Here's another thing I don't understand. You have the most amazing, stunning, gorgeous girls on the planet, are enjoying their bodies in clear HD and then you see an ugly tattoo on her back, wrist, leg or other key body parts. My question is WHY???! That ruins/mars what is an otherwise PERFECT body. I mean if you like dolphins and butterflies then great, take a picture and frame it in your apartment. LOL why permanently scar your body with something so unsightly? In one of the Zero Tolerance extra features there was a scene with Lindsay Logan and they said they were going to have a no-tattoo rule when they realized there were only like 2 girls in the industry without tattoos. :( Porn shows a fantasy for us guys. Those of us who are into the young hardcore stuff 18+ really like the perception of innocence in these young hotties. Seeing the body we are practically worshipping with an ugly tattoo sort of flies in the face of that fantasy. :( P.S. Certain piercings are actually ok, I think the tattoos are the worst.
[Link]
Mojo Deactivated User
1223 Posts 9/03
Posted - Mar 19 2010 : 6:57AM
There's actually a thread about this subject already. But I have to say I can't agree with you more. How often have I seen a beautiful girl and then found that she's got a massive zit of ink on her body somewhere, more often than not in a place that's easily noticable. Tats on a beautiful girl is akin doing graffiti on the Mona Lisa. Disgusting things, especially when placed on a beautiful woman (ie. a work of art).
I think if the girl is really flawless I'd rather NOT see ANY tattoos on her body,however if she is cute but not goddess material it does not bother nearly as much.I don't hate tattos ( I have A LOT on me ) nor avoid girls with tattoos ( my GF has a 3 ) but I do strongly dis-like tattoos on girl's feet,butt or lower back. I too like teen porn ( 18+ ) and I agree w/ OP that it somewhat ruins my fantasy if a beautiful teen has a ton of tattoos.Also,I like redheads with porcelain white skin and I agree if her body is perfect why mess with it ? WHY ?!!!
Though she is retired, Julia Bond had some horrible looking tats during her last few scenes. She looked like she was trying to become the female version of Wesley Pipes!!!
Relating to porn and non-porn: I like tattoos if they are like an "accessory". Similar to an ear piercing. My current TA has her name written in Arabic on her wrist and has cool black widow tattoo on her shoulder blade. It looks nice on her because it isn't garish or "busy". What I don't like are the menagerie of tattoos especially sleeves and belly tattoos. Don't like tattoos on biceps either b/c it smacks of butch biker chick. But working on a colllege campus, (where I get another year older and the girls stay 18-25 a la Wooderson in Dazed & Confused), I would say (exluding foreign students) 1 out of 3 have visible tattoos in either my classes or in the Student Union. Caveat: love Kat Von D and would love to see her fully tattooed body in all its naked and pierced glory. Plus best tattoo I saw recently having breakfast. Big heavyset girl with massive arms who had the Creature of the Black Lagoon between a girl's legs. Hilariously clever
[Link]
Mojo Deactivated User
1223 Posts 9/03
Posted - Mar 19 2010 : 4:02PM
Although I hate tats full stop, if a girl has to have them I don't mind if they're tiny and out of the way. At the risk of sounding obsessed Sophie Dee's tats aren't a turn off even though they're in plain sight. The reason is 'cause 1. They're only tiny and 2. her bod and face are more than enough to take my mind off them.
I guess my difficulty with this is that these girls and their makeup people and photographers and everyone put everything into making these girls look appealing to men. Yet if you poll men (I did this one time on another forum) and ask if they prefer a woman with or without tattoos, about 70-75% of respondents said they preferred he to be all-natural with NO tattoos. Earrings are okay. It's just that tattoos seem to contradict all the hard work everyone is doing to make these girls look so amazing.
Because they are living their lives and not yours. They express themselves in the ways they want and in my opinion, they aren't marring themselves. Unless they go for something trite or completely stupid, I have no problem with tattoos. I like them actually.
At least piercings can be removed but tatoos I don't understand as most of the pictures portrayed are really poor. A gun pointing down at your pussy or a capital letter F does nothing imo to make you sexy. Even seen a set of wings on the small of the back, whats the point, they should be baned from porno or given a seperate catorgory so as not to see it unless it's a personal choice,,,pay these girls a fraction of the norm and we would soon see this horrible trend eradicated.
Jesus, you guys are fucking ridiculous. You don't like something, fine, but you take it to an extreme advocating practices to discriminate against performers for doing what they want with THEIR bodies and then to suggest that they should be ostracized by limiting them to a small niche. Kind of reminds me of these corporations who force employees to cover up their tattoos, because they might upset someone's delicate sensibilities. Grow the fuck up. Let's just be clear. This is your problem, not theirs and if you don't like it, vote with your wallet or go the fuck away. No one is forcing you to watch.
^Corporations and thier decisions are rarely wrong hence their profit margins and there heads are hand picked to make maximum profit making decisions. Porn is no different, beeing asked to cover up tatoos in the interest of the masses has to be surely the right decision in terms of profits. What have personal decisions got to do with it? Your a pornstar where the majority of viewers don't want to see tats so don't have them if you want to be a mainstream star,,,however there is a tat market out there that you can make your money from and also those that don't give a shit but in the main it's not liked so it's upto you if you have a tat but you know the score free country and all. As for being my problem and not thiers I could not agree more just would like to Know before I buy a movie that tatoos are featured so at least I would then have a choice not to buy so I could "go the fuck away" as you put it.
I used to not like tats at all but now sometimes find them sexy/intriguing. But agree that there should be some tat free porn out there for people who have an aversion to them. And performers always could choose to wait until after they retire to get them done.
I don't mind small tattoos as long as they aren't located in certain places on the body but I also respect the fact that any performer can choose to get a smal to all back tattoo. That's why I agree with this statement. If I don't like the tattoo(s) then I won't watch or buy the movie. It's too bad if a girl that likes tattoos looses work because of them but that's the name of the game. Most of us have certain expectations in our job and if one of our choice affects our ability to meet those ecpectations then it's our decision whether we chage jobs or curbe that choice.
[Link]
Mojo Deactivated User
1223 Posts 9/03
Posted - Mar 20 2010 : 1:30PM
What would happen if I went to work as a TV presenter and decided to "express myself" by dressing in a Nazi uniform and have a giant Swastika tattooed to my face? "Oh, it's okay boss, I'm just expressing myself!" Edited by - Mojo on 3/20/2010 1:34:21 PM
Alright folks, there's another ongoing thread that's basically the same thing, so even though this one has a few responses already, I'm going to send you all to that one instead. Please continue your discussion here: Adult DVD Talk Forum Topic
Anniversary Lessons - review by Captain Jack
Posted - Mar 18 2010 : 10:26PM
