“Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards.” - Kierkegaard 2684 Posts 8/09
Posted - Sep 21 2009 : 8:14PM
I personally don't like to see many tattoos on a girl in porn. Although our American society is more generally accepting of tats today, when it comes to industries that depend on careers exposing bodies with little or no clothing, I think large and excessive number of tats still is generally not accepted as aesthetically pleasing by the general public, including heterosexual males. After all, porn is just a more dynamic, alternative form of modeling. Right or wrong, I think excessive tats in porn are not advisable, from a career perspective. Recently, I read a girl on ADT (was it Ms. Armani?) state that although she likes tattoos, she will not get one while she is doing porn. This is the smartest business/professional decision I have read by a performer and I find it odd that more performers do not subscribe to this business practice. To me, tattoos around pelvic, chest, and neck regions are especially distracting in porn. Also, I find the female body very beautiful in itself and I find tattoos, in general, mask and detract from the beautiful female form.
Congrats! You have a really cool look. Your hair looks good curly and straight (I prefer curly) so don't think you have to straighten it all the time to look like a certain type of porn star or something. Plenty of fans like it both ways, I'm sure. Who have you worked for? I'd be interested in checking out your stuff.
[Link]
deadmanwade Deactivated User
161 Posts 9/09
Posted - Sep 30 2009 : 3:08PM
I like tattoos as an art form, but in a similar fashion there is good and bad art. I've seen some tats on performers that really enhance their appeal, and some who look like they were used as a scribble pad by a 4 yr old. Damaged goods? Depends on a case by case basis for me.
The great thing about ink is that you can put it on cheap, replaceable paper in any configuration or color that you like and put it in a folder and nobody will ever ask you what you were thinking.
[Link]
Fernandez Deactivated User
781 Posts 12/08
Posted - Nov 25 2009 : 6:37PM
We need more anal tats! Ava Rose would be my first nominee. Edited by - fernandez on 11/30/2009 6:33:12 PM
My opinion of tats has always been... go big or go home. I don't really like tattoos to begin with, but that said, I do appreciate when people get really bold and beautiful tattoo work done. Tramp stamps? Little stupid stars? Lame. Stunning full sleeve or more? At least, even if I wouldn't want it, I know the person is committed to their form of expression. Lame: http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_oTZ3g_cSYKo/Ss4Ruf1AZVI/AAAAAAAAAAc/sqYLes4uu20/s1600-h/girl-Star-Tattoos.jpg Awesome: http://fc07.deviantart.net/fs27/f/2008/126/e/e/SuicideGirls__JaneDoe_by_builttospilllove.png Now I'll grant you... I don't really *love* the particular art in the second image... but I fully respect the owner's dedication to getting a quality tattoo, a quality tattoo artist, and committing themselves to having that much ink put down.
Depends on the look of the woman and how much ink she has on her. Sometimes, the LONG art that extends across their shoulder-to back-to leg, just doesnt look right.
Tattoos on women just doesn't do anything for me. I'm sure there are people that love it but I'm not one of them. If it's only a small tattoo it doesn't bother me too much.
Don't agree with thread at all. It all depends on what the tattoos are and the woman. Some women i feel tattoos compliment well. For example Skin Diamond, her tattoos compliment her edgy and sexy style PERFECTLY..I wouldn't have her any other way I'm sitting here trying to imagine Skin Diamond without any tattoos...and it's not as good of a picture in my opinion Edited by - WackPosteIntolerant on 4/16/2012 4:44:54 PM
While I'm not big on tattoos you bring up some good points. Some women with tattoos don't bother me but that depends on where they are located & are not covering up their assets. My opinion, sure some will disagree but thats the point of the discussion.