Porno movies, sexy videos, xxx. Adult DVD Talk at your service. 6409 Posts 11/99
Posted - May 3 2007 : 4:20PM
smg, do you realize how rude your post sounds? I will answer politely anyway. I brought up removing the quote icon a few weeks ago and received encouragement to do so. We removed a feature that too many people simply don't know how to use properly. When we got an email from someone saying that he could no longer reply to posts it was clear that some people thought the icon was the only way to reply to a post. Hence the problem.
Regardless, if we do something to make it easier to administer the forum then it benefits the whole community. I'm sorry you don't see it that way.
Does anyone have access to my email besides me? No, you don't know everything.
I've no problem I was thinking to those who have it could be difficult for US to understand what are they saying to whom but if our Webmaster which is obviously more experienced and skilled than me says it will be better then I take his word
I for one think a copy and pasted quote with no quote codes, separated from the new comment by only a paragraph break, is almost as hard to read as when someone would put their new comment inside the quote codes. But I'm seeing the copy and pasted quote separated from the new comment by only a paragraph break a lot more lately.
Sometimes it takes me awhile to post my comments, either because I got overly wordy or I got distracted. Maybe I was replying to what was the last post in the thread when I started writing, but when I finish there will then be three new messages between my post and the post I was replying to. I don't always remember to include the other poster's name when I reply. I don't feel comfortable starting a sentence with a lowercase letter or capitalizing a poster's name that is all lowercase. Do I start a post, "Croy, yadda yadda" or "croy, yadda yadda?"
If I'm halfway through writing a reply when I realize that I want to quote someone, but the thread is already too long for a complete thread review, it is inconvenient to go back and copy the relevant text. Not that I can't do it now, and not that the quote button made it that much easier, but it did make it a little bit easier.
The worlds' record is 212 words per minute, set in 2005 by Barbara Blackburn. You just typed (does math in head) 23 words (one was a numeral) in 3 seconds. That's an astounding 460 words per minute, more than TWICE the world's record!!!! And Ms. Blackburn uses a DVORAK keyboard and was transcribing, whereas you were composing text, which means you are even faster than what you are claiming here!
Steph, you need to go for the record! You could sooooooo beat it!
Doesn't matter to me one way or the other, any post I deem too much I just overlook, but then I don't have to read every post either.
Edited by - justalurker on 5/4/2007 11:19:02 PM
[Link]
tritone Deactivated User
1009 Posts 4/03
Posted - May 5 2007 : 11:51AM
Not having a quote button can be a major annoyance in large threads where the post you want to reply to is located in the "middle" somewhere.
First of all the "Add Reply" buttons are at the top/bottom of the page so its a minor inconvenience to scroll down and click them.
Next, if there is text you want to quote you'll have to scroll through all the posts and find it.
Before you could just hit the "quote" button and then edit everything accordingly to come up with a properly formatted quoted post that falls within the ettiquette rules.
Its really a pain now. Was the quoting abouse really that widespread?
Can you at least add a "reply to topic" icon on each post so we won't have to go to the bottom/top of the screen if we want respond.
Wow, tritone, it's like you read my mind. That's exactly what I was coming here to say. Sorry I didn't just quote you and add a +1, but that just seemed like too much work.
The funny thing is that I would kind of like the idea if it actually deters poor quoters. It's quite vexing to read a poorly quoted post, but is there really anyway to know that these poor quoters are actually using the "quote button"? They may just be improperly adding in quote tags themselves, or might be intentionally trying to annoy others with their poor quoting.
No big deal, though. I guess I'll just be quoting people a lot less simply for the fact that I'm to lazy for all that cutting and pasting, and I also hate hitting the back button.
I disagree with the suggestion of adding a reply to topic icon to every post. The reason is that I can't count the number of times that I've read a post which made me want to reply, only to find that someone else had written the exact same thing that I was going to write a few posts later. Therefore, it was completely unnecessary for me to post.
I would go the other way. Rather than having the reply icon at the bottom of each page, I would only have it at the bottom of the thread. That way, people would be more inclined to continue to read the thread before posting exactly what has already been written in the thread.
I think since no one seems to know how to use the forum correctly or to anyone elses satisfaction, the reasonable course of action would be to shut it down. Simple, elegant and effective.
Removing the quote feature is cool to me. I agree with too many people not knowing how to properly use it or just not caring. There are certain people that used it with just about every damn post they made.
[Link]
the unknown pervert Deactivated User
I'd like to stay but I've got a plane to catch. 3243 Posts 5/06
Posted - May 6 2007 : 11:49AM
If nothing else this has turned into a good way of finding out who never looks at the Tech Talk threads.
[Link]
DirtyDoug Deactivated User
143 Posts 3/07
Posted - May 6 2007 : 8:42PM
Perhaps redundant, but would it benefit the forum by including a "reply (without quote)" button, so we don't have to scroll to the bottom for each reply?
EDIT: I now see Bill's point about reading the thread before posting.
As it is now, I just open a new window when replying, so I can view the post I'm refering to simultaneously. But I'm just a mook who is lucky enough to post here once each week.
I'm not optimist anyway people still don't do even proper links even having a newbieproof URL button I don't think those users are smart enough to learn how to quote or maybe they're damn lazy. We'll see
Another way to see the right codes is to click on the edit button of a post with the feature we want and see how it has been done in the written text showed by the editing form Since we're not moderators we can't edit anything except our own posts so we can't do any damage.
Those who have powers here are obviously skilled enough and don't need any tutorial
Edited by - Laurie Cameron Fan on 5/8/2007 6:35:20 PM
I actually figured it would come back. It only was a matter of time before Drew would get tired of posts and emails saying "What happened to (or where is) the reply button".
We can now go back to making fun of people who lack quote management skills....until it is declared a disability.
so you're planning to teach people the way Nature does , if someone runs in a wood after crashing his nose on some trees he'll learn to walk instead of running
maybe some brutal editing of post with bad quotes might be enough and teach the same way
Edited by - Laurie Cameron Fan on 5/11/2007 7:09:12 PM
Paying trib-ute to SinncentVanSage 1412 Posts 12/04
Posted - May 17 2007 : 5:02PM
I'm glad the quote button is back. Without it quoting something that hasn't even been said was equally convenient as legit quoting. I think with the quote button back it's less attractive to quote users and texts that don't exist. Please let me demostrate that:
Sigh... that wasn't fun... guess I will stop harassing when playing nice is so much easier. Like this:
Woohoo... now that was simple.
Of course I understand the problem that the quote button gets klicked more often than appropriate, but let's look on the bright side, it would be even worse with a quote butt.
Panties - maybe not the best thing in the world, but next to it.