What have studios done that made you never want to buy another movie from them. This happened recently with white ghetto and their movie basement tapes (not to be confused with the gay title of the same name) available at adultdvdempire. The box cover showed a very popular euro actress with a full bush, but in actuallity the bush turned out to be a merkin (pubic wig). WTH. Your experiences?
Private going couples-appeal years ago. I will never buy their movies again! I want the old Private back like from the early/mid 90's. Ed Powers going condoms-only was also a reason never to buy a movie from him again!
When Fanta Dream put not one but TWO watermark ads through the entire film in After School 6. They put one in the top left corner and one in the bottom right. Wow just wow.
Just to counter-balance "mapofhawaii": Vivid. But IMO, for trying to go gonzo with anals, multiple guys on one girl, rougher sex. They've alienated/lost their couples customers, lost most of their contract girls who still had "life" in their careers. And, can't keep their Replacement Vivid Girls--who keep asking out of their contracts before their time is up. Today, Vivid is only making money because of their old material--that they re-issue in endless comps, and on their website.
Bang Bros. I've known for awhile that they sometimes edit their web scenes (usually shortening them) before putting 'em on DVD. But in Ass Parade 13, they took false advertising to another level. A whole segment of the scene, Sheila Marie in CG, is missing...even though she's prominently displayed riding CG on the DVD back cover. What took the cake though is that they had an animated chapter stop SHOWING her riding CG on her scene's menu but not one second of her in CG in the actual scene. Hustler did the same thing with Jenni Lee's scene in Barely Legal #71 (riding RCG on the cover but no RCG in the actual scene). I won't buy from either of these companies ever again.
I have my favorite studios and they are pretty high up on the yaynow good list for me. I'd say the studios that would be C-list and just shovel scenes onto a disc without much in the way of chapter stops. Or just one chapter stop for each girl. That doesn't work. It's 2007, DVDs have been authored and mass marketed for a decade. Intro - tease - BJ - penetration - postion switch 1 2 and 3 - cumshot! They all need to be a chapter.
Well, Derek117 might perhaps answer himself, but I think I know what he's after. Vivid has started to go more gonzo in their approach to sex. Not gonzo enough to win over the gonzo crowd, who hate them anyway, but quite likely gonzo enough to push away the couples-porn crowd (many of which, amazingly enough, find atms and such stuff gross). They are currently trying to go after two demographics, but might very well find themsevles with none. They still have their older material, but given its incredibly shoddy picture quality, it will probably become increasingly harder to sell to a market gearing towards hd-tv.
thats silly why wouldn't you want to encourage condom use in porn i know it's a fantasy but condom use would cut down the std issues in porn dramatically ...i for one give a shit about the men and women in this industry ...it's like the elephant in the room folks don't want to discuss but hey guess what it's there i love rough nasty sex thats' who i 'am as a sexual entity however ...i wish testing was full proof but it's not and we probably should all be using condoms in this business but it's the fans... the folks who spend the money who dictate what they want to see so i 'm just saying... the fuck junkie ♠
If I ever hear of a company forcing women to do shit they never agreed to do, it makes me a very reluctant future customer.
[Link]
Hypermastia Deactivated User
These R The Buttocks Of Ryan Star: No Butt Can Compare 248 Posts 6/07
Posted - Nov 13 2007 : 11:12PM
I bought some of Vivid's titles with the Luv twins when they were only doing movies for that label Lame Lame Lame: Lame Camera Angles, Lame Lighting, Lame STories Of Course, The Male Talent Is Pathetic, The Sex is barely XXX in my book False Advertisind does occur here and there: Blowjob Fantasies #22 featured Sammie Rhodes name as well as her photo on the cover; the Hottest Girl in the cast list and she's nowhere to be found:( [Usually Metro/Amazing Titles Are Great] With the Reality Kings, I noticed something that may bother some buyers (though probably next to none.) The Reality kings seem to make Top Notch stuff, except for this 1 thing (and they are not the only studio guilty of this). The did in fact wildly manipulate the images of the girls on the cover of "Extreme Naturals 1". Sara Stone Does Have Huge B(oYo)BS.....but the cover of EN#1 exxagerates them to circus freak size. (This doesn't really both me to tell you the truth; I'm getting a little off track here. The situation with too many labels to list is far worse with girls asses on the covers of bubble butt movies (the label adjusts the photo to the point that the ass is Way Too Flawless and round (sometimes you look on the back and the action shots clearly show that the girl on cover has a big round ass.....but not THAT big and round (sell that DVD at all costs) note: this computer created, pixelated exaggeration of even the most famous stars is far more rampant on the internet. Most Blatant Example: Bang Brothers' Big Tits and Round Asses Website. If you've watched these girls in many other movies, you know they have huge boobs; just not Circus Freak Sized (thank GAWD!) Again, this really doesn't bother me, so I guess I've completely strayed from the topic. I rate The Bang Bros.' "Boob Squad" The Best All-Natural Big Boob Series Available. Also they may exaggerate the Mammary(oYo)Glands on the initial internet photo advertisements for each episode of Big Tits Round Asses, but they actually show a very graphic, very long, and Very Free preview of the movie you will see (and you will see the shocking truth: Giana is A DDD at best, not an EEE). Note, the Bang Brothers offer these generous previews for Every Single Scene They Have Available On Big Tits/Round Asses......I've spent hours at a time at just that site alone. I've watched several Extreme Associates DVDs. Wasn't impressed. Like they try too hard to be the Hardest. I have nothing against people who adore super hardcore like Max Hardcore. It's just not for me......the stills from his movies alone. As far as any Company going too far? You can never go too far as long as everything is legal.
The only company that has ever done anything to make me not want to watch any of their product ever is JM Productions. I've never seen any of their titles but after the way their owner handled himself here I have no interest in giving him any money.
I, for one, don't mind condoms in porn movies at all, as long as condoms don't slow down the sex action. Actually, I would be happy if everyone in porn movies started to use condoms. That's because with reduced risk of STD's, a lot more very attractive women would probably be willing to perform in adult films. It's the best-looking women who sell porn films. And higher quality of women in porn might actually attract more men to watching porn movies. The porn market will expand. And the whole porn idustry would become more porfitable than it is now. Now that I think of it, good use of condoms in porn movies might actually improve the sex action and make it more hot too. When a guy puts on two or three condoms at once. Then his sensitivity goes down quite a bit. And as long as he uses lots of lubrication. He can blast the sexy lady's ass to kingdom cum as hard as he can and not worry about cumming too quickly on her. Using condoms like that, you can end up with some really spectacular sex action that simply wouldn't be possible without the use of condoms.
The use of condoms takes away the reality for me that's why I hate to watch it. Perhaps that's a selfish point of view but then again it us my point of view as a customer and I only want to buy movies I know I will enjoy.
Perhaps my reality is a little different from yours. I use condoms every time in my personal life. And I'm so used to using condoms that watching porn actors have all kinds of unsafe sex looks a little strange and dangerous to me. It's something I would be scared to do in my personal life. Perhaps a part of the problem with using condoms in porn and everywhere else is that condoms can make sex problems, when they are not used well. I found from my own experience that condoms they way they are sold are not fully ready for use. Without lathering up liberal dozes of water based lubricant on the condom, the condom quickly dries out and makes sex uncomfortable, especially for the lady. Dry rubber is what you use to stop your car on the road. And that's the kind of effect dry rubber has on sexual intercourse too. But if you take this lubrication problem into account and use lots of water based lubricant. Then sex can be just as good with a condom as without it.
Condoms are in my opinion a very big turn off.I only watch gonzo porn and there almost all companies have a no condom policy. So you know you will never see any condoms. There are many very attractive women in porn movies, who never fuck with condoms.As I said before the quality of women in porn is very high.Condomless sex is hotter. It is more real and more intensive. I like to see a bare cock fuck a girl's pussy and ass. I like it when there is skin-to-skin contact between the performers. And remember porn is fantasy and in my fantasies condoms don't exist, so I also don't wanna see them in porn. Edited by - blueyonder on 11/14/2007 2:23:00 PM
Ive seen 3 movies, a terrible bukkake gang bang, where 2 of 3 actresses werent enjoying it at the slightest minimum, a horror porn movie and a pseudo-rape movie, where the actress cries out her soul. I was astonished, that this is possible in US porn ( but later read, that they had and have quite a few legal troubles ), but I will never rent any movie from JM Prod. again. Also GGG/666/JT/Sexbox/Pissbox etc. - terrible women degrading stuff. The germans invented a word for this "Fabrikporno". A cheaply made porn film, that looks, like it was made in a fabric. And also very cheaply fabricated. Edited by - Caroline-NL on 11/14/2007 2:51:58 PM
Perhaps you are right. But what I don't like is the complete lack of tolerance for condoms in the porn industry. Not everyone feels the same way about it. And I see no good reason why those who don't like condoms should impose their point of view on everyone. People should be free to choose. Those who feel ok with condomless sex, should be free to perform in porn movies without condoms. And those who want to protect themselves, should also be free to perform in porn movies with condoms. If such choice was available. Then perhaps some of the more sexy ladies in porn (such as Gianna and others) would be more willing to perform anal sex. I remember from a long time ago how a very sexy lady of her time, Samantha Strong, one day relented on her pussy-only vow and had anal sex with a condom. If condoms were more accepted in the porn industry, then perhaps some of the modern-day beauties would also follow Samantha's example. I, for one, would rather see Gianna have anal sex with a condom, than have no anal sex at all. I think this lack of tolerance for condoms is bad for everyone in the porn industry, including the porn fans.
I have no problem with companies shooting movies in which the performers use condoms. I only will never buy them.Okay, but if a porn star is performing in gonzo movies, he/she knows that condoms aren't allowed there. Porn stars who wanna use condoms should perform in feature movies and not in gonzo movies. I think there isn't a big market for condom movies. If many people liked condom movies, more of these movies would be made. Edited by - blueyonder on 11/14/2007 4:03:10 PM
As we all know these "condom" movies make little sense anyway. The oral is always without the condom, just the intercoarse part is protected. And the money shot is condomless, usually on the face or in the mouth. So does that make sense? Still a risk factor. I think they do it just to get the watchdogs off their back.
Anyway, back to the topic: Don't like JM videos. they disappoint too much.
[Link]
eyeballs a bleeding Deactivated Again
181 Posts 9/07
Posted - Nov 15 2007 : 2:55PM
That's a good point. Why is it okay for the oral part of the scene to be rubber less and then the fucking is rubbered? What's the point? Is it okay for the girl to get mouth herpes but not vag herpes? To quote the late great Wendy O. Williams, "if it's not clean enough to stick in your mouth, don't take it home and sleep with it!" I agree with an above quote about the performers feeling free to insist on a rubber. Wear 10 rubbers for all I care. I just won't rent of watch it. I hate rubbers in my life, why would I want to watch them in porn?
I didn't even know there was such a thing as a merkin, and in one post I learn of their existence and of the fact that certain people rabidly despise them. My day is complete.
Merkins are quite old, I know they were used in the 1600's by prostitutes to hide stds and/or to keep the natural look but prevent lice from spreading.
as far as condoms go. the reason they use condoms for anal/vaginal and not oral is because no one i nthe history of history has been known to contract HIV through oral sex. Doctors say it can happen , but the U.N health board said the chances are less than 1percent which is why HIV is not really a problem in the lesbian community. also the condom is their to protect the actors from genital herpes. The aim test that most performers use do not test for herpes genital or anal warts, or HPV which is why these diseases are rampant in the industry. They only test for HIV gonnareah, and chylamadia. so the extra condom protects the performers from some of the diseases the test does not screen for. now the the female performer can still catch oral herpes from the male, but atleast she is safe from genital herpes. I do think there should be more pro-condom companies like sasha said, but my concern is that alot of companies will just say forget the aim test and go condom because its cheaper and I think that might cause more problems it should Aim test + condoms.
[Link]
Mr. Sausage Deactivated User
330 Posts 11/06
Posted - Nov 15 2007 : 7:06PM
Because it can and has. Don't believe the UN. :/ Anyway, with oral you can contract herpes and so on. What if the condom breaks or has a leak....? They might as well not use them. I don't like them in porn. I don't like them period.
[Link]
john45 arthur again
26 Posts 4/07
Posted - Nov 18 2007 : 7:09AM
I've also gone off Private. They seem very tame these days. The production is great, the performers attractive...but the sex lacks raunch and heat. The performers look as if they can't wait to pick up their pay.