In the context of porn, that's a load of BS. Porn performers should and usually do feel some degree of attraction to each other. The scenes are much more passionate and arousing when they do. Genuinely ugly men like Ron Jeremy and Ed Powers are the exceptions among male talent, not the norm, and many actresses never fuck them in any case. AFAIK, Kota Skye has never had sex with either of them. Along with all the social baggage involved in IR, it's completely plausible that many White women simply don't find Black men attractive at the most basic level necessary to perform well with them. Every empirical study of interracial dating trends/preferences (and I'm willing to provide the sources) suggests that the majority of White women DON'T find Black men all that attractive, and at least one study from Columbia University showed that the more attractive a woman was, the less likely she was to feel attracted to Black men. Are there some beautiful White women with a fetish for Black men? Of course. But they're the exceptions. Now, does this make those White women who don't feel attracted to Black men racist? NO! We can't help who and what we find attractive. These kinds of things tend to be heavily influenced by biological factors. Given our centuries of evolution and history of tribalism, it'd be strange if we weren't more attracted to people with features closer to ours. That's why, where I live, although same-race couples are the most frequent, it's still much more common to see Hispanics + Whites and Asians + Whites dating each other than it is to see Black + White couples. And again the statistics back me up, because Hispanic/White and Asian/White marriages are much more common than Black/White marriages. The fact is that Whites/Asians/Hispanics are all genetically closer to each other than any of them are to Blacks. See this graph: http://qph.is.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-71980930ae15576d1e85935b91902534?convert_to_webp=true Notice how Africans are furthest from the other races? This is unsurprising, since humans originated in Africa and those who left the continent continued evolving and adapting to their local environments, leading to the human races we see today. Of course, we all belong to the same species, but the physical differences between continental races remain quite conspicuous. And those differences are going to influence who we do and don't find attractive. The physical contrast between a White person and a Black person is as stark as possible between any two human populations. I mention this because many porn actresses who won't do IR with Black men HAVE done numerous scenes with Hispanic men. These include infamous "dodgers" such as Alexis Texas, Gracie Glam, Brooke Lee Adams, Ariana Marie, Jessie Andrews, and many others. Is this because they harbor some special contempt for Black men? I don't think so. I think that they're just able to find Hispanic men more attractive than Black men, although I also acknowledge that a White woman with a Hispanic man doesn't carry the same social baggage that being with a Black man does. But these trends within porn reflect the dating trends outside of porn which have been documented. Anyway, if you want to see Dakota Skye get fucked hard by an ethnic Latino man, watch her TeamSkeet scene with Bruno Dickemz. It's far and away the most popular scene on that site. She has better chemistry with him than she probably would with any Black actor, and she admitted on Twitter that he was the first guy to make her squirt. I think they might've banged off-camera a few times as well. Edited by - Billdude on 6/27/2015 7:49:44 PM
I tried to give the biological reasons (since attraction is always influenced by biology to some extent) why a White woman might not find Black men attractive compared to average-looking men of her own race, but you that point flew over your head. Furthermore, this phenomenon is NOT limited to porn actresses. *The majority of White women* are not sexually attracted to Black men. Yet many of these women will date and marry average-looking White men. This does not make them all closet racists. It's much easier to find White women who are sexually attracted to Hispanic/Latino men (and likewise much easier to find White porn actresses willing to perform with Hispanic/Latino men), but again there are sound biological explanations for this that don't involve racism or contempt for Black people. This is not to say that *some* social factors can't be involved as well. However, I would not reduce it to social factors. I just can't understand the mentality of those who hound a girl for not doing IR. Move on with your life and focus on the women who are genuinely enthusiastic about IR! Edited by - Billdude on 6/24/2015 1:46:03 PM
I disagree as your logic is wrong. To illustrate, if your statement was true, then the racists must be in the other group (the White women who are attracted to Black men). At best, you can say is "you don't know", definitely not an uppercase NO followed by an exclamation point. It's sex ... I can forgive her for excluding people based on race.
But you're quoting two people who don't do it in general, and never did it in this thread. Being disappointed she didn't shoot a scene she had planned isn't the same as hounding her.
You need better reading comprehension. The keywords there are, "does this make those White women who don't feel attracted to Black men racist?", i.e. does it automatically signal that they are racist. The answer to that is, as I said, NO! Simply finding a particular race unattractive doesn't necessarily mean someone is racist. It doesn't preclude the possibility he/she is racist either. (Conversely, it's also possible that someone who IS attracted to Blacks could still be racist...just as many slaveowners raped their Black slaves, and many homophobes are closet homosexuals.)
I ♥ the male gaze (and Palestine). 8737 Posts 11/13
Posted - Jun 24 2015 : 3:43PM
And what flew over your head is the unreality of the average porn scene. How people choose their sexual partners outside of porn is utterly irrelevant. Edited by - misspornUSA on 6/24/2015 3:47:48 PM Edited by - misspornUSA on 6/24/2015 3:50:46 PM
Trying to get this thread back on track,she is in process of completing her move to south Florida to attend cosmetology school.I wish her the best,full time student and paying the bills is tough.
I ♥ the male gaze (and Palestine). 8737 Posts 11/13
Posted - Jun 25 2015 : 11:24AM
I'd rather the thread not be derailed so I'll just say this and move on: Porn is a business. Ignoring that fact and buying into the fantasy while you're watching a porn scene is a good thing, but continuing to do so after that scene is over is irrational.
Why is Kotas thread still on the front page? Isnt she gone? This shouldn't be back in the front until a new scene releases or news about her within the business comes up. All the race talk in porn is just bullshit. Accept it.
Now she is tweeting she is gonna cam?:S I mean is she back? As in shooting scenes? She seems to have moved back to florida aswell witch limits the companies she can work with. But maby she´ll fly back and forth? And does this mean her site is gonna come? Hopefully she will come back to posting here and clairy for us:)
Oh Crap! Now I don't care if she makes an IR scene or not. She could get buttfucked by all the brothers in Compton and I still wouldn't be interested. I am just not down for all the ink. The good news is, it's America and I don't have to purchase or watch her stuff. I still wish her well personally but she's off my list.
Meh I'm somewhat desensitized to tattoos on porn stars at this point. It is her body & choice to make & I'll still watch her films, though I respect the right of others not to. At the end of the day, I think girls like Bonnie Rotten and Dahlia Sky showed that tattoo's are not necessarily, in and of themselves, obstacles to having a successful career with plenty of work opportunities available. I wish her well
I'll have to admit this news saddens me a little bit as I am not really a tattoo person either. But that doesn't mean I won't watch a particular girl's just because she has tats, as long as it is just not too much. Stuff like Bonnie Rotten is just, for me, taking things too far. She is really a pretty girl, but I just can't get past all that ink--I just won't watch it. However someone like Zoey Monroe is just so smokin' hot I just have to let the back ink slide--I'll watch anything with her in it. I really am disappointed that Dakota is going this route, but since her "retirement" I had consigned myself to not getting to see her anymore anyways. To me, her initial appeal was that she was just so petite, sweet and innocent looking, yet could take big stuff up her tiny little butt hole like a champ. I really prefer the sweet and innocent look as opposed to the hot and slutty look. The way that she would mumble and yell almost incoherently while taking cock up the ass really just blew me away. Plus, most of the time she was blonde, which is really my big thing. She really had that "girl next door" look which really turns me on. In a way she reminded me of a young Shay Sweet during her first few years in porn, that "very innocent but very nasty" look. Shay ended up doing the same kind of stuff--too many tats and breast enlargements (I like smaller titties) and eventually I just stopped watching her stuff, too. But don't get me wrong, Dakota is still a stone cold fox, and if she is still willing to put stuff up her sweet tiny butt hole--I'll probably still watch it!!
LOVE her tight, lean body, especially her great legs and cute face....would love to toss her around and bust inside that tight pussy. Love her look, here, in Sex Kittens...love when girls play with their hair and fold it back behind one ear..so sexy for some reason...her long look great, too. Haven't really kept up, unfortunately, as is started to seem like every scene was anal. I know I must be in the minority, oddly; but I prefer a good old fashion "pussy fuck", especially ending in a vaginal cream pie. Has she done this? Also any other swallowing scenes, other than Sex Kittens?
I love tattoos.... ...but some girls kill the appeal I have for them because of tattoos because it does not fit their image (remember Kiera Winter?) All the best to Kota (or whatever her name is this week if she hasn't already retired) but I'm out! Prediction: next up, implants.
I like the tattoos. Some girls they look really good on. like Jessa Rhodes or Bonnie Rotten. Im just glad she is back. Hopefully we can get that blowbang video soon!
you didn't know? If a woman gets a tattoos her life and career ends immediately. Thats the rule. She's no longer attractive to anyone. ----Dread's Twitter----
^Of course her life doesn't end but don't you think that any serious physical alterations in an established performer's appearance tends to be sort of a career killer? This is especially true for anyone who's appearance is one of the primary appeal to her fans. Tattoos and implants tend to be the two most common things that people pick a side and rarely switch it. That is why I think that if Dakota/Kota was still interested in doing porn than getting a huge sleeve is not likely to help her.
^^ Pat are you seriously comparing a tattoo with implants?? Not a tattoo enthusiast, but even the worst tattoos hurt me way less than crappy hairstyles, or than sudden weight loss/ gain. Or than lame scenes, or lame male performers, or blurred lights. About Dakota, I certainly did not liked her because she had a tattoo-free left arm. And I am pretty sure most of the audience could not care less if she has or not a tattoo in her arm.
short of full-scale plastic reconstruction of her face and body there is nothing she could do to fuck up how shit hot she is. hair color, tattoos, doesn't matter. she's beyond the beyond in terms of hot.
I'm comparing the two only in so much as saying that tattoos and implants are the two most common things a performer can have that will positively or negatively affect her possibility in having a fruitful porn career (at least as fruitful as it is possible today). If the performer starts doing porn with one or both and is able to attract a wide enough fan base than her choice of body modification is not going to be a major issue but it's a completely different thing if said performer About Dakota, I certainly did not liked her because she had a tattoo-free left arm. And I am pretty sure most of the audience could not care less if she has or not a tattoo in her arm. decides to alter her looks by getting either or both of the above mentioned things. This is especially true of performers that fall under a certain girl next door/all natural look like Dakota/Kota did. You may be fine with a huge all back or all arm sleeve tattoo but I'm not and I daresay most of the producers who happily hired her before she got it would not touch her with a ten foot pole now. I'm assuming based on what you wrote that you are more than fine with her choice of body modification and I suspect that most of her past fans aren't.
^Frankly, you are just exaggerating things because you hate tattoo... About fans, I just do not remember cases of actresses who lost many fans because they had a tattoo (let alone a tattoo in a arm!), neither it will happen with Skye. A tattoo in a arm is NOT a "body modification" remotely comparable with having implants or extreme surgery. Who cares if you are not fine with a tattoo, you can't compare apples and oranges.
Dakota Skye @ AnalVids
Posted - Jun 22 2015 : 7:23PM
