BL porn short for barely legal that is. I don't exactly find anything wrong with an older man having sex with an 18 year old girl. Do people find it wrong because their religion prohibits it? If so, are they forgetting that the USA is a country where we have separation of church and state? In most cases, there is no harm in an 18 year old girl dating an older man. Sure, every once in a blue moon an abusive case arises but this can happen with any relationship. So stop with the bullshit. It's your own personal moral views that you find it "wrong". Keep it to yourself. An 18 year old girl is a legal consenting adult. Nothing more needs to be said.
[Link]
Bert Piel Deactivated User
195 Posts 8/10
Posted - Sep 7 2010 : 4:34PM
You have the hots for kids. You want us to make you feel good about it?
[Link]
Perverted_Jewish_Guy Deactivated User
207 Posts 4/10
Posted - Sep 7 2010 : 4:36PM
I don't know what country you're from but 18 does not qualify as "kid" in America. Run along now.
Well, 18 year olds aren't kids. I think the main objection comes when they dress them up like 10 year olds and make people feel like they're watching kids. That makes people uncomfortable.
I've never seen any objection to it, but it is a huge part of porn that seems to be shot for and marketed to morons who never get laid and don't know what real sex is. I don't recall seeing any tattoos or implants in teen porn the last time I watched some. Maybe it doesn't matter how dumb the script is, if she's natural and uninked.
"Barely Legal" Two possible connotations: (a) the legal babes are naked (bare) or (b) Last week the babes were underage so they're just legal (ie, barely) If it's the second one that rocks your boat( along with pigtails ), then maybe that is edging towards the 'icky'
[Link]
Stalag Deactivated User
476 Posts 1/10
Posted - Sep 7 2010 : 7:10PM
An easy way to spot a kid lover is by the way they constantly spout "18", as in every sentence of the post.
[Link]
Perverted_Jewish_Guy Deactivated User
207 Posts 4/10
Posted - Sep 7 2010 : 9:12PM
Ok, I enjoy watching milfs, I enjoy watching BL girls, I enjoy watching any age. Do you guys really have a problem with an adult liking some of those fresh young sluts? Pigtails turn me off. They are not realistic and no 18 year old nowadays has pigtailed hair.
[Link]
Stalag Deactivated User
476 Posts 1/10
Posted - Sep 7 2010 : 9:23PM
Again with the "18".
[Link]
Perverted_Jewish_Guy Deactivated User
207 Posts 4/10
Posted - Sep 7 2010 : 9:26PM
Are you a troll? It doesn't seem like you're contributing to the thread very well.
Exactly. 18 year olds don't dress like they try to portray in those videos. There are 18 year old girls doing porn and they don't dress like that it real life. The only reason the "18" part enters the picture is because that's the age it's legal but clearly they're trying to look younger. It's creepy. If it were really about simply liking "young" women and not "little girls" guys would be just as happy seeing those real life 18-21 year old girls in regular videos dressing and acting their age. To each his own within the law but I still think it's creepy.
Well, the problem is that porn with 18 year olds looking and acting like 18 year olds is actually pretty hard to find. And I don't think it's because people are demanding it. Of course it sells because if you want college aged girls doing porn, that's all there is. You either buy it or you buy the MILF porn. So you have to try and pretend the girl isn't sucking her thumb halfway through the video. I think most people just tolerate it. I'm sure there are some pedos who get off on it but most would prefer they look and act their age. It's another one of those things like implants (And I'm not trying to drag that debate here. It's just an example) which isn't necessarily selling because it's more popular but because it's hard to avoid.
Draxxx wrote "Exactly. 18 year olds don't dress like they try to portray in those videos. There are 18 year old girls doing porn and they don't dress like that it real life. The only reason the "18" part enters the picture is because that's the age it's legal but clearly they're trying to look younger. It's creepy. If it were really about simply liking "young" women and not "little girls" guys would be just as happy seeing those real life 18-21 year old girls in regular videos dressing and acting their age. To each his own within the law but I still think it's creepy." I agree totally, anything that even touches the fringes of paedophilia makes me cringe. I have no argument with 16 year old and upwards girls having sex with whoever they want, I have no problem with girls 18plus immortalizing their sexcapades on film. My problem is underlying suggestion that they are younger than they are. At 12 I probably dressed like a 20 year old, at 18 I dressed as outrageously as I could get away with, and now I'm in my thirties i find myself wavering between matronly and tarty. It's difficult to strike a happy balance between age and desire( clothes-wearing desire I mean), but at no point did I ever dress like a barely legal teen. Edited by - pushkaa on 9/7/2010 10:24:09 PM
there is no religion or law prohibiting sex between a man and woman regardless of age as long as they are of legal age. If we have MILF porn..then why not DILF too (Daddy I like to fuck)...Personally speaking seeing old mature men taking it on young talent would be hot
[Link]
Perverted_Jewish_Guy Deactivated User
207 Posts 4/10
Posted - Sep 7 2010 : 10:33PM
Well people, I am not condoning the act of making them look way younger but it is their legal right so long as the girl is at least 18. Whining about how you find it wrong based on your moral views is not going to accomplish anything.
editorbb wrote "If we have MILF porn..then why not DILF too (Daddy I like to fuck)...Personally speaking seeing old mature men taking it on young talent would be hot" I sell Dilf titles....they're gay , mature men and their son's friends. None of the twinks wear school uniform though Edited by - pushkaa on 9/7/2010 10:42:17 PM
Well, not very many people are objecting to it in the industry, and its popularity is taken for granted in the popular culture. The AVN starlets are usually very young. I don't think that it's even thought of as a fetish. But if there is an objection to it, it stems from questions about their ability to make reasonable decisions that have a life long impact at such an early age.
Would that be anything like the decision to drive a subcompact car at 65MPH on the freeway with enormous semi trucks blowing by at 80MPH? That's not even safe for someone my age but a 16 year old can legally do it any day and every day anywhere in the country. Now fucking at 18? That's some serious shit right there! Evidently you need to be 45 and have some kind of degree or something before you can make a simple choice regarding whether or not to have sex. Edited by - randomprecision on 9/8/2010 12:31:33 AM
@ Good Charles "But if there is an objection to it, it stems from questions about their ability to make reasonable decisions that have a life long impact at such an early age." Well no, my objection is that they dress women as prepubescents and don't acknowledge that it's not youth they're highlighting so much as 'childishness'.
Well there does appear to be some thought that the underage element is being played to. Not sure I really believe it, and doubt there is a way to really prove it. Unsure if it's actually against the law. All performers are over 18 though, which is always acknowledged on any dvd, film, or online performance.
I understand the whole Lolita thing, I really do, I'm just saying that if people are objecting to BL porn (as the op states)the reason they're objecting(probably) is more to do with possible paedo undertones than whether someone is old enough to fuck at 18. It can be done well, I think Jenna Haze showcased young-looking girls really well in Cum Spoiled Brats without any icky undertones. There was a lollipop but it didn't make me cringe too much Edited by - pushkaa on 9/8/2010 1:52:06 AM
Well, you have a good point. There's absolutely nothing wrong with young people having sex but this isn't just sex it's porn. And their understanding of the world is rapidly changing at that age. Consider how credit card companies prey on young freshman on college campuses. Yeah technically its legal but that doesn't make it right. My biggest discomfort is the girls getting an STD that affects their lives after porn. That could be fixed by using condoms. But I know I am going to catch hell for even suggesting that.
Frankly, I'll admit I'm only in my 20s and I prefer teens and stuff like that Bus Stop Girls banner up there rocks my boat. Pigtails are a turnoff for me but I dig cheerleaders. Let's not forget that some girls actually enter the biz their senior year in high school. If you don't like it, don't watch it. It's that simple.
Seperation of Church & State has nothing to do with it. SOC+S is confused with the part of the Constitution stating simply that (quoting as closely as I can remember) "Congress shall make no law endorsing or prohibiting any religion." From there, anything Congress was banned from doing within the Constitution has also came to be interpreted to mean any state or local government within the United States may also not do it. The term "Seperation of Church and State" is not in the Constitution, Bill of Rights, or Declaration of Independence. Anyways, a 50 year old man with an 18 year old girl is creepy, sometimes. It may be legal, but it doesnt make it any less awkward. Jurassic Cock, for example, does not please me. I don't really get much BL DVDs because the couple I have gotten were very tame and PG but I did not find BL to be very creepy. Ally Kay's BL scene infact was the other way around - her mom was cougaring a young dude and when her mom left she hooked up with the boy "her age."
Sometimes life is goofier than a monkey on ether 12073 Posts 7/10
Posted - Sep 8 2010 : 6:32PM
^ +1,000,000
[Link]
screwcap Deactivated User
I'm walkin' here........ 1032 Posts 6/10
Posted - Sep 8 2010 : 8:01PM
Don't understand op's "what's with all the objections." I don't know of any. Hustler Barely Legal Series? tons of dvd's. "Teen's like it big?." Misma cosa etc et al. So who is objecting? So Please OP point me in the direction of of those objecting. Time for OP to reflect given that it's Jewish New Year 2010 aka Rosh Hashanah 2010. Make a New Year's resolution. Mouth closed avoides changing feet.
Not a shred of evidence exists in favor of the idea that life is serious - Brendan Gill 723 Posts 4/09
Posted - Sep 8 2010 : 8:08PM
The meaning here is not clear to me. If you are saying that someone who never gets laid is therefore a moron, I think YOU are the moron, because there are millions of people for whom disability and other factors beyond their control isolate them from any chance of "real sex" and have NOTHING to do with their intelligence or character. If you refer to people who don't get laid BECAUSE they are stupid, I have not noticed either in my own observation or anywhere on this forum that stupidity is a particular barrier to getting laid by SOMEBODY. On the other hand, if you are saying that pedophiles are morons, I kind of wish they were, in which case they would not be nearly as dangerous, determined, or numerous as they are. For the record, 18 year olds are, both legally and physiologically, adult. As such, the age of their sexual partners is entirely up to them and entirely their own affair. Just why an attractive young girl would choose to have sex with an old fart such as myself is a mystery to me, but I for one, given such an opportunity, seriously doubt that I would do much to talk her out of her choice.
^I was not clear in my post because I don't clearly understand what barely legal porn is supposed to be. If it is shot for pedophiles, then the pedos must be stupid to waste their money on crap.
[Link]
Rosco Fuji Deactivated User
On the licking stick, Mr. Magic Dick! 3309 Posts 2/09
Posted - Sep 9 2010 : 12:22AM
I'm curious, who has objections about barely legal porn?
I don't see the point of this thread. I believe the 'Barely Legal' series from Hustler is well past the 100s now.. Obviously not very many objections being made for of-age female performers to have sex with whomever they please. That is all from me. Edited by - oneluv on 9/9/2010 8:35:16 PM
i have seen this on pay channels. Church and state have nothing to do with it. They make them to look like way below 18, like 16 with braces. its shit. its wrong. It looks underage. Yeah, they have the records to prove they are of age. Iam disgusted to think there is an audience for it.
I I hate condoms in the movies. They stop pregnancy but not AIDS or STDs because they have microscopic holes in them, to much to get into. Its heavy research. I do not care if no one believes. Its the government that does not give a shit about people. Condoms are like raincoats too. FYI: i do care about every person in movies and there health.
^ Did they do any studies to determine what percentage of men (or women, for that matter) are turned on by watching a woman suck a condom? Edited by - randomprecision on 9/10/2010 9:01:28 AM
Apparently Paul Little's first inferior trial (the Max Hardcore trial) centered around the very question of exactly what type of behavior constituted inappropriate "age play" in porn movies. The prosecution asserted that "behavior consistent with underage participants is inappropriate" but the judge saw through that and asserted that only explicit declarations of being underage (which Little was clearly guilty of providing) were admissible. In other words, dressing girls up to appear underage isn't obscene and toying with "age play" isn't patently inappropriate. Now I don't enjoy it and I agree that people who do have some rather demented fetishes but their right to pursue, view, or use the material in any legal way is very much true and actionable. Again, if it doesn't pitch your tent, move on to the next campground. If you don't like it, don't watch it. It's that simple.
[Link]
Mr. Sausage Deactivated User
330 Posts 11/06
Posted - Sep 10 2010 : 1:49PM
Who is objecting? They are legal. The title even says it, barely but legal. I like younger girls. You can keep the old worn out, wrinkles, stretch marks, scars, heavily tattooed, out of shape, grandma, and so on. I'm not saying all the older females are that bad. Too many of them fit the description.
[Link]
Mr. Sausage Deactivated User
330 Posts 11/06
Posted - Sep 10 2010 : 1:51PM
No one wants to see condom blowjobs. Also, I doubt a flimsy condom helps much at all. The people in these videos know the risks and continue to work. End of story.
Posted - Sep 7 2010 : 4:26PM
