Reviewers Recommend Lesbian Trainer 4 (Sweetheart Video) - review by Captain Jack Director: Mike Quasar Starring: Serene Siren, Desiree Dulce, Blake Blossom, Kate Dalia, Gal Ritchie, Addison Vodka, Cami Strella, Taylor Wild. Read review
I'm a sociopathic financial economist with a foot fetish. 30 Posts 8/09
Posted - Aug 13 2010 : 7:58AM
It all started after I watched the Gina Lynn Facial Abuse scene, then it progressed to seeking out videos where chicks are deep throating literally until they gag and vomit (I do sometimes find the vomiting gross, but not always, it just depends)...anyway, now I'm regularly seeking similar content in addition to the usual footjob, foot worship, facial, and gonzo sex scenes, where the guy/girl sub/dom relationship is a more even. At first I felt kind of bad for enjoying it, well that's not true. I tried to convince myself that I felt bad. The truth is I like watching women get dominated and "abused" on video; it gets me off and makes me laugh sometimes too. I have yet to mimic the content in my sex life (although my girl is willing to try the extreme deep throat and vomit thing). I'm just wondering what the rest of the world thinks of the proliferation of such content. Sights are popping up left and right that serve this niche. It seems like there is no dearth of girls willing to do such scenes either. The scenes appear to be getting harder and harder too. Even, companies like Brazzer's have something to offer the niche. Is the "abuse", humiliation concept here to stay? Is it the wave of the future? Are guys like me sick for getting off on it? I suppose as long as the girls are willing to continue to subject themselves to such treatment, it doesn't violate censorship laws, and people are buying -- producers will keep producing. As for me, I will certainly keep watching.
Not a shred of evidence exists in favor of the idea that life is serious - Brendan Gill 723 Posts 4/09
Posted - Aug 13 2010 : 9:32AM
I don't believe any sexual fantasy, per se, is "sick." But when it crosses the line from vicarious enjoyment or role play into reality, it's time to ask questions about whether you need some help regaining your perspective. This goes for ANY sexual fantasy. Pretending you are cheating on your SO is about as common and harmless a fantasy as there is, but if you feel the NEED to actually cheat to get off, you are in trouble. Rough sex fantasies are almost as common, but, likewise, if it's the ONLY fantasy that can get you off or you have to actually DO it to cum, you need to get help both for your own sake and that of your significant other.
Is there anything more beautiful and erotic in the world than a woman licking another woman's anus? 51 Posts 12/09
Posted - Aug 13 2010 : 3:17PM
To each their own I suppose, the problem is there can be a thin line between what goes on consentually behind closed doors, and then the same thing getting out of hand in real life, and let me make it clear that I don't mean that in a disrespectful way to the original poster. I don't go for S'n'M in any context, even slapping gets a bit O.T.T. for me. Then again, I have fetishes other people would find bizarre or downright disgusting, so I'm in no position to judge anyone else. EVERYTHING SHOULD BE 101% CONSENTUAL, END OF STORY.
Not a shred of evidence exists in favor of the idea that life is serious - Brendan Gill 723 Posts 4/09
Posted - Aug 13 2010 : 3:21PM
If you do not have sexual fantasies about doing something that you would not actually do, you are very much in the minority according to sex research since the beginning of sex research. For all I know, you may be unique. For one thing, much porn depends for its existence on the fact that very normal, very healthy and very sane people often are aroused by imagining taking part in sexual activities that would make them monstrous if they ever actually DID those things. Whether that porn eventually compels them to turn fantasy into actual practice has been debated literally for millenia, but there is as yet no conclusive proof that fantasies necessarily drive one to actually do what he imagines doing to get off. Edited by - duefuss on 8/13/2010 3:23:22 PM
[Link]
Mr. Sausage Deactivated User
330 Posts 11/06
Posted - Aug 13 2010 : 3:48PM
I admit some of them deserve it. :p I will also say that many of them that do really deserve it I wouldn't want to see nude. Joy Behar :vomit: Same thing with Whoopi and many others. One thing people need to do before they sign a contract with a company is, look at their videos and actually read or listen to what they want you to do for them. If you don't like it leave. It's your choice, and you will have to live with it for the rest of your life. Also, remember the video will still be around after you die.
[Link]
Perverted_Jewish_Guy Deactivated User
207 Posts 4/10
Posted - Aug 15 2010 : 9:18PM
I love seeing girls getting fucked roughly and abused. I honestly don't care if people get appalled by it. I just laugh at them. More abusive porn needs to be released.
Gouman is letting directors take control of his dick. When vomiting becomes a habit, it leads to some serious health problems, such as heart failure and death.
[Link]
Perverted_Jewish_Guy Deactivated User
207 Posts 4/10
Posted - Aug 15 2010 : 11:07PM
I like abuse with bondage or just really rough sex such as hair grabbing but vomiting is taking in too far in my view.
pornography wasn't sex but fantasies of an impossibly hospitable world 12377 Posts 9/07
Posted - Aug 16 2010 : 4:21AM
I find that you laugh is the strangest part of your post, what exactly makes you laugh? Somtimes the OT acting will make me laugh in porn. I'd disagree that this is 'the wave of the future' or that 'sites are popping up left and right to serve this niche.' There has always been a market for this but if anything it is on the decline, I think you've just discovered it and are searching it out so you think it's growing, but in the late 90s/early 2000s this stuff was really booming and started showing up in regular gonzo porn. Since then there has been a steady decline in terms of quanity but in terms of quality things have improved a lot with the rough sex videos of Kink.com Belladonna, Mason and Jake Malone. I think these directors actually enjoy what they're doing and like to use performers who enjoy it too. But then I think most of these producers are more S/M oriented, 'abuse porn' is different, imho, and that may be more what you're talking about?
[Link]
realtip Deactivated User
2301 Posts 6/04
Posted - Aug 16 2010 : 4:28AM
^True. This type of porn has been on the decline for the last few years. However, it's really interesting that at the time when it was more available, porn was also reported to be a very lucrative industry. Indeed, this type of rough porn has since decreased in volume, but so have industry profits, according to the reports I've been hearing. I don't think this is merely a coincidence, and really doesn't support the statements of those who keep saying that this type of porn only has a marginal audience.
pornography wasn't sex but fantasies of an impossibly hospitable world 12377 Posts 9/07
Posted - Aug 16 2010 : 5:00AM
^ Perhaps, I address that in another thread here Realtip, but I think from what I've read the increase in this kind of porn in the late 90s/early 2000s had more to do with decision by Janet Reno to not pursue obscenity convictions for adult pornography, no matter how offensive, in favour of going after child pornography.
[Link]
realtip Deactivated User
2301 Posts 6/04
Posted - Aug 16 2010 : 6:06AM
^Exactly. Thus, my belief that the decrease in this brand of porn is more a result of politics than the lack of an audience.
Not a shred of evidence exists in favor of the idea that life is serious - Brendan Gill 723 Posts 4/09
Posted - Aug 16 2010 : 9:55AM
Don't confuse correlation with cause and effect. If rough porn prodction declined at the same time as general prosperity declined, they may or may NOT be related to each other
Not a shred of evidence exists in favor of the idea that life is serious - Brendan Gill 723 Posts 4/09
Posted - Aug 16 2010 : 9:57AM
gouman Deactivated User
I'm a sociopathic financial economist with a foot fetish. 30 Posts 8/09
Posted - Aug 16 2010 : 12:29PM
I'm admittedly not a porn industry analyst. The abuse content may be on the decline. However, my perception is that it's becoming more common place on the basis of it showing up in more of the places I go to consume pornographic content. It's also in most of the new places I go to consume content. Granted, I am a sample of one, so my conclusion is wholly anecdotal. With respect to what about "abuse" porn makes me laugh, it's a combination of the dialog, and occasionally the girls reactions to the treatment. For example, in the Gina Lynn Facial Abuse scene she clowns the guys by saying something like "In a club these guys wouldn't have a shot with me", then some hairy overweight guy comes and stuffs his cock in her mouth balls deep. To me that kind of shit is funny. Sometime the girls are just so stupid too. The directors often play off the girls stupidity by asking them questions that require a little thoughtfulness, or questions that are passive aggressive. Sometimes the girls responses are so stupid it's funny. In general, I think it's funny that women allow themselves to be subjected to such treatment for what, a grand or two. I mean I wouldn't let two chicks with treat me like shit, even in a sexual context for that kind of money. In sum, the fact that these girls are allowing themselves to be treated like shit, in a sexual context, for basically chump change -- and it's on record via video that is plastered all over the internet -- that's funny. Fucked up, but funny.
I must admit that I am guilty of enjoying these "abuse" scenes too. I'm sorry but even if the women are not fully aware of the acts that will be in the scene that they signed up for it's all good with me. In fact seeing them look shocked makes it even more enjoyable for me. I think that Gina Lynn scene was kinda weak by that sites standards. She should have been abused more.
If you want to believe that people are stupid just because you see them acting stupid on video then be my guest. I'll wait for some proof in the real world. That's not to suggest that porn is full of rocket scientists on a lark, but we are talking about a medium that is dedicated to fantasy; a medium where people are paid to perform on camera. Being stupid can be just as much of a performance as being an insatiable slut is. As for the 'women being abused' thing, I can enjoy some bondage and spanking where everybody is enjoying themselves. I have no interest when it devolves into degradation, mock or otherwise.
I agree with blackSix that this kind of porn has been in decline for quite a few years. There are very few sites still dedicated to it. The only one that comes to mind is Facial abuse and the ones under the adult doorway banner. Those guys are definetely keeping the torch burning. Now those sites should never be compared to Kink's stuff. Although you might say they both deal in abusive porn. I think the main difference is in the intent and how it's done. The stuff kink does is more on the side of extreme porn where you see a performer try to push herself further. In Facial abuse you get a guy that tries to push a girl beyond what she can take. As much as I was a big fan of Max earlier work. As much as I dislike is later stuff. The chocking, gagging and vomit inducing BJ's are just the tip of the iceberg. The number of gorgeous girls that performed in Max's video is hard to believe. How many couldn't deal with what happened during those shoots and soon left the porn biz? If anyone likes this kind of stuff then good luck finding a lot of new content. I for one won't miss it at all.
Once you've been dominated and abused, it's very hard not to crave it, and regular sex then becomes kind of boring. I dated a professional Dominatrix for a number of months, and the pain she inflicted was enjoyable and heightened my sexual awareness and orgasms. So, when I look at women in rough porn, I can relate to the blissful pleasure of their pain and it turns me on. Real abuse pisses me off and I'd kill anyone who smacked around a woman for real. Fantasy/consentual abuse (bondage/S&M) are beautiful things that more people should allow themselves to experience.
[Link]
A-ten Deactivated User
581 Posts 8/07
Posted - Aug 16 2010 : 10:25PM
I like watching women get dominated as well. For me it harkens back to the days when men walked this world as warriors and animals. And we took what we wanted by virtue of our physical power including women. Survival of the fittest existed. We lived short, mean, primal lives. We battled animals for dominance with our physical prowess and superior mind. Even though they don't show it much, women were probably long-haired, hairy and primal as well. We wouldn't talk to them or court them. We'd just find one we liked, fight anyone that challenged us, physically dominated her, fucked her like an animal to spill our seed inside her hoping to breed, and then wandered off. And women probably enjoyed it and learned to understand their relationship to the male. Thus was the beginnings of male dominated society. It was based on the physical power of men and physical and sexual dominance was the first way males dominated women. When you see it in a porn film or get with a woman, you can still feel a bit of that primal dominance we've given up in the modern day.
My ex-gf let me slap her tits and her face and I kinda got off on that. she totally enjoyed it and told me to do it. There was this other dude she had been with that would fuck her and slap the shit out of her face and she'd get off on it. I think that's hot for some reason. I was slapping her tits at her house one day when we were fucking and I had to stop doing it so hard because it was loud and she lived with her parents and we didn't wanna wake them up. She was fine with the intensity, we just didn't wanna get caught. haha. She'd let me bite the shit out of her too. I bit her inner thigh so hard one time that it bruised up really bad. Her dad asked her what happened one day when she was wearing shorts around the house and she had to make up some lame excuse about how she got it.
[Link]
CHI - BEAR 85 Deactivated User
225 Posts 9/08
Posted - Aug 17 2010 : 4:00AM
I guess I add my two cents to this very interesting topic. Is the abuse content on a decline? No! I believe it's going to be growing, because of the success of Facialabuse.com, Ghettogaggers.com, Herfirstgangbang.com, herfirstanal.com, meatholes.com and etc. Howard Stern said it long time ago, " That men don't like soft ass porn they like hardcore porn". The adult film industry in dvd sales are way down and the internet adult websites who are shooting abusive porn videos. Are growing because they are giving what men like to see hardcore abusive sex. It's in our DNA, we like to fuck like an animal. I totally agree with (thedude008) comment, if the women are not fully aware of the acts that will be in the scene that they signed up for it's all good. In fact seeing them look shocked makes it even more enjoyable. Usually people who don't like this kind of stuff are usually female viewers and sissy men who got no balls who act like girls.
[Link]
CHI - BEAR 85 Deactivated User
225 Posts 9/08
Posted - Aug 17 2010 : 4:15AM
Check out the adult films that shoot hardcore abusive fuck videos in Japan. Why are they so successful in that country and I might as well add Europe to the list. In America we act too damn soft, let's all grow up and act like adults and not be afraid to like what we want. Without someone criticizing us for likeing something that might be wrong. It's fuckin porn there's a not a damn thing wrong with it.
[Link]
realtip Deactivated User
2301 Posts 6/04
Posted - Aug 17 2010 : 5:36AM
As I said, I think there's more of a correlation between the decline of rough porn and the practice of the government prosecuting everybody and his brother for obscenity.AdultDoorway lost its cred when it got rid of YellowDiscipline.
My only stipulation would be that they would have to really enjoy it and it wouldn't just be for profit. There's no pleasure in it for a sub unless the top enjoys their work. Edited by - randomprecision on 8/17/2010 6:51:11 AM
I didn't say it was erotic. I said I was amused by it. I guess it's not as sick if you think it's funny as it is if you think it's erotic. Anyway, I don't think it's all that sick either way. To each their own. There's far worse. At any rate, you've probably been waiting for most of your pathetic life to voice your opinion on people who like poop to someone who cares so carry on. I might even play along if you can get dramatic enough and convince me you're really serious. Edited by - randomprecision on 8/17/2010 9:24:13 AM
Nothing wrong with rough sex. What two (or more) consenting adults do in thier free time or on camera is upto them. As long as everyone walks away happy i don't see a problem. If the chick leaves crying then chances are it's not cool.
Not a shred of evidence exists in favor of the idea that life is serious - Brendan Gill 723 Posts 4/09
Posted - Aug 17 2010 : 10:58AM
There's a certain roughness involved in really passionate love making, in which both people are highly aroused. In the sense that the roughness duplicates the kind of desperate hunger to stimulate and be stimulated to ultimate sexual arousal, rough sex can be vicariously very effective in getting someone off. But when the roughness becomes abusive to the point where the woman is clearly no longer aroused and enjoying it, then, I think, one is getting off on the abusiveness of rough sex rather than on its simulation of great passion. It may seem a fine line or no line at all to some, but it's very clear to me and I personally don't care to cross it. As I say, however, any "fantasy" is okay in consensual or vicarious sexual enjoyment.
Not a shred of evidence exists in favor of the idea that life is serious - Brendan Gill 723 Posts 4/09
Posted - Aug 17 2010 : 11:34AM
That's their business (pun intended). But in answer to your question, I never said what fantasies I had, or that I get off on EVERYTHING. Who does? What I DID say is that it is normal to have sexual fantasies and to be aroused by the imagination or depiction of doing something that you would NEVER do or even WANT to do actually. It is, conversely, equally possible to have sexual fantasies that you WOULD readily indulge in real life, given the opportunity. The imagination never has been restricted to either the realm of the possible OR that of the impossible. This is not MY opinion or conjecture. It's been documented since Kinsey.
[Link]
Mr. Sausage Deactivated User
330 Posts 11/06
Posted - Aug 17 2010 : 1:28PM
Kinsey lied and falsified a lot, more than likely all, of his "work." He can't be taken seriously. He also did experiments with pedophiles and a NAZI pedophile. Go look that up. ;)
[Link]
MonkeySpank Deactivated User
14 Posts 1/10
Posted - Aug 17 2010 : 1:33PM
Remember sites like "Meatholes" and "Pissmops"? They either went out of business or were shut down by law enforcement. More than one porn producer is serving time now for violating laws governing porn activity.
And they won't be the last. Whether guys like Khan Tusion bow out gracefully or not, once they're gone, the "anti obscenity" people are still gonna have to earn their pay somehow. And once they start doing what they do with the approval (Tacit or otherwise) of pretty much everyone, there's no telling how far all that inertia (And zeal, of course) will carry them. Edited by - randomprecision on 8/17/2010 4:11:44 PM
Not a shred of evidence exists in favor of the idea that life is serious - Brendan Gill 723 Posts 4/09
Posted - Aug 17 2010 : 5:12PM
You go look it up yourself if you care. I certainly don't. You're the one making the claim; it ain't my job to prove your shit. Was Kinsey the second shooter, too? Not that it matters. If you did more than read to find something to disagree with you'd notice that I said "since Kinsey," meaning that the nature of sexual fantasies being not necessarily something the fantasizer would do or even want to do has been known since there's BEEN sex research (Kinsey's was the first attempt at a representative sample poll of American sexual practices, in 1948) and has been verified many times. Or are all clinical findings falsified? Oh, and what in the HELL does a Nazi pedophile have to do with ANYTHING? Edited by - duefuss on 8/17/2010 5:31:39 PM
This kind of shit makes me depressed. The tired old DNA arguments and "it's just porn, relax!" rebuttals are beyond idiotic - in fact, it's lazy and pathetic. I honestly find it distressing that people still think in these ways. Luckily I still come in contact with men who prove that these kinds of "masculine" attitudes do not speak for an entire gender.
If liking 'this kind of stuff' is what it takes to be considered a real man, count me out. I'm pro-evolution, and yes, perhaps there was a time men simply took what they wanted by brute force. But is there something so wrong with rising above that by at least treating all women with the same respect you would show them in real life? I have zero problem with consensual rough sex. But getting enjoyment out of seeing women willfully deceived in to a rough and demeaning situation they weren't expecting is just sick. That level of detachment, fantasy or not, makes me glad to be one of the sissy men.
[Link]
realtip Deactivated User
2301 Posts 6/04
Posted - Aug 17 2010 : 7:56PM
I think you might be surprised. That's why it's a good thing that we cannot read each other's fantasies.
Your previous post seems to imply that you find attitudes of sexual aggressiveness to be less common among men than they might actually be. Since I can't speak for the men you know, you could be right. But it sounded as if you were underestimating the prevalence of aggressive sexuality in heterosexual men, as compared to women. It reminds me of the time when comedian Chris Rock told the women in his audience, 'Your man is a whole lot freakier than you think he is.'
^ I think you misunderstood my post, or you're conflating a bunch of different attitudes into one. Either way, it's a common way of dismissing certain opinions or arguments to say "men don't tell the truth around women." The converse of that, of course, is that men often don't tell the truth around men because they feel they have to perform some kind of masculine role. Nobody tells the absolute truth about their inner "demons" (if you want to call them that). I was commenting on the specific attitudes of enjoying the suffering of women, and feeling that there's nothing wrong with that. I don't believe that all men feel this way. If you want to think that the men in my life really do feel this way, and simply don't tell me, you can. I don't believe it to be the case, and I'm sure there are men here who would be insulted that they are presumed to feel such misogyny simply because they are male. P.S. Just to be clear, I'm well aware of societally instituted misogyny, believe me. Edited by - Gore Gore Girl on 8/17/2010 8:25:39 PM
[Link]
realtip Deactivated User
2301 Posts 6/04
Posted - Aug 17 2010 : 9:05PM
^Certainly, my intention was not to cast judgement on anyone, especially people I don't even know, neither am I dismissing your views or experience on the subject. To the contrary, they are very insightful. It is true that men do lie around women, and they also lie around other men. Anyone who has ever spent more than five minutes in a men's locker room can attest to how frequently men lie when surrounded by other men. Women do likewise. Although both sexes tend to forsake honesty when dealing with members of the same and opposite genders, this does not negate the fact that men do still tend to express a more aggressive form of sexuality than women, despite what we see in porn that says otherwise. As for men being insulted at being labelled innate misogynists, I agree. I am not a misogynist. Thus, I think men would be equally offended at the suggestion that the entertainment of their own sexual fantasies, no matter how licentious, is somehow a symptom of misogyny. To this end, I think you also have partially misunderstood the issue: The active desire for sex and power is traditionally considered part of being male. This has nothing to do with misogyny, which has seemingly lost its meaning and been inaccurately transformed into a label to, if I may put it bluntly, emasculate men. Edited by - realtip on 8/17/2010 9:10:55 PM
There are fantasies that take place in one's mind. And there are fantasies committed to words. And there are fantasies brought to life by visual artists. And there are fantasies enacted by paid performers following a script they approved in advance. And there are filmed scenes of sexual activity that are unscripted and in which the parameters of consent may be less clear. And there is consensual, unfilmed "real" sex. There is consent (express and implied) as a legal matter and there is consent as a matter of wholehearted and eager participation. It pays to bear these distinctions in mind. People who enjoy watching real human beings being really upset and not actually enjoying what they are doing or what is being done to them sexually -- those people need psychiatric care. ---------