All Forums > Tech Talk > Tech Talk Forum Page 32 > talk me out of an HD-DVD player
AuthorPost
ObiBong
Senior Member


1162 Posts
12/02
Posted - Jul 17 2007 : 2:20AM
OK, the price on a refurb Toshiba HD-A2 at tigerdirect.com is down to $199.99, which is a magic number I have trouble ignoring. Is there a good reason I wouldn't do this?
Harri Patel
Senior Member

#SDNY he's all yours. -- Michael Steele
5110 Posts
3/03
Posted - Jul 17 2007 : 2:32AM
"Refurb" = All they do is repackage stuff that's been returned by someone else. You never know what you're getting.
There, did that work?
ObiBong
Senior Member

1162 Posts
12/02
Posted - Jul 17 2007 : 2:53AM
Not really. I've had excellent luck in the past with refurb products. I acknowledge the potential risk but consider it small.
My unfamiliarity with the retailer is probably the best target area. At that price point I probably don't care if Blu-Ray wins in the long term, and reviews of the product seem positive enough.
Edited by - obibong on 7/17/2007 2:55:10 AM
Harri Patel
Senior Member

#SDNY he's all yours. -- Michael Steele
5110 Posts
3/03
Posted - Jul 17 2007 : 3:41AM
Those thieves want $36.56 to ship one of those via UPS Ground to my zip code. Which is not on Mars or anything.
Surely that worked?
ObiBong
Senior Member

1162 Posts
12/02
Posted - Jul 17 2007 : 3:53AM
Well it got me off that retailer. From one of the "other" sellers on Amazon I can get it new for $228.99, shipping included. Thinking, thinking.
 
Bill All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

5334 Posts
6/00
Posted - Jul 17 2007 : 8:55PM
The biggest problem that I had due to purchasing an HD DVD player is that, because I no longer wanted to watch SD DVD's that I ended up also buying a Blu-ray player.
The ability to rent disc as a local store is very limited for both formats (although most Blockbusters are currently stocking about 50 Blu-ray discs). If you go with either format, you should plan on joining Netflix or Blockbuster Total Access (if you don't already belong).
I went with Blockbuster for the ability to return discs at the store and get a free rental in exchange. One of the Blockbusters near me was one of the High Def test stores. So they have a really good selection of Blu-ray discs and a so-so selection of HD DVD's. I've been getting HD DVD's online and getting free Blu-ray rentals at the store when I return the HD DVD's.
As far as refurbished equipment is concerned, I agree with ObiBong. They are usually a great deal. You always know that a refurb will work when you get it home because every one of them has been tested. I've had nothing but success with refurbished equipment.
Johnothan Pedak
Senior Member

Catastrophe
1594 Posts
6/07
Posted - Jul 18 2007 : 9:41PM
I say buy it as an upconverting DVD player that also plays HD. And at that price it won't hurt if Blu-Ray does win.
skronker
Notable Legendary Icon

Scopophiliac
9780 Posts
9/02
Posted - Jul 19 2007 : 2:18AM
Most of what I want to see isn't on HD or Blu-Ray so it's a non-starter. Shit, I still haven't watched all my old Laserdiscs yet. I'd rather have an iPhone.
Rotted Brain
New Member

4 Posts
7/07
Posted - Jul 20 2007 : 3:04PM
Blu-Ray is a better quality format from a technical standpoint. That doesn't mean they'll win out though, Beta was better than VHS, but it still lost. Although, so far Blu-Ray seems to be doing better in the market. Also Blu-Ray is from Sony and HD is from the evil empire, Microsoft.
Bill All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

5334 Posts
6/00
Posted - Jul 21 2007 : 10:39AM
This is true only "on paper". Blu-ray hasn't implemented the features that makes it the better format yet. People, such as myself, could be completely screwed when the future incarnations of the Blu-ray spec are implemented.
Future Blu-ray players are required to have significantly more memory than the current players do and will need to be internet enabled (which most, if not all HD DVD players already are). When (if?) these new players come out, it's a good bet that disc manufacturers will take advantages of the features that the new players will allow for. When that happens, the early adopters could be screwed.
If the Blu-ray Disc Association decides not to screw the early adopters, then Blu-ray will not be technically better than HD DVD.
EvilMonkey
Member

55 Posts
9/06
Posted - Jul 21 2007 : 2:33PM
Well, the issue is the HD DVD spec was finalized before anything was ever released. Every (every single one) is required to support all features, and that includes an ethernet port for internet connectivity. Also, to correct a point, HD DVD is from Toshiba (not Microsoft), although MS is a supporter obviously. Every single HD DVD player out today will play every single HD DVD disc from now through the end of time.
Sony on the other hand, in their rush to get to market as to not give HD DVD a lead, did not have time to finalize their spec. Thus the players aren't required to support all features, and don't need an internet connection. This is also going to screw over all early adopters who bought players when the 1.1 spec is finalized in November. No players (other than the PS3 probably, although it hasn't been officially confirmed) will be able to take advantage of the spec. They'll still play the movie, but anything coded in BD-J (such as the PIP commentaries and many other special features) won't work.
Also, although Blu-Ray currently appears to have momentum, keep the following in mind:
1) It's due to the PS3 surge. Now that sales have leveled off, that surge is over, and I expect HD DVD to close the gap due to lower cost players and attach rates. Take a look at amazon's top sellers in the DVD player section, the HD DVD player is always #1 or close to it, while the Blu-Ray players are way down the list. With attach rates (number of discs bought per player), the PS3 needs to sell about 9 units to equal the disc sales of one HD DVD player. Once prices go down on HD DVD players and reach that magical consumer-friendly $199, they'll fly off shelves.
2) There are going to be a lot of pissed off Blu-Ray owners when they buy a $500 player today that's "obsolete" in November.
3) The sales numbers for both formats are pathetic. They account for less than 1% of the market. When Blu Ray outsells HD DVD discs for any given week, it's by a few thousand units. We're talking sales of Pirates of the Carribbean 1 and 2 COMBINED selling around 47,000 copies. It's pathetic. When you hear numbers like Blu-Ray outselling them 60-40%, you're talking a few thousand units, not hundreds of thousands.
4) HD DVD is outselling Blu-Ray in Europe and many other places.
5) HD DVD is region free. I own quite a few Blu-Ray "exclusives" on HD DVD because I import them from Europe, where a different distributer has the rights.
6) HD DVD and Amazon reached an agreement to release 1000 independent films on HD DVD using their "burn to order" process. Most small studios can't afford the license for Blu-Ray or HD DVD, so this will get independent movies in line.
7) Despite Sony's impressive list of studios, HD DVD has Universal. Despite being one studio, Universal is HUGE and in terms of numbers, their library is comparable to all of Blu-Ray's studios combined. Plus studios like Fox and Disney, while supporting Blu-Ray, aren't really releasing anything.
8) Blu-Ray appears to have more current blockbuster or mainstream movies, while HD DVD seems to have more classics.
9) Blu-Ray looks better on paper, but the specs have yet to bear this out. In terms of both picture quality and audio quality, they are even. Keep in mind King Kong is a 3 1/2 movie and fits on one HD DVD and is considered a reference PQ and AQ disc. Also, HD DVD is supposedly making a 50GB disc soon which will take that advantage away from Blu-Ray. Also, while Blu-Ray has a higher bit-rate, they use a different encode. A higher storage capacity and bit-rate doesn't automatically equate to a better product due to the encode used. HD DVD has managed to use the encode VC-1 which uses less space and requires less bitrate, while producing the same quality.
10) HD DVD has porn. Sweet sweet porn.
IMO, both formats will be around a long time, and are in very serious danger of simply becoming a niche product. Since HD DVD currently has about 40% market share, I don't see them rolling over anytime soon.
Don't want to sound like an HD DVD fanboy as I own both formats, but IMO you can't go wrong with either format. I just can't recommend buying a Blu-Ray player until November, other than the PS3 of course.
If you are really worried, wait 4 or 5 months when both formats come out guns blazing for Christmas and see what the war looks like in January.
Edited by - evilmonkey on 7/21/2007 2:34:44 PM
Edited by - evilmonkey on 7/21/2007 2:38:12 PM
Bill All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

5334 Posts
6/00
Posted - Jul 21 2007 : 3:13PM
This part is only partially correct. Blu-ray discs can be either MPEG-4 or VC-1. At first, Blu-ray was only going to support MPEG-4. But some, in the Blu-ray Disc Association, correctly pointed out that this would negate a good amount of the space advantage that the BDA was touting as an advantage over HD DVD.
The BDA subsequenly accepted VC-1 as a supported codec. It's up to the disc manufacurer which codec to use.
VC-1 is the only supported HD codec for HD DVD.
Neither codec produces a better picture. VC-1 does a better job of compression than MPEG-4 does.
ObiBong
Senior Member

1162 Posts
12/02
Posted - Jul 24 2007 : 6:23PM
Poor planning: My HD player arrived from an Amazon partner today.
My first discs haven't arrived from Amazon yet.
Bill All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

5334 Posts
6/00
Posted - Jul 24 2007 : 8:13PM
If you plan on connecting your new player to the Internet, go ahead and do it now in order to update your firmware. If you don't plan on connecting it to the Internet, go here to download the most current firmware and the burn it to CD.
ChrisInCali
New Member

4 Posts
5/07
Posted - Jul 29 2007 : 4:23PM
I'd go Blu-ray if I were you. I started out with an HD DVD player because it was cheaper, but over time I realized there were just too many titles on Blu-ray I wanted, and that HD DVD was more than likely going to lose.
 
kenny62
Member

21 Posts
11/02
Posted - Sep 3 2007 : 9:59PM
Blu-Ray is tailored to the 15-to-35-year-old-male demographic (because the installed base of players is overwhelmingly PS3).
For those seeking other than popcorn flicks, HD-DVD is a better bet. Players are $200 cheaper (and the technology is more stable), and, being cheaper to replicate, the format is more conducive to catalog titles. And, HD-DVD is the choice for XXX, as Sony and Disney have made replication of adult fare on Blu-Ray difficult.
HD-DVD has some significant advantages over Blu-Ray, and the decision of Paramount and Dreamworks to abandon Blu-Ray to concentrate their high-definition media efforts exclusively on HD-DVD has given new impetus to the format. Couple that with $200 MSRP street price Chinese HD-DVD players coming to a store near you this Chrismas season, and the format war isn't over, by a long shot!



Jump To: