I mean, I usually need about 5 minutes between orgasms, before I can go again, and even then I can only go about 3-4 times in a night. Now I know viagra helps get your cock up and up faster, but for me it inhibits ejaculation (besides I'm to young to take that shit anyways, lol). What if we had a pill that would let you cum and then continue to fuck, you know, male multiple oragams. I new a few guys are lucky enough to have this talent. I have read of a guy who scientist studied in a lab who was able to nut 6 times in 36 minutes. I think this is where science is heading. I mean forget cancer and heart disease medication, we need a drug for this. But back to my initial question. How would a drug like this affect society as a whole? Would there be more cheating? Less work productivity? More rapes? Happier men? Less war? How would this affect women? Please discuss.
Still wanking after all these years. 8082 Posts 10/00
Posted - Mar 8 2009 : 12:29PM
I prefer to make things last longer, with one huge orgasm at the end, rather than to be able to come multiple times within a short time frame. Edited by - Joey Starr on 3/8/2009 12:29:39 PM
Well... there's the problem of friction damage, there's the fact that you will be completely out of cum, and the 4th or 5th orgasms aren't really that good anyway. Sure it would be cool but I don't think most guys would bother to orgasm 15 times anyway.Not to brag, but I can nut 6 times in a shorter period than that when jerking off, and I think a lot of guys can. It helps a bit to be uncut for the stimulation (because the foreskin that moves stimulates the whole cock, not because of the commonly used sensitivity argument). But my cock will not be as hard as before the first ejaculation. That's the refractory response from the brain, you will still respond to stimulation but it takes a bit more frantic jerking so to say :P Cumming many times in a very short period is much harder with vaginal intercourse than with your own hand.I always say.. baldness will be cured long before cancer, even if the mechanics behind it should be more complicated. I also believe we will have a pill that combines the effects of viagra, eating right, excersising and getting a tan long before we cure cancer.I doubt the effect would be huge. Guys are horny bastards anyway and it can't get much worse in that regard. Women would probably protest a bit, but by then we will probably have solved the bigger problem first; a pill that makes women want to fuck 24/7.
I need a pill that diminishes my desire to a level my guy feels like dealing with without entirely removing it. It would appear that my sex drive is either completely on (24/7) or completely off. At this point, I feel guilty for being horny.
And on that fateful day, the hatred consumed me... 1423 Posts 3/09
Posted - Mar 8 2009 : 8:17PM
I think the refractory period is needed as a physical and mental rest, so that sex isn't on ones mind 24/7. There needs to be some period where you can concentrate on other things, and feeling perma-horny gets in the way of that.
i work at an adult store and we do sell a pill that shortens that "recharging" period between. It's called Stiff Nights. Kind of pricey but it works - I used my boyfriend as my guinea pig!
Just what the world needs, more pharmaceuticals. We are so over-medicated and over-stimulated already. What's the big rush getting hard again? That time can be spent pleasuring her.
They would have a lot more "head-aches" -- buy stock in Tylenol if this ever happens -- their bf's / hubbies will be sure to have a full supply on hand at all times...
“Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards.” - Kierkegaard 2684 Posts 8/09
Posted - Oct 4 2009 : 7:02PM
I agree with prior sentiment. If a pill existed, guys wouldn't have dicks anymore as their junk would either be disintegrated (from overuse) or rotting due to infection (from overuse). I think this is nature's fail safe. As with many things I have discovered and continue about the human body, these mechanisms are there for a reason and messing with a good thing usually produces more problems than needed.
Well, according to Dr. Drew, a vast majority of women don't want/like more than about 15 minutes of intercourse, so I'm guessing that women in general wouldn't care for this pill. But for the chicks who like it all night long, well.... I'm sure the porn industry would welcome this, though. Think of the multiple cum shot movies to be made. And the male talent wouldn't have to worry about nutting so quickly. In fact, it would probably open up the industry to more and better male talent.
There are a variety of drugs that basically perform this type of function. Generally speaking, they are not specific enough to only impact the neurotranmitters involved in the orgasm process. The effect of these drugs is one of the reasons why sex and drugs (at least some drugs) are often associated. The primary problem with these drugs is that their use results in permanent physical changes. These include the inability for the neural structure to work without drugs, a need to increase the use of the drug, and permanent damage leading to a loss of neural function. The loss of function is due to a loss of the natural neurotransmitters or receptors that our bodies use to propogate signals between cells.
When I was a teenager and up until about age 23, I was capable of having multiple orgasms without stopping. It was great and it surprised a few girls. I'd come and they would probably be thinking "great, that was quick" and then be surprised to find that I was still going.
The refractory period is the only thing that probably keeps me from fucking to death, because if not for that, I would fuck 24/7. I already want to.. Just my body can't keep up. /needs to have sex at least once a day //wants to have sex 3-5 times a day ///have had sex as many as 12 times in one day and wishes it were more ////when does sex actually end if all you can think about is doing it again? /////never have tried Viagra, because I'm afraid it would be like throwing a saturn sized ball of gas into the sun. :)
Angel Anthology: Angela White, The - review by bono-one
Posted - Mar 8 2009 : 12:45AM
