Reviewers Recommend Big Wet Asses 34 - review by Captain Jack Director: Pat Myne Starring: Vince Karter, Zac Wild, Summer Vixen, Lilith Grace, River Lynn, Victor Ray, Tessa Thomas, Jay Romero. Read review
I'm hoping porn parodies are nothing more than just a fad. Like emo, grunge, nu-metal, boy bands, etc. I've never bought any parodies & never will. Audrey Bitoni's #1 Fan
Lily Carter is the starlet of the year 174 Posts 9/10
Posted - Sep 22 2010 : 2:18AM
Well, your point is true. I personally like porn parodies, but the biz has bombarded their product all the way they can, It's okay for one or two, but when you see this many coming, you just get lazy and just choose the best one. Anyway, my point is porn parodies nowadays is like 3D trend in filmmaking. It will last eventually
[Link]
Stalag Deactivated User
476 Posts 1/10
Posted - Nov 28 2010 : 9:36AM
If they made them without sex they would still sell. The people who eat popcorn while watching porn love this stuff!
Took a few porn parodys to a 'Good Pizza/Bad Porn' day on the weekend and although 2 of the 3 were unsurprisingly utter shite from storyline to the sex, just needed to say that The Human Sexipede was actually hilarious and the sex was (mostly) fucking hot! It was the only parody I've ever really enjoyed.. so thanks Tom Byron.. :-)
Death is caused by swallowing small amounts of saliva over a long period of time. George Carlin 1567 Posts 2/07
Posted - Feb 4 2011 : 7:08PM
Could you please tell me what you do want to see? It is hard to stop something that sells up to 10 times more than an average title. I would like to know what you think the next trend will be?
Oh my god I love porn parodies. They're hilarious. They're extremely fun to watch (IMO) especially if it's a parody of something you like (Batman, and seriously...SEINFELD!), and even better to watch with a few friends to laugh over. For example: Seinfeld XXX Parody. Holy shit this was hilarious. it was soooo well written, played out exactly like a Seinfeld episode, the sex was good, and it was an overall good time. If there's any porn I would dish my money out for in a heart beat, it's the parodies. Just a laid-back take on it all.
^Seinfeld was a great porn parody, but situational comedies and their sex-heavy themes lend easily to the format. Blockbusters and horror flicks do not usually. Thankfully, most of them aren't parodies, to say nothing of Friday the 13th and flesh-eating jizz, but rather tributes to the original films and series. Still, it's not as creative as developing a story of your own, but like woody says, "can you find another way to make ten times the amount of a normal title?" Parodies sell well, and that is the only reason they'll stick around for a while, because they are getting ridiculous.
Death is caused by swallowing small amounts of saliva over a long period of time. George Carlin 1567 Posts 2/07
Posted - Feb 7 2011 : 2:00AM
Personally, I don't think comedy and porn work well together unless you're at a frat party. We have some serious parodies in the cue that lend themselves to extreme sexual content. I have commissioned possibly the best writer out there to come up with a seriously great script. As soon as I can I will announce it. I was seriously looking forward to making a Sons of Anarchy parody, still might do it, after hearing another company did it, but wrote it as a comedy. I was extremely disappointed. It is anything but a comedy. Plus it needed to be done correctly with the storyline and plenty of bikes, hot chicks and club life. I think if you are going to do it half ass, don't do it.
Death is caused by swallowing small amounts of saliva over a long period of time. George Carlin 1567 Posts 2/07
Posted - Feb 7 2011 : 12:39PM
I would do the proper thing first and ask Kurt. The other thing that kind of bothered me is that it's called, "The Offical" and there was nothing offical about it. They never had Kurts blessing. That may be a problem for them down the road. Offical implies it is sanctioned by the originator, it clearly was not.
"Official" does kinda imply affiliation with the original work/creators. Moral issues aside, this can be potentially dangerous from legal standpoint (trademark laws).
Death is caused by swallowing small amounts of saliva over a long period of time. George Carlin 1567 Posts 2/07
Posted - Feb 7 2011 : 6:08PM
I totally disagree with you. What you are saying is that it is ok to slap a title on any piece of shit to make it sell. People like Axel Braun and Jeff take a lot of pride in what they are making, and it shows. Batman was done well to the last detail. The upcoming Justice League was a labor of love, all the costumes hand made, they spent a lot of time on special effects, chose the cast very carefully, and it shows. To make something that you claim has no integrity, call it offical, and slof it off like hey man , it's porn, it can suck and we get away with it, really sucks. Just my opinion. I am sure you will try to back peddle on this one, but jeez, to state there is no integrity and we make something half assed because it sells, wow. I talked to one actor who was on the set of SOA and he told me it was a joke. That could have been such a great parody. I actually thought it could have been one that would have sold 10k units. Now what will happen is that people will distrust your product, you sell 1/10 of what you could have, and ruin a killer concept for a great movie. Shameful. Great box/bad movie. Edited by - hollywood woody on 2/7/2011 7:17:31 PM
Maybe you should watch it before you criticize because I'm pretty sure we haven't been one of the top selling companies by slapping a nice box on a shitty product. I didn't say anything was half-assed. I just said that there's no integrity in ripping off someone else's original idea and putting sex in it. I don't care who shot it.
You're not seriously comparing anyone who has ever been in this industry to the Cohen brothers or Hendrix or Clapton right? 'Cause that would be too silly for words. If parodies suddenly stopped selling, which they will sooner than later, you will not see another single parody being funded my any studio. That is the personification of an absence of integrity. I don't mean that in negative way either. Of course, they'll stop making them if they stop selling. It's the essence of Capitalism and last time I checked, most of us are still trying to make a living doing this.
I don't know why studios slap "official" on parodies. ZT does it often, but having two different films claim to be the "Official Jersey Shore Parody" just makes the whole concept entirely useless. If you were to make a Sons of Anarchy tribute, it'd probably get better reviews, possibly higher sales figures, and the whole "official" part of their title won't even matter.
Death is caused by swallowing small amounts of saliva over a long period of time. George Carlin 1567 Posts 2/07
Posted - Feb 8 2011 : 11:48AM
I am comparing someone who did not do an original piece of work. The analogy is valid. Parodies have been around for a long, long, time. In the early 1980s adult companies would take any movie and name it something slightly different, i.e B.J. and the Bare, which had nothing to do with the movie. In the last 4 years or so the parody has become much more refined. Companies are actually shooting a movie that has something to do with the title. The Cosbys, Seinfeld, Batman etc. You are missing the point entirely. Again, I take exception with the fact your company called something "Offical". It is misleading. You said there is no integrity in making parodies, and I disagree, if they are done correctly there is plenty of integrity. The influx of companies in the last 10 years is overwhelming, people who just want to make a quick buck. It has hurt the industry. If you have a camera and can get a girl to have sex, you're in business. Well it's not that easy. Your company makes fine films, your comments should support that imo. They do not seem to do that. Edited by - hollywood woody on 2/13/2011 12:19:58 AM
Death is caused by swallowing small amounts of saliva over a long period of time. George Carlin 1567 Posts 2/07
Posted - Feb 8 2011 : 11:50AM
I stand corrected. Thank you. But still the point is valid, just switch the artists. Clapton did a fine job on Little Wing, possibly more popular than Jimis version.