I have cable, and generally thing 'pop' onto the screen. If there is a slow load, it's usually the server at the other end that can't feed that data fast enough.
This thing is specifically designed to speed up the internet for broadband users. I don't know why Google thinks that the internet is slow for these folks.
I've been testing it for about an hour just to be sure that it doesn't screw up the site. Thus far it seems OK.
There's a lot of doom and gloom "Google is evil" talk going on in some of the webmaster forums about this new software. I'm trying to figure out if we need to block it or not.
My primary concern is that it's going to consume a ton of bandwidth. Google will be prefetching pages from links that users simply mouseover. The user may never actually visit the page but we'll be sending the data over the wire to google's caching servers anyway.
FWIW, I've been using the software for over an hour and it hasn't sped up a thing for me. It keeps track of how much time it thinks it's saving. Mine still says "0.0 seconds saved" but I can see the prefetching service hitting the server hard.
[Link]
DenverDon Benevolent
Firmly Embedded in Depravity 5914 Posts 7/02
Posted - May 7 2005 : 10:40AM
Sounds to me like advertising hype for something that is not needed. Advertise an 'accelerator' and get your name in the headlines again, or build an ad campaign around it.
You also make a good point on how it might affect the server.
It's all about data mining. Sure they get a little PR but this is a better means of collecting info on who visits what pages than their previous methods. (google toolbar)
Collecting this data will allow google to more accurately target ads to specific types of users based on the URLs they click and the content of those pages. They will be able to build statistical models of individual surfers from this data.
God hates us all, you know it's true, God hates this place. - Slayer 1726 Posts 10/03
Posted - May 7 2005 : 10:54AM
I don't use it, nor plan to. As DD said I'm on cable and my internet is fine. I don't want to try to fix something that isn't broken, hell I'm not sure the webpages can load too much faster on my computer.
I don't trust Google... I'm willing to bet there's ad/spyware attached to that "accelerator".
[Link]
DenverDon Benevolent
Firmly Embedded in Depravity 5914 Posts 7/02
Posted - May 7 2005 : 10:54AM
Data mining so they can target you with specific ads? Friggin wonderful!
You're laying down some good reasons NOT to Google.
Yep. Randomly move your mouse around a page and the prefetcher starts requesting pages. I am doing some testing on our various top 50 list pages and I have been able to lauch 12 simultaneous prefetch requests. The server handles is just fine but it's just me doing it. I can't imagine what's going to happen when there are 250 simultaneous users hitting the server with this wonderful software.
I'm tired of listening to the "in" crowd knock who ever becomes successful. IBM, Microsoft Windows, Microsoft Internet Explorer, Google, AOL, Yahoo, etc etc.
You're right DD. I was just making a blanket statement on how it is trendy to slam the "big bad companies" (and Teagan) when the same people were fawning all over it when it was the new up-and-commer. The success or size of a company isn't a reason to slam the product
In this case I wouldn't trust software that says it will accelerate your web experience. It sounds like it's a modified proxy server but I bet it's more like server-side spyware.
cobalt - looks like your sarcasms mechanism is down.
I'm joining the "google is evil" crowd and try to use them as little as possible now that they've decided that they won't do anything gun-related in searchs. It does sound like a wasted thing that's more than anything trying to gather information in a sneaky way.
"Vegetarianism for me is about saying ‘yes’ to things - even meat." - Coupling
Regarding Google and MS: a few days ago I was reading a magazine - sorry, can't remember which now - and there was an interesting article. It was about how Bill Gates was exhorting his people to come up with something to compete with Google. He said something like Google is the biggest threat to MS ever, since Google is the most like MS than any of the other companies that MS has crushed over the years.
Who do you use now? In other words, who do you recommend?Oh? Can you elaborate on this some more? Or direct me to some place where I can read up on it a bit? [ I shouldn't Google for it, huh? ]
I switched my little Mozilla thingie in the upper corner to dogpile.Oh? Can you elaborate on this some more? Or direct me to some place where I can read up on it a bit?
Click to expand
I think I saw it in the forums over on www.accuratereloading.com .
"Vegetarianism for me is about saying ‘yes’ to things - even meat." - Coupling
No I didn't read it but I can't see how a search engine company can dislodge the maker of the top operating system and top office software products.
Honestly what does Google produce? How does their product line compare to Microsoft? The internet is too global and too fickle to guarantee web traffic.
There will be a new "in" search engine (www.AskOatmeal.com Feeling lucky? Click on the random link generator called the Crumbler) later this year, another next, another after that.
I use Google for my searches but if that doesn't give me good results I try Yahoo. Between them I usually find what I want.
If I am looking for an image I use unfiltered image searches at AltaVista.
Note: a Google search using "guns are for killing people" and "national rifle association are lunatics" returned 3,900,000 and 22,900 results respectively.
Think about Microsoft's business model. Now, what happens when the Internet becomes fast enough that you don't need software installed on your PC? What if you can run it from 'the internet' instead, and the OS becomes trivial to what you can do? BWAHAHAHA!! Y'er going down, Billy! Y'er going DOOOOOOWWWWWNNNN!
PS - I'm not using Google's or anybody else's web accelerator.
Dogpile. I'd forgotten it. That's what I used before I discovered Google some years ago. Thanks for reminding me.
.
Oh? Can you elaborate on this some more? Or direct me to some place where I can read up on it a bit?
Click to expand
I think I saw it in the forums over on www.accuratereloading.com .
Click to expand
Have tried www.accuratereloading.com a few times today. A few hours apart too. No luck. Is it dead? been long since the last time you were there? I'll try it again tomorrow.
Sorry - I found it interesting to read, but didn't try to remember the details.
I found the magazine again. Matter of fact, half of Gates face is the cover.
Fortune magazine May 2, 2005 . The article answers your questions.
Now I must confess , I used Google and searched for "+google +bill +gates" and it looks like the article is the first return.
"Technology - Why Google Scares Bill Gates - FORTUNE Bill Gates is on a mission to build a Google killer. What got him so riled? The darling of search is moving into software—and that's Microsoft's turf. "
This is the link to the article. With a quick glance, it looks like the same article I read in the magazine - but I haven't re-read it completely to be sure. I'm posting the link, just in case somebody else finds this sort of thing interesting too.
Btw, :) , for those using Dogpile, searching for "+google +bill +gates" , finds it too - it is the second one listed.
astro-i lurk there too for the african stuff, great site. +
google hasn't done anything right for a while- everything's perenially in beta, they killed dejanews after they bought it, the other heavyweights muted gmal's fanfare quickly by upping their storage without google's privacy violations, desktop search is junk, the toolbar doesn't offer much not built into firefox and ie's got an effective popup-blocker and the web-accelerator is getting tons of flak. they just shut the downloads down early after it caused problems and pissed off webmasters. aside from their archiving services, nothing new is any good and their engine itself is aging and askjeeves will have a new one out that's different, but a generation ahead of theirs coming out soon.
they're also going to deal with pressure to dumb-down their engine as google-hacking becomes more and more of a security and theft issue. they've got an awesome bread-and-butter, but they're trying to force things in other areas too much. i'm just not sure there's room for them to expand past being the standard for search engines unless they do something a lot better than what they've done recently.