I have read that lots of Brazilian and Russian girls do animal porn. Is this a growing trend? Will more porn stars go to these countries to do scenes with dogs and horses?
ummmm, I not sure pushing limits is the right phrase. Standard porn for me is about appreciating a beautiful girl and watching her in a sexual act that you fantasize participating in. Involving animals is something entirely different and NOT something i'd find appealing, i'd guess there would be two types of people who'd watch it, those who want to be shocked and probably only view it once and those who have a psychological problem, maybe they hate women are something. Perhaps someone who is into this could explain what they get out of it? As for a growing trend, i would think there is such a small demand for it, that no.
Blowfish is a nickname I gave myself when I was young. Girls kept wanting pinch my fat cheeks like the Gary Coleman character on "Different Strokes". My way of saying pinch these cheeks and a bitch is going to get hurt.
I dont hate animals, I dont hate women and I dont hate myself, but I enjoy normal animal porn. I prefer horses. I am not such a big fan of other animal porn movies. Normal = no brutal stuff, no degrading, no force, etc. Brazil was always an eldorado for animal porn. ( The Netherlands arent it any longer, dutch parliament passed a law against animal porn nearly 2 weeks ago. I still dont understand, if "only" the production is illegal, the distribution or even more. Maybe another dutch member can clear this up. ) I dont like it, when women are doing this only for the money, Ive met a few women who enjoyed it too, some here and in Scandinavia, who had no financial interests. Russia and East-Europe produce a lot of stuff, but I dont think that legions of models do this. This genre hasnt a great future. Especially when more and more countries outlaw animal porn.
I saw a TV programe, a serious documentary about women who had sex with there pet dogs, I thought they had to be insane. What is the attraction, do you see it as an ultimate taboo?
If you don't break the rules, you'll never have any fun! 717 Posts 10/06
Posted - Mar 23 2008 : 4:15PM
Chessie Moore did a number of beast films. There's another one, I can't think of her name now, she was an early squirt queen, but her name totally escapes me.
This may be one of those unexplainables. You have already made judgements, so why should anyone try to offer you an answer? Nevertheless... I like the idea of horse, but not dog. Also, I like fisting scenes. If I try to analyze...maybe the reason has to do with something about a woman who has a mega-huge adventurous sexual appetite, which can not be satisfied by normal human size. From a fantasy standpoint, imagine such a woman, who can and will do anything and everything you could possibly imagine, and craves it, not merely enduring it or tolerating it. It would be exciting, challenging, and immensely fun to play with her. I enjoy seeing video of such a woman going to unusual measures to get satisfaction. That's my explanation.
[Link]
conquistador Deactivated User
Hellhamster. 2947 Posts 10/03
Posted - Mar 23 2008 : 5:46PM
newveggie07's previous bestiality thread which is not locked and has almost the exact same topic Topic of old thread: Do we have any recent porn stars in America or Europe who have done scenes with dogs or horses? New thread topic: I have read that lots of Brazilian and Russian girls do animal porn. Is this a growing trend? Will more porn stars go to these countries to do scenes with dogs and horses? Nationality is obviously not the point here, this poster wants women with dogs and horses. Is anyone else missing the point? I fail to see why a new thread was necessary but anyhow I won't judge. If this is your thing there are already 300+ posts in that thread to keep you busy. And there is no need to do the whole thread all over again is there? Edited by - conquistador on 3/23/2008 5:50:28 PM
No, they arent insane. I dont see this as the "ultimate taboo". Its a sexual option. Its not fair to label all women who do this as "insane". I dont want to defend everything going on in animal porn, as much as I dont want to defend everything going on in normal porn. The ( very few ) women Ive met, who liked this, had either a deep relationship to their pet, were sexually aroused by horses, or just bored with male/female sex. They wanted more incalculability, were fascinated by an animal drive. It has nothing to do with an "ultimate taboo", or that they need to do grotesque things. Most dont need an ongoing escalation. As with "SM" fans, who want to push the limits more and more. I bet that much more women are sexually aroused by horses, but they are afraid of these thoughts.
[Link]
conquistador Deactivated User
Hellhamster. 2947 Posts 10/03
Posted - Mar 23 2008 : 5:57PM
It isn't just thoughts one has to deal with. There is a significant amount of physical danger involved with horse sex. It has killed humans before.
I think a bigger danger is cross species pathogens. Are these people trying to discover the new AIDS or Mad Cow disease? Societal norms are not all the result of prudishness. Why do you think incest is illegal? The basis of the law reducing genetic defects. They figured that out tens of thousands of years ago. Pork your family and your offspring were much less likely to live. Anyone caught fucking animals should be banned from porn from health and safety reasons. No sense tainting the whole fuck pool.
Some sound advice Blowfish! I've heard it said that women can get clitoral stimulation from riding a horse, in a conventional manner, perhaps thats a safer and more ethical approach to your desires Mindee?
Cept it's not true. Incest doesn't cause defects in healthy people. Without boring you to tears with science it merely increses the likelihood of recent genes coming out. You know blue eyes, sicle cell, chest hair. Cross-species pathogens? You do know that the pathogens that effect animals are generally restricted to a single species. Sure there are times when it mutates and crosses over and certian things that we are actually at risk of but they are few and far between.
Yes, it increases the likely hood of recessive genes that cause cystic fibrosis, Tay-Sachs, spinal muscular atrophy, hemophilia, albinism, fragile X, etc.Cross-species pathogens normally are restricted to one species because there is no trans species carrier. Most of the time said pathogens must travel a blood bridge to survive in a human host. Take HIV for example. Extremely difficult if not impossible to get infected via saliva or an insect host. Have unprotected sex and your odd increase exponentially. Horse or dog semen has that ability to penetrate the anal or vaginal wall just as well as human nut. There was a theory that AIDS jump species. That has yet to be disproven. Until we know for a fact human to animal sex is safe, why risk another human scourge for a couple dollars. Edited for grammar. Edited by - blowfish on 3/23/2008 8:20:36 PM
If you don't break the rules, you'll never have any fun! 717 Posts 10/06
Posted - Mar 23 2008 : 8:03PM
Yes, I am. If you noticed in my post I said a safe environment. Since no one's lining up to introduce me to that lifestyle, I doubt you'll have to worry about me.
I did find a youtube like sight that had Chessie doing her thing. Not necessarily her videos, but other perps where holding or bracing the animals then contorting the penises in unnatural positions. Thats animal abuse to me.
I am not an expert on the subject of bestiality or zoophile by any means. I have read a couple books about the subject and it is intriguing. This isn’t something new. People have been having sex with animals for hundreds and hundreds of years. It is a lifestyle for some; it is not as uncommon as you might think. Just go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bestiality And read the pages on pages about the subject. As for porn stars doing animal videos I don’t know how common it is or if it is common at all. But I have had a couple girls (not big names) tell me about being offered a ton of money to make these videos to sell underground. And, No they didn’t go for it.
I haven't seen it, but if it was with a dog, the funny thing is that a dog can actually rotate the penis in ways that seems very unnatural for us but which does not harm them at all. And a horse, well, the way they fuck, I doubt animal porn is harmful on them unless the woman bites down too hard... Considering the very small amount of bestiality scenes, I wouldn't be too alarmed about STDs, it's probably a lot safer doing only animal porn than mainstream hardcore porn with creampies and the like. I've noticed that everything that is banned by the US government for being 'obscene' is also very taboo among american porn fans. Fisting is not more extreme than say double anal or a baseball bat up the ass... still it's considered to be something freaky those decadent europeans do.
If you don't break the rules, you'll never have any fun! 717 Posts 10/06
Posted - Mar 24 2008 : 5:44AM
You make a very interesting point. What is more extreme..a girl taking 60 loads in the face during an American Bukkake video or one person putting all 5 fingers of one hand into a woman's pussy? Two large cocks being inserted into a woman's ass or a woman pissing on a cock? Someone jamming a dick so far down a woman's throat that she gags and pukes or a woman giving head to a great dane? As Americans we do have an interesting outlook on what is extreme and what's not!
It surprises me this subject, as well as numerous others commonly deemed by society to be morally corrupt, is so seldomly debated around this board. For or against it, I don't know of any self respecting porn site, that should be afraid to merely discuss any sexual act under the sun, but more and more often, this site seems to line up, and sing the hymns of a Southern Baptist church choir. Sure that topic had run its course, but with all due respect conquistador, that thread was nearly five months ago, in October. Despite the fact I have my own reservations on the subject, I don't know of any other genre, illegal or otherwise, that isn't granted the leeway of at least an annual discussion. Edited by - Endless Loop on 3/24/2008 6:07:53 AM
How many different sexual positions do dogs actually do? Besides the unnatural penis positioning was more for the horses. I still have to disagree with those who think cross species sex is safe. Because we don't know if anything bad has happened yet is not sign off. The numbers, globally speaking, that participate in bestiality is still statistically insignificant. This is probably the main reason for no major epidemics save AIDS. More and more people doing it not because of zoophilia but for profit. This trend may tip the balance in favor of trans species pathogens to which man has no defense against. People who traditionally fucked animals probably didn't have many human partners. This is not the case for porno personalities that engage. For those curious the site is shockingtube.com (warning most of the content is bestiality)
Gunzo wroteWho said anything about these acts being banned? There is no ban - there is the Miller test. You might get a jury of free thinkers to consider fisting okay, heck, this is pretty average bedroom behaviour - I can't see them being so forgiving about fucking animals. Whether an act is consider "extreme" is irrelevant, the key is if it is considered obscene.
What do you mean? I'm not judging anyone. I think its extremely risky behavior due to the unknown. Should porn workers be informed that their costar porks animals? A lot of good performers were lost to the AIDS epidemic in the 80's. No true fan wants that to happen again.
Theoratically, you're right, practically, you're wrong. I've seen a few movies using the tag 'Banned in the U.S.' on the cover. It doesn't say 'The american obscenity laws makes it very hard for this movie to get any kind of distribution in the U.S.'. It seems to me some people think that americans don't like this kind of stuff, but if you put this on the shelf like any discusting (I don't want to watch them so I've got the right to call them disgusting, right?) gangbang creampie, no doubt it would sell. Maybe it would sell on shock, like many of the movies themed on double anal, huge gangbangs, gapes, bukkake, throat gagging... Animal right movements would go crazy though... burn down every single store selling it... damn terrorists! (I may also point out that I care for the animals, therefore I'm a vegetarian) Edited by - Gunzo on 3/24/2008 9:54:52 AM
"I've seen a few movies using the tag 'Banned in the U.S.' on the cover. It doesn't say 'The american obscenity laws makes it very hard for this movie to get any kind of distribution in the U.S.'." Marketing hype.
Innocent Girlfriend Rewards Him With Pussy - review by Captain Jack
Posted - Mar 23 2008 : 2:57AM
