It's disgusting to me, period. Just like i think vegetables are disgusting. I also think rap music is disgusting. That's how I feel about those things.. Just because you think semen is cool or whatever doesn't mean that everyone else thinks like you do. Why are porn viewers some of the most intolerant people of all?
^ You are aware that these forums are about debate and discussion? People are allowed to think differently to you and explain their point of view. It isn't being intolerant. Some find cum disgusting, some don't. I've tasted mine, I didn't love it or hate it to be honest. But if you don't like people debating your opinions you are going to have a tough time in these forums.
today i have nothing that i hate but i think we are missing out on some acts that dont seem to be filmed and i dont now why. Lately i found those clips very sexy that have the girl tease the cock with her pussy and eventually cameltoeslide him to cum. Would love to see that being done on the big guys. Girls with big labias would be perfect for this
"Pornography: That which excites, whether from approval or disapproval." ~ Leonard Rossite 2345 Posts 12/17
Posted - Oct 22 2020 : 10:15AM
Never thought I'd say this - the shocked look when a guy's cock springs free or if a girl hands a guy her panties etc. Come on now: unless you're a monk or a nun or you never look in a mirror or as you go to the bathroom, you have been exposed to male and female genitalia so there's no need for the wide eyes unless you're having a moment where it feels that good or you're dealing with one of the more impressive endowed people like Mandingo, Lexington Steele, Dredd and Alex Jones. Then you can look in appropriate aww at the prospect of fitting that inside a tight pussy.
^ Wow. Where are you seeing smoking in porn? Smoking fetishists constantly complain about never being able to find that stuff. They would be grateful to know, I'm sure.
Karma RX and James Deen on his site in "Karma RX does not have a seizure" Jodi Taylor with Charlie Mac from Black on Blondes Mia Rose and Manuel in Raw 6 and 17
This is a common hate I have in porn. Useless camera operators.
I was watching one new scene recently, and it started off so hot. Two women really lezzing it up, really good lesbian connections. Kissing, caressing and oral. But this didn't last long. The stupid ****ing camera operator decided to back off from the women so he was about 12 feet off. You couldn't see f all. Totally ruined the scene. He stood there about 12 feet off for about 10 minutes then did a walk about with the camera. You couldn't see nothing worth seeing.
All this while the girls were having great sex. I eventually switched the scene off. What a total **** that camera guy was.
I hate it when the female wanks off the guy when he's about to cum, because the cumshot lands anywhere but on her face. It either drips down on her chest or misses on the sides. Let the guy hold it, as it will have better precision.
Something that's becoming a problem more so than what it was (it always was a problem but it's happening too often now) is guys with massive dicks who are soft.
You see this in Blacked scenes quite often, huge cock but soft.. I'd rather see an average sized cock that's hard fucking a girl as opposed to a huge cock that's soft. I don't understand how any male talent keeps getting work when they're obviously half soft in all their scenes.
[Link]
Mass Facialties Deactivated User
"Facialized Vol. 7" 2021 AVN Awards Winner: Best Oral Movie 9308 Posts 9/13
Posted - Oct 23 2020 : 2:58AM
Exactly. Viewers that demand to see girls "finish off" the guy rather than the guy doing it himself don't seem to get that...the cumshot is gonna fuckin' suck.
well, just because the guy is holding his cock doesnt mean the aim is perfect but i know what you mean. Seeing a girl jerk off a guy is IMHO way hotter.
And regarding that "Wow " when a small girl unpacks a huge packet i kinda love that ... fake or not :)
Cube
[Link]
FlacFan Deactivated User
10088 Posts 8/15
Posted - Oct 26 2020 : 10:26PM
^ Mason never makes the girls do anything. That's why she is the GOAT.
[Link]
EdgarAPoe1809 Deactivated User
35 Posts 5/20
Posted - Oct 26 2020 : 11:11PM
I hate "Couples Porn," which is really porn made for women - i.e., the crap put out by Deeper.com, SweetSinner, Wicked, etc. The formula is always the same. Turn down the lighting until it's so dark that you, the viewer, can't see anything. You see, women don't like having sex with the lights on; it's not romantic. Of course, no facials. Women don't like those; they're degrading. In short, make a video that denies the male viewer everything he wants to see. I would never imagine this biz model for porn could make money, but I guess it does?
I agree 100%. If it's going to be a facial the guy should always be in control of the dick. He knows when he's going to shoot, how he shoots (forceful, drippy ect.) so he knows exactly how to aim, how close to get etc. I hate all of the shooting over her head or not even reaching her face nonsense.
^ I also hate it when the guy cums when he's lying down on his back while she is waiting for the pop shot. The cum just shoots up and lands back down on him.
[Link]
EdgarAPoe1809 Deactivated User
35 Posts 5/20
Posted - Oct 31 2020 : 4:14AM
Since you brought up FACIALS, I have a long list of things I hate related to this subject:
1. All the male talent in the industry who are incapable of producing a pop shot that is decent, easy to see. In the Vintage Era, Randy West was the "King of the Invisible Facials." In this time, Mark Wood gets the award, with many dribblers like him getting, for some reason that is beyond me, tons of work. These include Mr. Pete, Marcus London, Johnny Castle, Seth Gamble, and on and on. Why a studio would hire these dudes who shoot blanks is difficult to understand. It's a little like a construction company hiring a carpenter who doesn't own a hammer.
2. Bad camera angles that make it difficult, often impossible, for the viewer to see the facial...eg, the camera is on the floor pointing up, the camera is behind the girl's head, the camera is looking at the profile of the girl's face (every Digital Playground facial is filmed this way and each one is impossible to see), etc. The best camera angle for a facial has the camera slightly above the girl's face and pointed slightly down and directly into it. This way we get to see her reaction, her flinch, her smile, her disdain, whatever. The Peter North film series "Deep Throat" has tons of facials that are filmed the best way. Another good way to film a facial is on CastingCouch-X site, with the camera pointed down from the perspective of the guy's face looking down. Mason, the best director in porn, films great facials for Hard X.
3. Bad lighting... eg, the room is so dark the facial never has a chance of being seen, thus couples porn filmed for Deeper.com, Wicked, SweetSinner isn't very good for fans of facials. More often the room is too bright, the scene filmed against white walls with white couches, or outside in bright sunlight. Semen, which is a watery/milky colored liquid, simply blends into all this white and disappears.
4. Bad positioning of the girl's face...eg, the girl is laying on her back with her face upside down, the girl's face is bent back so that she is staring at the ceiling, every other position where she isn't looking into the camera.
5. Props that get in the way...eg, glasses, blindfolds, etc.
6. Other girls getting in the way... I hate BGG scenes because the girl of the two I prefer never seems to receive the facial
7. The camera cutting away from the facial the instant the cum is on the girl's face, moving to showing her knees on the floor, fading out to nothing, etc. This is maddening. I feel like screaming, "Stay on the girl's face!" You get to the best part of the scene and they stop filming it!
8. The girl's wiping the cum off her face with her hand the instant she receives the facials. If a girl does this she shouldn't be in porn because she is behaving like a Roman Catholic who spits out the eucharist after the priest has given it to him/her...ie, the girl's behavior is sacriligious.
9. The guy wiping the cum out of the girl's eye... the dude on CastingCouch-X does this all the time and it drives me crazy. Hey, we get you're chivalrous and want the girl to like you, but many of the viewers don't want you to wipe away evidence of your load after you have dropped it. Some of us like when a girl gets cum in her eye.
10. The guy missing his target, firing his cum over the girl's head, to the side of it, on her neck. I especially hate it when the guy does this INTENTIONALLY because the girl is a cum dodger.
11. The guy popping on the girl's body... what a waste.
12. The guy popping into a glass or onto a table or the floor, so the girl can drink it or lick it up... what a waste.
13. Creampies... what a waste
14. Girls who are cum dodgers. They are only a little worse than the dudes who shoot blanks. Thankfully, there aren't as many as these "too good for facials" girls around today as their used to be. Annette Haven set the tone back in the Vintage Era when she refused to take pop shots because she said they were degrading. In the 90s we saw the rise of the Porn Princesses, many employed by Vivid and Wicked, girls like Jenteal, Lexus Locklear, Racquel Darrian, etc. who acted like cum was battery acid.
15. Sites/videos that promise facials, but don't deliver. The worst offender is the site 1000Facials, which should really be called ZeroFacials, because the male talent, Scott Hancock, has an invisible pop shot (he must be the son of Randy West). In the SWALLOWING genre, the worst site is Swallowed.com, which to me is unwatchable. I always think "Swallow what?" when a see a scene for this site advertised." Mike Adriano has a great dick for anal, but he produces a watery pop shot that has zero volume and is impossible to see.
^ That must leave all of around 0.1% of scenes to your liking!!
[Link]
EdgarAPoe1809 Deactivated User
35 Posts 5/20
Posted - Oct 31 2020 : 5:36AM
True, I'm hard to please. I like probably about 5% of scenes and 5% of pop shots.
But sometimes a terrible scene has a great pop shot, and sometimes a great scene has a terrible pop shot. I always try to find what's good, even if it's only 30 seconds from a scene, whether I like the entire scene or not.
He had a manyvids channel. But its gone. Any source for his swallow vids from there!
[Link]
Viagra Deactivated User
la pilule bleue 45 Posts 7/20
Posted - Nov 1 2020 : 7:44AM
bright outside probably 3pm. Stud yells GET READY !! and she dives off the bed onto her knees. the camera angle changes , its pitch black outside and he cums.
Edited by - viagra on 11/1/2020 7:49:38 AM
[Link]
EdgarAPoe1809 Deactivated User
35 Posts 5/20
Posted - Nov 1 2020 : 8:29AM
Great points! I agree with all you say.
Really miss Brandon Iron. He truly was "The Master of the Facial" -- that should be the epitaph written on his tombstone. He had a fantastic pop shot himself, but beyond that he knew how to film facial and swallow scenes better than just about anyone. I still watch his stuff all the time -- "10 Guy Cum Slams," "50 to 1", CoverMyFace.com, "CumGlazed", "A Good Source of Iron," etc. With BI everything always seemed to be right... the camera angle, the lighting, the position of the girl's face. And this wasn't an accident. If you watch these videos closely you can hear him give directions to the girls, etc. In short, he knew what he was doing. His brilliance really stands out today, where very few porn makers know how to film a decent facial or swallow scene.
Brandon's name reminds me of one other thing I hate about facials today, and even the great Mason is guilty of this one. Blowbang scenes should only have dudes who have great pop shots, and yet someone like Mason will have a 6 guy Blowbang and only 2-3 of the guys leave a big load on the girls face. This drives me crazy. Please hire the right talent required for the scene! Dudes who shoot blanks shouldn't be allowed into a blowbang, and yet you'll always find male talent like Marco Bandaras, Alex Gonz (hate both of these guys!) dribbling out nothing onto the girl's face, making no contribution at all.
Agree about Manuel F. too. He has a fantastic pop shot that shoots a reliable 6-7 times each time he cums, and you can see each spurt clearly. Manuel also has the biggest dick in porn in terms of girth, which is huge compared to a guy I hate, Seth Gamble, whose girth is comparable to the size of a pencil.
The site is called SWALLOWED because the girls swallow his dick, not necessarily his cum. Every 1000 Facials scene I've seen has had very noticeable facials, you must be unlucky with the scenes you've picked.
Always feet n ass. In that order.
[Link]
EdgarAPoe1809 Deactivated User
35 Posts 5/20
Posted - Nov 1 2020 : 12:41PM
You apparently don't know the definition of the word "swallowed." Whether it is in a sexual or non-sexual context, it means "to take into the STOMACH by drawing through the throat" (see Dictionary.com). Has Adriano's dick ever gone into a girl's stomach? Of course not. The title of the site, Swallowed.com, refers to Adriano's semen being swallowed (ie, going into the girl's stomach), and there's not much of it at all. The guy has a great dick for anal, but he shoots blanks when it comes to his pop shot.
Please direct me to a scene by Scott Hancock, the principle male talent at 1000Facials, where he delivers a decent facial. I agree that there have been some decent facials when male talent from the outside is brought in.
^Then why is the expression swallowing dick, then? That what the site refers to. I don't pay attention to the male talent, so the scenes I've seen may not have been Scott Hancock. Still, the point is they are not ZERO facials as you put it. And why did you get all personal? I have an English A Level, so I must be alright with the definitions of lots of words. How shocking that a porn site hasn't stuck to the dictionary definition!
Always feet n ass. In that order.
Edited by - Feet N Ass on 11/1/2020 12:49:21 PM
[Link]
EdgarAPoe1809 Deactivated User
35 Posts 5/20
Posted - Nov 1 2020 : 1:02PM
By that logic every blowjob is a "swallowing" scene. Sorry, it isn't. I'm talking about American English here. In the USA "swallowing" refers to consuming cum (ie, depositing it in the stomach). When an American male says to his friend who scored the night before, "did she swallow?", he means did she consume the friend's cum. Granted, in the UK and other parts of the English-speaking world, the expression may be used differently. Swallowed.com, of course, is an U.S. company. Most of its customers are Americans. Therefore it's safe to assume the word "swallowed" is used in the American sense of the word.
^Only if it is a deep throat. I'm English, and swallowing can mean swallowing cum here too, but also dick (thought that it was a universal thing, maybe not) and, of course, food. Given that Mike Adriano is French, assuming that the American usage of the word is what was intended could be flawed. But anyway, you don't enjoy the site and I do, so there we go.
Yep....that's one of the many uses of the word, many of which don't necessarily imply reaching the stomach. In 'swallowing dick' its obvious that we're talking about taking into the throat and not into the stomach!
[Link]
EdgarAPoe1809 Deactivated User
35 Posts 5/20
Posted - Nov 1 2020 : 4:30PM
Okay, if that's what is intended by "Swallowed," I add deceptive advertising/branding to my take. The site's home page says nothing about "Swallowing Cock." It just says "Swallowed" and that's a recipe for confusion.
Websites that make a terrible job of tagging their scenes. This is specially true of the Mindgeek websites, where sometimes you can't find a scene because not even the performer's name is on it.
I can't stand OIL scenes, you know where gallons of oil are shot everywhere. A tiny bit of massage oil sure. But there's nothing less attractive to me than that huge dripping mess.
(1) actresses in "teen" flicks who aren't teens. It deflates my peen when I want to watch 18-to-early 20s getting pounded and the girls in the scenes are clearly 24+.
(2) really skinny "teens". Yeah I know that younger people tend to be thinner than older folks, but I see young women every day who have butts and boobs and aren't so skinny they look like 17th-century peasants.
(3) male talent who look like amateur bodybuilders with spray tans and sub-10% body fat. Like huge fake boobs for others, jacked dude-bro takes me out of the scene, since I like to imagine myself (or someone who looks like me) banging a hot chick. I'm not saying the male talent have to look like an overweight 40-year-old office drone, but there has to be a happy medium between the average guy and a gym rat.
(4) tattoos all over a woman's legs and breasts. I don't mind a few tats, especially on the arms or back, but I think too many distract from an attractive woman's body.
(5) no foreplay.
That's all I can come up with off the top of my head.
It's a real scourge right now (according to me of course) but girls who seemingly change their haircuts every week is something I loathe. I liked you looking a certain way, please don't change that look every five seconds.
Also, getting hair dyes in purple or pink or whatever (or worse, half white half black) might work when the porn girl is an alt model but when their niche isn"t alt it's a boner killer for me.