The graphic nature of porn | Porn Fan Community Forum

Participate...

log in
register

Browse...

Etiquette
Active Topics
Popular Topics
Member List
Search

All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 204 > The graphic nature of porn

Author	Post
prophetman13 Member 289 Posts 8/07	Posted - Apr 27 2015 : 11:48PM Clearly over the years porn has gotten more graphic. Do you think this is good? Also - do you wish porn was more graphic, less graphic or is good as is. For me, i definitely think its a good thing. Could even handle it if porn was more explicit/graphic. [Link]
Mister Fahrenheit All-Star Member Meh 4655 Posts 10/13	Posted - Apr 28 2015 : 12:19AM Sure, I like that the sex is now more explicit and lovingly documented. But I've found I have my limits. When I would check out Mike Adriano's stuff it felt less like watching porn and more like watching a gynecological exam. Not my thing. [Link]
misspornUSA Senior Member I ♥ the male gaze (and Palestine). 8737 Posts 11/13	Posted - Apr 28 2015 : 12:23AM ^^OP. could you give a few examples of what you mean by explicit/graphic? [Link]
N00dlesDaddy Senior Member Layla...got me on my knees... 1793 Posts 7/13	Posted - Apr 28 2015 : 1:32AM prophetman13 wrote: do you wish porn was more graphic Click to expand Erm, how could it possibly get more graphic without venturing into illegal territory? I love porn but, boy, does it suffer from the law of diminishing returns. [Link]
whitewalker Member 25 Posts 4/13	Posted - Apr 28 2015 : 2:05AM Honestly, i am trying to limit my porn intake and eventually quit it altogether because it's fucked my psychological up in certain ways and what i am expecting from girls in real life sex. I do think the more graphic scenes are giving younger guys a false impression of how sex should be, so there's more cases of young women being abused during sex and doing stuff they're not comfortable with. Sometimes you just gotta know where the limit is tbh. [Link]

wanka Senior Member 1678 Posts 5/13	Posted - Apr 28 2015 : 2:14AM ^ Or the more "graphic" sex is also changing the way women view sex and are more willing to have rougher sex. Wait who am i kidding [:p)] [Link]
Dan Senior Member 2056 Posts 6/07	Posted - Apr 28 2015 : 5:51AM prophetman13 wrote: Clearly over the years porn has gotten more graphic. Do you think this is good? Also - do you wish porn was more graphic, less graphic or is good as is. For me, i definitely think its a good thing. Could even handle it if porn was more explicit/graphic. Click to expand I think porn needs to be graphic for it to work at all. Because porn is sex for show. The viewer needs to see what the guy is doing with the lady, or else their sex becomes a private enjoyment for the lady and the guy but not for the viewer. I'd say that porn still has some way to go in showing everything that the viewer might want to see. For example, you almost never see guys spread their lady's pussy-lips with the V of their fingers. It doesn't take much for a guy to reach his lady's pussy with his hand and flash it open with the V of his fingers once in a while. This is something graphic for the viewer to see, and it probably is enjoyable for the lady too. I know from my own experience that at least some ladies enjoy the feel of such pussy-stretching. The only time when graphic sex doesn't work well is when it's not enjoyable for the lady so much that the viewer can see it. Porn sex needs to be as graphic as you can make it, as long as it's enjoyable for the lady. Because her not enjoying it is a turn off in itself. It defeats the whole purpose of being graphic, which is to turn on the viewer. [Link]
BlackSix All-Star Member pornography wasn't sex but fantasies of an impossibly hospitable world 12377 Posts 9/07	Posted - Apr 28 2015 : 6:01AM Mister Fahrenheit wrote: Sure, I like that the sex is now more explicit and lovingly documented. But I've found I have my limits. When I would check out Mike Adriano's stuff it felt less like watching porn and more like watching a gynecological exam. Not my thing. Click to expand Ditto. Things are a lot better than the late 80s and 90s when meat shots dominated to such a degree that John Waters accurately described most porn as looking like open heart surgery rather than sex. Also have never liked some of the odder camera angle decisions, like blowjobs shot from below so we're looking at the guys balls and taint and just the women's chin. The best directors mix it up with full body shots, close-ups and what have you. That can be just as sexy as you see the reactions, can see the woman's face and the flesh jiggling, etc. Edited by - BlackSix on 4/28/2015 6:03:15 AM [Link]
prophetman13 Member 289 Posts 8/07	Posted - Apr 28 2015 : 12:13PM misspornUSA wrote: ^^OP. could you give a few examples of what you mean by explicit/graphic? Click to expand Porn has gotten more visually explicit. What I mean is we are now given countless hours of bj and penetration shots where ass, pussy and dick are easily viewed. If you go back to the 80s you will find a lot less of these types of shots. Just think - men in porn now shave their pubic hair so the penetration can be more easily seen. [Link]

All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 204The graphic nature of porn

Previous topic: Cheerleader Confessions (2000) Vivian Valentine (topic moved)
Next topic: getting into porn (not fucking)

Link to this post

Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post.

URL of this thread

Link to this post with HTML

Link to this post with Forum Code