New Pornstar Interviews - [more]
Chloe Temple Interview

"I’ve hooked up with multiple people in one day, just bounced from one to the other."
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 536 > Why stop at four?
AuthorPost
Pete Zaface
Senior Member


3064 Posts
8/03
Posted - Dec 25 2006 : 11:07PM
I've noticed that a lot of female porn performers have a limit of four male partners in one scene. I'm curious as to why. I mean, once you have one guy in your mouth and one in your pussy, and perhaps one up your butt, too, you have either one or two guys standing around waiting for an opening to develop. What difference would it make if it were five or six or eight or 10? I can't see wear and tear on the pussy being a factor; that's more a function of length of scene than number of cocks. And I can't see, "I only fucked four guys at once, so it's not like I'm a slut or anything" having a lot of credibility with Mom, Dad or the friends back home.

I can see why some girls might want to stop at one guy at a time. And I can see that the amount of time involved in a significantly larger number -- say, eight or 10 or more -- might require more effort than she's willing to, er, put out. But once she decides that two is acceptable, I can't see why four seems to be the magical point at which she deigns not to entertain any more cock-owners simultaneously.

Can anyone enlighten me on that question in particular and,in general, how a girl decides where to draw the lne when it comes to multiple male partners?

imak
Adult Film Legend

3345 Posts
2/04
Posted - Dec 25 2006 : 11:16PM
with how much you can handle. pussys and asses can only take so much, and that number is diffrent for every one
Joey Starr
Senior Member

Still wanking after all these years.
8082 Posts
10/00
Posted - Dec 25 2006 : 11:28PM
Because three's company and four is a crowd?
RandomPrecision
Senior Member

Enjoy!
8175 Posts
3/06
Posted - Dec 26 2006 : 12:06AM
I don't know but personally, as long as the girl gets worked over by one or two really good performers, I'm a pretty happy guy.

Unless you're looking for a bukkake scene or something, there's really no point in having more guys than can possibly be engaged with the female at one time. "Blowbangs" can be pretty cool but I still prefer two or three men (four or five at the most). Otherwise, she's spending far too little time on each cock.

It's pointless. Get one or two really good performers and you won't really need the circus stuff to make it hot.

Endless Loop
Senior Member

Tomatometer
1129 Posts
8/04
Posted - Dec 26 2006 : 2:14AM
Pussy and blow bangs are one thing, that I would agree seem puzzling, while anal banging would understandably suggest another.
I do believe theres sufficient anal content available, to conclude a considerable degree of physical distress is incurred, with each male participant added incrementally to the mix.
 
John Pype
Member

I adore sluts
779 Posts
9/03
Posted - Dec 26 2006 : 4:39PM
Houston claims to have welcomed 620 cocks in her pussy in a single day and lived to tell the tale . Victoria Givens managed 100 cocks in her anus in one day apparently without lubrication.
There seems little reason to stop at four men except that the more cocks there are the more bucks it costs. If a girl is willing to take four cocks, and gets relaxed, I can't think why she would not take five, six or seven in her pussy or anus.
pwing
Member

413 Posts
4/05
Posted - Dec 26 2006 : 5:01PM
To me four is excessive already. RandomPrecision has a good point that better talent eliminates the need for acts based upon shock value. On occasion it's fun to watch but I'd much rather see a good old-fashioned b/g.

Other than that I'm guessing that it's gotta be incredibly difficult to shoot a scene with that many people in it.

Panoramata
Senior Member

15816 Posts
11/06
Posted - Dec 26 2006 : 5:38PM
Things start to get hot for me when a girl takes three guys . I´m perfectly satisfied with that .

Also 4 on 1 , 5 on 1 etc is very appealing to look at .

Maybe , when there are more than 8 guys , it starts to get messy .

the unknown pervert
Deactivated User

I'd like to stay but I've got a plane to catch.
3243 Posts
5/06
Posted - Dec 26 2006 : 6:24PM
The more guys involved in the scene the more you will be subjected to HMA, closeup shots of nutsacks,and cutaway shots of guys faces when coming. There are variences for individual tastes and preferences but sooner or later the law of diminishing returns must be applied.
Pete Zaface
Senior Member

3064 Posts
8/03
Posted - Dec 26 2006 : 7:42PM
The question I was asking wasn't about whether anyone preferred one-on-one scenes, or scenes with four are fewer guys; nor was it about the economics of having more than four dicks in a scene. The question was based on what I've read at the performers' agency pages, where quite a few specifically say that four is their limit when it comes to multiple male partners, and on my obseravtion that many of the women who say they have that limit stick to it.

So the limit is not based on viewer preferences or economics, but on the woan's preference, and four is an oft-cited limit.

I ask again, what's so magical about four?

Kimi Lixx
Senior Member

2012 Posts
6/01
Posted - Dec 26 2006 : 11:00PM
I don't know if this is still an industry standard, since it's been a while since I was active, but back in the day less than 5 guys wasn't considered a "gang bang" and agents advised talent not to break the 4 man barrier until they had enough press and promotion to get a really good paying gang bang scene later in their career. It was like a B/G gal holding out on doing anal until she could get more for her first anal scene, or a G/G gal holding out on doing guys until she could make a big splash into the B/G talent pool. A gal who already did everything could keep holding something back to bump herself up later. Extend her shootable life.
Pete Zaface
Senior Member

3064 Posts
8/03
Posted - Dec 26 2006 : 11:07PM
Wow! Informative and on-topic; a response indicating that someone actually read the question and understood what was being asked.

That the number is based on third-party advice rather than individual standards or preferences explains why it's a standard number for so many. Thanks, Kimi.

Edited by - Pete Zaface on 12/26/2006 11:17:35 PM

Flash All-Star Supporter
Golden Age Classic

11017 Posts
5/01
Posted - Dec 26 2006 : 11:08PM
If you keep going then you can just make a video line of men standing around jerking off waiting to get to the woman, it can be a two parter, one with just throngs of men jerking themselves off and a second one where you actually see each one make it up to the woman.
Sorry I'm just trying to figure out when heat in a scene got changed to how many men can we fit in it.
cross
Senior Member

I Love Beef Curtains!
1072 Posts
6/05
Posted - Dec 27 2006 : 5:03AM
I'd say it's probably their personal "line in the sand"
Everyone's gotta have a limit including Porn Babes. If you look at it from a viewers point of view, isn't 5+ cocks entirely too much dick? Also I'd say 4 cocks is controllable, each one can be given attention - there's nothing worse than watching a hot girl fucking on camera with a cock in each hole and one in her hand with another 3 dudes standing round chatting to each other with their cocks in their hands.



Jump To: