Pirates
[ invalid url ]
[Link]
Introducing Kalani Luana| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| Dan Senior Member 2056 Posts 6/07 |  Posted - Jul 14 2008 : 7:28PMA good [ invalid url ] says more than thousand words. And that's the kind of informative front-cover pictures porn DVD's should have. If you click on the link I've provided above. Then you won't see the word 'anal' written anywhere on that front-cover picture. But the idea of 'anal' immediately boggles your mind and arouses your cock, when you see the unmistakeable anal-lust from one of the guys towards the seemingly willing lady. Instead of informing you that there is anal sex in this film. This picture makes you want to see anal sex on the front-cover lady in a very provocative way. Most porn front-covers show off the lady's body in some way. But no men appear with the ladies in poses that suggest the kind of sex they will likely have. And quite often you get the impression that the film is either a solo-masturbation or a lesbian only due to the absence of men. Only when you look on the back cover. Then you realize that the front-cover gave you the wrong impression. I think all heterosexual film covers should be a variation of the example I gave. The men should be there just like they are in the films. But of course, the main focus of the front-cover should be on the lady and not on the men. Just as it is in the example I gave. A man's hand burried deep between the lady's ass-cheeks is something I would love to see on the front cover of every anal film. A man's hand covering up the lady's pussy I would love to see on the front cover of every vaginal only film. DP films should show two male hands from two different men: one hand on her pussy and the other hand burried in between her ass-cheeks. And tit-movies should show a man's hand doing something interesting, suggestive, and arousing with the lady's tit. [Link] |
Flash  Golden Age Classic 11018 Posts 5/01 | Posted - Jul 14 2008 : 7:59PM Pirates [ invalid url ] [Link] |
| ma meeshka Iconoclastic Member 3939 Posts 4/06 | Posted - Jul 14 2008 : 8:50PM grainy. shit aesthetics. skinny white guys. too many shit photoshop effects, not enough actual information about the movie. ugly expressions. what the fuck is 'regeional' coding? too much white saturation. i'm with flash. i'd rather my money go into the pocket of a good graphic designer, than some froot loop with poor grammar and pathetic photoshop skills. [Link] |
| Draxxx Senior Member 3831 Posts 2/07 | Posted - Jul 14 2008 : 9:18PM The best covers for me are the ones where as all the girls in the movie are on the cover posed showing off their best assets. All the girls in the movie should have their names on the cover. If the cover is good enough to make me pick it up and turn it around then I'd like to see each girl in their scene in various shots and stages of sex. My biggest complaint about covers and back covers is having to try and figure out who's in the movie because they aren't named and at least one good clear shot of all the girls in the movie. I've passed over many of my fav girls because I had no idea they were in the movie. [Link] |
| Johnothan Pedak Senior Member Catastrophe 1594 Posts 6/07 | Posted - Jul 14 2008 : 9:41PM [Link] |
| Dan Senior Member 2056 Posts 6/07 | Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:12AM If this lady was just standing there alone without any guy pawing her ass. Then the picture would be a lot more soft-core and a lot less suggestive of any sex. A guy pawing the lady's pussy and/or asshole naturally calls the viewer's attention towards her sex-holes. Which is what every man needs to think of, just before he starts penetrating his lady. Perhaps a lady standing alone can expose her sex-holes and call your attention to them. But only a man standing there with her and pawing her asshole can suggest to the viewer penetrative heterosexual sex. Heterosexual sex cannot happen without a man. And a nude lady standing there alone on the cover looks nice. But such a cover doesn't immediately suggest heterosexual sex. And that's why I think it's misleading. When the film is completely and totally heterorsexual. Then the front cover should portray heterosexuality in order to be truly representative of the film. Edited by - Dan on 7/15/2008 9:19:04 AM [Link] |
| SexyHard Member 673 Posts 6/07 | Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 10:46AM  [Link] |
| Tommy Kaye Member 135 Posts 2/07 | Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:40PM Ciao, Tommy [Link] |
| tricia_devereaux Evil Angel DVD Patience is a virtue, but who wants to be virtuous? 4283 Posts 4/00 | Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 2:08PM I saw the trailer to Fallen at the FAME Awards last month. Very promising. I'm hoping Brad comes through for me. :) I think I heard that they did the Underworld shot where she steps off a building at the beginning of the movie. If so, I'm so jealous. I've been dying to recreate that shot ever since the first time I saw it. Well, at least Fallen isn't a vampire movie. Then I'd REALLY jealous. [Link] |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |