I'm an IT manager and I've been running Windows 7 for about two months now, I put it on a new gaming machine I built running the 64 bit version. Its just the beta but its been running great, I haven't had any problems with it so far. They change some things in internet explorer I don't like but I think its done to keep clueless people from screwing up things, however I haven't dug into it heavily either. I built it for gaming so I mostly been playing Supreme Commander and watching porn on it, but I'm now starting to write documentation for our users at work on the networking which I am already starting to dislike. Time will tell I guess.
Tried it. Didn't care for it. I thought it looked butt-ugly(*), and I couldn't find a friggin' thing. Win2k come back, all is forgiven... well, nearly all. *sigh* I guess I'm getting old. Some of the new-fangled ideas I see in the latest Linux desktops don't sit at all well with me either. (*) As in Ron Jeremy's hairy backside. Not Nina Hartley's dainty derriere.
I've just installed the release version of Windows 7 on a second partition on my system drive. I'm playing around with it to determine its compatibility with my hardware and key software. It doesn't seem so bad at all. Maybe it's even good -- too early for me to tell. I still like the visual scheme of Vista better. Once I'm really up and running with Windows 7, I'll try a compare and contrast.
I installed the 64 bit version of Win 7 a couple of months ago replacing a 32 bit Vista and haven't looked back. There were unexplainable lags in Vista file operations; for example, while deleting single jpgs in quick succession using irfanview where the CPU use would go to 50% maxing one core. This has disappeared in Win 7.
There are a couple of things I love about this thread: 1: Bob started out on ADT as a computer neophyte and now he is "partitioning hard drives" and performing alternate boots . This is awesome. 2: Apple fans still say "we dont get viruses because we dont have enough users to interest hackers".
Of course, I don't understand anything of importance about computers; just another chimp at a typewriter. I've attained a Geek-Squad level of competence -- which isn't much good for anything other than a job at Best Buy. If the bottom falls out, though, I guess there would be worse ways to make a buck.
That's really all a person should have to know about a computer. It's supposed to be a tool you use for browsing or typing or whatever. Too bad it hasn't been simplified to the level of, say, a hammer for function and usability. Beyond knowing where the power switch, keyboard and mouse are, you shouldn't have to know all this other stuff. Of course, if it interests you then by all means be a hobbyist with them just like others who work on old cars or scrap-booking.
[Link]
NewRomancer Deactivated User
under THEIR avatar 738 Posts 7/08
Posted - May 5 2010 : 10:58AM
The internet would be a far more interesting place if people did have to know more....
I've reconfigured Windows 7 to be a bit more Vista-like in terms of its interface. Having done that, I think it's faster and slightly more intuitive than Vista. So I've transferred all my files and settings from my C-Drive and wiped Vista. Windows 7 is not a hugely different product from Vista in the way that Vista was with respect to Windows XP (whether you liked the huge difference or hated it). It's really just Vista refined -- what Vista should have been if Microsoft hadn't rushed it to market. And it seems as if they rushed Windows 7 to market, too, because there are still plenty of bugs, some of them obvious -- such as the tiny, unadjustable font and icon on the welcome/login screen. Oh well. Maybe by the time they release Service Pack 1 . . .
I don't know about that. I read this thread and it seems like all Windows users ever do is worry and debate about the latest system from Msoft, and all the issues they always seem to have. I don't know shit about computers and I am now on my 7th year as a Mac user. OS X gets me exactly to where Bornyo says you should be: Plug and play. Nothing has ever been easier. I never had that ease or comfort with Windows.
The hammer is my favorite tool for exactly that reason. Sheer simplicity. You can't fix much with a hammer but you can do one thing you can't do with any other tool. You can even things out. You can make sure that if you can't fix it, no one else can either.
Wicked Pictures,Vouyer Media, Axel Braun Productions, Marc Dorcel, JoyBear Pictures, abbywinters.com 1390 Posts 7/05
Posted - May 24 2010 : 2:57PM
XP for machines that are doing the heavy lifting and producing revenue is the way to go. Apple? I have a couple of their devices - a Touch and a couple earlier iPods - but I have a robust enough list of iTunes grievances - unauthorized charges, purchased products being "stolen back," non-existent service, and, of course, The Dreaded Exclamation Point Error - that I'll never be a fan. Roads To Moscow / Twitter: @roadstomoscow
^^^ Under Windows 7 Professional or Ultimate, a user can run XP as a virtual machine at the same time that the regular operating system is running and can switch between them the same way that one can switch between "conventional" windows on either operating system. The two parallel operating systems share printers, scanners, optical drives, and files seemlessly. So you can run applicatoins in Windows 7 at the same time that you are running other applications in XP. This embedded XP mode is much smoother and more convenient than Microsoft's previous implementation of virtual machines in Vista. In addition, you don't need to pay for or install XP separately. A couple of very compact programs, available for free download from Microsoft, do all the (light) lifting that's necessary in a matter of minutes. The only "glitch" -- if you can call it that -- is the necessity to install separate anti-virus and anti-malware program for the virtual machine. However, Microsoft Security Essentials is free and reasonably good, so that's what I'm using for my virtual XP machine. All in all, very spiffy!
Then give me a hug, you big lug. And I agree - maybe not so bad. But I'm seriously considering going Mac in my personal life. Not going to happen at work, so I'm stuck with Windows and Office and SQL Server and all that rot for the foreseeable future.
I've had Windows 7 on my tower since March. Overall I am OK with it. Like everyone, I have minor quibbleswith it. I didn't see a reason to get rid of the quick-start toolbar. There are also fewer options for screen savers. Not only did Vista have more display options, if you used the photo album you could have the name and location displayed. I liked that because I use folders of amateurs and sometimes an uggo gets through the filters. Now a colleague of mine just bought a new laptop and is getting used to Windows 7 after having been on XP for years. He can't get Windows 7 or the Office 2010 package figured out, but that likely has more to do with him being in the middle of a months-long alcoholic binge than anything else.