Whew! What a relief!!! For a second there I thought maybe rampant homophobia amongst the porn fan base had dwindled. How could we survive as a species without it?!? This site really needs a resurgence of threads judging gayness and racism. Those are without a doubt the two most important subjects in porn...
Who cares, obviously it's a market for it, I like it because it's so nasty and only an act that the top notch girls can pull off, being filled to the max with cocks :P If you feel uncomfortable watching it you just can fastforward or skip the scene.
it is gay. Two dicks rubbing up against each other is gay no matter how you try to put a spin on it to make it not gay. It is that simple. If you are bothered by this trend in porn, dont watch because I sure as heck dont want to see two dudes plugging the same hole at the same time, possibly "nutting" at the same time too. That is all.
Look, it's as simple as this. Some of us need proof that these girls we are watching are ultranasty. No better way to show that than letting themselves be overpowered by two men while having their asses stretched to their limits, the combined product of those being double anal. These girls are willing to give up the tightness of their buttholes to prove their nastiness to us, these guys are willing to rub their oiled up cocks together to help them prove it. It's not about being gay. It's about sacrifice. Edited by - Pavel Praha on 4/20/2012 9:38:10 AM
It seems to me that what this boils down to is that if it bothers you then it is gay, if it doesn't bother you then it isn't gay. This suggests an inability to distinguish between being indifferent to touching another male's penis and being aroused by touching another male's penis. Male doctors touch male genitalia all the time without being accused of being 'gay'. As far as I am concerned, 'gay' is being a woman trapped in a man's body (or vice versa), and that includes a sexual attraction toward/preference for members of one's own sex. It may or may not extend to embracing other cultural aspects of sexual identity. By my definition, then, being naked around other members of your own sex is not enough to make you 'gay', which is a good thing considering that humans have probably been running around naked for the majority of our existence. Two males sharing a woman sexually is not 'gay', unless the only reason one of them is there is to get close to the other male. Even there, it is only 'gay' to that one person. Following this line of reasoning, sharing the same orifice of a woman at the same time isn't 'gay', either, it is uninhibited.
This is highly illogical. Let's break down this line of reasoning shall we?Two erect penises rubbing up against each other being gay has nothing to do with whether or not it bothers you. A penis becomes erect when the male is sexually excited. It's really that simple. All you need to correctly call it gay or at the least bi-sexual is two aroused men involved in a sexual activity together.It's not the same thing. Perhaps your doctor's methods differ from any doctor I've ever been to but if he's rubbing his erect penis against yours all in the name of "medicine" then you may have been misled.Wow. The mental acrobatics that you have to do in an attempt to ignore the obvious is astounding. There are masculine gay men just as there are gay men who display more feminine traits. But this is besides the point. The human body does not lie. Two erect penises pressed against each other providing sexual pleasure is all the evidence required in this so called debate.That's a logical fallacy if I've ever heard one. (A)Your definition of "gay" suggest that two sexually aroused men can bump and grind their genitalia together but they are not really sexually aroused although the evidence of two massive erections would suggest otherwise. (B)Your comparison is once again faulty. I've played high school sports where you hit the showers afterwards. I can assure you that my junk never touched another dude's junk. (C)Sorry I have to call it but for you to say that two men can be together in a sexual manner and only one of them be actually gay (or bi) is laugh out loud bullshit!I'll have to stop you there. Reasoning involves forming judgments by a process of logic. Try again. "It takes courage to enjoy it: the hardcore and gentle...Big Time Sensuality!"
I'm amazed on how much attention some put on dicks here, I don't see two penises rubbing each other I see a girl taking two dicks up the ass I see a girl so nasty that she wants it up the ass , I see a girl so nasty she not only wants to be fucked up the ass but wants it doubled , wants to be really filled up, stretched out beyond comprehension ,that oversizes even the word size queen. Wait there are two guys , really? Oh my didn't even notice them No it's not gay
Edited by - Laurie Cameron Fan on 4/21/2012 12:57:18 PM
The only thing that makes a person gay is by being turned on and wanting to have sexual relations with someone of the same sex. I personally wouldn't put my stuff in the same hold as another dude but it's a gimmick of the industry. If you look at it with the logic of it being gay then so is jacking off to M/F porn since you're sort of jacking off to a penis.
Is as gay as to hug a male friend is , maybe the hug is even more gaysh since you actually want to do it , it doesn't happen while doing something else
I mean if you fuck a girl and want to have a sexual contact with another man then it might be gay whereas if it happen to have a contact with another man but you don't care because you're thinking to something else (say kissing a woman's neck while sinking your dick up her ass , then it's not So if you want to rub your dick on another's man one pretending to fuck a woman is gaysh , not the other way around especially if you don't care who he is.
I don't think it's gay, but I think guys who are down to do this are definitely more open-minded when it comes to their sexuality. It's like a vegetarian who sometimes eats vegetables roasted inside the carcass of an animal. It's not just about convenience. We know it's about adding that extra forbidden meat to the scenario.
Double anal is not gay because both guys are fucking 50% pussy and 50% rubbing dicks.... so it becomes like a glass half empty half full situation depending on who you are . But triple anal there is definitely some gayness for the "3rd guy". you see that the 3rd guy doesn't even get to touch the girl. His cock is sandwiched between 2 dicks. So 100% dick contact. All he gets to see or hold is the butt of the guy on top. His balls are rubbing against the balls of the bottom guy. That said... sometimes I which there is much more man to man contact in hetro porn than what it is today. Because of this stupid fear of homosexuality new things are not being tried out and porn is becoming boring.
^ so it's a matter of maths? If I buttfuck a girl I'm straight (until someone will claim that those fucking asses are gay because true man fuck only pussy) If another man adds up and we both fuck up the ass the same girl it's uncertain But if a third one comes along then we all are gay? that's weird I might cross over my gender in a matter of minutes must be very careful
If it's a matter of finding gay sex appalling, then consider that guys in porn would do severely obese women on camera for money. That is waaaay more gross than being straight and doing gay porn.
Giving pleasure to a woman doing a trick where my erect penis is pressed against another mans=bi to gay. Experiencing moments of sexual extasy while my erectnpenis is pressed against another mans=gay. Making money for doing tricks while my erect penis is rubs against another mans=still gay. Denial that this gay=priceless.
This is a fantastic thread. The mental gymnastics on show are utterly wonderful! Two dicks in a woman's vag that touch - I'd do that - not gay Two dicks in a woman's mouth - I'd do that - not gay Real life - two dicks that touch cause they're gay (and not touching you in a million years) - horrific.
Double vaginal is the sexiest act ever!! 214 Posts 11/12
Posted - Jan 8 2013 : 9:24PM
THIS IS NOT GAY!!! I LOVE double vag because of how the girl is reacting. There is nothing hotter than seeing a chick in reverse cowboy getting stuffed with 2 cocks at the same as she is staring at both of them in her and how wet they get. Watch Harmony Rose or Elizabeth Lawrence in these scenes when they are talking shit to the guys and if 1 of them pulls out how they immediately tell them to put it back in. I would say it is more of a control thing about how bad they want it. Like Tory Lane in gangbangs.
^ Guys intimately touching each other in a wrestling match isn't considered gay, because their purpose for touching each other isn't gay. And it's the same for any other type of intimate touching between guys. Whether intimate touching between guys is gay or not depends on their purpose for touching. Which is why two guys going after the same woman and both ending up inside her pussy or ass isn't gay. Each guy's purpose is to get the sexy woman and not end up being the loser, with the other guy having her all to himself. It's like a wrestling match between two guys for the same woman, where everybody ends up being the winner.
Thats stupid, gay porn dont exist its only PORN If 2 guys fuck one girl ass its porn for straight people If 2guys fuck one men ass its porn for gay people Double anal its not gay its sexual
First post at ATD.Best porn-forum there is.DAP,Dp etc is cool to watch,but as a hetro not so cool to do in "real life".Tried it once(dp),not dap.The other guy's dick touched my dick,and i immedelatly lost wood.To be able to enjoy DAP,DVP and DP in "real life" you got to be realy relaxed about your sexuality.Myself being not comfortable in the situation.Professional male an female talents are entertaiment to watch,not to copy.DAP is not gay,it's just hot to watch.
[Link]
Pentasa Deactivated User
233 Posts 9/08
Posted - Jan 10 2013 : 12:14AM
The ACT (double anal) itself is knocking hard on the GAY door but its the INTENT of the male participants that determines wether its gay or not. Dudes maybe enjoying rubbing each other's dick more than fucking the girls ass in which case, they would be labelled as gay. One would therefore be justified in say 'Double anal is gayish' but not outright gay without knowing the dudes' intentions.
So sick of the "what's gay/what isn't gay" issues in society and pop culture. Then why stop with this topic? By this logic as long as another guy is in the same room it must be gay too then. Gangbangs? Forget about it! 1 or 2 girls vs 10 or more guys in the same room. It must come off so distractingly gay watching several guys just jerk off in plain camera site as they wait for a turn at the girl! Then again, I'm a bi guy so what do I know. Oh just think about that, I guess that makes me half gay then! LOL Edited by - Jake Rabbit on 1/10/2013 12:54:24 AM
Also what about regular dp? What if sack meets shaft? In the military guys who play around with each other to joke it off always say "it's only gay if balls touch". Edited by - Jake Rabbit on 1/10/2013 1:01:51 AM
I agree completely buddy. I have a friend who thinks watching blowbang videos makes you "gay" because there is only one girl and lots of cocks. Its fucking stupid, I like watching blowbangs because it turns me on watching a whore suck off cock after cock after cock. lol anyway...my two cents
Introducing Kalani Luana
Posted - Apr 18 2012 : 6:57PM
