Last video game system I actually owned was the early 90's Sega Genesis. After a while it just gathered dust. Then I occasionally played a few games on my computer when it was new - it was actually built with some decent gaming specs way back. Now I wouldn't mind just renting a couple of games a month and playing them once in awhile in the living room. I'd just be renting for the most part. Standard TV.
God hates us all, you know it's true, God hates this place. - Slayer 1726 Posts 10/03
Posted - Sep 16 2007 : 11:22AM
Depends really on your gaming wants. First I'd decide how physical you want to get with the game. The Wii is totally motion based, the PS3 some motion with the controller and the x360 has no motion in the controller. (by motion I mean waving the controller around to do things in the game). Second, does a BluRay play sound appealing? If you are playing on a standard TV, I'd presume looking amazing isn't top on the list, so if BluRay isn't a must, I'd narrow it down to the Wii or X360. Third, try to find out what games appeal to you. Do you prefer more M rated games or more E games. From all the games I have seen, the X360 and PS3 are geared more toward the late 20s/early 30s gamer. Personally I love blood, guts and violence. Going on the library it currently has and it's price, I would say X360. I have one and love it. I love the weigh of the controller, Xbox live is kind of cool (lots of retro games you can download for a few bucks), and as stated, the library. Additionally, the X360 has been out a while and so the games could run on it smoother - example, Madden 08 and NCAA Football 08 both run at 60 frames per second on the 360, but run at 30 frames per second. Some of the games I'm interested in (future and present): Ninja Gaiden 2 (will be available on X360) Rock Band (will be available on X360/PS3) Guitar Hero 3 (will be available on X360/PS3/Wii) BioShock (available on X360) Jericho (will be available on X360/PS3) Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare (will be available on X360/PS3) Assassin's Creed (will be available on X360/PS3) My best friend has a PS3 but the guy has yet to get a game for it. Although some cool games are coming for it exclusively - Heavenly Sword, Metal Gear Solid: Guns of the Patriot and Gran Tourismo 5: Prologue I'll also throw in I have a Wii, it's for my son (Xmas - I know it's early but I had top get it before I couldn't find one ) and it hasn't been played yet. Although I plan on getting Resident Evil: Umbrella Chronicles, Manhunt 2 and Metroid Prime 3: Corruption for it. That's my advice. I can try to help more if you give more feedback from this (if you want it of course). PS, I'm a game LOVER World Class Adult Reviews
[Link]
conquistador Deactivated User
Hellhamster. 2947 Posts 10/03
Posted - Sep 17 2007 : 9:55PM
Get a Wii and if you like gaming but aren't that serious get a DS (handheld).
I think I'm going to be getting a Wii for a family Christmas present this year. Was talking with a techie friend the other day who told me it's been the fastest selling console out there, I guess it's to the point of game designers are stopping their development of some games for systems like the PS3 so they can get it out there for the Wii instead. One of the guys I work with just got a Wii the other weekend and loves it far more than any other console he's had. "I do not as a rule seek advice about food from thin people..." - Jeffrey Steingarten
We've a Wii, Xbox360 and PS2 in our house, but no PS3 yet. You should really base your purchasing decision on the following: 1) Your budget...don't forget to include the cost of controllers and add-ons. Once you add them all up, these things don't really differ in price quite as much as you may think. 2) The kinds of games you want to play, both current and future releases. While the more popular games often are released on multiple platforms, some are exclusive to a specific platform. Halo is a good example. 3) How much you want to play solo, versus others in the same room with you, or versus others online. I love co-op play with my kids and that's a high criteria for me. 4) What kind of equipment you have to hook this stuff into....Hi Def and Dolby are great features of a high-end gaming system, but if all you have is a 20" color mono TV, the extra features are going to be worthless to you. For us, the Xbox360 is the most played console in the house. The Wii is fun to play with my young son who really doesn't need to be exposed to violent games and seems to thoroughly "get" the motion controls. I enjoy a few adult games on that system, but there aren't many...most are pretty much just fun family style games. The PS2 has been retired to the basement rec room for the DDR and Guitar Hero games now. But let your budget and your primary game interest drive your ultimate decision. The Wii has done amazingly well in the sales race since last holiday season...I'd expect it to be in short supply again this season as well.
I think you'd be better served by figuring out which platform has games you want to play and go with it. Nothing sucks like getting a game machine that has 100 available titles and none of them appeal. It's why I have no desire to buy a PS3--there's nothing out there for it that interests me. If I had it to do over, I might not even have bought the PS2--I'd have just bought the PC version of the games I enjoy.
Never. Always buy a new piece of electronic wizardry on the first day of availability. Make sure you get in line at least 3 days in advance or hire someone to buy it for you, and always, always pay a premium. Just to expand on my previous post: I think it's best to look at a product's current base of titles (unless the unit is brand new) as indicative of what will be available in the future. If you buy a machine because of what *might* come later, you can be easily screwed. We all of anticipated titles that were cancelled, or came out and turned out to be hugely disappointing. I think one of the big problems with the PS3 isn't the high cost (though it doesn't help), it's that it doesn't have it's own Halo.
Thanks to those that have responded - I might check out Best Buy this weekend to look at these game machines. Or should I just concentrate on getting a new computer to play games on. I need a new computer anyhow.
Right now, the only good reason for buying a PS3 is if you want to use it as a Blu-ray player. It seems to be the best player available as far as compatibility with all discs and upgradability to upcoming standards are concerned. On the other hand, it's not particularly friendly to people who want to use a single remote to control their entire system.
Answer these questions, in order. 1. Which games do you want to play? 2. Which platforms do the games run on? That will narrow it down. If have more than one machine that can satisfy that, then go down to a store and kick a kid off it, and get a little hands-on time with the machines you're interested in. You'll probably find one looks or peforms better, or has better gear (like the controller) than the other.
I just want to dick around with a few rented games a month. Maybe I could just get a new computer and play games on that - my computer is an old one so it needs replacing.
I own all three. If you actually care about the GAMES, the 360 completely obliterates the other two. It's not even close. The trifecta of Mass Effect, Bioshock, and Halo 3 this fall is unbeatable. I love my PlayStation 3 as a blu-ray player. The Wii has the virtual console and Metroid Prime 3. Those are two good reasons to get one, but it's still a very underpowered and gimmicky system.
If I were to buy a gaming console; I would purchase the PS3. For $400; you get alot! Xbox 360 Elite version does not come with a DVD player from what I read. PS3 has slight better graphics then the Xbox 360 and it is based on the CELL process too. The CELL is the next wave in the CPU technology edge. It design by IBM to fight Intel dominance! Time will tell but I am waiting for a further discount before I step in to buy one or the other. Both are very closely matched game consoles.
The 360 doesn't come with a HD-DVD drive, but you can buy one as an add-on. As far as graphics go, the PS3 will EVENTUALLY be superior. Not now though. Gears still looks better than anything it has to offer.
[Link]
conquistador Deactivated User
Hellhamster. 2947 Posts 10/03
Posted - Nov 9 2007 : 6:08PM
Sony PS3 'not as good' as Xbox 360 "Games developer slams PS3, says Xbox 360 is more powerful" Some console related news for you folks. Edited by - conquistador on 11/9/2007 6:09:02 PM
In principle, yes, the problem is just that a lot of programmers are complaining about the cell processor being difficult to write for and it really is an open question whether its alleged potential will ever be realized (before it's outdated anyway). As long as not enough people buy a PS3, game developers will probably not invest the time and money needed to fully utilize the cell processor, and as long as they don't do that people have no reason to buy a PS3 (currently the 360 tends to beat the PS3 in head-to-head comparisons of games available on both consoles, and on top of that it wins in terms of the exclusive games that are available). This might very well turn out to be a vicious circle for Sony & Co. As someone already said, the only reason to get a PS3 is that you also get a fairly cheap and fairly good blu-ray player included in the package.
I have to finish some games on my Xbox and PS2 but then I'm getting a 360. I like the games on the 360 better now. Too bad MGS4 looks PS3 exclusive but at least GTA4 will be 360 also. Btw, I also read reviews how Assasins Creed looks better on the 360 than on PS3.
[Link]
conquistador Deactivated User
Hellhamster. 2947 Posts 10/03
Posted - Nov 21 2007 : 3:56PM
Check out the Zero Punctuation Console Rundown for a very realistic (and funny) comparison of the systems. (An adventure in fanboy baiting) It is a short video. EDIT: bizarre link building. Edited by - conquistador on 11/21/2007 4:02:02 PM
Waiting for the discounts before buying. It really a toss up which I going to buy. Price and features will make it a factor. I heard that the 40mb hard drive version; they left out the PS2 compatibility circuitry to save money. Anyone who buy this limited version is going to be very disappointed when he/she get a PS2 game to run. Sony as result seems deperate to sell units at any cost and screw the consumer at the same time. I will now only go with the 80mb PS3 or the Xbox 360 Elite. I just don't want to be disappointed after all you are spending at least $300 or more so why not another $200-$250 for everything?
The PS3 is actually considered to be one of the best Blu-ray players on the market. There are a couple of shortcomings though. It can't be controlled with a universal remote, because the PS3 remote is bluetooth, rather than IR. It also doesn't have analog 5.1 output, which all other Blu-Ray players have. Without the analog 5.1 output, unless you have a receiver with HDMI inputs, you can't take advantage of the new higher quality audio codecs that have been developed for Blu-ray & HD DVD.
If anyone see this tonight, tomorrow (11/24) the 80GB PS3 is at Walmart for $499. (no Big Deal with price) but.... it includes five free Blue-Ray movies and five more to mail away for. This sounds like a pretty good deal huh?
Just read reviews of the PS3 80mb and it only 85% backward compatible with PS and PS2. The 80 mb model, Sony left out the Emotion Engine circuit to save money and try to duplicated using software only. The only one that is full or nearly full is the one with the 60 MB. I am going to buy this one. The latest one have a thinner wafer; so it draws less engine. And there are some minor differences too that I don't recall. The 60mb is discontinued but it sell on Ebay at a big premium over the 80mb PS3. So I will buy the 60mb too! I mean - go with the heard!
I all PS3 it does not come with a HDMI cable. Sold separately and has a propertary end so you have to pay another $40. It the Sony way! Yes more money out of your pocket!
What's proprietary about the PS3 HDMI connector? The HDMI connector on my friend's PS3 was standard. You don't need to spend more than [ invalid url ] are available for less than $7.
If I got something it would probably be the Xbox360. Or should I just wait for the next generation of whatever. I want to play sonic. Mostly I have around $200 worth of Best Buy gift cards laying around burning a hole in my pocket. I don't need any music/movies, could get a new camerbra but don't need one that much, I guess I could pick up a computer. I do get 2 free movie or game rentals a month at Blockbuster which is halfway why I want a game machine. Mentally, I'm not well at times.
Just want to add the PS2 into the mix. The strong points are theses: Has the largest game library. Slim down console sell for about $130.00 and has the same graphics as the Wii 480p! I am serious considering this because the games are so cheap - used at places like Gamestop where they trade in games.
Sony actually announced a new version of the PS2 a little while ago, which probably means that they're committed to the console for at least a couple of years more. There are still new games released and it has an amazing back catalogue. For a casual gamer without a hd-tv set, the PS2 is still a good choice. And much cheaper.
More and more it seems that the safest bet is to go with an Xbox 360. Its software is currently the best of this generation. Halo 3, Mass Effect, BioShock, Gears of War are too tempting to ignore. "Hey, I'm talking at you!" -Jayne Cobb
From what I've understood it's just cheaper and lighter. But it is an indication that Sony stands committed to the PS2.
[Link]
conquistador Deactivated User
Hellhamster. 2947 Posts 10/03
Posted - Dec 4 2007 : 9:55AM
Did you finish BioShock? I fould the game tremendously misleading and disappointing (but it had great graphics). A supposedly open-ended game of that scope should feel less like a typical corridor shooter. They don't even tell you what the maximum level for the bio-mods are so it's impossible to know if your close to maxing them out. More then 2 endings would have been nice in such a sprawling game.
I'm one of those dorks who has all of 'em. From a purely games-driven standpoint, you can't beat XBOX 360. It covers the widest range of game genres available. 95% of the multiplatform games out there both look (graphics) and run (framerate) best on the XB360. It has the most stable and consistently updated online network. While I am spending most of my gaming time on the XB360, I must add that the Wii and PS3 have also been providing a decent amount of entertainment lately. Both Super Mario Galaxy and Uncharted: Drake's Fortune are superb exclusives. And Heavenly Sword was one of my favorite gaming experiences of 2007. The PS3 is the most powerful system out there... but developers are still a ways away from learning how to take advantage of its power. Until then, we're gonna continue to see inferior PS3 versions of games such as Rainbow Six: Vegas, Assassin's Creed, and Spider-Man 3. In all 3 cases, the PS3 version has significantly more problems maintaining a steady framerate, compared to the XB360 versions. In the case of Rainbow Six, it just looks better on XB360. Whatever you decide, make sure you get at least an XBOX 360 or a Playstation 3 this year. Why? So you can play Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare, the most kick-ass, mind-blowing adrenaline rush I've had in a long, long time.
[Link]
conquistador Deactivated User
Hellhamster. 2947 Posts 10/03
Posted - Dec 6 2007 : 3:04PM
Anime Nut: No mention of the wii, I want an adt'r opinion of the new mario game.
Oh, I mentioned the Wii briefly. 2nd paragraph, I believe. Anyways, I haven't gotten too far into Super Mario Galaxy, but I'm definitely having fun with it so far. There's about a 5-minute learning curve with the controls. After at, you're set. Definitely loving the game a lot more than Sunshine. Also currently playing Resident Evil: The Umbrella Chronicles. Not the most revolutionary shooting game ever made, but fun nonetheless. If you're an RE fan, it's a must.
God hates us all, you know it's true, God hates this place. - Slayer 1726 Posts 10/03
Posted - Dec 8 2007 : 12:31AM
Although I wasn't asked, I did finish BioShock, LOVED the game, it's between that and COD4 for game of the year in my book. And I did play Halo 3... Mario Galaxy is on my short list of games to get for the Wii as xmas draws closer, that and Manhunt 2. The game just seems bad ass using the WiiMote to play. Strangling and stabbing and such with motion controller... NICE! RE is one of those ones I wanna play, but I'm not sure if I ever will. World Class Adult Reviews
[Link]
conquistador Deactivated User
Hellhamster. 2947 Posts 10/03
Posted - Dec 9 2007 : 12:30AM
My problem with BioShock is that the press release forgot to mention that most of the game is a corridor shooter with pretty graphics. "No encounter ever plays out the same way twice. No two gamers will ever play BioShock the same way." That may be almost true except no encounter except the damn ending. Don't tell me there are RPG-like elements to a game that only has a good and bad ending. Don't claim to be "open ended" if there is nothing more then happy or sad, good or bad. BioShock is hype.