On the licking stick, Mr. Magic Dick! 3309 Posts 2/09
Posted - Apr 18 2012 : 11:46PM
There is no such thing as being too pretty for porn. As far as mainstream models are concerned, yeah some are good looking, but take away the hair and makeup artists and a lot are rather ordinary looking. It's more about a certain "look" than being drop dead gorgeous. I've seen Gisele Bundchen (sp)when she was not all done up and you wouldn't even give her a second look.
Uhm, some are gorgeous, but some are just...ordinary:P [mod edit: link removed. no tube sites. Many of our members earn their living by making or selling porn. They don't need you to give it away for free.] freak Edited by - killbillvol69 on 4/19/2012 7:04:58 PM
At the end of the day, it is what it is. 629 Posts 12/09
Posted - Apr 19 2012 : 2:34PM
Nobody is too pretty for porn and when I go to the strip club, I want to see feature dancer porn stars that are as pretty as possible. I'm constantly disappointed with most strippers, especially on weekends when the clubs are supposed to presenting their best.
^ Definitely; Nancy was absolutely one of the most beautiful women ever in porn, especially in the golden age..this was before all of the super euro beauties..Nancy really stood out, along with Annette Haven, Angel (Penthouse Pet Angel), Loni Sanders and others. Nancy looked so great in Taxi Girls...I'll have to look for some additional pics to post. Edited by - zophos on 5/31/2012 10:34:15 PM
Just saw a very very hot steamy porn movie with Leola Bell. wow wow wow. I have almost never seen such a beautiful woman ever, forget porn. I almost couldn't believe what I was seeing.
You may be a lover but you ain't no dancer 556 Posts 1/12
Posted - Jun 2 2012 : 3:38PM
IMO, Jenna Haze, and Tori black are the only pornstars that are to pretty for porn.
[Link]
Zy28 Deactivated User
251 Posts 2/12
Posted - Jun 2 2012 : 9:10PM
Yeah I saw that with Leola Bell. They said it was before her playmate days when I guess she needed the money. And I agree with the poster who mentioned Tori Black. She could easily have done legitimate modeling.
[Link]
realtip Deactivated User
2301 Posts 6/04
Posted - Jun 2 2012 : 9:22PM
One guy can look at a girl and call her "too pretty for porn," and another guy can look at the same girl and say that she's not pretty enough for porn. Just sayin'.
Well, thankfully not, but I think what "too pretty for porn" really means is a girl that could have landed some high status male and been sitting by a pool or cruising around Europe. Until he dumped her for some new arm candy and she cashed in on half his stuff. But I think this only applies to relatively high class American girls who could carry off the high class social scene, for instance, the ones that work "f@#4" into every sentence twice. If you're from Hungary or Appalachia, some guy sucks you in on modelling, then suddenly you are sucking a dick on film, then, what the hell, you're 24 with 100 titles under your belt. But anyway, I think my list on page two sums it up, and those I'm sure some of those girls fall into the above category, without being mean and mentioning them. (What I really meant to say was "bump".)
I was always surprised that Nikki Dial was in porn. She had the body of Holly Michaels with the facial symmetry and beauty of Tori Black. She was truly stunning. She was in the era of VHS and 10 minute scenes, god I wish I could go back in time and have her doing scenes for Elegant Angel.
Dunno think its a bit of a strange topic to be honest. For me porn is purely fantasy so I enjoy seeing 'slutty' looking girls rather than 'cute' girls. I think Yuffie Yulan is super hot though.
I agree, the slutty girls, and no so pretty seem to work harder, same for escorts I noticed too! There are some pretty girls that are damn nasty in porn though..
As long as they eat,pee and shit,they can't be too pretty for porn.
[Link]
Todd Gack Deactivated User
"Oh, of course. Todd Gack." 849 Posts 6/12
Posted - Oct 22 2012 : 1:16PM
JMO but for those who say that no girl is too pretty for porn, I say you're a being a bit too politically correct, maybe too idealistic as well. Any list of "girls too pretty for porn" has to have Racquel Darrian in at least the top three.
Less identical crap, more sleaze and bush! 2378 Posts 7/09
Posted - Jan 2 2013 : 7:58PM
Agreed. A better thread is probably too ugly for porn but would be offensive.. But if there was one my vote would be Ashlyn Rae so wholesome naturally beautiful almost feels a crime to see her doing porn..
[Link]
JrCanon Deactivated User
623 Posts 12/12
Posted - Jan 2 2013 : 10:30PM
She's perfect! Edited by - juniorcanon on 1/3/2013 9:26:51 PM
Bravo. I applaud your answer. I get what the guy who started the thread was going for, and in general I get what guys mean when they say a girl is "too pretty for porn." I've been told that several times by my own fans. And in that, I kind of read a connotation of "too pretty" meaning "too good" for porn, which when I think about it is kind of insulting! This is what I've wanted to do since I was 19! It's my passion. Sure, I could go sign up at Central Casting in LA and go to every audition for every tv pilot and commercial and maybe find some degree of success doing that, if I gave a damn about being mainstream... and I'm sure nobody would say I'm "too pretty for TV" if I ever got on it, LOL. But THIS is what I want to be doing, and I'm really glad that there are fans who understand that some of the most attractive and intelligent women choose porn because it's what they want to be doing, not because they think it's the best they can do.
[Link]
JackSparrow Deactivated User
7235 Posts 7/11
Posted - Jan 4 2013 : 2:13AM
Great Posting Siri.
[Link]
JrCanon Deactivated User
623 Posts 12/12
Posted - Jan 4 2013 : 3:34AM
^^ Siri is definitely right!!! People forget that porn is actually a way out like any other professional career you choose in life!
Asking "why porn?" Is something that bothers me a lot, its because I like to fuck and I like the attention so what better job? Every girl pretty or ugly has their own reasons for being in this industry but instead of asking "why porn?" Ask "why wouldn't she do porn?" And just accept it for what it is and thank her for being in porn!
I think you have to differentiate "too pretty". There are two kinds. There is too pretty - as in girl-next-door or as in too-damn-gorgeous-that-no-one-man-could-ever-deserve-to-touch-that. None of the girls mentioned so far falls in the latter category. Granted, it's all subjective but some girls should not even be mentioned here. The type 1 version of "too pretty" is easier: it's just too many to count.
I would say that Silvia Saint, Michelle Wild and Aletta Ocean v2 are the type 2 kind. Aletta Ocean v1 was the type 1.
I agree though with those that say that "too pretty for porn" is insulting and maybe even stupid. I think there are many girls who are too sweet for porn. That one is more interesting to discuss.
LOL, yes I can be a firecracker. 99% of the time I'm way too forgiving; I have a pretty high tolerance for bullshit from otherwise kind, well-intentioned and reasonable people. But I DON'T have a high tolerance for assholes or unreasonable people, which may be what you have observed! LOL!
^ That is to me a perfectly balanced person: a good person to have in this world. I think I like you more because of that *blushes* PS. May I say that I really like the way you carry yourself. Sorry, I should move this over to the worship-Siri thread =0)
Sorry to interupt Siri and Mr Purple... but back to the thread.... I definitely think Kayden Kross falls into the 'too pretty for porn' category, even though no girl is too pretty for porn. It's their decision to do it. Thank you Kayden for making that decision.