"Pornography: That which excites, whether from approval or disapproval." ~ Leonard Rossite 2346 Posts 12/17
Posted - Mar 19 2019 : 12:31AM
Face down, ass up with one of his feet on her head. I don't get the allure because well some folks spasm and lose control during orgasm. If you're hitting it like that, ouch and possibly major head trauma if he puts even half of his weight on that foot.
^Like you I don't like it but it's not because the performer could be hurt during an orgasm because that's unlikely to happen to her in a porn scene. She is more likely to be hurt during the scene because a man has a foot on her head and there is no way to control how much pressure he applies when he is concentrating on fucking the woman his foot is on.
Gape obsession. I love sticking my cock, finger and tongue up a woman's ass. I just don't need to look all up in that motherfucker. The prolapse gapes where it looks like a pound of tomatoes exploded in the woman's butt hole frighten me.
Shoes on while fucking but otherwise butt ass naked. Makes no sense to me. Especially with women, whose heels are practically weapons. I wonder how many couches get ruined because the director insists the female talent wears stiletto heels during the scene.
Fucking on the beach. I don't care how big your towel is. Sand is going to get where you really don't want it.
Fuck scenes on the bathroom floor, on the kitchen counter or any other uncomfortable, hard surface.
I've pretty much gotten used to the female talent with brain fart tattoos but the men with tats all over the place, especially the face, repel me.
Scenes where there are more men than women. I watch porn for the pussy not the dicks.
Nobody behind the camera should be allowed to talk. Except Mason of HardX. And for the men who are going to continue to talk and conduct interviews from behind the camera, spend some time after filming to equalize the audio. All too often the woman's reply come across loud and clear while the man is just some semi audible mumblings. Mike Adriano's work is full of this.
Cream pies. I just don't get it. She has a mouth for a reason.
"Pornography: That which excites, whether from approval or disapproval." ~ Leonard Rossite 2346 Posts 12/17
Posted - Mar 26 2019 : 2:10PM
^ And that is why I don't get the allure of gangbangs with like 10-20 guys, you're not paying to watch the girl get stuffed but rather to watch men stroke their dicks and while there's nothing wrong with that - I'd think the gay porn arena would be more the focus of such fans.
If there was an award for the best line of the day here at ADT I'd nominate you for that one. I may not agree entirely with you, but this line made me laugh out loud. The rest of your post was great too. I'll be keeping an eye out for future posts.
Add all the step-this and step-that fake incest stuff out there. I just don't get it. "Real" incest stuff too. Unless it's twins. I know that makes me a hypocrite but twins in a sex scene is hot.
^I wouldn't use the word hypocrite so much as confused because if you don't like real incest but like twins together in a scene then what do you think twins are if not biological siblings.
I'm mostly indifferent on the subject of incest porn. I can take it or leave. Where I'm less indifferent is when producers keep screwing up the incest plot of their videos. You want to make pseudo-real siblings incest or pseudo-step siblings incest porn than make sure it's more than a few lines of dialogue between two people at the beginning of the scene where the dialogue is delivered like a laundry list and where it's never brought up again in the scene.
[Link]
Arnold The Geek Deactivated User
251 Posts 7/17
Posted - Mar 29 2019 : 2:39PM
^ I don't get the whole "step" thing either. Go all in or not at all. I don't care for the whole 5 minute disclosure that they aren't actually related.
Pretty much. Most of these "step" scenes are just vanilla couch porn with a "but your my sister" dialogue tacked on at the beginning. It's a bit odd how porn has gotten so extreme in some areas but the story driven stuff is tamer and more sanitized than what was around in popular features during the 70's and 80's.
Edited by - jackie treehorn on 3/29/2019 5:17:20 PM
^&^^I'm going to reveal my geekiness with the following Yoda quote. Do or Do Not. There is No Try. If most porn producers took what Yoda said to heart then their porn would be better and that goes for those who do pseudo-incest porn. That said I understand why producers of incest themed porn stay away from characters that are biologically related even though everyone knows that it's all fake because none of the performers are related. No one wants to get accused of making obscene porn and sadly that could happen with an overzealous DA.
Would porn fans really cry foul if tomorrow pseudo-incest producers changed the relationship to an older woman seducing a younger one or a younger woman initiating another young woman into lesbian sex?
"Pornography: That which excites, whether from approval or disapproval." ~ Leonard Rossite 2346 Posts 12/17
Posted - Apr 7 2019 : 11:24AM
I don't get the pretzel position - honestly, for all the tweets that were made about how the RCG position is dumb, the pretzel position of porn just hurts me even looking at it. I can't imagine it's easy to breath all compressed like that.
Not a big picture one, just something recently that came to attention:
Madison Ivy returns but doing limited scenes, half of them for the same company with the same guy (Kieran Lee). What's the point of this lol? You've seen one you've seen them all.
Same performers, same director, same production, same editing.
Trailers as a general rule are about 2 minutes of a 30 minutes or more scene so while you think that this is bad news. In fact it is very good news because if a site is unwilling to show what any potential customer will get for his/her money then there is a good chance that it's not worth the join price. Think about it. Would you buy a car if you went to the dealer and he showed you the car but didn't allow you to test drive it?
Let's be clear. You are talking about Madison working more or less exclusively for Brazzer. While I can sympathise. You have to realise that she had already shot 73 scenes for Brazzer before this year and that is over a decade. It makes sense that if she was planning a return then she would want to work for a company that has been her biggest employer.
I think most returning performers but especially true porn stars don't want to play the booking game so if a company is willing to give them enough exposure and meet their asking price then why wouldn't they refuse their offer. Look at Tori Black. She has only worked for Mason and Lansky.
I mean if it makes sense the most sense for her business-wise then so be it, it's her life and she can do whatever she wants.
I guess if Brazzers feels they can put out the same scene like once every two weeks and it won't hurt their bottom line then I can't blame them either.
Just from a fan perspective, it's pretty lame lol.
"Pornography: That which excites, whether from approval or disapproval." ~ Leonard Rossite 2346 Posts 12/17
Posted - Apr 21 2019 : 2:12AM
G/G scenes featuring female performers with long nails - I can't think of a single woman who wants a vaginal tear courtesy of an errant fingernail during the festivities. I mean sometimes I overlook this but it's just not even plausible for someone who is bi. Usually you can tell bi or lesbian girls by the fact that the nails on one hand are conspicuously trimmed.
Incest scenes. No shade, but this is cultural. Ancient Greeks and Romans got down like this, but not Ancient Africans. We (black people) don't do incest--we find it repulsive.
^ But what about the real-life incest scandal in Nigeria where tribal cases of incest within large families are covered up so as not to bring shame on the family?
If you're going to speak for all members of a certain race and make such as strong pronouncement, make sure you have every base covered.
^&^^I see nothing wrong with arguing for or against incest/pseudo-incest porn but please drop the rest before it gets even more unpleasant. This is a porn forum so bringing up so called cultural points of view as though you guys are scholars having an academic debate is a terrible idea in general but even more so when it's only going to derail the thread.
Shit I don't understand: almost cult-like adulation of some girls who are admittedly hot but have awful screen presence and no skills and look like they'd rather be getting a root canal during their scenes.
Well, fanboying (and fangirling) is rampant in all entertainment industries. Lots of people fail to keep any sort of reasonable perspective when it comes to "celebs".
I don't know any performer that were hot but lacked any skills in front of a camera or any screen presence and were able to acquire a cult-like following. I would say that a performer like Kendra Sunderland has a following that to my mind makes very little sense but she at least has skill and screen presence. She doesn't have enough content to deserve the following she has so maybe some of that following is fake. One performer that has a crazy following in this forum is Mia Melano and no one can show me why she should even be worth discussing on a weekly basis let alone every day.
Just noticed recently a spate of these remote controlled/sexbot scenes, obviously my opinion but utter they're utter garbage. Completely unerotic and ridiculous to the point of a complete turn-off.
I was reading the Dogfart thread and a cuckolding scene was mentioned. I really don't understand cuckolding scenes. Well, I don't understand cuckolding at all. I'm not criticizing anyone who is into it, the thread is stuff we don't understand, not that we don't like. How do people view the fantasy in these scenes? Do they see themselves as the dominant male who is fucking a submissive man's wife and making him watch? Is the viewer seeing this through the lens of the submissive guy?
I'm genuinely curious here. I truly don't understand it.
What Have You Done To My Little Cable Boy? 2966 Posts 5/10
Posted - Apr 22 2020 : 1:58PM
Hookuphotshot
The girls are terribly dressed. They look like clowns. $5 clowns. Then the sex is so weird and that with a male actor who doesn't look like a porn actor at all. I'm guessing this is deliberate trash. I don't get how that turns people on.
^I don't think it's watered down Max. In fact if there is one producer who managed to copy later day Max then it's Bryan. Just about everything in a standard HUH video is classic Max. The way the performers look. The clothes they wear. The various position for oral, vaginal and anal is all later day Max. Sadly so is the vomit, drool and piss.
I like the performers Bryan hires. I'm okay with his choice of makeup and clothes but I would prefer he didn't do it. I'm even okay with some of the things he does in his videos but so much of what is part of his sex scenes has the opposite effect of what it does with his fans then his content remains something that I can't enjoy.
^ To be fair though, he may have been goaded into the piss and vomit through people on this forum and on his own forum. Piss was extremely rare and puke was unknown until a few people started pushing hard for it. He hasn't done that in a while. He appears to be back to his original formula. Well, he was until the pandemic got in the way.
I don't agree that Bryan is channeling and inner Max. On the surface there are a lot of similarities but underneath there is a significant difference. For Max, the latter half of his career was finding new ways to torture women. Bryan's scenes are 'vigorous' but I've never perceived that he's trying to push limits.
Introducing Natasha Carter
Posted - Mar 19 2019 : 12:31AM
