Reviewers Recommend
Tempting SchoolgirlsTempting Schoolgirls - review by Captain Jack
Director: Mike Quasar
Starring: Robby Apples, Codey Steele, Katie Kush, Melody Marks, Some Dude, Hazel Moore, Madison Wilde, Jay Romero. Read review
All Forums > Star Crossed > Star Crossed Forum Page 737 > Not seen Jewel in a while ...
Page 1 of 4 2 3 > Last
AuthorPost
Lee O
Forearm Trainer


mmmmmmm........ after-birth
1193 Posts
8/03
Posted - Mar 7 2005 : 12:52PM
could this be why ?

Seriously though , I thought Simon Wolf productions had kicked the bucket ?

MLyons
Senior Member

1617 Posts
8/02
Posted - Mar 7 2005 : 1:04PM
Lee,

Simon Wolf is still around, I'm afraid. They are being distributed by Pure Play Media.

Jewel (Denyle, I assume you mean) is still around as well, of course, but ... she's no longer around ADT. Her account was deactivated a few weeks ago.

dandaman
Devil's Advocate

Still stuck in hell's waiting room
384 Posts
1/05
Posted - Mar 7 2005 : 1:26PM
what happaned... any reason

Edited by - dandaman on 3/7/2005 1:26:20 PM

phatbasey
Senior Member

1390 Posts
1/05
Posted - Mar 7 2005 : 4:07PM
I have to second about jewel, I am unclear why someone gets deactivated and I want to make sure I dont cross the line ethier
MLyons
Senior Member

1617 Posts
8/02
Posted - Mar 7 2005 : 4:31PM
Jewel had been unnecessarily nasty with a few people in the forum over a period of time. When she was asked privately to dial it back a bit, she responded by being nasty once more. She was deactivated as a result.

Edited by - MLyons on 3/7/2005 4:31:55 PM

 
Asmodeus
Lord of Lust

az-mo-day-us
6338 Posts
10/01
Posted - Mar 7 2005 : 5:17PM
Well I for one miss Jewel around here. It is a damn shame she was deactivated, hard to believe one of the hottest babes to ever work in porn was banned from ADT. Where ever you are my dear, I light a candle in your honor and hail the mighty Hecate.

Valentino
Member

Celina Jaitly, the new Goddess......
448 Posts
8/04
Posted - Mar 7 2005 : 5:34PM
A sad turn of events, but I guess you can't tolerate anything.

As I said a couple of times in earlier posts, it was Jewel who rejuvenated my interest in straight porn again. Looking back, It has been great to know that four years after that, I found myself posting at the same forum as she did.

''The unexamined life is not worth living''

Lee O
Forearm Trainer

mmmmmmm........ after-birth
1193 Posts
8/03
Posted - Mar 7 2005 : 5:42PM
Was it the telling Bill she wished he had HIV thing ?
DenverDon
Benevolent

Firmly Embedded in Depravity
5914 Posts
7/02
Posted - Mar 7 2005 : 5:46PM
Accumulative thing Lee O, not a single event.
Peter1
Member

USA
139 Posts
10/02
Posted - Mar 7 2005 : 6:17PM
I admit I have not read all Jewel's posts, but from what I saw she was not that bad. Come on, man, the guy was dissing her. And anyway, was anyone really offended? Just IMHO - no disrespect intended.
Jenna
Jenna Jameson

139 Posts
12/03
Posted - Mar 7 2005 : 6:26PM
WOW
That is really shocking. I thought Jewel added SO much to this forum...
I haven't read through all of her posts, but I do have to admit, I will miss her!

JJ

Peter1
Member

USA
139 Posts
10/02
Posted - Mar 7 2005 : 6:36PM
Wow, it's an honor to be posting in the same thread as the Great One, Herself.

Free Jewel!

Jenna
Jenna Jameson

139 Posts
12/03
Posted - Mar 7 2005 : 6:55PM
The more I think about this, the more it bugs me...
Jewel is such a major facet in our industry, what she says has a lot of merit, and sheds light on what it's like being a female (part) owner of a company.
I have to track down these posts, that got her booted....

hmmmm

JJ

Valentino
Member

Celina Jaitly, the new Goddess......
448 Posts
8/04
Posted - Mar 7 2005 : 6:55PM
Now that she's unable to tell herself.....what was that in her last avatar??

''The unexamined life is not worth living''

LinusVanPelt
Member

She is Kelly Lords and is clickable
175 Posts
12/04
Posted - Mar 7 2005 : 6:59PM
ADT without Jewel is like... well, not as fun as it used to be.

I understand you guys don't want to give someone special privileges just because she is a famous star, so I won't complain too much about this ban -- and it does align quite well with the general ADT deactivation policy (like it or not). Still, I sincerely hope this ban won't last forever. After all, 99% of her posts have been perfectly nice. And we all get a bit passionate at times, don't we?

 
Jenna
Jenna Jameson

139 Posts
12/03
Posted - Mar 7 2005 : 7:00PM
Was her exchange with Bill the moderator the reason for the boot to be laid to Jewel??? If that is the reason, she should never have been banned. I would have said the same thing! LOL

JJ

Edited by - Jenna on 3/7/2005 7:01:06 PM

noahped
Senior Member

2978 Posts
8/02
Posted - Mar 7 2005 : 7:00PM
Wow, I'm surprised! I think Jewel should have the leeway to post whatever she wants...I mean, it's Jewel for goodness sakes!!
MLyons
Senior Member

1617 Posts
8/02
Posted - Mar 7 2005 : 7:11PM
Ok. Let me explain a little.

Remember that people who get deactivated at ADT almost never get deactivated for a single incident (obvious spamming or trolling being the exception)--and remember also that not all incidents happen in the forum (they can happen in an exchange of emails).

That said, the only people who can deactivate someone are Steph and Drew (and Saki). No other moderators can make that decision. My understanding from Steph's explanation is that Jewel was deactivated as much because she didn't show any signs of caring that she was being rude, as much as for the act of being rude itself. I expect Jewel can probably come back if she wanted to, but she has not shown any sign that she wants to.

We don't make special exceptions for stars because they're stars, especially those who aren't willing to respect our community and our rules. If they're nasty to people over a period of time and show no signs that they don't intend to behave any differently in the future, that's that. It's no different for anyone else.

Honestly, I don't know the whole story, but that is what I do know. I'm sorry that a facet of the industry has repeatedly chosen not to respect ADTs rules of etiquette, but my understanding is that it was more her choice than ours.

Jenna
Jenna Jameson

139 Posts
12/03
Posted - Mar 7 2005 : 7:13PM
Should personal emails be a reason to be banned from a public forum?

JJ

Peter1
Member

USA
139 Posts
10/02
Posted - Mar 7 2005 : 7:24PM
As a contributor to and 'customer' of the site, I respectfully request that the owners review the policy that got Jewel banned. It just seems like it might have been a little harsh in this instance.
Asmodeus
Lord of Lust

az-mo-day-us
6338 Posts
10/01
Posted - Mar 7 2005 : 7:27PM
I read each and every one of Jewel's posts and I didn't find them offensive or even rude. As Jenna said, something is very wrong when she can't defend herself or her company from precieved attacks on her part. Still, it is very sad that she's no longer a part of this community.

Edited by - Asmodeus on 3/7/2005 7:30:20 PM

bono-ONE All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

SAMCRO
8570 Posts
8/00
Posted - Mar 7 2005 : 7:27PM
I don't know the story and have emailed with Jewel since this happened. I like Jewel so I'm sad she's not posting and hope at some point she comes back. I must say I'm with Jenna with what she said in her post just now. We don't want real nastiness in these forums and I'm all for keeping that out and do so when I can. But haven't we said more times than I can count to take such behaviour to email. I also grant you those emails should be cordial or as cordial as possible if the subject makes the two exchanging emails upset with one another. But that is what I would want someone to do, take it to email and try and iron out any differences and if not let that be the end of it but if those emails start getting to personal than yeah I have no problems with someone being deactivated.
Pocketcomb_Pimp
Deactivated User

1921 Posts
7/03
Posted - Mar 7 2005 : 9:01PM
ADT does not tollerate posters slammin' talent or insiders, so how does it look if they allow talent or insiders to slam others? This is the 1st I've heard about Jewel being bounced, but it's a good thing. Not because I have issues with Jewel, because I don't, but people should be able to voice opinion with class. If anyone is incapable of that, I'd assume not have to read their rant. Non forum drama should stay out of the forum, and no one person is bigger than this place.

PXP does great work, and Jewel left quite a legacy in a short period of time. Not having her here may be a loss in some ways, but I'm sure her fans will have many other opportunities to kiss more than a mouthful of ass.

Edited by - Pocketcomb_Pimp on 3/8/2005 7:38:03 PM
croy
Platinum Member

Discovry
4574 Posts
3/04
Posted - Mar 7 2005 : 10:11PM
+1 PCP
-Kelly-
Senior Member

2517 Posts
5/03
Posted - Mar 7 2005 : 10:29PM
You deactived Jewel De'Nyle, huh.

Tough choice. Obey your principles or go easy on an industry person? Honestly, I had definitely noticed Jewel becoming more caustic lately and I was surprised, but the thought "she should be deactivated" never crossed my mind...mabye that's just because I knew she was Jewel Freakin' De'Nyle.

I'll miss reading her opinions and I'd welcome her back.

This sucks all around.

Edited by - tscfan317 on 3/8/2005 2:00:47 AM

 
Delaware
Senior Member

1706 Posts
7/04
Posted - Mar 7 2005 : 10:29PM
deleted post

Edited by - Delaware on 3/7/2005 10:29:48 PM

imak
Adult Film Legend

3345 Posts
2/04
Posted - Mar 7 2005 : 10:47PM

Edited by - kami on 3/7/2005 10:47:18 PM

major sharp
Deactivated User

246 Posts
2/04
Posted - Mar 8 2005 : 12:02AM
LinusVanPelt who is your avatar?
And not to have Jewel on this forum is sad and she has answered some of my posts which is real cool but rules are rules I suppose.
nietzsche
Deactivated User

5470 Posts
8/03
Posted - Mar 8 2005 : 12:40AM
I thought Jewel's bitchiness added a lot to the forum. All the catfights she got herself into used to give me serious wood.
Mayor of Chatsworth
Freelance Pornographer

Chatsworth, CA
178 Posts
1/05
Posted - Mar 8 2005 : 1:35AM
Jewel is abrasive, it's one of the things I like about her. I'm sure she didn't care that she was being rude, because that's who she is. She's always expressing her inner New Yorker.

I've always thought you guys are way too quick to lock threads that wander off the original subject and onto something much more interesting. And I wish you'd permit more no-holds-barred intercourse, instead of banning folks like Jewel. She's opinionated, smart, and brash, and surely an asset to these message boards.

It's no wonder others poke fun of mild-mannered ADT: XXXPornTalk thread

EL_
Member

Browsing with Mouse Gestures
193 Posts
7/04
Posted - Mar 8 2005 : 1:44AM
Well I think it is wrong to ban her. She got mad before took some time off and came back posting info and generaly helping people and providing inside info. Now I know for a fact that she was "attacked" a couple of times and never really got any support/respect having 10 years of experience in porn.

It must be frustrating for her to defend her opinion and not getting the respect she should have received.

She was correct about Teagan you don't really hear about her that much and she was right about a bunch of other stuff too.

My 2cents bring her back she is JEWEL

loop
Senior Member

1409 Posts
9/03
Posted - Mar 8 2005 : 1:44AM
+1 . she can be a bitch sometimes but hey thats one of the reasons that makes her so sexy.

i say - FREE JEWEL.

and jewel if u read this - we still love u and i'd love to be your bitch

Ivor Biggun
Deactivated User

99 Posts
6/04
Posted - Mar 8 2005 : 1:47AM
I wonder how many "If you don't like it, don't participate." emails Steph will send as a result of this thread?... Somehow I don't think she'll send one to Jenna.
Ivor Biggun
Deactivated User

99 Posts
6/04
Posted - Mar 8 2005 : 2:04AM
Indeed it did. Her cattiness provided some rare moments of excitement in here.

It did seem to me that she was given a lot of lattitude because of who she was, but I guess the mods eventually decided they couldn't tolerate her disruption of shiny-happy-porno-people land.

Hardware All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Your other left
14594 Posts
3/02
Posted - Mar 8 2005 : 2:12AM
Go troll somewhere else, Ivor Biggun.
 
jrv
Senior Member

1266 Posts
2/03
Posted - Mar 8 2005 : 2:31AM
Banning industry participants inevitably harm's ADT ability to let fans see the industry and its participants as they really are. What's left is often P.R.-induced prefabricated posturing that is of no interest to anyone.

You really have to make a choice about ADT here: do you want a bunch of fanboys to politely discuss happenings in pornland (about which they know nothing), with a few P.R. shills tossing in manufactured tidbits from time to time, or do you want industry players to freely give their opinions (as freely as they dare anyway) and let readers sort out the good, the bad & the ugly?

You can't control people's honest opinions, only whether they get to state them, and whether the ADT members get to read them. If they can't state them then we can't read them, and it's pretty clear who loses in the end.

-Kelly-
Senior Member

2517 Posts
5/03
Posted - Mar 8 2005 : 2:35AM
jrv-

Well put. No one person is bigger than ADT. Fantastic, but the place sure seems smaller without Jewel. At least we still have those people shilling for Britney Rears.

ADT, not porn, is now the news. Lukeisback has picked up the story.

Edited by - tscfan317 on 3/8/2005 2:40:00 AM

Ivor Biggun
Deactivated User

99 Posts
6/04
Posted - Mar 8 2005 : 2:40AM
And let's not forget that's it's not just one person. It's dozens and dozens of people over a period of years. Jewel is just the first one that's been high profile enough to create a widespread revolt.
infimum
Member

189 Posts
3/04
Posted - Mar 8 2005 : 2:42AM
Silence from Steph, Drew, and Saki is deafening here!

Edited by - infimum on 3/8/2005 2:42:02 AM

nietzsche
Deactivated User

5470 Posts
8/03
Posted - Mar 8 2005 : 2:46AM
Oh look, Jewel will be readmitted in a week or two. This whole thing will blow over, no pun intended. For the record, I think prima donna behavior in female talent should not only be tolerated but encoraged as it adds to the entertainment quotient of the board.

Edited by - nietzsche on 3/8/2005 2:46:16 AM

Redish All-Star Supporter
Poetic Moderator

Long and Cursive road to the Ivory Pagoda in the province of Loraine
4076 Posts
12/03
Posted - Mar 8 2005 : 2:47AM
+1 Nietzsche.

But then again, its not my forum either.

nietzsche
Deactivated User

5470 Posts
8/03
Posted - Mar 8 2005 : 2:54AM
+1 catfights. They add to the stroke value of the forum.
Ivor Biggun
Deactivated User

99 Posts
6/04
Posted - Mar 8 2005 : 2:55AM
If that were to happen, it would blow the whole "no special treatment" argument right out of the water.
jrv
Senior Member

1266 Posts
2/03
Posted - Mar 8 2005 : 3:29AM
I don't mean to imply that pornstars should be worshiped on bended knee. No one person, even a pornstar, should be larger than the forum in which they participate.

The problem for me is that it cuts right to the heart of why porn forums exist and why people participate on them. Consider Jenna's comment:

The more I think about this, the more it bugs me... Jewel is such a major facet in our industry, what she says has a lot of merit, and sheds light on what it's like being a female (part) owner of a company.

Jewel is one of very few people to post uncensored here with direct, first-hand experience in all aspects of the production side of the business. Yes, she is rude sometimes. Yes, a lot of her posts are pitching her product. But there is simply no way a thousand polite fanboys posts can make up for the loss of her perspective. Politeness and good manors are not a substitute for substantive content, as annoying as the wording may be.


Edited by - jrv on 3/8/2005 3:31:38 AM

Lee O
Forearm Trainer

mmmmmmm........ after-birth
1193 Posts
8/03
Posted - Mar 8 2005 : 3:38AM
Well, quite . There's already a board that's tried that road and it didn't lead to "industry players ... freely give(ing)their opinions" , it just leads to anarchy where the loud and oblivious thrive . No info , no opinions , no point .

But's that's all moot anyway , this is a business and from the looks of it a pretty successful one . Just try typing "XXX porn talk" in google and see what results you get - even with their own words in the search JM productions aren't exactly streaking ahead .

Jewel can always go post over there of course , as can any industry person . Why do you think she hasn't ?

LinusVanPelt
Member

She is Kelly Lords and is clickable
175 Posts
12/04
Posted - Mar 8 2005 : 4:26AM
Leaving the specific Jewel De'Nyle case aside (I do believe there is a place for her on this board), I think we all have to acknowledge that the banning policy of a messageboard basically sets the standard of the board. If you choose the easy way out like xxxporntalk, allowing pretty much anything to be posted, you will end up with a board with so much mean-spiritedness that anyone who is not a cynic at the level of Scott Fayner will be downright disgusted. How much you may hate it, you just have to occasionally ban people and lock threads -- unless you really want to see your board flooded with threads like "[Insert name] should be shot/looks horrible/will be the next AIDS victim/is dead" (not to mention misogynic flame threads about administrators from rival forums).

My personal take is that ADT is a very friendly place without by any means thwarting creative discussions on controversial topics, thanks to the administrators and moderators choosing just the right level. Still, no matter what level you choose, sooner or later there will be incidents like this where there is a major disagreement as to a given decision. This is by no means a sign of weakness of the board. Quite the contrary, it's simply inevitable and happens on all large messageboards worth the name.


Edited by - LinusVanPelt on 3/8/2005 3:34:33 PM

Ivor Biggun
Deactivated User

99 Posts
6/04
Posted - Mar 8 2005 : 4:47AM
Why leave it aside? Too difficult?

All your waffle about the relative merits of different moderation policies is irrelevant when you start off by making an exception for Jewel. She consistantly sniped at people in various postings over a long period of time. By the typical moderation standards here, "just the right level" as you describe it, her banning was long overdue.

You evaded the very crux of the issue, which is that the most entertaining and informative posters are not always the most polite ones.

Lee O
Forearm Trainer

mmmmmmm........ after-birth
1193 Posts
8/03
Posted - Mar 8 2005 : 5:16AM
People looking to get banned just to boost their standing on another board are pathetic .

Oh , and could someone please point me to the great insights and insider info that Jewel and other stars have posted . I must have missed all that . If you're just talking about gossip then check out the TonyT thread .

Ivor Biggun
Deactivated User

99 Posts
6/04
Posted - Mar 8 2005 : 5:22AM
If that was what I wanted to do, I could have achieved it easily in one post.

What I'm doing is voicing my honest opinion. If it leads to my banning (as I suspect it well might), then people can draw their own conclusions from that.

Lee O
Forearm Trainer

mmmmmmm........ after-birth
1193 Posts
8/03
Posted - Mar 8 2005 : 5:31AM
They certainly can . Voicing an opinion you know isn't welcome in someone else's place tends to get people thrown out . Most guests understand that simple rule of thumb , why don't you ?

You still haven't explained what exactly you think could be added to this place by a new policy of "anything goes" . A quick look over at the hollow shell of XXXporntalk suggests not much .

Ivor Biggun
Deactivated User

99 Posts
6/04
Posted - Mar 8 2005 : 5:41AM
Oh right, my opinion isn't welcome. Is Jenna Jameson's?
All Forums > Star Crossed > Star Crossed Forum Page 737Not seen Jewel in a while ...

Previous topic: Please ID Euro Babe
Next topic: Is this Janet Alfano?
Page 1 of 4 2 3 > Last



Jump To: