I don't want to see any guys in any scenes, hear them, or interfere in any way as well. I also wouldn't interfere on a "lesbian" thread and tell somebody to chill on seeing guys lol. The worst guy though that I have personally seen was the "Buttman" guy. He had some great looking girls and shot some good lesbian scenes/vids but he always had to be seen in the background somehow with a mirror, by talking, or touching the girls himself. I couldn't stand it.
You are aware that lesbians have to interact with men in real life, even if they don't have sex with them? In fact, they usually are related to some men. So if porn occasionally reflects that, then I don't think it's a bad thing. This is a lesbian thread, but you don't have to be a lesbian to watch the scenes or post here. Or even watch lesbian porn only. So he is well within his rights to offer an alternative view. I also wonder if there is a similar reaction from fans of gay porn if a woman makes a non-sex role.
^ No - men in lesbian porn can gtfo, now and always. Minor ask. Who's asking for men in these things? I've seen some say it doesn't bother them but I've never seen someone ask for men to be in lesbian scenes. Just the opposite. The choice to include them will always be given all methods of available negative/poor feedback for such choice from this end, always. Firm. NQA.
No men in lesbian films:
- no men faces - no men hands - no men voices - no men characters
No men, nothing about men, period, please. It's nonsensical to ask for otherwise in lesbian productions, a betrayal of those tuning to lesbian films to get away from men, not wanting to see or hear about them.
I like porn and the Golden Age of Porn 1947 Posts 9/21
Posted - Apr 12 2022 : 12:34PM
If the story asks for a man in the plot, then I don't see the problem with a man in the scene or movie in a nonsex role. Just skip over the scene with the male, it's not like half of you even pay attention to the story anyway. We should allow the writer or director to tell their story. Not limit them by saying no men at all.
I like porn and the Golden Age of Porn 1947 Posts 9/21
Posted - Apr 12 2022 : 12:45PM
Here's another question for the people asking for real authentic lesbian sex. Why don't y'all watch stuff from Crashpad or Pink label and movies by Shine Louise Houston? They do real lesbian porn with real lesbians and queer women, most are amateur but they got some big-name pornstars.
^ Again, while you don't see the problem, or it isn't a problem to you, doesn't mean it isn't a problem for others.
And regarding skipping over it - I refuse to accept that. I'm paying for a product, I refuse to just accept it and skip past it; too akin to the arguments that folks give who say they don't care about the noise in lesbian porn and to just mute it. Why would I pay for a product that I have to mute? Why would I pay for a product that I have to skip half of? I wouldn't. And as a paying member, I would give feedback appropriate when this came up.
Also regarding skipping it - the industry is dominated by the numbers of scenes and films out there with men in them, it's overwhelming the percentage - why would I want to encourage writers and producers to make even more! To take away the one place fans of dude free, cock free, content can turn to is by encouraging this is just nonsensical.
Not much of a limitation to the writers and if it is I'd argue they need to find better writers. (That's a fact as is, I'd argue, scene in and scene out the writing is pure drivel.) Moreover, I would argue that I would like them to be more creative and not need the crutch of including a miserable man in the scene. I'd also like them to produce content that is for their members, not for themselves. Too much of this is rampant in porn, the creators doing it for their own titillation, instead of listening to feedback from their membership bases.
I'm not buying it. I maintain - no men in lesbian films, period. Not needed or wanted.
-----------------------
A glance at Crashpad shows me nothing of interest - I wouldn't pay to watch those folks as they aren't attractive to me. That site is a hard pass. I don't like butch women, or what some call "queer" women - it's not a lifestyle theme that I'm into or looking for. Just on account of their appearance being non-mainstream doesn't mean it's authentic or real. Way too many tattoos, looks like they do electrical shocks and shit. Overall it looks like trash to me. Pink Label looks terrible too, nothing of interest and nothing I'd seek out to pay for. Where's the lesbian content on that? Looks scant. Pink and White productions has pretty much nothing on their page about their content and a bunch of PR-seeking self-sucking going on about how ethical and great they are. Nothing about their page or their directors page is of interest or worth clicking through.
On every level those suggestions are of less than zero interest to me - no matter their supposed realness or authenticity. I'd just jerk off without porn, period, than make do with those sites.
Edited by - gooch on 4/12/2022 1:16:35 PM
[Link]
Lezzyist Deactivated User
Make Porn Erotic Again 1736 Posts 9/19
Posted - Apr 12 2022 : 1:18PM
I go through a cycle where I get fed up with the regular standard porn set up and I take yet another look at your Crashpad or makelovenotporn or lustery, etc., last instance of this being like a couple weeks ago. Hitting up Crashpad, you'd be hardpressed to find 2 different videos featuring two people assigned female at birth who are feminine. I guess I am not the target for the realest of the real lol.
Girls Out West has some good stuff and I see alot of them between my AdultDVDEmpire and Adulttime memberships. GoW has quasi-realistic sex with plenty of natural females. Now, you may have to be into curvy and sometimes their hair choices are interesting, but I'm down as long as there are pretty and feminine performers.
Ersties used to be good for sexy content with a more natural, realistic bent, but they seem to have a philosophy now where women never have sex with each other without toys, so I likely won't be renewing that membership. That may be close to true but I just am admittedly not big on toys and they're in every pairing now. Plus they are doing foursome scenes every other release now which is just a mess and just like the shittiest American lez content.
AbbyWinters has fallen off in terms of the performers and release schedule too. They used to be a good spot for more genuine content with pretty ladies.
Edited by - Lezzyist on 4/12/2022 1:25:07 PM
[Link]
Lezzyist Deactivated User
Make Porn Erotic Again 1736 Posts 9/19
Posted - Apr 12 2022 : 1:21PM
I think B/G fans want someone they can imagine themselves being when they watch lesbian content.
^ I find it a limitation of their own, as I self-insert with my own mind, as I'm enjoying the film, routinely. That for me is often part of the experience, added thoughts or fantasies to complete the experience. Even then, it's myself, in my own mind, not needing that other dude there. You're not wrong I don't think, I don't disagree, I just think it's fucked that's where some may be at. I just don't get the pervasive need for cock, I think through conditioning (years of watching porn, or growing up with it) there's many folks out there that can't get off unless there's a cock on screen. I'm also reminded again of the conversation I had with Rose at VivThomas, and a user there who posts all the time (two women and a man, living together in Europe) about how more often than not B/G (and it's permutations) only have the female there to add a thin veneer of heterosexual acceptance, the focus of the film really being about the man, his feelings, his wants, and his looks/body.
B/G fans, also, have a net negative effect on the lesbian genre - their wants, desires and the like taking up space from cock-free content fans, warping the overall product as they push for their desires to be reflecting in a genre that has nothing for them.
I prefer none at all as well, and understand the hard line of no men in G/G scenes.
Otherwise giving them an inch like brief non-sex supporting roles where they completely disappear eventually escalates into dudes jerking off while watching the women go at it, to cuckhold scenes, all the way up to the what Brazzers is doing these days with their G/G scenes including full B/G in them.
^^^ I can't speak for others who mainly watch BG, but that is not the case for me. I just like the occasional reminders in lesbian porn that men still exist! Of course, the main focus should always be the women. But to have the occasional male appearing (non sex, of course) just makes the setting a bit more realistic.
Edit: Aya, I don't think it will be a snowball effect. And the Brazzers scenes your describing are usually stories split into two scenes, one BG or BGG and the other GG. And I think they are aimed more at people like me, who enjoy all of those scenes. But we are not your enemy, and I still want their to be plenty of GG only scenes to enjoy too.
Always feet n ass. In that order.
Edited by - Feet N Ass on 4/12/2022 1:44:17 PM
Edited by - Feet N Ass on 4/12/2022 1:50:25 PM
[Link]
Lezzyist Deactivated User
Make Porn Erotic Again 1736 Posts 9/19
Posted - Apr 12 2022 : 1:47PM
Honestly, I don't really want anyone not involved in the sex in the scene. Adulttime just released a GG where they occasionally make space in the camera view to show that two other (female) characters are watching the performing duo and it was just unnecessary.
But I'm the type to where the scene trappings/gimmick need to get out of the way when the sex starts. I'd just watch pairs of attractive women fuck in beautiful sets with no gimmicks if that was something a company offered. Besides SLAYED, who intentionally mess their scenes up with moronic screaming.
^I mean, the gimmicks can be interesting, but alot of times they just go on and on, invading the sex rather simply going away so the performers can have a good-looking sex scene.
Take Adulttime, and I like picking on them because they can make good content but a majority of it is shit, mainly due to the fandom. Adulttime does this thing where in some scenes performers have to keep saying dumb stuff about whatever the gimmick is rather than just having sex. For instance, if it's an incest scene, the performers have to say "mom" every 5 seconds, or if it's a "don't get caught" scene they have to stop the sex to do a bit about how someone is in the house listening to them or whatever.
Setups can be interesting if there is good and snappy dialogue and they don't turn the sex into a Brazzers-esque mess but alot of times the gimmicks don't stop when the sex starts and so the important part of the scene is disrupted with sillyness.
^^^ I get what you're saying, but they have been increasingly including B/G content in their "G/G" scenes, such as having one of the women having oral or regular sex with man briefly before moving onto the one on one Lesbian Sex.
I don't think it is unreasonable for their one and only G/G site that updates once a week to be pure G/G.
And many G/G scenes acknowledge men via dialogue, often to help set up the scene.
this to the extent that I'm generally mystified as to how typical male fans of B/G relate to a scene. Not in a disparaging way, to each his own, and I seem to be in the minority, but my experience of porn (speaking as a straight male) never has anything to do with the dude's perspective, and rather is a function of (a) how turned on the chick gets multiplied by (b) how hot she is. And yet there's this large population of porn viewers who consider it a basically ruinous affront to their enjoyment if the guy is wearing a condom. Literally the last thing I'd ever think of! But it's interesting how different that perspective is from my own.
Taking the controversy of men in G/G scenes, I remember the dissapointing return of Where the boys aren't with scenes where men were constantly interrupting the sex. It was so annoying, I think they did any justice to the title. No mind they haven't released new scenes.
I like porn and the Golden Age of Porn 1947 Posts 9/21
Posted - Apr 12 2022 : 2:33PM
Everything you just said is the reason why porn sucks. You're limiting writers creatively by saying you can't inject a male character into their stories. What do you do if you need a male to play the father or brother of a female character? Do you get a cis woman to crossdress or do you use a trans male? Do trans males even count as male to you? Your bias against males in lesbian porn just sounds silly. Do you even really care about the story at all? If you're looking to just jack off, why even care about the story?
Now, Let's talk about you trashing a small indie label like Pink Label and Crash Pad. I know somebody was going to say this shit. The problem is you don't really care about seeing real authentic lesbians, made by and showing real lesbians. Because like most people here have said most of the women in g/g porn are bi or straight women and most of the directors are cis male and women. The average porn viewer is mostly cis males, cis male porn viewers are the ones this industry listens to the most. The g/g porn you getting is what cis males are asking for and buying, it's being made because it sells. Bree Mills is lesbian but she also listens to the porn market and what sells. What sells is so-called young hot pornstars who do g/g scenes, not lesbian sex. Indie labels like Pink Label and directors like Shine Louise Houston are really the only ones who will try to bring you actual lesbian sex with real lesbians. I never had a problem jacking off to women who look like women I can run into in real life and actual date. My porn collection and taste is a wide range of body types, looks, and legal ages. I love all types of women and don't find tattoos or butch women( butch and queer are different, bro) unattractive at all. So, to end this, the problem isn't the g/g directors and producers not listening to the fans, they are listening to the majority of fans. The problem is the majority of fans are asking for this type of g/g porn and you're just in the minority of fans who want something different and that doesn't sell. But you too are just looking for the same type of "fantasy pornstar" look in your lesbian porn. So, you're not that different from the rest of the cis male porn fans.
^ "The problem is you don't really care about seeing real authentic lesbians, made by and showing real lesbians."
So they have to look that way to be real and authentic huh? I think that's more marketing than reality. A certain look does not equal authenticity or realism.
"What sells is so-called young hot pornstars who do g/g scenes, not lesbian sex."
As I surmised, for you if it's a conventionally attractive woman, or too young of a woman, it's not lesbian sex. You've bought into the fallacy that it has to be performed by a certain looking woman in order to be authentic. I watched some of the trailers on Crashpad - same drivel and bullshit that's running rampant through mainstream lesbian porn just performed by less attractive folks. And that's not to even mention how little cisfemale/cisfemale porn it appears is on there, seems rife with all sorts of other pairings I have no interest in.
"Indie labels like Pink Label and directors like Shine Louise Houston are really the only ones who will try to bring you actual lesbian sex with real lesbians."
"Real lesbians" does not mean unattractive women only, or just every day meet on the street looks, no matter your bent on this.
"But you too are just looking for the same type of "fantasy pornstar" look in your lesbian porn. So, you're not that different from the rest of cs male porn fans."
LOL! I've fought the fight for more realistic (not uglier women, but more realistic lovemaking) for more than two years now, across over dozens of memberships, comment sections and forums. That claim is baseless, you're just upset nobody cares about your pet projects. I'm looking for real lovemaking, not performative bullshit, and done by what I consider attractive cisfemales.
Look through my post history, check my thoughts on the sort of things I want to see in lesbian scenes, I am not asking for the bullshit stuff you claim I am by lumping me in with the rest of those that buy into the rote, over the top porno drivel that fills scene after scene of supposedly realistic lesbian sex. Goddamn. You literally have no clue the amount of work I've put in the past two years (both in public and behind the scenes) to try and affect this bullshit rampant fakery (NO! It's not about them having to look "butch" or whatever you want to call it, that's not relevant to their authenticity in the least!) fakery and performative pleasure routines in lesbian porn. I have been nothing but consistent in this regard.
Edited: And if you do your due diligence and go far enough back, you'll see a turn. You'll see bullshit approval of bullshit fakery, and asking for nonsensical stuff in both lesbian porn and B/G porn. Yes I watch transwomen content, Transfixed is why I rejoined Adult Time after the first year and a half - and after having been either asked to leave or only comment on what I DID like, I chose to leave; that's how hard I fought there to try and get better quality lesbian lovemaking, the front office started having a hard time keeping up the facade of what they were putting out, yet they refused to make any changes. Look through Adult Time comment sections on lesbian scenes in 2020-2021 for my username, you'll see me pointing out in exacting detail all the BS they pull in G/G scenes there. Look through the Girlfriends Films comment sections from 11/20 through late 2021, nobody called them out on their bullshit fakery more than I, and if you can find it/use the WayBack Machine the full reviews on their forums I posted did the same. Anyways, you'll see a marked changed in the tone of my posting, what I liked, don't like anymore and what I now fight and push for.
I think Ive been on the record of saying when it comes to men in a G/G that I hate if the men are in the room with the girl having sex and they keep showing him watching and even worst playing with himself. The only exception is a DigitalPlayground scene with Demi, Desiree, and Scarlit where Xander was the male and was tied up in the room and after a few minutes into the sex when they kept showing him they stopped and let the sex just go on and finish before they showed him again and truly acknowledged him. I thought the storyline was pretty good.
That leads me to say that if the storyline fits well and it comes seamlessly then I dont mind men being in a G/G scene. I think directors already have too many restrictions on what they can come up with in a storyline to begin with. As I mentioned before, I was talking to a director and she told me how she has so many great ideas but she cant put them in scenes bc of restrictions. So with there being so many restrictions already, taking men out of every G/G scene would limit even more what directors can do. G/G is not living in a bubble. Lesbians have guy friends, they have brothers, cousins, uncles, dads, step-fathers, male professors, male doctors, etc.. in their life daily. They arent surrounded by nothing but females all the time. I remember when GFF used a male. It was early at some point early in the series "Please Make Me Lesbian". I had no problem with it. Lust Cinema uses males in their movies regardless if its a G/G scene or not. I have no problem with it. SHV have used males in their scenes and I have no problem with it. AHL have used males in their scenes at some point and I have no issue with it. There is just a line that cant be crossed. The great directors know that line that cant be crossed.
Also I take issue in how in G/G scenes they talk about men. They talk about men in a bad way. Like we are no good and useless. As if in a perfect world we arent even needed. Again thats not reality. Lesbians dont look at men like that. You can have a G/G scene where the girl talk glowing about a male but is just unsure about her sexuality or just more curious about another girl. Maybe even wanting to try a girl out not to leave her man but to spice up her sex life or life in general bc she might feel like she is too predictable and want to walk on the wild side. Like there are so many ways a storyline can be in a G/G scene rather than "guys are dumb and useless" or "my husband and I havent had sex in 20yrs bc I just dont find him attractive anymore". Thats just my take. Plus as we all know that most girls in these G/G scenes are truly bi. Its rare that we see a true lesbian. What I mean by true lesbian is someone who has never had sex before with a guy. So we are already watching a performer knowing she is either married, is dating a guy, or has been married or dated a guy, or has sex before with a guy. So we might as well make a normal scene not acting like men dont exist when talking about us or if done right put a male in a scene. And I preference by saying, "if done right" bc if not done right then dont have a male anywhere near the scene.
Oh and I definitely feel the same way about trans too. I love the fact that trans are starting to be on sites like AdultTime part of their G/G genre. I love the fact that a big name like Angela White put a trans in Natalie Mars in her G/G series "Angela Loves Women". I think the right idea of gender fluid shouldnt be one sided. I think Sinn thinks of herself as gender fluid. I know Kristen Scott does and Kasey Warner does. So if we take no issue if Sinn Sage does countless of G/G scenes bc she was technically born a female that she even said herself that when she has a strap-on she can mentally switch then why we have a problem if a trans is in a G/G scene where they can say the exact same thing of mentally switch? And yes the only exception and I know the deal breaker is the penis in a G/G scene but thats where I think we as a society need to stop it when it comes to trans women. Key word is women. Again thats just my opinion and I hope one day GFF and SHV and other sites that employees good if not great G/G use trans in their scenes and again use them in the right manner too. I bash Brazzers for all their horribleness but the one thing they got right was having trans now.
I like porn and the Golden Age of Porn 1947 Posts 9/21
Posted - Apr 12 2022 : 4:25PM
Dude, Take it down a little I'm not saying you haven't made good and valid points, I have many times agreed with your points But I just feel you also just asking for more of the same. First, Attraction is subjective and everyone has different tastes in women and sexuality. So, some people find the women you called ugly and unattractive, beautiful and sexy. There are a lot of women that people on here think are hot, that I don't find physically attractive, and not the body type I'm into at all. But if they have a great scene with chemistry that works, then I turn into a fan and am sexually attracted to them. This happened with Aiden Ashely, I wasn't into her at all because she's too skinny for me. But her scenes are great and now I'm turned by her. Not all the women in lesbian porn need to look like a big butch lesbian but not everyone needs to look like a skinny super model too. We need variety with lots of different types of bodies and looks. Just felt like you weren't asking for this at all. That's why it just sounds like more of the same. You just watched a trailer, so you didn't actually watch any Crash Pad vids at all, ok. Like I said some actual big-name pornstars have shot for Shine and Crash Pad movies. Crash Pad and Pink LabelTV( which is a site for queer and lesbian movies) movies, they're in no way made in the same way as mainstream g/g or trans porn. I have never seen anything that looks "porny" in their films or series Pink Label has a lot of old lesbian porn from '80s and 90s worth checking out, also many indie lesbian porn directors have their work on PinkLabelTV. As an independent label outside of mainstream porn, they can make and sponsor the type of lesbian you're talking about. Because their fanbase isn't the mainstream porn watcher. Mainstream porn is the way it is because its fanbase like it that way. You and I are in the minority porn fans I'm afraid to say. Until the majority of g/g fans demand change, nothing will. I don't work for Pink Label or Crash Pad, just a fan of the site. The only site I give money to each month, I'm not giving any mainstream company any of my money. I'll just buy VOD from AdultDVDEmpire and Hotmovies. I'm not even queer or bi and still watch stuff on Pink Label. But I also watch porn without jacking off sometimes.
^Hey, heard and will do. Apologies for getting going there for a minute. Got a friend on the way and we're about to head out for a bit of a gaming night, I'll take a break from the thread for a bit, contemplate this whole thing, decompress and offer a proper reply. Appreciate the expounding of your points. Apologies for the dander! Back in a few hours.
Alright well this whole thread is quickly going off the rails. People can fight with each other about the multitude of things they aren't happy about in contemporary lesbian porn. BUT, there are some growing trends that I've noticed more of which are certainly positives in terms of finding things that I enjoy.
One thing that I've come to appreciate is femme presenting lesbians who will dabble in dressing up in or engaging in more masculine role-type scenarios for their scenes. Initially, the first few times I've seen it I could never really get into it. The more traditional 'butch' lesbian style (I believe that's the correct terminology but I could be off) never really appealed to me because more often than not the physical features of the women were not quite to my taste. In the last few years, I've noticed a growing trend of feminine performers throwing on male-tailored suits & other more masculine clothing for scenes in where they top their co-star. Seems to show up more regularly in G/G strap-on stuff. Here's a great example: Alice White is a OF creator that I subscribe to. This is a G/G strap-on scene where she's wearing a power suit while topping her co-star. The mix of feminine facial features with tomboy/masculine clothing is a fun twist that can often lead to really exciting content.
^I really think this has potential as a sub-series/site for a bigger company or as a stand-alone. I would love to see some of the popular feminine performers today "butch it up" as it then have them strap a hyper-femme performer in a scene.
For example, from the recent Slayed scene, imagine Kenna James in a suit, hair pulled back in a pony-tail and hat strapping Avery Cristy. It would have to be a full clothed-female/naked female scenario though. I don't know if directors could resist the urge to make both girls get naked and devolve into a typical G/G scene.
^ Yeah it could definitely make for some more unique and compelling content. But you're right, the overwhelming amount of G/G content immediately goes for hyper-femme from top to bottom. Which is fine, I obviously enjoy a lot of it. But, it would be nice to see more variety. Unfortunately that seems to be a pretty niche thing that I really only ever see from indie content creators on OnlyFans. I think one of the issues is that producers will wrongly assume that to go that route, people would just want to see the more stereotypical 'butch' kind of performers (something like what you'd see from Syd Blakovich or Jiz Lee), instead of more feminine presenting performers who just happen to throw on a more masculine costume.
Which seems like a big wasted opportunity. Hell, Dani Daniels won an AVN award for this scene where the set-up is her lounging around in a man's suit & smoking a cigar while Sinn Sage gives her a lap dance.
On another note, I would love to see a Classic Girlfriends Films style scene with the production values of Slayed.
The best classic Girlfriends Films style scenes usually contained the following elements:
- An hour or more in length. - Plenty of foreplay/kissing, and build-up. - Little to no direction, or at least useful direction. - No toys except maybe a Strap-On. - Women who were actually into women/each other and had some experience, or least gave a convincing impression that they did. - Were not in a rush.
^ A very large one for me is not being in a rush. Every bit of the scene is made ever so much hotter when they just slow down, take their time, savor the things taking place. A touch with deliberate slow intent is much more arousing and sensual than the a frantic reach in and get back out with haste. Even the way a woman walks approaching you - just by slowing it down, without rushing, it heightens the experience, becoming one as opposed to simply just walking up to say hello or some such. I'd wrote above about loving when women hold the gaze of their partners in these films, letting the moment expand, "hanging on the edge" as I call it before the begin to kiss, moving slowly together. Can't count the number of times one woman launches into her partner with frantic recklessness and dashing the heightened sensual tension that had (ideally) been building. I feel like I'm doing a poor job in describing how the simple act of slowing down deepens the sensuality of a given scene.
^For me, I'm not really into a lot of close-ups. I prefer to see the lady's face and body when she's getting eating out to see how she reacts as she's getting closer to an orgasm!
To each their own my friend. nobody responds in my lesbian analingus thread anymore so this is all I got lol. Sadly, there are rarely any good closeups nowadays so I'm the unlucky one.
On the subject of a girls first ever G/G , any scenes where you really believe she's never been with a girl before ? This came to mind as I'm working thru glory hole swallow , two hot girls , Allie and Rylee both said their first time with a girl was in their GHS scene . For that matter any scenes where both girls were totally new to G/G ? Allie and Catherine Rylee going down for the first time
Id love to see close-ups of pussies throbbing and contracting when a girl truly orgasms. Ever since that live show Abi did for her onlyfans when she had a dildo in her ass and a vibrator on her clit and you could see closely her pussy contracting then she was having an orgasm I was like thats the hottest thing ever. Her legs started to shake, she had her head back in great pleasure and we know in general how Abi gets when she has an orgasm. It was intense bc she literally ran to the bathroom saying she felt like she had to pee. Now I knew that was code for squirt but Abi dont squirt as she firmly says its pee. But still it was so hot.
Again I would love close-ups just to see girls pussies throbbing and contracting when they truly orgasm. I know not every girl in every scene really have orgasms but there are those girls and we pretty much know who they are try to have at least one real orgasm in their scenes so Id love to see their pussies contract when they have an orgasm bc its the hottest thing ever.
In general though I love close-ups especially when kissing. Yes I do love to see body language and how girls respond to pleasure but I love kissing and I was to see close-ups of how the girls are kissing. I want to see the lip sucking and pulling. The entire scene dont have to be close-up but show the most intimate parts.
I was thinking, there are number of girls who have steadily been doing a lot of G/G for various studios but who fly under the radar for some reason. Girls like:
Ember Snow Lily Larimar Emma Starletto Gizelle Blanco Paige Owens Emma Starletto
Anyone a fan of any of these ladies?
[Link]
Lezzyist Deactivated User
Make Porn Erotic Again 1736 Posts 9/19
Posted - Apr 15 2022 : 12:21PM
^I think Lily's the cutest woman in porn and she is getting better and better as a GG performer. Did a great job in a recent Adulttime scene with Laney Gray.
The other Lilly, Bell, doesn't get the respect she deserves for her GG work either.
Well, Lily Larimar is really good. I like her scenes in All Her Luv and some that she made for Girlsway. Emma Starletto is another one that has given good work. Paige Owens has also a few shots that I like. Gizelle Blanco had an scene with, thank God, Jayden Cole, that was released yesterday and it's amazing. In general, I like many of these actresses and they're doing many GG, but maybe the problem is that is overshadowed by their BG stuff, I guess.
Edited by - Bistahieversor on 4/15/2022 3:27:33 PM
The only one jumps out to me on this list is Ember. She also does a ton of G/G for her own platform. She has a series called "Girl Crushes" where she shot with the likes of Gina Valentina, Eliza Ibarra, Kendra Spade, Jill Kassidy, Spencer Bradley, Serene Siren and many many many more. I have a few of them but there are so many that I can't get them all so I just pick the ones I want the most and they are really good.
Spencer Bradley for me flies under the radar. I really like her. She is beautiful, very friendly and just super chill. I also will say the same about Freya Parker. I really like her as well. She is really cool.
Vanessa Sky has also recently been popping up a lot in G/G scenes recently. I initially wrote her off as more of a B/G type, but so far she seems to really enjoy being with women.
These 2 have a Sweetheart Video scene that came out in'21. Perhaps, you would enjoy that one, although it involves a lot of noise as well. Anyways, glad to see Kylie added the Slayed rotation. As for the playing around, those involved would call it performing.
[Link]
Lezzyist Deactivated User
Make Porn Erotic Again 1736 Posts 9/19
Posted - Apr 16 2022 : 7:59PM
^I think "playing around" is a more accurate descriptor than performing
Introducing Brandi Swan
Posted - Apr 11 2022 : 9:50PM
Rylee going down for the first time
