However, a note of caution: While the sheer small-mindeness of insisting "Service Animals" be changed to "Anal Service" is pathetic, I am afraid "Anal Service 2" is the only one of the Service Animals listed at the BBFC's site that hasn't been cut. Others have some major chunks of "urination during sexual activity" and "i.e. gagging during oral-genital contact" removed - 23mins and 13secs in the case of Service Animals 14. 5 and 10 have had similar chunks lopped off.

I am sorry to say that as much as I might wish it, and this is as a long term critic of the BBFC and film censorship in the UK in general, I very much doubt that you could use the exceptional case of Service Animals 2 as a precedent. The weight of evidence is against it. The BBFC might be inconsistent, they might be subjective, they might not credit porn film viewers with the same intelligence as arthouse cinema viewers, but until someone like David Sullivan takes them to court again, then that's what we're stuck with!

[Link]