^ in this case I just wanted to figure out, if I understood him clearly (with no intention to be despiteful or sth), English is not my first language. Beyond that, I found porn discussions more amusing than only watching and it sometimes leads me to a bit odd thoughts.
^^Not sure if this is for me so in case it is then it's not a question of hatred for the platform but more my attempt as some kind of PSA warning possible customers of the inherent danger in believing performers B.S in regards to their "OF" page. Trust me when I tell you that I was once one of those hopeful guy that thought that if a performer had a website where you couldn't see the content until you joined than it still had to have some decent porn. It never did and I learned it by wasting a lot of money.
^ what they said. If I really love the performer Ill still grab an anal scene and just use software to edit out the anal but that usually that just leaves the BJ. I can't do anal, Fake tits, Gaping or scenes that are over the top rough (Gagging, slapping, choking) To say that I hate these things wouldn't be completely accurate. I understand there is a market for it and some stars truly enjoy doing these things. It just doesn't do it for me. What I DO hate is when performers are pressured into doing these things, be it by fans, producers or even other performers. It probably doesn't happen as much as it used to, but to deny that ever happens means you've been living under a rock.
^^ There is a huge amount of porn out there which isn't anal and in fact sites with virtually no anal scenes. There are also plenty of pornstars who won't do anal or have a huge back catalogue of non anal before they take the plunge. Just do what most people do and concentrate on what you like and avoid what you don't.
^^ oh yes, this foot-head stuff is weird and disappointing. I need to say, that I got much convinced to anal and gapes (if they aren't insane huge), but not to prolapsing (I found it dangerous and not sexy at all). But it grew on me with the abundance of anal scenes, yet I still appreciate much good, wet vaginal sex. I think it is all about passion, chemistry, nice poses, not about where the lady got penetrated.
The good newsto feet on head or face is that while it still exist. It's quite rare now. I'm not going to comment on the misogynistic sites because that's usually a must for those guys but at least it's mostly gone from standard gonzo.
I hate the color grading and lighting styles from the past few years. They either look too washed out, too dull, or too dark in an attempt to make the scene look like a big budget movie. I miss the early HD days from 2006-2011 when the colors were more natural looking. I really enjoyed the "look" that Red Light District, Diabolic, Anabolic, Platinum X had from that era.
Here are some screenshots from 2007 to show you what I mean. Granted, it's not even 1080p, but I'll gladly take this look over a 4K scene with muted colors and an overly backlit backdrop. Take note of the furniture here too. Very colorful. Now they're all grey and white.
I wouldn't be able to tell you from which studio those scene are from but I am certain that they were all from mainstream studios because I clearly remember seeing that in many different videos over multiple years. Erik Everhard, Rocco and James Deen are three male performers who have done that in multiple videos.
- Porn stars being choked, gagged, etc. - Porn stars being slapped. (Rough sex in general, really. Unless it's the male talent being roughed up, then it's awesome) - 'Daddy'/'Papi' talk. - Incest storylines/setups. - Scenes with an excess of white light & overly clean sets: dark, mood-lighting-only sets are 100% preferable to me. - 'Romantic' scene - The 'teen'/first-time thing AND the 'MILF' thing. - Femdom sans sex.
Basically, 90% of what is currently being made. ;)
<3: Gal Ritchie, Jade Harper, Kiki Isobel, Melissa Stratton, Nefernik, Zoey Di Giacomo, Zo Pattison 336 Posts 10/17
Posted - Jan 9 2020 : 11:02AM
The use of 'fisheye' lenses, those that blow the body parts of a woman out of proportion. Let's take a woman with nice curves like Savannah Bond. Why not film her bombtastic tits and booty in all their glory with a normal lense?? I don't get it.
5 dicks, 2 girls porn. Any porn where there's more penis than pussy.
[Link]
BallsDeepX Deactivated User
13 Posts 4/19
Posted - Jan 10 2020 : 3:45PM
I hate but I respect and understand the trend to use so much young and petite girls, with flat breast and small ass.
I much prefer older porn from 90s and 00s because the girls looked like women, dressed like women. I much prefer seeing a glamourous woman doing dirty things than your small 19yo with braces, pink socks, flashy yellow top in a super bright scene with spit and a foot on her face. No elegance. And putting lingerie doesn't mean it looks elegant. It's more than that. Just look at some Tori Black scenes from her first era, she looked very elegant but was a total whore. As I said I respect it, I understand people may like this and from time to time some of them are good but I would rather watch an erotic movie from 2002 than what you see now.
And if it's not these kind of girls, it's bbw. The only good thing is they are still natural, which is a big plus to me.
What Have You Done To My Little Cable Boy? 2966 Posts 5/10
Posted - Jan 10 2020 : 3:56PM
^I couldn't agree more. Of course I don't hate these girls. But they are everywhere. Skinny, tiny, small boobs, small butts..Trends come and go. But this one has taken over the entire industry. And that is a pity.
^ & ^^ That's part of the reason why I spend a lot more time watching scenes from small/mid sized companies. Other than Bang Bros, no mainstream companies are shooting women like Alexis Andrews or Virgo Peridot. Also companies lack scenes with black or Asian women in general, or all their scenes are with white guys, or they only get the skinny women.
(Also the smaller companies are a lot more responsive to model suggestions.)
If WCP really does start producing scenes again then hopefully they'll be getting those kinds of performers.
Really OTT fake moaning When a guy gets very rough with the woman (slapping)
[Link]
10000 days Deactivated User
Keep on trolling. What a bullshit! Im fucking unstoppable now ... 717 Posts 3/06
Posted - Feb 7 2020 : 2:32AM
Ahegao needs to go away and never come back. Lamest porn trend ever. It was bad enough a few years ago when only a few women did it in scenes but now its almost in every scene.
^ I had no idea what that was until I read your post and Googled the word. Yeah, I'd be happy to see that go away too. I wonder if the rise of selfies, especially duck face and having the tongue stuck out is something that encourages this in porn too.
What Have You Done To My Little Cable Boy? 2966 Posts 5/10
Posted - Feb 8 2020 : 6:19AM
The 'TinySize' trend. I will never understand the appeal of skinny, almost fragile, curveless female bodies. To each his own, but unfortunately almost every big studio jumps on this trend.
I have no issues with tiny porn stars (skinny, no ass, no boobs) more so if they are good performers and show enthusiasm (Vina Sky comes to mind). I would prefer if there was more variety though, have more scenes with curvy and extra curvy women and not just tiny porn stars everywhere. Also did Mick Blue clone himself? Decent performer but seems to be in over half the new releases the last few months.
Not so much something I hate, just a nitpick: "watermarks" on the video. Y'know, where they have the site name or the logo on the screen. If you've got to have it, okay you've got to have it, I can deal with it. But if every video on your site is going to have it, at least make the cameraman aware of where it is going to be, so that he or she can account for it in his viewfinder and not constantly put the action where it is going to be covered up by the watermark.
^ That's my problem with the Evil Angel DVD's. Not only they're weak quality they have the logo in the corner. But when you buy them digitally, they're not.
Lack of scenes where the girl is wearing no makeup. When I look at a lot of these girl's pics and vids on their social media or Onlyfans they look great if not better totally makeup free. For me makeup just reminds me that I'm watching porn instead of being a voyeur watching people hook up and fuck.
I agree, and what's worse is that some companies will fetishize that skinny/tiny size and dress them up like school girls or young teens pretending that they're under 18. I hate that shit.
"Pornography: That which excites, whether from approval or disapproval." ~ Leonard Rossite 2346 Posts 12/17
Posted - Feb 27 2020 : 9:54PM
^
I have a theory about gangbangs and blowbangs where there is more cock that pussy on display, the fans of these scenes secretly are more obsessed with cock that most women are but then again that seems to happen with alot of fans given the comments about how the male talent wasn't rock hard etc.
The issue is HDR and exposure. A lot of video is being shot with cameras that are not being properly configured for SDR acquisition - SDR is what video cameras used in 2007 and earlier and it was pretty much automatic back then - and if you shoot HDR video, you have to re-grade it for both SDR and HDR. Lansky and his bros always bragged about using an Arri Alexa mini, when it was clear in their hazy videos that they had no idea how to handle the footage properly, which is why much of their stuff has had muted or washed out colors that make the vids look like your second example. A lot of RED ONE footage looked pretty awful because none of the post-production people knew how to grade it and didn't have access to proper monitors for it, so you can dig up a lot of DTV films from 2007-2012 that look pretty bad. When Joone (Digital Playground) got one of those cameras for Robby D. and used it for the features they were shooting, he apparently made sure the company had what they needed to handle the footage properly, because the footage from those productions looks pretty good.
^ Just imagine porn being shot in Panavision 70mm film! We know it'll never happen because it's so expensive, because it would be like looking through a beautiful window.
The closest you can get to that is the Panavision DXL2, which can do 60FPS at 8K, with a 65mm sensor. While you can shoot porn with that, like Lansky and Friends have with their Arri Alexa Mini, a digital cinema camera really isn't the ideal choice for shooting porn content, unless you are using something small with auto-focus, like RED's new KOMODO camera, which may become the new workhorse for the high-end sites.
Posted - Dec 21 2019 : 6:56PM
