Anyway, I'll try bumping this once, but I won't go too far with that idea, lest I rouse the ire of the moderators.
[Link]
Tres Vias - review by Captain Jack| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| RickFBerger3 Member  You do you. 201 Posts 11/23 |  Posted - Jan 5 2024 : 11:39AMAs social media platforms continue to die in slow motion, it would appear folks like me are revisiting great forums like this. In so doing, we're discovering threads that were launched in the '00s, and marveling at the span of time that has passed since just yesterday. Our norms, our tastes, and our opinions have truly changed. Especially now, we all need something to bring us together. Here, it's the knowledge that we all love erotic and sexual imagery, that we all love watching naked bodies in motion, and to one extent or another, we all partake in a habit that society (along with, in some cases, our own families and elders) has historically deemed shameful, but which we're coming to realize has not only been normal all along but healthy. While we've all come together here (sorry for the pun), each of us has his or her own classes of images that make us immediately want to wank. We all have different tastes, so the purpose of my bringing up this topic is not to argue which of our tastes is better, but rather to explore what it is about one facet of porn that makes us hard. Alice Ozawa from Catwalk Poison 69, streamable from Elegant Angel
I love seeing women full of cream. I love how they got full of cream, and I love their ecstasy in having it inside of them. Now, for obvious reasons, we can't make porn production become a billion chances to get women actually impregnated. Most of the time, men pull out and ejaculate some other place. And many times, the woman pretends, oh, that's wonderful that I now have sperm in my eyeball, and I'll just pretend that's really sexy. Yes, yes, there are a million ways performance sex is distinguished from real sex. Christy Canyon has been asked before, after a hard day's work on the set having sex, how does she go home to her partner, relax, and then, well, have sex? Her answer was that there's a real difference when you're having sex and you don't have to open up a 90-degree angle between your legs and the guy's legs to make room for the camera and the lights. But I just bet Christy's real-life partners didn't intentionally come on her eyeball. Jayden Jaymes from Incumming 16 (Diabolic Video 2009), available on DVD from Adult Empire
Back when it was naturally assumed the typical porn viewer was a straight man, a scene came to an end when the man came to an end. He'd pull out and ejaculate someplace obvious to give us evidence that the sex was real. In the 8 mm days, when porn was projected backwards onto translucent screens in stinky, private booths, viewers were thrilled by the fact that the guy really did cum. Seeing the guy cum validated the scene - it must have been real sex, because there's the sperm to prove it! And that set a precedent for so-called reality sex, even when the soundtracks were people moaning and grunting into microphones because you wouldn't want open mics on the real set (you'd drown out the sex with the squeak of the bedsprings). I'm wondering whether that precedent is outdated now. Maybe the male climax doesn't have to be the climax of the scene. I love watching lesbian sex. I love watching women masturbate. Women's orgasms are what turn me on. But over the decades, girl/girl or solo scene directors who are apparently accustomed to boy/girl scenes don't seem to know when the scene should end. Let's have one or both of them squirt, some decide, because then there will be a climactic event and we can declare the scene over. But women can cum several times, and that's the thing I'm so shocked that directors miss. They're looking for a single incline in the rise of the action, followed by a precipitous drop, so to speak. And I think they've been conditioned to think that way because the typical, mechanical boy/girl scene ends in the guy's climax, not the girl's. Indeed, as has been pointed out here in this very forum more than once, it's the magic of editing that allows for the guy performer to instantly ejaculate, then clean the girl up and spend several minutes flaccid inside her, moaning as if he hadn't just cum, and for the pre-determined order of events to all be fixed in post. Velicity Von from Sperm Filled Sluts 4 (Platinum Pictures, 2006), available on DVD from Adult Empire
Here's my assertion, and I'd like to ask members here whether they agree: More often than not, in scenes where it has been decided from the beginning that the man will cum inside the woman, the sex is better. All the sex is better, from start to finish. The girl gets into it more, she orgasms more, and the guy seems genuinely interested in where the scene should go. There seems to have been a conference beforehand, certainly between the performers but perhaps including the director, about what the guy could do to really turn the girl on. Let's have some fun with this scene, somebody decided from the outset. There's not a checklist somewhere where the director's thinking, okay, let's do a five-minute blowjob, then we need to spend four minutes in doggy, at least three in reverse-cowgirl, and no more than three in mish, but with the five-minute vignette, that'll give us a rounded-off 20 minutes so we'll be good. Rather, the performers have their own plan in mind, and they go to town with it. The cameraman and the director often become non-voting participants here, because the performers know where to go with the scene and what to do. Febby Twigs in GangbangCreampie
So some of us who find ourselves entranced by some of the more fetish-oriented sites like GangbangCreampie.com, or the FuckingMachines department of Kink.com (where the scene lasts for as long as the girl keeps on cumming), may ask ourselves, how is it we got into these strangely kinky and borderline-perverse fetishes? Is porn somehow perverting us? I would argue, no. At a deeper level, we're enjoying scenes whose purpose in life is not to build up to a crescendo where we get to see the guy ejaculate. Where he lays waste to the girl's face or throat or breasts, and then de-be, uh-de-be, uh-de-be, uh that's all folks. Gay men, who have a fine appreciation of the penis, have said this pattern doesn't really turn them on. When it's possible (and it isn't always) to show the guy cumming inside his partner, and have that partner revel in it, that's when the real sex is being communicated to the viewer. Otherwise we're just getting closer and closer to it before we bypass it - it's just a long tease that never comes to full fruition, pun intended. Twenty or thirty minutes of buildup with exactly the anticipated jackpot, but without the greatest part of the thrill that makes real sex, for those of us who've experienced it, so magical, beautiful, and memorable. Long story short: Creampie scenes tend to show better sex than facial scenes. That's my opinion. Folks, what do you think? RFB3 [Link] |
| RickFBerger3 Member You do you. 201 Posts 11/23 | Posted - Jan 11 2024 : 9:01AM Anyway, I'll try bumping this once, but I won't go too far with that idea, lest I rouse the ire of the moderators. [Link] |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |