine and swear they'll never watch another of her scenes? It's usually the second one, right?
That includes a lot of people who were happy watching her vag-only scenes. Now that they've had a taste of the anal one, vag-only is not good enough anymore. They want anal or nothing.
I think that, if the scene were released, people would love it, and if Brazzers refused to do any more, they would boycott the fuck out of the site.
I would be very surprised if that were to happen. Of course, you might have a few dunderheads that would go bonkers because they won't film any more scenes of that nature, but the vast majority of viewers wouldn't do that. They would understand and be ecstatic that Brazzers decided to do the right thing for their customers and post it.
I'm fairly certain if this were in Mediation, the result would be to post the scene with (along the lines of) the disclaimer I mentioned earlier. This way, it shows that they're willing to follow through with what they started, and it ends there.
Yet...So, all these new signups won't be wanting more? Really? If you believe that, go check out any star thread where she vaguely hinted anything that could be interpreted as anal, and see how many years her "fans" keep demanding she make good on her promise for.
The circumstances are very different. Obviously, I haven't seen every video on Brazzers, but from what I'm hearing, this is the only time they've shot and released (although partially) this type of content.
Anyone that is aware of the video knows that the dynamics of what happened is an aberration. So, therefore, only a fraction of viewers would be hounding the site for more such scenes even after a disclaimer on the site for the video is posted.
To make things go smoother, they can add a brief explanation about what happened for someone that is totally ignorant about the posting, and why it was taken down and then reposted in full.
P.S. Flash, I had to edit your post by removing the spacing to make it 2 lines instead of 3. For some reason, the entire quote would not show in the preview until I changed it.
I just assume they've been shooting twincest/sistercest scenes for a while and keeping them in the vault to release when needed or safe enough for them to do so. The dwarves dug greedily and deep for their hoard.Twins in porn who don't do twincest might be the minority.
