"Facialized Vol. 7" 2021 AVN Awards Winner: Best Oral Movie 9308 Posts 9/13
Posted - Jul 22 2015 : 6:34AM
^ I just watched the episode on HBO last night. EDIT: The piece is about the prevalence of domestic violence incidents amongst MMA fighters. Christy Mack is interviewed and the story of last year's brutal attack is recounted. Edited by - Mass Facialties on 7/22/2015 6:40:17 AM
^^ Hey DVDstuff, when it will be finished show it to us here, ok? ^ there is possibility that you are right, wolvie. But we will never know untill the day in which we hear from Christy why she decided to quit. But if it was because of this idiot, WM, I think it's still tough for Christy to talk about that. Well, at least IMO
Christy quit porn long before the War Machine incident. See this post from December 2013. The severe beating she received from him that landed her in hospital was in August 2014. She did supposedly get beat by him on several occasions prior to this, though. Maybe it was one or more of those beatings that made her quit the business. I can't say.
#SDNY he's all yours. -- Michael Steele 5110 Posts 3/03
Posted - Jul 28 2015 : 12:40AM
LOL. It'll be malpractice if that attorney fails to do everything up to and including a flying knee and a rear naked choke to try to prevent that imbecile from taking the stand.
I have a half-dozen images of her I need to draw. Been gathering about 60 images to draw past couple years. Only want ones that can be a drawing and an image. FEW images like that anywhere.
^^ How is that a "new profile" when it says "Previously represented" above? It just means that this model was at some previous time in the past represented by that agency... in 1657 or during the French Revolution or whenever. E.g. Cece Capella, Naomi Woods, Lily Rader, probably the most current models, don't have this written on their profile.
^ i'm not great in english language but it can mean that she was rapresented before because she was in the biz previously as we know and that now they rapresent her again because she is back doing scenes
^No, it clearly means she was a client but not anymore, some of the other girls have it too. It's similar to businesses having a "previous clients" or testimonials page. Jacco
[Link]
wolvie667 Deactivated User
4467 Posts 4/11
Posted - Oct 1 2015 : 9:53AM
The first pic shows off her great ass in a good way. Oh and for you guys who didn't already know (like there would be anybody here on this tread) the red hair in the second pic is a wig. I believe she was already sporting the shaved head look (witch I didn't like in the beginning, but know think she looks great with it. has grown on me, although I liked her sort of mohawk saved shides style she had in her porn days the best)
it's probably just for feature dancing Edited by - cm37564 on 10/3/2015 10:54:36 AM
[Link]
wolvie667 Deactivated User
4467 Posts 4/11
Posted - Oct 3 2015 : 12:57PM
If christy would make a return to porn, Who past or present do you want to see her do a scene with. I would say: * Belladonna (also making her return (might be a dream, but a wonderfull one)) * Annette Schwarz * Katrina Jade * Kleio Valentine or * Tory Lane
^ Not only are they arguing sex was consensual, they are implicitly arguing that her work in pornography means she is either unrapeable or that consent is complicated. It's not, and she is not. I can't believe they are arguing this. 'Mackinday's career lead to her "desire, the preference, the acceptability towards a particular form of sex activities that were outside of the norm," Sua said. Koppenhaver met Mackinday while making an adult movie. "The jury needs to know the nature of this relationship, and what was customary and consensual," Sua said outside the courtroom. Prosecutors argued that rape shield laws, which limit the ability of defendants to introduce evidence of victims' sexual history, should prohibit defense lawyers from revealing the details of Mackinday's movies to a jury. "Because she consented to those acts through her course of employment does not mean the defendant is then entitled to think he can do that to her," Bluth said. "You can't make that leap." The judge questioned whether pornography established consent but asked Sua for a written motion explaining the history of the sexual relationship between Mackinday and Koppenhaver. "I don't see how any of those activities that she did in adult movies would ever show her consent to the acts with the defendant that he's charged with," Cadish said. "I'm not seeing that connection."'
[Link]
Canadian_Cindy Deactivated User
1102 Posts 2/15
Posted - Nov 26 2015 : 1:42PM
Hard to fathom they would even attempt to say getting her face battered to pieces was legal because she does porn. Or are they just trying to get the rape charges dropped so he just has to deal with the charges related to beating her (less charges may mean less time behind bars). Thankfully the judge didn't buy it.
"You have sacrificed nothing and no one." 3689 Posts 8/10
Posted - Nov 28 2015 : 11:50AM
Somebody has got to offer Christy the right price, and get her back in front of a camera again I don't know how a subscription site (e.g. Brazzers) could make her an offer she couldn't refuse, and still make it financially beneficial for them to do so. Could it possibly generate enough new memberships and/or renewals for them? Also, sales of physical disks are not what they used to be. Don't see how or why people would buy DVDs in sufficient quantity to make the money back (i.e. and DVD resolution is not going to cut it for a premium priced disk). Maybe, a DigitalPlayground scene, where even members would be willing to pay the extra couple bucks -- on top of their membership fees -- to download a premium scene? DP already does this with some of their content, which is why I'm throwing this thought out there? I'm sure many would be willing to pay the $1.49-to-$2.49 upcharge DP currently imposes -- certainly for Christy Mack's first scene back. Some DP "Downloads FAQ" Discussion Maybe, Brazzers could think a little outside-of-the-box, and offer scenes such as a Christy Mack cumback across ALL their websites, in that $1.49-to-$2.49 upcharge range? Bound to generate many new memberships. Hell, how about $1.99 to members and a stand-a-lone download sale for, say, $6.95 to non-members? They shouldn't get carried away with the concept -- i.e. as just another way to milk the customers -- but I really feel that using a pricing model as I've described would be a win/win/win for everybody, and enable the economics to work.
[Link]
Rosco Fuji Deactivated User
On the licking stick, Mr. Magic Dick! 3309 Posts 2/09
Posted - Nov 28 2015 : 11:36PM
You left out the part where it mentions that she filed and then withdrew rape charges previously, and also how they routinely engaged in rough sex. Based on these tolerances, one could argue that he thought that they were just making love. Poof, there goes all rape charges and he's just facing a simple assault charge.
Worst defense attorney ever. Perhaps "War Machine" is going to try to get an appeal based on incompetent counsel.
[Link]
Canadian_Cindy Deactivated User
1102 Posts 2/15
Posted - Nov 29 2015 : 7:58PM
Hard to fathom any judge or jury will take "regular rough sex" and connect it to beating her face to a pulp and it being part of their regular sex life. I am actually liking this obscene defense because it may piss off a judge enough to throw the book at him harder. Here's hoping he keeps blowing kisses at prosecutors and any female judges he encounters. Just keep acting as offensive as possible please; let's get that sentence as high as possible. PS - I actually was shocked they took this type of really offensive angle. I was thinking they would try to pull the "Brain damage" card out due to concussions and all the head shots in MMA. Although, I have been an MMA fan for a long time and have seen footage of him from 7 or 8 years ago. He was just as bad then as he is today (or so it appeared), so I would suspect MMA had nothing to do with him being a horrifying creature. Edited by - Canadian_Cindy on 11/29/2015 8:10:38 PM
[Link]
Canadian_Cindy Deactivated User
1102 Posts 2/15
Posted - Nov 29 2015 : 8:04PM
Mack fans like you or I who enjoyed her performance are not what this would have to be marketed to. We are already here. Her return would generate a massive amount of guys wanting to see "the porn chick beat by war machine". It would make big money at the start, however I find it in terribly poor taste because of the type of crowd that would be rushing to see it. Of course, porn would jump at the chance to exploit the wallets of those guys who magically became fans after she got beaten to near death. I hope she stays away from sex scenes for a long time (or never) to keep out of the exploitation that would occur. She has a big enough body of work that we can have a Mack Monday anytime we want, right? I would think she can make a pretty nice living doing erotic photos and softcore adult entertainment. Edited by - Canadian_Cindy on 11/29/2015 8:08:44 PM