GOLDEN SHOWERS! RIM JOBS! SQUIRTING AS AN ART RATHER THAN A REACTION TO SEXUAL ACTIVITY! Let's be honest, this is nasty! And I'd rather kiss a woman who just swallowed my Cum more than one I just deposited bodily waste on or in. Or who had her tongue in my ass!
What I hate to see - Rosebuds. Never got it why people found this attractive to see.
and I would also like to see more girls with shaved head looks and also more with dreadlocks. I only have seen Indica Flower with dreadlocks in regular porn. Some would say Kira Noir has dreads but that for me is more Braids and not truelly dreadlocks
I'm with you though it's spitting generally, not just while giving head. Spitting in mouths is a serious turn-off for me. Hell, as strange as this sounds, I don't even like it when a girl is rimming a guy and she spits on his asshole.I get that. As with spitting, above, we all have things that some people love and some abhor. Unfortunately, as much as I dislike spitting, it occurs often and I just ignore it. I don't know if there are sites that focus on spitting (it wouldn't be something I look for) but with rimming, there are sites that focus on it (Girls Rimming and Rim 4K are examples) and sites where it isn't the primary focus but occurs in most scenes (Hookup Hotshot, older Mike Adriano scenes, See Him Fuck, etc.) so you can avoid a lot of it that way. Personally, I'm a big fan and look for it. It takes all interests, I guess. Porn would be boring without all of us having our kinks and fetishes.
What Have You Done To My Little Cable Boy? 2966 Posts 5/10
Posted - Feb 5 2026 : 1:04PM
Aging male directors who continue to push their way into every scene, even though they haven't belonged in front of the camera for a long time and basically just ruin potentially great scenes.If their dicks were at least half as big as their egos, I'd probably be only half as critical.
In a way this thread is something of a moanfest but, since there seems to be a general agreement among posters that one man's poison is another man's medicine, the overall tone of the contributions is surprisingly civilised for the internet.
Anyway, I don't know how, in my previous post when I enumerated a litany of porn gripes, I came to overlook the following bugbear - possibly because I don't feel I spend too much time avoiding such scenes (so maybe there is already less of it than I imagine). Nonetheless, if I know the scene is going to include squirting, I don't watch. As with all kinks and fetishes people's mileage may vary.
This is unfortunately becoming more and more of a major thing at the one site I'm still subscribing to. It *could* be hot *IF* it was a spontaneous, candid thing the performers were into, but watching it feels more like a mandatory meme from the List of Mandatory Memes That Have to Be Checked Off in a Scene, like scissoring. Super fast-forward-worthy.The thing about "squirting" for me is the insistence that it's something it isn't: magical, unknowable woman-semen. Would I still skip it if they advertised it as "chicks pissing on the furniture for some reason?" Yes, but the fakery in insisting it's "cum" is part of the nuisance. I could sort of describe it as the the chest implants of sex acts.
I don't know how I neglected to mention this too. I fancy myself a porn collector though porn hoarder may be a more accurate description. At any given time, there are models I'm a bit obsessed with and will join sites just to get their scenes, but if the scene or movie indicates that "squirting" is a big part of the theme, then I skip it. I fully accept that everyone is entitled to have his or her own interests, but this one completely escapes me. I say this as someone with a mild interest in peeing videos too. As Girl Crazy says, just call it what it is. There's a market for it among people who aren't deluding themselves into thinking it is something it isn't.
A small but annoying thing about photos where the model is on her behind, nude, and showing her face, chest and legs spread displaying her pussy in all its beauty. The anoying thing is that the photographer will blurr her face but leave pussy clear. Why not just have a clear face and a clear pussy to let the viewer enjoy her beautiful face and gorgeous pussy at the same time, let us enjoy face and pussy together ! Maybe the photographer is trying to be "arty" with the blurring, but the point of porn is to reveal feminine beauty.
From the OF world, I could so with less dildo-sucking. I just don't understand how that's a turnon for the doer or the viewer. And there's a lot of girls dressed up in Spiderman or looking like Velma. I get neither.
In mainstream: - All the step-relative scenes. It just gets creepy. - Cuck scenes. It's not that I don't understand the appeal to some, but there are so many. I often wonder whether the market for either is that big, or whether we consume it because that's what's being produced.
Also: - FMF scenes where there's virtually no interaction between the guy and both girls simultaneously. I'm particular fond of one girl teabagging a guy whole he fucks the other, and cumshots where the guy pulls out of doggie and 'splodes on the face of the teabagger. I don't see a of that. I do see a lot of one girl off to the side playing with herself while the other gets fucked, and a lot of one girl in cowgirl while the other places her hands on the former's buttcheeks. Meh to both. I don't invest in a lot of MFM because there's not much for the niche I'm in.
- Cumshots from under the chin so that you can see the boogers in her nose.
- The combination of defective or fucked-til-its-gone makeup, bad skin, and high resolution. I know these are real girls and some have real skin issues, but, if the idea is to make them as beautiful as possible, better makeup and photography would help.
- The occasional girl who becomes really big and then decides that, despite the success that her body and face have brought her, she needs to have some work done on one or the other. I fall off her wagon almost every time.
- And I'll chime in with tattoos, as well. I've sen some ugly women whose tattoos I welcome as a distraction from the faces and bodies, but I've never seen a pretty woman who I thought would look better with a tattoo. And I've seen plenty of women whose videos I would enjoy if they didn't have the ink. There are some women I can forgive, whether because of their looks, tattoo placement or personality -- Asteria Jade comes to mind because she has an insane face and I was just watching her -- but most I cannot. On the other hand, this discrimination has likely saved me thousands of dollars.
I suspect what you're noticing isn't deliberate but an artifact of taking pics in less than ideal light which then has an impact on the depth of focus of the photo.
Thought if another one: On a good boobjob, where I can't tell or can delude myself into thinking the augmentation is real, being able to see the scars. For me, that's an absolute woodkiller.
This is the other side of the same coin but I'd like to see more of the gonzo type stuff that Shane and Seymore did so well, as did Ben Dover back in the day, Assman series and a few others that escape my mind. That playful spontaneous combination of hardcore porn intertwined with real world is missing in today's genre. Not complaining or criticizing cos there are so many amazing performers today but it's become all too familiar. Just my two cents. P.S- If anyone could recommend something replicating what I describe in today's porn world, I'd be grateful.
^ Good call. The Seymore and Shane movies were an instant buy or rent whenever I could find one. Shane's World too. And Seymore's movies after he and Shane broke up were good too. I missed Shane, but Alisha Klass was great as well.
Like you, I'd like to see a studio pick up where these series left off.
I've got no doubt that that will be the case at times. Just important that people realise that it is definitely not always intentional. I've done a lot of photography and videoing and it pains me, on occasions, how little the person doing the filming appreciates the strengths and weaknesses of their equipment or even some of the basics of photography.
I don't like what I call "The Headless Cocksman." I want to see the guy's face (even briefly if it's POV) to see who the stud is and don't get me started on the one's with the face blurred out.
I would like there to be more porn where the setup is people having sex because they like being on some freak shit and somebody is gonna pay them for it. Someone remove the retarded nonsense and take my $30 a month, please.Is it not a "power play," "dominance," coercion/not consenting meme?
The ones I have seen are like a "oh no, you are stuck in a sexual position and you can't stop me/I won't help you unless I get to have sex with you" type of thing.
^ Totally agree on split screens. I was watching an Exploited College Girls scene and the whole thing was split screen or facial reactions in a window. It's like watching porn on Microsoft Teams.
There is all kinda flavors of Porn. Stop trying to turn Straight Porn into Bi Porn or something else? Straight Porn is about Girls taking the D , thats it.
As a fan of anal scenes, this may seem odd, but I don't like double anal scenes. I don't mind seeing B/B/G anal scenes. I'm happy with DP and spit-roasting, but double anal just doesn't look good.
As much as I dislike double anal, there is one position for it which I really dislike:
I can't help but focus on the guy who would be on the left of this photo. What's his view? While he can tell himself that his cock is in a woman's ass, his brain must be struggling to believe that because when he looks down, all he sees is a man's hairy back and ass. I've always assumed that these guys need a truck full of Viagra to perform like this.
Maybe this isn't exactly on point because I don't see a lot of this because I specifically avoid it, though I recognize that there are a lot of people who like it. It's cuckolding. I just don't get it. I get the stag/vixen thing where a guy willingly and happily shares his wife with another man or men, but the whole embarrassment/shame, whatever is just lost on me.
But I mean it when I say that I get that a lot of people love this genre and I realize it's a big thing. I just don't get it.
I have no data to back this up, but I think that both cuckporn and stepporn are both produced in greater numbers than the proportion of their fans in the general population would indicate. A lot of us just purchase and view it because that's the only way we can get our fix of a particular performer (new scene or old) at that particular time.
^ You may be right. I'm not into step porn but I do download it and watch it because I can just skip through the setup where the relationship is revealed. Apart from the occasional reminder during the scene, it's just a standard B/G scene after the beginning. I don't like seeing another guy sit there and watch. I'm into voyeur and exhibitionist scenes, but cuckolding doesn't fit there either.
There is one niche within the step genre that I do like, and that's a large age gap. But even there, it's the age gap (young woman, older man) that draws me in and not the step part of it.
And while I'm complaining, with the whole step thing, someone needs to explain how a guy in his mid-30's has a 22-year old daughter or step-daughter. It could happen, but it isn't likely.
I agree it would be hard to generate data to provide evidence, or otherwise, 'that both cuckporn and stepporn are both produced in greater numbers than the proportion of their fans in the general population would indicate'. However, in terms of my two major bugbears, POV and cream-pies, I have a supposition.
I pay a monthly premium that gives me access to literally thousands of 'free' videos via the VOD site I subscribe to. I assume the videos that 'fall' into this free pool are ones that fans/subscribers are less and less willing to pay good money to view. Admittedly based purely on the eyeball test, the proportion of POV and cream-pie scenes amongst the free videos is significantly higher than amongst the videos for which you have to pay, indicating that in general POV and cream-pie videos fall into the free pool at faster rate than other videos. Moreover the production dates of the free POV and cream-pie videos are generally way more recent than non-POV and non-cream-pie videos made by the same studios. Porn fans will tolerate shitty porn concepts to view a favourite pornstar, but only once or, if they're like me, not at all.
Obviously, given the low-to-no production values for POV scenes, producers of such material can turn a profit on a lower number of sales, but what are the economic drivers for producing cream-pie scenes: do the pornographers make some sort of saving by not having to pay for the money shot?
"Pornography: That which excites, whether from approval or disapproval." ~ Leonard Rossite 2342 Posts 12/17
Posted - Feb 22 2026 : 10:56PM
Shoot if you want to talk racism in porn that I could do without - two words - Black Patrol. Talk about being an instant wood killer. Does absolutely nothing for me and I'm not against good IR scenes but none of those come out good.
Well since we're on the subject, I'd like to see less "snow bunny" talk. Total turn off.
Unrelated but still something I want to see less of, dudes giving each other high fives in scenes. Happens a lot in those idiotic "sharing stepsisters" scenes.
^ Does "snow bunny" have meaning past skiing and snowboarding? I ask because I can't think of many scenes around skiing. Private Studios did a bunch of movies at ski resorts years ago, and Shane had a skiing themed movie a long time ago too, but that's all I can think of. Does it have another meaning?
Apologies if this is a really dumb question, but I honestly don't know.
For porn purposes, a "Teen" is a young woman 18 or 19. High School Senior/ College freshmen. I consider a scene categorized as "Teen" with a female talent who clearly hasn't seen the inside of a high school since Bush-The-Younger was president to be deceptive clickbait. While I understand she needs the work, a late 20's (or even thirties) female prancing on set in braces, pigtails, a pink backpack and a schoolgirl outfit (that can't even begin to hide the miles of hideous ink defacement) saying "Hi Daddy! I'm home!" is just stupid. And we won't even address the pink kitten ears. You're not fooling any of us.
Edited by - Fuzzy Coathanger on 2/26/2026 1:00:05 AM
Used in scenes by black men to describe white women (often blondes but not exclusively so). It isn't necessarily widespread in porn but still something I can do without.
(Latinas always playing the maid in porn. I think we should move beyond this trope.) Exactly. I'd prefer to see Latinas with big asses cast as congresspersons from Brooklyn. now THATS progress!
[I think that both cuckporn and stepporn are both produced in greater numbers than the proportion of their fans in the general population would indicate.]
Agreed, probably because stepporn is a brainless, easy premise by which to feature 18 year olds with older men-- which has always been the industry bread-and-butter. They simply couldn't make it on MILFS, Goths, and heavily inked biker babes. But not for me. Since these people are NOT actors, and kinda embarrass themselves by taking on "roles" they simply can't pull off (we've all seen it a million times), just phase out ALL premises and story lines. Simply go all "Exploited College Girls" or any one of a dozen others. "Here's Marcy, a freshman at Florida State. For the next hour, I'm going to fuck her like an animal in every position, then cum on her face. Hi Marcy! Show us what you've got underneath those clothes!" Or even better-- NO set up, al la Legal Porno. A pretty girl, dressed sexily dances for us a bit. Then the male talent(s) enters-- begins removing her clothing. Simple. Effective. We do not need to see Marcy in kitten ears "accidently" walking in on her stepdad in the shower while stepbrother jealously looks on. Why not take a bare minimalist approach and let the VIEWER decide how this girl fits into his own cosmology and why he likes her? Maybe she reminds him of a girl who works at his coffee shop. A friend of his daughter. Somebody he remembers from college. Why the need to "force feed" a story line? Two people simply don't need a stated reason to find themselves together in a bedroom-- fucking.
Edited by - Fuzzy Coathanger on 2/27/2026 3:42:39 AM
"Pornography: That which excites, whether from approval or disapproval." ~ Leonard Rossite 2342 Posts 12/17
Posted - Mar 1 2026 : 12:26AM
I'm more against what I call obnoxious tattoos rather than tattoos overall. What I mean by obnoxious is tattoos that look cheap, out of place or outright trashy/corny. A great example of what I consider a corny tattoo is the infamous Playboy bunny tattoo that became trendy. I'm always impressed when an adult performer can make a tattoo arguably a trademark part of their identity as opposed to those who get tattoos because they see everyone else with one and want to get with the program. Spophia Locke, Riley Reid, Rachael Cavalli, Chanel Preston, Vanessa Vega - her tattoos make her look like such a badass who could deepthroat you and fuck you so good; you'd be seeing all twelve disciples when she was all said and done. Veruca James wouldn't have been nearly so memorable without her ink and I feel the same goes for the long retired Nikki Rhodes.
Posted - Jan 31 2026 : 3:13AM
