All Forums > Sex Talk > Sex Talk Forum Page 59 > Battle of the Sexes 2
AuthorPost
Endorphin
Luminary


1185 Posts
3/00
Posted - May 25 2002 : 5:41AM
Read interlude for a little more understanding of my motivation for this thread.

Is it more shallow to be turned on by looks than by intelligence, confidence, wealth, etc?

Motivation for this question: I had this female friend(sic)who said she was most attracted to intelligence. Later she criticized me for placing some importance on looks. Looks are not the only thing of importance to me, but they are important. Honesty is very important as well.

She said that she really wanted to be mentally stimulated. Is the desire to be mentally stimulated any better than the desire to be visually stimulated?

Still Campaigning for Inari Vachs
And when it's cold outside, I want to crawl inside of you --from Untied and True by Bang Tango

Endorphin's ADT Lair
FREE THE WEED

Michael Saint
Photographer

Alexis Texas is always lovely
1062 Posts
2/01
Posted - May 27 2002 : 11:42AM
Well Endo I am not sure I would put "confidence" in there with the other two because it is a state of mind not a physical or tangeble assest. However, the other two are equally shallow. If you are only attracted to a person because of money or looks then you are extremely shallow.
Endorphin
Luminary

1185 Posts
3/00
Posted - May 28 2002 : 5:56AM
lee, (good to talk to you again), do you consider intelligence to be a physical or tangible asset?

I can see the importance of confidence, but I don't see why looking for it is necessarily superior to the others.

Close ties can be generated between confidence and looks and other things.

First, good looks can be a representation of confidence. People sure of themselves will be more likely to work out. Plenty of insecure people will avoid going to the gym because they are insecure about how they look when working out. Are looks necessarily the best representation of confidence? No. But what is? People can be attracted to others because they appear confident, but only find out that they are insecure. How do we gauge confidence in the short run? By mere perceptions.

Second, confidence can stem from good looks. Granted, there are insecure people that are good looking, but some confidence can come from good looks. If you have more people complimenting you more frequently, you should be more likely to be confident. In other words, the confidence stems from the good looks.

Still Campaigning for Inari Vachs
And when she had me hollow and naked, that's when she put me down, pulled out a knife and flashed it before me, stuck it in and turned it around --from Soul Stirpper by AC/DC

Endorphin's ADT Lair
FREE THE WEED

-lunacy-
Senior Member

1081 Posts
4/00
Posted - May 28 2002 : 2:55PM
I don't think so. It's good to know your mind, to know what you're looking for. So long as you're upfront in your intentions and your partner knows what you're looking for in them then who's to say it's wrong?

I think we're all looking for different things at different points in our lives and to label any of that process "shallow" or even wrong is unfair.

Michael Saint
Photographer

Alexis Texas is always lovely
1062 Posts
2/01
Posted - May 29 2002 : 12:52AM
I don't know about that lunacy. If someone only dates people in a certain tax bracket I would call that shallow no matter what your motivations are.

But that is just my opinion.




Jump To: