Some stories stay because they are more entertaining than the truth (the cliff story, a famous British performer doing dogs). Some others are laughed at and dismissed ("Rocco is hiv-positive, everybody knows that"). Why would Wooman push Ricauld down a cliff??? The girl that shameless mentions, Kim, was so shocked by her experience in Thailand that when she had her ticket back she didn't fly back home, but to Cannes, to shoot Cannes Fantasies with Thring.
I seem to have mistaken your "cliff" reference. I know nothing of this British girl doing dogs. Why would Woodman push Ricaud over the rocks? To take his place perhaps? He had just been given the premier "Club Private" series (a sort of prelude to Black Label). Kim BSG looked mighty unhappy in her group sex scene in "The Golden Triangle": doesn't surprise me at all that she cried on Thring's hands. I'm sure Woodman had trouble with her. But Thring is just an asshole, no matter how much you like him.
No, the "British girl" is another of Luke's hard to die urban myths, concerning Nici Sterling doing doggies.
Woodman didn't take anyone's place. Milton was already impressed by his casting videos and by the quality of the women in Woodman's magazine layouts. So Milton sent PW (who was a photographer, and not a director) with Ricaud to the Seychelles, as his assistant, so that he could learn how to do videos. This is said and repeated dozens of times in European magazines, but that will never make Luke's little story disappear.
I guess Christy Parks put an end to that. I understand from Mr. Burns that Pierre worked for Michel Ricaud at VMD in much the same capacity as in the Private Seychelles movies. From the Mont Blanc thing they appear to be quite a team, but with the ambitious PW always overshadowed.
Anyway, the real controversy of Woodman and Hustler is that this ace Private director is working for Flynt at all. I'm glad that he keeps a foot in the door with this casting series. Who knows, in a couple years (after his contract expires) he might be back at Private, taking them to heights exceeding the Pyramid and Tatiana days. Pretty to think so.
Yes, David, enough. On a nerdy note, I'd say that any kind of attempt at porn historiology in forums and newsgroups is pretty futile (as Walter taught me a while ago). On the other hand, nothing wrong with myths. Legends are always much more interesting than reality and, as they say, they always contain a part of unquestionable truth.
wow, the beginning of the thread was understandable, but alas now i am showing my lack of knowledge over these last few posts. i have a few questions if you dont mind:
1. the casting series began with private & is now with hustler? 2. what is his nationality? 3. has anyone here worked with woodman?
Still wanking after all these years. 8082 Posts 10/00
Posted - Jun 11 2003 : 4:54AM
He's French.
[Link]
shameless Deactivated User
Moscow 1313 Posts 1/03
Posted - Jun 12 2003 : 2:51AM
No, Woodman began with Private and now works for Hustler. While he works for Hustler, his Castings are still edited by Private. With Hustler he has no casting series.
BUT initially I did not want (and still do not) want to discuss his highly controversial Private Castings-series, I just wanted to make sure, he gets his incredibly beautiful and anal-friendly girls in a fair way nowadays. As this seems the case, my <case> is resolved and I can go on to enjoy the steady influx of new girls he provides. More, he is exactly what our Russian girls need: A promotor of their beauty and willingness to perform all dirty acts on film for money in West. And sure: he shall get some money for his great work, too. A few Hustlers I ordered have arrived just yesterday night, so I dont want to waste time discussing about Woodman here, I'd better turn on my new dvds and enjoy my wood...
You mean his castings for Hustler movies are being released by Private? I thought the CastingX serie was just footage he shot while he was with Private.
Still wanking after all these years. 8082 Posts 10/00
Posted - Jun 12 2003 : 7:38AM
I would think it was older material, castings he did in the past for his Private movies. There is so much material left that Private keep releasing those casting DVDs. On VHS there are almost (more than?) 40 available on DVD they are only up to 20 or so, I think this is back catalogue being released way after the VHS tapes came out (at that time Woodman was probably still with Private).
Judith Fox and Mia Stone both dislike Woodman. He has no respect for the girls, and only cares about himself.
Yes, there is an element of truth in his methods. He lures girls into thinking it's only a nude photo shoot. I haven't seen any of his castings series, but I'm sure there is a lot of editing.
Well of course Judith Fox hates Woodman. Her ass is still probably sore after anal punishment she go from him in casting 36. With all due respect to her she has a world class ass. Firm, round and probably previously off limits. Well Woodman sure took care of that. With all the cuts he must have spent at least an hour up in her heart shaped hiney. Eating fingering and power fucking her butt. First he enters her ass doggy but then rides up in her shitter balls deep and forces her onto her belly where he straddles her buns pumps her good. He flips her around alot, but he likes buttfucking her mostly with her on her stomach. Probably because he likes looking at his dick sliding between her perfect butt cheeks. I've seen about 20 of his casting movies, and it appears he does this to most of the girls. I say "Go Woodman." Bust all the butts you can. I love his style.
..well, your coments are only good to the newbies 'cos everybody that has watched those Casting videos already knew that, so not surprise there. ..and his "methods" is what makes those scenes unique, you can be sure the girls are not faking when they are moaning and screaming their lungs out when they are beeing ass fucked (they don't even know the camera is rolling!) ..but forget it about that just to watch some of them jump out of the bed in disgust after he tells them to see the porn magazines next to them is priceles. ...I dislike Woodman myself because he is a pig but thankfully I'm able to separate the real persona from the great pornographer that he is.
[Link]
shameless Deactivated User
Moscow 1313 Posts 1/03
Posted - Jun 13 2003 : 4:02AM
Question is if this <element of truth> makes him one applying unfair practices. Here sure I would oppose. No matter what the girls might think entering his office, most of them need money and want to work in one way or another with their good looks. As fashion is payed less than porn (unless you are a super-model), of course a lot of them choose porn. Nothing wrong with that. Even better for us!
Woodmans style of anal-izing the girls is a story apart. Still, please remember that the girls agreed on their free will to fuck with Woodman. If he really records his fucking with a hidden camera (and afterwards even releases that), this is unfair. BUT, I stated it before: This tread is not ment to discuss his Castings series.
As I've said before, it is surely inconceivable that a company like Private would release a film without all the usual paperwork, including a 'model release'.
In France, about a year ago, I saw a '60 minutes'-like show on pornography. A lot of the report was devoted to Pierre Woodman. They showed pictures of him at the police academy. He used to be a cop, but he was suspended-- fired. Because he used his authority as a cop to get sexual favors from young women. I don't know if he used physical or psychological pressure, blackmail or what, but he did force them to have sex with him... i.e. RAPE .
I watched a few of his movies and found most of his stuff to be sexually uninspired. Just plain cold. Yet I must admit that when I read some of you guys describing the dirty realism of his castings I felt excited. By the true evil of it. I wanted to check them out...
But I'll try not to... Maybe what Woodman does with porn does not fall outside of what the current law allows. Does it make it right? Porn is a real moral conundrum to me. I accept it and enjoy it that way. But maybe there's a line that shouldn't be crossed, even when a girl does end up saying 'yes'. These Eastern-European girls are often vulnerable financially, culturally, intellectually, whatever... How much can you take advantage of that?
I believe you can find beautiful women who'll have wall-to-wall sex on camera without having to resort to lies, deceit, deception (however subtle Woodman may be with those).
I've got close to 500 adult DVDs, and many of them feature the gaping assholes of marvelous Eastern girls. But now, after seeing that show, after reading what you guys wrote, I say no to Woodman . He's one fellow Frenchman really worth boycotting.
Whatever your viewpoint on that issue, I'm glad many of us are concerned with that stuff. We're the consumers, the hardcore fans. We can put pressure on the industry not to employ psychopathic criminals like Monsieur Pierre Woodman.
Woodman's a good guy: honest, forthright, very real. He believes his own porn gospel, that the world is fucked up in its attitudes toward sex and people have been wrongly educated on this subject. He doesn't lie to the girls or deceive them in any way. What persuades them (and it doesn't always) is that he obviously believes what he's saying and it makes sense. The charisma here is authenticity--the very opposite of deviousness.
A lot of people seem to agree that he's one of the best porn directors around, but am I the only one who actually likes the guy?
I'd be very interested to know the contents of that French TV show, from a sane man.
Still wanking after all these years. 8082 Posts 10/00
Posted - Jun 14 2003 : 8:02AM
Sane man, madman : I get it now! I'm a bit slow sometimes
Back to Woodman to me he doesn't really come across as a "good man" but rather as pretty creepy...
But I have a large number of DVDs directed by him, he made some fabulous movies and can be a great director, with a great talent for framing (maybe his photographer's background helps).
Following the comments about Judith Fox, I had another look at her scene with Woodman (it's in Castings #32, not #36).
It's true she says repeatedly that she only wants to do 'soft' photos, BUT, she comes back for a second casting 5 months after the first, and she then knows exactly what Woodman does, because she has seen his photos in the first casting. She also says that she has been to a casting with 'Christopher' (Clark?) who offered her a lot of money to do porn, which she refused. It looks very much as if she is just bidding up the price. When she finally gets down to the sex with Woodman, she looks happy enough.
sir_cumshooter, I'm sorry if you've covered this before and I missed it, but how do you know Judith? Are you in the business? Can you give us any other insights into her work with Woodman?
No, I'm not in the business, but have met several Hungarian girls via their agents for a bit of fun.
Judith told me she met Woomdman, and was offered porno work, but turned it down. 10 months later, after breaking up with her boyfriend, she returned to do a shoot with him. They then went to Ibiza (I think) and did some work there.
Both her and Mia Stone think he is only interested in himself, and is a bit fucked up with too much porn constantly in his head. Woodman used to have a team, make-up artists etc, but most have left now.
There probably isn't anything new that I've said here. Mia Stone did tell me something, but I'd rather not comment, unless it's already public knowledge. Does anyone know what happened after her first meeting with Woodman?
I also met both Mia Stone and Judith Fox when they were in London (for a bit of fun, too). I asked Judith about Woodman and she said she initially only wanted to do softcore, but went back to him the following year because she had changed her mind and wanted the money. Her ass does look good. Mia just said she didn’t really like him - her ass is even better. Well worth a trip to Budapest for that alone :)
How very French of you, pal... Here is another idea: Join National Council For Women Rights - this kind of talk is sure to make those old bags purr.
I can hardly understand your and shameless' sensitivity on the subject. It's rather funny: let me unlock my 500+ DVD collection, every penny of which went into pockets of porn makers+distributors, put a disk into the player, grab a remote with one hand, my cock with the other, and start worrying about the girl's fate . That is the most Politically Cute fucking idea I've heard in years! While I appreciate other guy's research into Woodman's past and starlet's opinions, I find your concern with "morality" in all this completely laughable!
You can watch porn, or you can watch sissy movies off TV. But watch porn that was shot with entirely "moral" way of casting is DUMB! You simply physically CAN NOT go over every girl's life story, look for drama and decide on whether to watch it or not. It's a pathetic approach to things - may as well quit porn all together, not to shake some highly moral foundation in your life.
Isn't it simple, and universal: Q. Would you fuck for money on camera? A. Yes or No. I know, there are MANY reasons to asnwer this or that way. I KNOW, various countries with various economy levels make these decisions look like luring and baiting the prey. But don't you know any girls that SURVIVED in every one of those countries WITHOUT doing porn? How about MOST of them! Then why the hell do we have to wash through the dirty underwear of the ones who decided to go this way?
Oh, well. for the conversation sake, it's kinda even fun to see some amusing EuroSensibility X.
---what do you mean, why... listen, i have a pusle, damn it! ---
Have you ever been to the countries where Woodman's girls come from - especially the one's with lower living standards (for instance the Ukraine)? A "no" would qualify your answer.
C.G.
[Link]
shameless Deactivated User
Moscow 1313 Posts 1/03
Posted - Jul 5 2003 : 6:24PM
While I do not understand Madmans rigidity, too (especially after we have established that Private-Woodman is not Hustler-Woodman in his recruiting tactics), your way of thinking reminds me a lot of that infamous Druber-guys way.(check this!!! ) It sounds a bit like you were his re-incarnation...or do I understand your point in wrong way?
So what are the top 5 woodman movies where he deceives naive girls and basically rapes them? I'm just curious, because I find Private films to be such a fucking joke and barely worth the breath it takes to discuss them -- the lamest shit imaginable, basically. Though, loaded with gorgeous babes. But why even bother when you have Christoph Clark? I mean -- REALLY!
[Link]
shameless Deactivated User
Moscow 1313 Posts 1/03
Posted - Jul 6 2003 : 9:27AM
I would not be surprised if he had been to Ukraine. Why not? World is small nowadys. Maybe he has seen all poverty there and just because of this he writes this selfish things. But let me tell you, Pardon...: Our girls are not dumb fuckmeat!!! Our girls are people of freedom, new breed - beautiful and willing to perform. Girls might be only export product of Ukraine able to meet Western standard, girls are near only Russian export product apart from oil. BUT if you truely love women, you will care for their well-being. You will really care! Because if given a chance, treated fair and payed right they will sweep the porn market! They will give you the dirtiest and hottest porn you have ever seen. They will dedicate a few years of their young lifes to you and all fellow customers and present you pure Slavic beauty combined with pure Slavic soul - a firework you should not miss mocking yourself off about PC-talk when we just ask for fairness.
some information for pardonmypulse here. Click on the filmstrip.
In the European Version of Superfuckers 20 there's an XXXtra about Woodman, how his grandfather influenced him and also about how many girls come from agents and how many of them he has actually fucked.
He once again says that some of the girls only come for nude foto shooting but then the all too obvious question remains: do they bring an hiv test for a foto shooting?
Sbando already explained to me his view of the things but I'd somehow love to get an explanation from an industry insider.
C.G.
[Link]
shameless Deactivated User
Moscow 1313 Posts 1/03
Posted - Jul 8 2003 : 2:30PM
Unfortunately I cannot watch that film. So I just read the info about it. Let me just say so much: I do think it is the good right of those American producers mentioned to "cash in on the booming porn market" in Budapest, because of "drastically lower production costs". Every industry wants to make profits. There is nothing wrong with that.
What is wrong, however, IMHO is to pay our Ukrainian and Russian models working in Budapest lower fees then local talent. I think it is one of our girls advantages that they can do it all for much cheeper than the US-girls. With wages as low as 50$ per month in Ukraine "drastically lower" payment can still be a lot of money. But payment may be lower, but it still should be fair.
All in all I am glad American producers come over to Europa at all. They sure bring our girls a lot of new opportunites. Without US-producers support some of them would nver get the chance to visit USA and work there.
Of course, I've not only BEEN to Eastern Europe, I grew up there, my dear gentlemen.
While I am being deeply amused by your care for the girls, by your admiration of their free spirit, gorgeous body, willingness to live better, etc. I am simply reminding you - the only reason we even know their faces, is because they have assholes, which are available to be used for the right price, while the camera is rolling. So, while your concern is doubtlessly shattering internet traffic around AdultDVD Talk - it also plays ABSOLUTELY NO role in the real world. Maybe you'll get some 3 liberal puppies stop buying Woodman DVDs - boo-hoo! how very impressive. Maybe, you'll even go to Vegas to some convention where woodman hangs out and make an ugly face, show a cute little banner and whatnot. The point of my reply to you - so fucking what! You, you, you and I are nothing else but Pirates Of Remote Controls. We push no other buttons in this world, but FF and Stop after we cream the napkin. Getting political in this business is just as pointless and silly as getting political in ballet, sports, poetry and scuba-diving. We could talk about low salaries of Russian Hockey Players - hot sucking shit! It is porn, buddy - have you ever bothered thinking what this implies??? Do you have any idea how many girls were scarred, abused, molested, raped before, while and after they joined the industry? Do you know, how many of them are infected by AIDS, Hep-C, Herpies, and 962 other STDs, while you are watching them being used as fuckmeat that you pay for? If you don't like any of this - be my guest - quit watching porn and rent some Tom Hanks movies. Personally - I watch porn for what it shows me - fuckmeat. And don't tell me, I don't respect women - I live with one for over a decade and still crazy about her. I do, however, know and separate door-mats and house-plants from women.
Mr. Woodman - I would like to take this opportunity and THANK YOU for the outstanding job - casting such beautiful and agreeable talent from Eastern Europe and Former Soviet Union! Not only you have raised the bar in the standards of adult cinema, you also showed the Western World where fresh horizons of this business lie. Most importantly, you have satisfied my personal hunger for seeing young gorgeous meat being fondled, stretched, penetrated, and drenched in cum. (May I recommend some more stretching and gaping, by the way?). I wish you all the best, Master - your product will always sell, be asured of that. As a personal wish, may I recommend joining forces with Max Hardcore series and making these gorgeous creatures truly meet the toilet and some new treatment with additonal spice? Oh, and more gag reflex adventures for some of my dear friends, who practice similar ideas in the real life, on the similar subjects. merci beaucoup!
Shameless, thank you for the link, it was a worthwhile read!
No, I am NOT the person, who you're comparing me to. And I apologize if I offended anyone - we are just guys talking here, not punching each other in the stomach. My posts were comments about your sensitivity, which is quite common for an Eastern European person - believe me, I know. I think, this sensitivity doesn't exist in such overwhelming quantities in the Western World, which I applaud - it's much easier to breathe here. You surely have a right to be concerned with anything you feel is worth your time. I believe, I have a right to remind you of other areas, deserving no less concern than this, OR - areas, where consumer's concern plays little-to-none role. And that is my sole point. Best regards to you and the french member, I cannot remember nickname of - who I mentioned earlier.
[Link]
DenverDon Benevolent
Firmly Embedded in Depravity 5914 Posts 7/02
Posted - Jul 8 2003 : 5:12PM
Not really. We're quite a mixed group here.
DenverDon
[Link]
shameless Deactivated User
Moscow 1313 Posts 1/03
Posted - Aug 8 2003 : 3:32AM
Sorry that this post comes so late: Just let me say one thing: Despite having grown up in non-customer-right-society I do my best to exercise all my customer rights at least at ADT (and ordering porn from West). This, however, shall not lead to total de-sensitivisation as far as those fabulous girls acting in porn movies are concerned. I really aim at balancing customer-rights and girl-rights. And I am not the only one, as you well can find out reading all the posts of Western-porn consumers here. I sure do want my share of porn, but I do want these girls to be treated fair and payed good money, too. And I dont think I do want this only because I am a <sensitive Eastern-European> man.
Let me repeat: I want my porn, I buy escort girl services regularely, I like capitalism, BUT these girls are NOT just fuckmeat!