Scenes that film everything too close. I like the up close shots, but I also want to see the full body shots too. I want to feel like I am watching the whole thing.
> phony grunts-groans-ooohs-aaahhs, phony porn star dialogue "F-yeah, Hell > yeah," I fully agree! Newbie pornstar Amy Fisher is one of these types who kills the scene with a stream of non-stop fake talk. Her scenes are otherwise hot, I hope she corrects herself.
I can enjoy most things in porn (anal, handjobs, close-ups, gaping). I hate the robotic nature of scenes. There may be too few people filming too much. Too many vendors, not enough product. I would like to see some conversations between the talent before the fake foreplay. Even if it is stupid and inane. If they can go through motions of foreplay, they can talk. It would be great if they would taunt each other and lay down challenges as to who will be the best performer in the scene. if it is fantasy, at least act like it is not work. If they do not enjoy fucking a 9in huge penis, they need to bring male talent they can get off with.
Money shots on the back or belly. That is SOOOOOO outdated. Cum belongs in the pussy, the ass, the mouth, the face, or the tits (in that order). Who really pulls out to blow a load on a woman's back or belly? I really enjoy Nica Noelle's M/F work, EXCEPT for the fact that after a bout of really scorching hot, passionate, sex the guy pulls out and blows his load on the girl's belly or back. Why? Just let him finish. We never know FOR SURE if the woman had an orgasm, why MUST we see the evidence that the guy had one? The whole thing is about fantasy after all. Just had to get that off my chest.
[Link]
Mojo Deactivated User
1223 Posts 9/03
Posted - Feb 24 2011 : 2:38PM
Guys insisting on porn girls not having pubes. I don't know about them but I like all women to look like just that, WOMEN, not like little girls. Of course I wouldn't want the girls to look too hairy like monkeys, just a trim would do. But when guys go on about the girls shaving all their pubes off it, along with, in some cases, this seeming sexual interest in the girls dressing up and talking like little children, well, it just makes me wonder about them.... Edited by - Mojo on 2/25/2011 10:57:44 AM
+1. Couldn't agree more. Even if the scene is hot, the pullout and dump it on a non-erogenous zone is a wood kill. It says hooker-john to me. There is no connection betweeen the two performers except in a money transaction. It ruins the fantasy that drives us to watch porn.
I would say that the moderators here generally do a good job. Considering how many tens of thousands of posts. I am very critical of the studios like Vivid, Wicked etc. on this forum. And to my recollection, my hairy eyeball towards them has never been censored.
I hate close ups in porn! I wanna see the background and especially the girls face while she is being fucked.
[Link]
Clams Deactivated User
173 Posts 12/10
Posted - Feb 26 2011 : 4:13PM
Upside down cameras.
[Link]
Mojo Deactivated User
1223 Posts 9/03
Posted - Feb 26 2011 : 5:28PM
If you mean the cameraman looks like he's pissed (drunk) then yes, that's another hate of mine in porn. Why the fuck do some cameramen seem to want to get "arty" with camera angles I don't know. Just shoot the fucking, that's all we want, not all the stupid angles!
Some of the things guys don't like, I like...b/c I'm a chick. I like seeing a guy's face (esp. as he's cumming), moaning (vocal guys), seeing the guy's penis (not balls, balls are gross), the guy's body, etc... Dislikes: *unemotional fucking, faking it, excessively loud yelling/screaming *gagging *gaping *spitting *DP/DV/DA *piledriver *anal *torture *facials, facials all the time. these need to be on their way out. Change it up a bit. *licking a guy's ass *gross dudes (old, fat, ugly, etc) *guys who don't care about actually pleasing the girl That might be it. Though, most of these are negotiable if it's the right male performer doing it. I don't personally like anal, but watching Jean Val Jean (no longer active, but I've seen a few of his scenes where he's spitting on girls and does anal, hot because it's him), James Deen, or Peter North do it is not out of the question. And, though I'm not really into overly kinky stuff, I would submit to James Deen - tie me up please.
I'm a guy, and I share all your dislikes. The abusive and domineering side of porn needs to be more clearly seperated as a niche, as it is in Japanese Adult Video. Nor do I want "couples" porn, which should just go full out for females like yourself coz close-ups of male faces is one of the biggest complaints among males. I like to see women cumming, and one of my recent annoyances is close-ups of women's faces when they cum. It is criminal that they don't shoot the whole body quivering uncontrollably. Close-ups in general ruin everything for me, the performances and the view.
a few things 1. james deen being rough with women as more often than not the women are bigger than him and could pulverise him in one punch 2. james deen 3. bad camera work/angles. buying a dvd cause of hot women only to find you can hardly see them and are better off jerking off to the dvd cover 4. 15 minute intros of the women walking around the house and a 5 min sex scene 5.james deen 6. old ugly men with young attractive women 7. gaping 8. squirting wrecking a hot scene, detracts from the scene and wastes time 9. porn stars i LUV not doing anal. they might after a few years but by then i have lost interest in them. i can only watch a few scenes of non anal of the one start before i wont buy anything of hers anymore. 10. stars like devinn lane who i loved, for years only doing girl on girl then finally she starts doing boy girl but by then she is 10 years older and i cant be fucked looking for her dvds anymore. 11. james deen 12. rough sex. ie max hardcore/rocco.. i will never watch a rocco scene. massive turn off. i dont mean i only like soft sex but when the focus is more on hurting and humiliating the woman over fucking her then snooze, that dvd goes in the bin 13. the total and utter over exposure of james deen! for the love of god employ someone else who isnt built like a 12 year pre pubescent girl. most female stars have better muscle tone than him. not that the male start has to be a steroid muscle freak but he is so puny and boring
[Link]
keny Deactivated User
400 Posts 11/09
Posted - Apr 16 2011 : 12:43AM
when a beautiful babe is teamed up with a small dick performer !! when overrated girls are so hyped and overestimated , that they are able to choose the male performer !! and most of the time they choose a decent guy to have a nice and pleasant time !!
i dislike all the fake "milf" or cougar stuff, when you see a young girl with an even older actor. I mean, it's a fantasy that have to do with age, the term was coined in american pie and milf doesn't mean simply "mother", but that there's a teenager who would like to fuck a mother of a friend (now, the friend is not essential but we're not talking of a 28 years old mother of a newborn baby). So it must be about a really young male (18-22, 23 years old) and a hot well aged woman.
i disagree the milf term has nothing to do with the age of them man, i mean obviously is he is 70 and she is 35 then it doesnt really fit but its more to do with the womans ago i call milfs hot women from mid 30s up your right, i dont think a 20yo woman who has kids a milf at all but, just because american pie brought the name to the general public ( it was around a long time before then) doesnt me the man has to be a teenager at all. For me, i like milfs in real life too and im 33... i love women mid 30s to mid 40s...so they suddenly dont become milfs cause im 33? i dont see your logic
yes it has, what fantasy would be if it would simply be sex with an old man and a old woman? I don think that "mother i'd like to fuck" is about the fact that the woman have been a child, the fantasy is not about the child and for a 40 years old man there's nothing to fantasize about a woman of the same age or even younger... the fantasy is that of the teenager that would like to fuck his teacher or the mother of a friend, anyway the hot older woman.
[Link]
DrexlSpivey Deactivated User
Face sitting is the Simon to pegging's Garfunkel 837 Posts 1/07
Posted - Apr 16 2011 : 1:57PM
I dislike the over use of facials. It's common knowledge that the majority of porn watchers love facials but I'd like to see some pop shots on body parts like belly buttons, sweet ass cheeks, breasts, pubic hair or the bare pubic area, and swallowing. I'm also not a fan of anal circus acts. For the most part you can just avoid these scenes as they're usually in DVD lines that are dedicated to circus tricks, but sometimes they pop up unexpectedly in a release. I don't argue that this type of stuff is insanely popular and often very well shot, it's just not my thing. Prolapsed asses should be outlawed or something. I don't dislike, but I hate when guys take over the action during a blowjob. I want to see the girl's skills and don't want to hear someone call her a whore a billion times and force her head down the majority of the time. There's usually no ball licking or sucking in these types of scenes as well. Who can blame the girl when random douche bag is leading the action and all about showing how forceful he can be. Boring. I do like some throat fucking like anyone but these days it seems like it's the majority of the action in quite a few scenes. I also hate that the porn industry with all it's billions in profits can't somehow subsidize an affordable comprehensive STD test for it's performers and give them some more safety and peace of mind. It's not discussed often; but while there may not be many HIV scares quite a few performers catch other STDs. And finally, as always I'd love to see more pussy eating and face sitting in general release. Edited by - drexlspivey on 4/16/2011 3:25:17 PM
[Link]
keny Deactivated User
400 Posts 11/09
Posted - Apr 16 2011 : 3:04PM
hmm , some girls who are so overestimated and who do has a reputation , they always choose the male performer that will not make their pussy sored , a guy like alan stafford lol , thats why i say a nice and pleasant time , coz they should have a hard time most of the time !! a babe like devon lee has never worked with a legend like mark ashley , could u believe that !! while some girls make quick and easy money , get fucked , gets to choose the performer , dont want their pussy pounded , on the other hand there are some girls who work their pussies and asses off with big dicks and still there dont get recognition !!! even in porn there is that kind of view , that kind of treatment , !!
Porn definitions are sometimes quite different from real-life definitions. In porn, MILF is all about the age of the woman. In porn, MILF means the woman is in her 30's-40's(-50's?) and looks hot/sexy/attractive. If you expect something more precise than that, you're gonna be disappointed.
the problem is that there's also the definition "cougar", that means exactly "older woman with younger man" and a lot of times it's exactly the same stuff, maybe because there are not too much young males actors and there are not too many 40-50 years old hot actresses Edited by - leatherface on 4/16/2011 4:21:21 PM
[Link]
Rocketbuzz1 Deactivated User
5 Posts 4/11
Posted - Apr 16 2011 : 5:39PM
repetitive, idiot nonsense. Edited by - Janitor on 4/17/2011 11:47:44 AM
Well, yea, that is EXACTLY how it works, what are you ranting about? And the hottest of the cutest girls tend to be lez-only in porn. It's called - girls who abuse their bodies do so because they *have* to to get work in this business, _not_ because they want to. I always say this - the moment *you* choose to take the biggest cock in the business up the ass for the world to see, *then* you can start judging the girls on what they are or are not doing You game? Look, it's the entertainment business here. Hate to sound too objectifying, but the simple truth is, if a girl is not naturally entertaining then she must do the "other" things to entertain the other crowd. Is it "fair"? That is what the business is. If she wants "fair" she chose the wrong career.
[Link]
keny Deactivated User
400 Posts 11/09
Posted - Apr 17 2011 : 9:23AM
dude , this thread is about '' The Things that you dislike about porn '' RIGHT ???? excuse me , but i say what i dislike about porn , was i out of subject , for me i was not ranting , maybe what i say did not please u , Firstly i was not talking about those lesbian cuties like someone like molly cavalli who do only lesbian , in europe do u know how many romanian , hungarian and czech cuties are there ? , TONS , do they do exclusively lesbians , no !!! they do their porn work like everyone !! next u wrote something that totally shocked me , u judge girls who choose to take big cocks in the ass , how dare u ?? this is porn , this is an insult to all these pornstars , porn is actually hardcore fuck , big dicks , anal , d.p etc !! this is the present porn that counts , and from what i see , i suggest u sound a racist person , yeah , what your trying to say is that all these black dudes that fuck those white chicks is not admissible !! those white chicks finally u mention entertainment , let me tell u one thing , its girls like shyla stylez ,nikki benz , teagan presley , eva angelina , jenna haze , phoeniz marie who bring money to this business , who make more people to watch porn , not those lesbian cuties , girls who dont want take the biggest cock in the ass that bring money , bear that in mind !! its gonzo that brings money to all the people involved in porn !! what kind of porn do u watch , semi soft porn , parody porn ???
OK, this is recycling a post a made a while ago in the VEF, so it caters a bit to vintage tastes; but I'm interested to see what you guys make of it. My point was not so much what I dislike, since I believe it is trivial these days to avoid my particular hates (plastic boobs, tattoos, piercings, overly misogynistic scenes) - porn is so diverse that one can easily avoid these. I would rather concentrate in stuff that annoys me *in porn I actually like*. OK, here goes. Warning, long post. Sorry, I've always been wordy. (1) Non-naked actresses. Not just the old silly "push the panties on the side for penetration", but stockings, shoes, corsets etc. The French are particularly fond of that, and it gets in my way because I consume copious amounts of otherwise excellent French porn. Now, I understand that a lot of people have a fetish with lingerie, and I respect that. How about us poor fellows who want just the naked body? And I do mean totally naked; even in my personal life I don't tolerate anything more than a pair of earrings. Even watches and rings annoy me, as I am particularly attracted by long, willowy arms and long fingers. I want no jingly stuff to distract me. I make a single concession: waist chains, and that only because I have a huge thing for waists, preferably waspy ones, and chains can accentuate that. Anyway. Undress the women please! (2) Insufficient breast play in lesbian scenes. Another colossal fetish of mine (and I'm sure I'm not the only one) almost completely ignored. A few seconds of perfunctory pecks on the nipples, perhaps a momentary suck as if they're taking a drag on a cigarette butt and down they go to the pussy. And this in a period when lesbian porn has never been better thanks to Viv Thomas and his imitators! Infuriating. Roy Alexandre, who I otherwise rate very highly (I'm a breast man, unsurprisingly), is particularly guilty of this. Is there a worse Waste Of Resources (TM) than having Angel Dark do a scene with Jane Darling without them spending at least 15 minutes on each other's wonders of nature? Or, to go back a few decades, how can they have allowed Brigitte Lahaie to do any scene where another girl wass in the same room without the latter being attached remora-like on Brigitte's bosom? Idiots, all of them :-) True, there is some specialty material that focuses on this, but it's almost exclusively big breast focused, often featuring large women, who I do not fancy (I'm a pig, I know). Often it's otherwise softcore and features JUST breast play. And anyway I don't want specialty! I don't necessarily want big boobs! I want an otherwise excellent lesbian scene (which 99% of the time means no toys in my book) which has proper kissing and pussy eating (i.e. no tongue-fencing and perfunctory clit flicks) to add 5 minutes of attention to breasts. Any sized breasts, they're all good as long as they're natural. There are some girls who are clearly into that (the wonderful Christina Jolie is one such example) but even they only have a handful of scenes where they are allowed to have their fun before they are told to go down and waste no tape. (3) Where the hell are the closed mouth cumshots (mouthshots)? I am positive that a crushing majority of men consider finishing inside a closed mouth incredibly stimulating; apart from its tactile pleasure it is also a wonderful display of acceptance and trust (NOT submission!). BTW I don't care if the woman spits it in a little tissue afterwards rather than swallow it, the orgasm is over and I'm not trying to humiliate her if she's not into the taste/texture, like many women aren't. And that real life dislike means that it's not something that you can readily ask for; some women will say flat out no. Fair enough. Enter the fantasy substitute then, i.e. porn. Right? Wrong. In porn they will cum everywhere and anywhere except inside a closed mouth. On faces. Bellies. Backs. Inside bums so that the result can be shitted out afterwards (good lord!). Oh, there are "oral" shots, where they will have the girl stay with an open mouth like a little baby bird while these guys dribble inside. Who the hell finds this sexy? Again there is some specialty stuff out there and, surprise-surprise, most of it is amateur, as it is real people who find this sexy in real life. The professional porn geniuses would rather think of a new way to humiliate their talent rather than ask her to do one thing that the majority of their customers may actually find arousing. Imperator
At the end of the day, it is what it is. 629 Posts 12/09
Posted - Apr 18 2011 : 5:45AM
When the only performer on camera is the dude for more than one mississippi. There's no reason for this. If you want to show the dude's expressions or whatever, you don't need a closeup; just include her in a wide angle shot of his face. It would save me the trouble of using video editing software to cut his ass out.
Gravity as Curved Space: Bootymeister's Theory of General Relativity 1589 Posts 11/08
Posted - Apr 18 2011 : 10:54AM
I wish the porn definition of MILF was so well defined. Some porn stars are cast as MILFs in their mid 20s. For me the definition is 35+. Edited by - bootymeister on 4/18/2011 10:58:10 AM
I would put the age even older, but I won't quibble on the point. To me the concept of MILF suggests those fantasies that I might have had about the good looking mother of a friend when I was a teenager. 35 seems about right -- no younger than that. Porn makers seem to believe that the "M" in MILF stands for anyone old enough to reproduce and do it legally.
exactly, why they have to label a movie with a 25-35 years old girls as a milf movie? It's not a milf movie! Edited by - leatherface on 4/18/2011 2:10:46 PM Edited by - leatherface on 4/18/2011 2:13:29 PM
At the end of the day, it is what it is. 629 Posts 12/09
Posted - Apr 18 2011 : 5:25PM
Is there a difference between a chick who just started porn and is around 30 and gets hired by a "milf" producer and a chick who's been around for years, graduated from teenie porn and is now 30?
I woke up today and everything is still everything! 403 Posts 1/09
Posted - Apr 20 2011 : 4:25AM
....oh i forgot another one......the "angry sex" porn face and all the grimacing that goes along with it. when i see this it reminds me of people trying to force out a turd or something. all the fake anger & histrionics are for the birds! i think that porn that is in some way in touch with reality is a very good thing....the grudge anger sex stuff is overdone already.
Wow, Imperator, you can speak for me any time -- being an inarticulate lout myself, what I wouldn't give for a spokesman who so clearly lays out so many of my own dislikes. A big +1 for your post.
when Vince V releases two DVDs called Cum Glazed 2...each a completely different flick,different cast causing me to blow hard earned money on the wrong one. Yes sure I could have double checked once more before clicking the IAFD seller link to DVDEmpire before ordering but who expected the same producer to release the same named DVD with a completely different cast. Or that the Pissmops site sign up link takes you to the Meatholes/Meatmembers group of sites sign up and after signing up for find Pissmops isn't available from the Meatmembers account. And then you find the Pissmops posted contact email which happens to be Khan Tusion's is a bogus email. Good old baitr and switch tactics using what's probably a defunct web site. Which is why I hate porn web sites and try to only buy dvd porn...at least I dont have to deal with dozens different companies of which is a potential rip off or open to hackers. I dislike that I can watch the AVN Awards on cable and see(just my impression) nothing but contract stars for DP or Vivid the entire show.
I woke up today and everything is still everything! 403 Posts 1/09
Posted - Apr 21 2011 : 10:38PM
ditto those, insert "Leisure Time" for Vince V and add women pictured in the artwork that never make it into the DVD. Vivian Le & Max Hardcore have a scene from the old Hitchiker series that was sold on many Leisure Time Asian titles but never included. Regarding "contract girls" ditto....the best women in adult are those who fit outside of the "typical contract qualities" if you ask me. About the only contract girls i really dig are Mika Tan and Bella and they are very much the "anti-contract girls" in many ways. Otherwise, same hair, same body, same attitude during sex etc. A little boring and why i almost never buy or watch Vivid stuff. I'd rather watch Latina BBW Vanessa Lee, Afro-Latina Kira, BBW Trista Lace, Racquel Lace, Karla Lane, Mya Minx or Sarah Jay or any number of women who break the mold!
This has been going on for along time. I remember sitting Indian style in a porn room, mind u the door was very big and the room was 10'X10' and no curtain. I nice buzz from 80 proof vodka running thru me, not that i needed the buzz to be there, just happen to be drinking that night when i went along w/ abunch of people. Anyway: I saw alot of boxes that had such good front boxes and knew the trick( deliberate false advertising to make a buck) so i carefully looked at the back of the box and if no photos i would not rent. I got one movie after looking at 20 and it was ok. they had me sign a damn contract to rent even though i was a member, hated the store for that. One woman walked near the room and said this is porno. I said "what gave it away"?
1 Girls that gag when its a small dick 2 Girls that quack too much 3 Movies called Latina with Asian chicks in them 4 Milfs that are under 35 (a Milf should be a MOTHER.....) 5 Too many black guys with white chicks - what is the obsession ? 6 Guys having to finish themselves off - make the girls do it ! 7 Guys with big tatoos all over. 8 Positions that suddenly appear with out seeing how they got their - eg pile drivers. 9 Guys that slap the girls arses too much so that they go red.
I hate it when a girl leaves her top on during (or for most of) a scene. I've also grown tired of bald pussy (although it's far from a deal-breaker), I prefer girls with atleast a little bush. The lack of anal and "hard" gang bangs with dps or even DAPs in most recent porn compared to around 2003 or so.
Gravity as Curved Space: Bootymeister's Theory of General Relativity 1589 Posts 11/08
Posted - Apr 23 2011 : 9:57AM
I agree. I hate when the woman's top stays on only because she has small breasts. However, I appreciate coverage when the woman's only major flaw is an oversized boob job.
Racism/Sterotyping in porn. I.e horrendous titles like "Abominable Black Man"; the reinforcing of sexual stereotypes about blacks; the way sex with someone who happens to have a different colour skin is seen as taboo and dangerous and the fckwit dialogue in so-called "interracial" films - "f*ck me with your black/n*gg*r" c*ck etc. I suppose it reflects a dark underbelly of US society - that sort of thing would never pass muster here in the UK. My only consolation is that one day our descendants will look back and wonder if the world was insane.
I believe that it was the late Rober J. Stoller who pointed out that guys finish themselves off for psychological reasons, namely to re-establish control of their own sexuality after surrendering control of it to a woman. (Hence, even if a guy does cum solely from the ministrations of his costar, he will invariably touch his cock afterwards.) Also, it has occurred to me that guys, like gals, in pr0n get to the point where they need to be touched in an exact way to achieve orgasm. So you see guys taking over so that they can cum and, conversely, you see women, time and again, stopping others from touching them.
Introducing Natasha Carter
Posted - Feb 20 2011 : 12:25AM
You game?