^ The true thrill on actual glory hole scenarios is that the guy putting his dick through it doesn't really know who is on the other side of the hole , there is an anecdote pertaining a famous Amateur IR queen , she and her then date/boyfriend went to a glory-hole show . Some of the people in there went on the other side , they knew anybody could suck them , the girl did nothing but then a BBC appeared and she felt the urge to suck it ,but didn't want to show to her date (now husband) how slutty she was but then her boyfriend asked her if she wanted to suck it , she denied then he said do you mind if I do? As it happened he wasn't the only male going to suck dicks. We only see it mostly as dedicated straight or gay scenarios because it's meant to selected customers who wouldn't pay for something out of their lines , although I can imagine on a gay perspective that to suck off an unaware straight guy and making him cum might be an exciting idea much like a straight guy eating out senseless a lesbian who doesn't know
"You have sacrificed nothing and no one." 3689 Posts 8/10
Posted - Feb 26 2016 : 9:21AM
One thing great about glory hole scenes, is that the girl always finishes the stud No guys jerking themselves off... No stupid positions... Hard to screw-up the camera angles... In real life, though, I don't think there are too many girls on the other side of the hole
Surely - surely - one could tell the difference between being sucked off by a girl or by a bloke? I'm not sure how, exactly, but something just tells me you could. And, no, I've never been to a glory hole, nor have I ever received fellatio from a dude.
"You have sacrificed nothing and no one." 3689 Posts 8/10
Posted - Feb 26 2016 : 11:58AM
^ When you're sticking your cock through a glory hole, I'm guessing you pretty much don't care
[Link]
Canadian_Cindy Deactivated User
1102 Posts 2/15
Posted - Feb 26 2016 : 3:19PM
Exactly.. I doubt there is that internal dillema "am I gay if a guy is on the other side...."..... and really, here in 2016, if you really want to visit a gloryhole, it will always be a man, CD, etc....
prolapse, sounding, and everything involving blood. The biggest no for me. It's not just that I don't like that stuff, I find those practises scary. I like many extreme things, but those are my boundaries. tattoos, the bigger the less I'm interested in the girl, who can be the sweetest, intelligent person in the world and the most beautiful girl, but still I really don't like tattoos. double anal - the idea of rubbing cocks isn't exactly my thing. gloryhole and pov - I think it's stuff for those who don't like to see male faces in a scene. constant close ups and masks - I think it's stuff for those who don't like to see female faces in a scene. squirt - I just don't care Edited by - leatherface on 2/26/2016 3:41:05 PM Edited by - leatherface on 2/26/2016 3:41:51 PM
^^ What we need is a bisexual contributor to come on here and explain if there is a difference between the sexes when it comes to giving BJs. In the meantime, I think I'll stick with the glory hole fantasy as it's portrayed in porn - nasty girls sucking off anonymous schlongs in sleazy locations. Love it.
I know this isn't really the forum for this question, but as the topic's been raised. I read in Craigslist "women" seeking men for their private gloryhole, and having a whole set up and story. But I don't understand why. If you're really so eager to perform fellatio on strangers, do you really need to go through all of this to find willing participants? Or is it all just part of the thrill or anonimity?
[Link]
Canadian_Cindy Deactivated User
1102 Posts 2/15
Posted - Feb 26 2016 : 10:57PM
It's likely not a real woman if you found this on craigslist...... it's either a fake to get your email address to spam you ,or it will be a man or CD on the other side of that wall :)
^ If it is in fact a woman who wishes to do such things, I understand the anonimity could be important. (Or that's what the ads say anyway.) But if it's a male, why would they need to go through this whole charade to find recepients? Is it part of a game in fooling straight men?
Put it this way, unless the 'hole' was big enough that I could at least see the lower half of the face going down on me, I'd keep well clear of glory holes, lol. This seems to be the case in porn scenes - some of those 'holes' are so large the girl could almost climb through. ^^^^ Oh, by the way, GGG, cheers for that link. Interesting! Edited by - N00dlesDaddy on 2/27/2016 2:00:18 AM
[Link]
Canadian_Cindy Deactivated User
1102 Posts 2/15
Posted - Feb 27 2016 : 5:13AM
fooling straight men gets some people off...... there are alot of gay men and CD's who... instead of advertising for M4M on craigslist, will advertise as women and try to get guys that way.. there is a thrill to get a usual straight man to do things like this. They figure once the guy shows up and he is horny, he will say "what the hell" and go ahead with it. That excites some people to a high degree. Edited by - Canadian_Cindy on 2/27/2016 5:14:41 AM
[Link]
Ben Mockridge Deactivated User
382 Posts 9/15
Posted - Feb 27 2016 : 9:38AM
^ You mean a guy would place an advert pretending to be a georgous girl and when the respondent straight male turns up at the rendevouz he would approach him and say something like " Hi you must be XnameX , im sorry XgirlX coudnt make it , she asked me to come and make her apologies , anyway while your here how about a blowy from me ?" While i dont discount mans potential for bizaare sexual behaviour it seems unlikely that the respondent guy would be willing since he expressely was looking for a chik - and purely on the statistical low probability of sucess it hardly seems likely that anyone would think it worth the effort to go to all the trouble involved just to get repetitively told to F off - possibly it happens but in very low numbers.
"Facialized Vol. 7" 2021 AVN Awards Winner: Best Oral Movie 9308 Posts 9/13
Posted - Feb 28 2016 : 10:47PM
I've also heard this referred to as "the Eiffel Tower."
[Link]
Ben Mockridge Deactivated User
382 Posts 9/15
Posted - Mar 1 2016 : 5:16AM
Id never even considered watching gloryhole porn before this topic but out of boredom gave http://gloryholeswallow.com/ a shot and i have to agree with you 100% - the focus is totally on the chick - theres none of the annoying guy slobbering all over her and jacking himself off for 5 minutes - its all about the girl and the service that she provides. Its v good. The camera guy is ok as well. The only downside is that alot of the videos are in 192 hex 1080 so are quite arduous to download - id prefer to download 10 100mb files than 1 1gb file. Heres Marcella at Gloryholeswallow.com -
[Link]
StarGrek Deactivated User
Under the moonlight. 1763 Posts 10/11
Posted - Mar 1 2016 : 9:13AM
^^ The Eiffel Tower is a reverse cowgirl version where the girl is portrayed squatting and her body stands vertically above the guy. She can use her thigh muscles to move up and down impaling herself, vaginally or anally. The DP edition is extremely rare and exceptionally hot, especially when the guy on top manages to place his body without blocking the view to her entire body. Like this!!! Meanwhile... Explore Sexuality!
turnoff: everything in which any of the performers is visibly uncomfortable (that's why dislike quite a lot "rough porn". if it's consential, it's fun. but if it's pretty much paid abuse, it's disgusting).
^ I used to be of the belief that this was a distinct section of porn; and if you wanted to see it, that's where you went. Why is rough porn now so mainstream, to the point where it's almost considered standard?
A lot of men out there want to see things women in their personal lives would never go for......... and... a lot of the men in porn really don't seem to like women in general.... they are all disgusting whores to them. I enjoy rough sex on film when the women is just as aggressive and part of the action, I don't like "paid abuse" as someone put it. And there is a difference, a big one.
^ There is indeed a difference. People who refuse to acknowledge that are part of the problem. Meanwhile, yes, a lot of men don't seem to like women very much and there is porn out there that directly caters to them, seemingly created by men who don't like women very much or otherwise don't have a problem making money from producing abusive content (and I don't mean "rough sex"). Likewise, there are men who seem to will their own misogyny into porn that otherwise is merely sex of varying sorts between actively consenting adults. It's great when a dude is salivating over a woman's pain on film, only for the woman in question to come along and tell them they are mistaken; that what they saw didn't actually exist.
^ The fact that the vast majority of 'rough' or 'abusive' porn is most likely staged doesn't affect my enjoyment one iota. I'd have to be incredibly naïve and/or stupid to think the girl's suffering was real. But who can tell the difference anyway? Unless the girl goes on record after the shoot to say "That was an abusive shoot". In which case, isn't that almost grounds for criminal proceedings against the producers? As I've said in other threads, I find it more disturbing that there are women willing to make rough and abusive porn for misogynistic men. Aren't these girls troubled by thoughts along the lines of: "Jesus, what if some fruit loop views my scene then goes and rapes his girlfriend...?" And before anyone says "Well, isn't Arnold Schwarzenegger worried that someone might go out and shoot a bunch of people after watching Commando?", that's totally different. I shouldn't have to explain why, it just is and you know it is.
I don't know about that. I mean I've (accidentally) seen porn where women are anally penetrating men with objects, while also verbally abusing them. (And I'm sure there would be much rougher things out there.) Do I conclude from that that the women performing these acts, those creating this porn and those who seek it out, all have a hatred of men? Or could they all know that this is just acting and taking it for what it is?Sorry to take this off on a tangent. I suspect a lot of the anti-porn messages from some women who give themselves a certain label, is really just a dislike (hatred) of men. And men getting enjoyment from seeing women engaging in sexual acts angers them, and so this stated-as-fact narrative that porn is actually a degrading of (and a hatred of) women is developed. Edited by - Simple Simon on 3/5/2016 11:00:29 PM Edited by - Simple Simon on 3/6/2016 3:53:02 AM
the more I read this thread the more I realize that my taste in porn is pretty vanilla.
[Link]
Ben Mockridge Deactivated User
382 Posts 9/15
Posted - Mar 6 2016 : 4:05AM
Personally i think that certain women beat the misogyny drum far to much. I mean its ok to watch guys beating the living daylights out of each other boxing but if a guy watches a girl having her physical and emotional limits tested all of a sudden hes a woman hater.
^^ I think it's more a case of starting off with the conclusion, and then going looking for "evidence" that supports it.
[Link]
TastyFilthyGirlStinkHoles Deactivated User
It just looks and feels so fucking good! 142 Posts 3/16
Posted - Mar 7 2016 : 11:03AM
Not necessarily acts, but things that turn me off anyway: -stupid camera men showing the male performers face -scenes in which the photoset or pictures in no way reflect the actual video... -too much talking from male performers or camera crew -bad camera angles... acts that turn me off -anything to do with pee or other such bodily fluids -extreme prolapsing -too much manhandling or beating women Edited by - TastyFilthyGirlStinkHoles on 3/7/2016 11:04:45 AM
This shit definitely turns me off. A woman licking the guys ass in the scene. What the fuck? Me personally I would never have or let a woman lick my ass. I don't know it's just something that fucking makes my dick softer than cotton. There are some who like it (there is even a tread for it) but that shit fucks me up when I watch a scene and I see that.
^^^ On a related point, the obsession with ATM in DPs/Gangbangs. And it's not only the act. It's the repeated ordering at the lady "... taste your ass, ... taste your ass". Can I just honestly ask, is there anyone that likes hearing this?
^ Me. And I love female to male rimming too. One of my biggest bummers is that Adriano is seemingly the only guy who does it consistently in his movies yet practically everything else he does I find repulsive. I wish Mason would throw a little more rimming into her movies. It would be a really nice addition to her gangbang films. Sasha Grey was rimming guys left and right in her scene from Gang Bang 5 and it was hot as hell.
[Link]
JackSparrow Deactivated User
7235 Posts 7/11
Posted - Mar 19 2016 : 2:33AM
two different things ,watching a other dudes ass licked and getting your own ass licked.because you maybe like the own ass licked thing does not mean you enjoy watching the other one happening.
^ To me, even the guys in the movies don't really seem to be enjoying it. The GB scenes where they make the guys all line up with their back to the lady, with the men naked and bent over, the lady then licks each man's anus, going down the line. IMHO is anyone enjoying that? (Admission: There is one porn actress with which I did enjoy this act. A lady named Susan Reno. In one GB film, in the interview she tells the Director she likes Rimming, he asks what that is, and Susan bluntly says "sticking my tongue up somebodies ass." In another GB film, while sorrounded by the men, Susan grabs hold of one man, physically turns him around, then proceeds to stick her face in his buttocks. Needless to say, in most porn, it is nothing like this.) Edited by - Simple Simon on 3/19/2016 4:18:10 AM
^ Couldn't agree more with the 'love it in real life, hate watching it in porn' philosophy. Male rimming (by female) falls perfectly into this category. In reality, it feels delicious. On screen...oh dear.
How come staring at someone else's cock is normal, but showing their ass getting some love (by a woman) is a taboo? IMO F -> M rimming breathes life to nowadays bland and mechanical porn. And no, I'm not talking about situations where men get lined up and bent over... but more natural and passionate settings. I hope it will become more common in the near future. If you don't like it, you can still enjoy the rest of the movie.
Sorry but there is a difference. The cock is unique to the male anatomy(and trans whatever, if you prefer) and a necessity for porn. I have no interest in the male ass hole however.
One thing that really does nothing for me is reverse cowgirl. It doesn't necessarily turn me off but I don't think I've ever gotten off from watching this position. I usually find myself fast forwarding when this position comes on.
Gangbangs. They don't do nothing for me. Don't wanna be a sissy, but there's nothing more degrading to a woman than that. I could imagine, why it has its fans, but it doesn't anything for me. I don't wanna bring anything up (because I guess it has been talked about a thousands of times here and there's hardly any consent) and you will say, her will, blabla, but I have never heard of any girl, who likes to fuck six or more guys one after the other in her private life. Same goes with Bukakke. Edited by - Porn Minister on 3/19/2016 12:31:54 PM
^^ Eh, while I often wonder if there's some underlying hetero-anxiety behind the vehement disdain with which some guys on the forum regard certain sex acts (rimming, DA, DV, even DP sometimes), unless they state it explicitly I'll give them the benefit of the doubt. Sometimes people just don't like a thing.
- Not all GBs are what you describe - Just because you haven't heard of something, doesn't mean it does not exist. (Though it's probably more 'would like to' or 'have fantasized about') - It's usually all at the same time. (Oh, and thanks for telling me what the magic number is, it's often debated here.)
