"You have sacrificed nothing and no one." 3689 Posts 8/10
Posted - Dec 7 2011 : 12:31PM
If you read this thread from the beginning -- or any other "pro vs. anti boobjob" thread ever posted on ADT -- nothing is "safe" to say on this topic Might I ask you a favor? I'd really appreciate it if you would post something here, to get that thread going. If anyone can twist it all together in an entertaining way, my money would be on you
All I have to say is let's look at some of the most popular women in porn ever and look at their success. Top of the list would be girls like Jenna Haze, Sasha Grey, Tori Black, Belladonna and so on. These are some of the most popular girls ever. And these girls did it in half the time it took non natural girls. These girls have the longest lines at events. Girls who have reached a level of success that many girls with "enhanced" breast can only dream of. So it is not always all about the size of the breast. It is about the woman behind them as well. And before someone says "Well there are plenty of girls with fake boobs that are superstars too!", look at the ratio. Fake:Real = 50:1, hell I would even dare say 100:1. Now take that ratio and compare success records. The most successful women ever are naturals. Can't lie with stats. BTW, not hating on fakies cause there are some nice ones out there. But, Real > Fake every time with me. Just Sayin! *****The Dr. of Nasty***** Edited by - Dr. Nasty on 12/12/2011 2:51:56 AM
^^^ they are popular girls yes, but not the most popular ever that would be Jenna Jameson by a LOOOOOONG way tera patrick, jill kelly, Lisa Ann, Julia Ann etc etc etc would all be up there the top 100 of 2010 http://www.porn-star.com/top100.html only Tori Black is natural in the top 10... and its been like that for many many years so those saying no one likes boob jobs are talking out their ass, as its pretty obvious the "average joe" does like them
I see you have missed my point completely. I am not saying that those girls are at the top in #1, #2 and so on. But they are definitely in the top 10. Also, I am not basing my statement off of a Top 100 list which is pretty much biased anyways. No one knows what most top 100's base their list on. I am basing it on the word out on the street and in the communities, the forums, the events(exxxotica, AEE,etc) and so on. When Tera Patrick was at AEE a few years back, her line for fans didn't even compare to that of Tori Black and Kristina Rose. Also, again, if you look at the ratios, that still puts the natural girls out ahead of most non natural ones, just because of the sheer amount of girls they have to contend with. *****The Dr. of Nasty*****
the top 100 list i gave is a list compiled of the most searched porn stars online its not someones opinion, its the most popular for 2010 online ive looked up that page since about 2006 or so ...every year the majority of the top 20 have all had implants bottom line is, if everyone hated implants so much no one would buy porn with stars who have them, but seeing how so many stars get them obviously there is a big audience for them
"You have sacrificed nothing and no one." 3689 Posts 8/10
Posted - Dec 12 2011 : 5:50PM
Here's a totally insane thought... Porn fans don't like/dislike pornchicks, or buy/don't buy - rent/don't rent - steal/don't steal product, based solely on natural vs. fake boobs Even as I type this, I realize that I will be viciously flamed by the handful of tit-freaks, on both sides of the argument, who do exactly that.
^^^ disagree 100% its porn, its chicks naked, most guys like boobs right? whether its natural or fake so why wouldnt they buy titles based on that? maybe not solely, but it would be a factor it is for me for sure there are many other things i look for, that make it a title i love but yeah boobs are a massive factor ( i dont mind naturals, im not saying i dont.. i am saying i really like fake ones.. put it this way, i wouldnt buy a title that was all naturals)
^ This is where that argument loses weight. If you are basing your argument off of a Top 100 list that only takes into account most searches on the web, that is pretty flimsy. What about people who don't use search engines? What about people who don't have computers? Is it considering that the persons doing the searches are possibly the same group of people that watch porn all day everyday on any device or computer they can? What about the guys that liked the girls before they got implants and they just like the girl themselves? You can't say that the girls at the top of the list are most popular and that is attributed to fake boobs. That is completely hypothetical. Also, to use that alone as an argument is weak because it is completely vague and inaccurate. For instance, plenty of people look up Justin Beiber, Twilight, and Britney Spears. Does that mean that a majority of them like those things? No. Does it even mean that some of them like those things? No. Maybe they did something news worthy so people just want to know. Maybe they just want to find out who or what this thing is. To automatically some to the conclusion that "Most men like girls with fake boobs because this Top 100 list says they are most searched" is not a good argument at all. Yes alot of men do like big ol fakies, but to say or imply "most men do" and to attribute "enhancements" to success is just foolish. *****The Dr. of Nasty*****
"You have sacrificed nothing and no one." 3689 Posts 8/10
Posted - Dec 12 2011 : 6:07PM
So, since I posted what I said -- with the qualifying statement "based solely" -- what are you "^^^ disagree 100%" going-on about? You have proven my point, though [o\|] Here's one for you... For the guys who base their decisions based on anal/no anal, do the tits matter? How about the IR/no IR guys? I know I'm batshit insane, but I believe pornfans have preferences. And, when girls and/or scenes add-up enough of their preferences, they overlook the others that are/aren't present. Edited by - Goldstein on 12/12/2011 6:09:20 PM
Huh. A website that tends to focus and specialize in pornstars with enhanced chests shows that their visitors prefer porn stars with enhanced chests. That is amazing. There is simply nothing left to conclude other than everyone just loves boob jobs. Edited by - joeblow123321 on 12/15/2011 8:10:19 PM
[Link]
Hodel Deactivated User
462 Posts 12/11
Posted - Dec 15 2011 : 5:40PM
Same people also love Big Macs and Coors Light! And snickers
This is Mandy Dee. I am more in awe of her than I was of Greta 1478 Posts 1/04
Posted - Dec 15 2011 : 8:52PM
I just skimmed this thread, and two big issue surrounding breast implants seem to be missed. First, the economic pressure some producers put on women, namely "You won't make anywhere near as much money if you don't have your boobs enhanced." A lot of woman have allegedly heard that during their porn careers. Is this true? Second, I think that there's a consumer issue involved with breast implants. Namely, how can anyone claim a woman has big tits when in fact they're big breast implants? Only recently has the implant technology become good enough to escape close observation. That makes it even worse. All porn with women with implants should be labeled "BIG PHONY BREASTS." Only videos with women without breast implants should be labeled "BIG TITS." lordish
In general this is already the case. Anything that advertises big tits in any way at all is a guarantee of rubberized bolt-ons. Anything that says "natural" is non-rubber. Natural is the keyword; try a search on iafd and you'll see. I tend to focus on the chick anyway. though I'm not especially a fan of large tits, there are certain chicks I might seek out like Mandy Dee, Gianna, etc.
[Link]
Digital Lust Self-removed
All truth is parallel; All truth is untrue 768 Posts 10/11
Posted - Dec 16 2011 : 10:33AM
Fake tits are a big issue for me. If I'm looking for new pornstars, I will usually ignore anyone I see with fake tits. If I don't ignore them, it's because they are insanely hot. I'm not an expert on boob jobs, but I don't see why fake breasted women don't go for a more natural look. For example, Jayden James has fantastic fake titties that have a somewhat natural look to them. That doesn't seem to be the case for most fake tits.
Yes, I agree with you. The best boob-job is one where you can't tell for sure whether the lady had a boob-job or not. This is the standard of good quality for any other kind of plastic surgery. And plastic surgery for boobs shouldn't be any different. An obvious boob-job is a bad boob-job. I'd say that many ladies end up with such bad boob-jobs because they go for increased size, rather than for a better-looking shape. A woman with well-shaped tits looks very attractive, even when she has small tits. Her only disadvantage is that her tits are less visible, when she is clothed. But this is a disadvantage only in real life and not on porn. Because in porn, women routinely take off their clothes and show their tits.
+1000 I'm an "All Natural" kinda guy, but i have to be honest and say that i LOVE Jayden James and and Sophie Dee's boobjobs! They look absolutely amazing! I literally had no idea they had them done before i looked them up... Same goes for Eva Angelina and Molly Cavalli - Fantastic all around!
The problem is that for every GOOD boob job, there's about 10 bad ones! Like Rebeca Linares (who's one of my favorites) sadly got a pretty bad one and i just don't enjoy her new scenes as much :/ . Edited by - unreliable narrator on 4/1/2012 10:26:45 AM
Gravity as Curved Space: Bootymeister's Theory of General Relativity 1589 Posts 11/08
Posted - Apr 2 2012 : 6:24PM
Yeah right, Kristina Rose is not in the top 100?
You are sick or apparently can not read.
From the first paragraph of that webpage:
"...Free pornstar galleries are added daily to the site since many years. Carrying on with its yearly tradition, porn-star.com has released a list of the most visited pornstar archive pages of 2011 and as such has compiled the Top 100 Most Popular Pornstars of 2011. This list is an actual ranking of the 100 most visited pornstars on the site in 2011;..."
According to the site itself, that dumb crap you cited refers the to that site, not the internet, and certainly not AVN where natural women dominate.
Again, if I see a set of tits and I even have to ask, it goes in the "boob job" category. And for whatever reason, to me, a boob job is somewhat different than a nose job. But I generally prefer my women with the nose they were born with. Generally, tits are different. They just are. But if I see a girl who has those massively inflated lips, I can't watch her. It's just too distracting. It looks freakish. No offense to the women who have had that done. That's just my opinion about it.
It really depends I think on how the boob job is actually done. Mackenzee Pierce is a perfect example of what to do and what not to do with boob jobs. Her first one was great. But the second one was just god awful. Boob jobs really suck when they look rock hard.
I don't know if "most everyone" hates boob jobs. It might be more accurate to have said that most everyone hates *bad* boob jobs, and unfortunately bad boob jobs (disproportionately large, hard-looking, oddly shaped, etc.) are very common in porn.
At the end of the day, it is what it is. 629 Posts 12/09
Posted - Apr 25 2012 : 8:37PM
^^^ Save it Anita Blue got a boob job for god sakes... There's no talking these girlz out of it. I saw a flick with a Jack Napier + Anita Blue scene where Anita suggested in the "backstage" part of the DVD that she might someday get a boob job. Jack Napier went on a tirade right on camera. Edited by - ControlFreak on 4/25/2012 8:38:25 PM
^ You watch that video and then look at before and after pics and you just wonder what she was thinking. I mean, this girl was smokin' hot. Now? Boob job. That's all I think when I see her.
^Let's agree to disagree on her before and after look but one thing we can't argue about is the fact that she disapeared from the porn scene just about the same time that she had her surgery. I don't know if that was her decision of if her new looks made her less appealing to producers.