Edited by - JeanElsass67 on 5/14/2020 10:36:38 AM

Edited by - JeanElsass67 on 5/14/2020 1:25:07 PM

[Link]

It's their body and their choice. Do YOU wanna get fucked up the ass by 5 guys with 10inch dicks?? No?? So then why do you think some girl you've never met does??

The ones who do: Great

The ones who haven't or don't want to: It's their body and their choice. They're fucking on camera. If that's enough for them you need to be OK with it

Edited by - Chinaski on 5/14/2020 3:21:56 PM

[Link]

G/G
B/G
BJ
Handjobs

The she'll get hit with:

You need to do I/R.
You need to get analed by Dredd.
What? No DP's
and so on.

[Link]

"SO WHAT ABOUT GANGBANG IR TRIPLE ANAL??!! ARE YOU GONNA??? WELL ARE YOU??? CMON TAKE 8 10" DICKS UP YOUR ASS NOW!!!"

[Link]

I hope she will do porn for a real porn company !

FF Kissing is kind of poor, no anals, the cumshot is bald on the tits with no cum swapping or cum kisses.
Sad !!!!

She should work together with Greg Lansky

That said - I would almost give an arm and a leg to see her in something like say an FMFM foursome anal ATM scene with say her and Nicolette Shea with two hung BBC's - wow that would be the matchup of the century !!!!

Lets keep dreaming and lets keep the news and rumors going - while keeping our fingers crossed !!

Here is a stunning new adult star newcomer that Maitland should DEFINITELY work with in new group action scenes, preferably a hardcore fmfm 4some orgy with lots of FF kissing and cum swapping. Enough of the lesbian tease please....

Hopefully, she's going to start doing 'proper' porn now.

^Do we think that mean she's going to be shooting some 'proper' porn with 'proper' companies now?

come on blacked, dogfart book her fast

Too bad she doesn't do anal !

^I agree that it's unlikely to be churning out a ton of scenes for a myriad of different companies, but any 'proper' porn she manages to do would be most welcome.

She'll be 'exclusive' because she has a lot of cache. She's a proper mainstream actress (albeit, a really obscure actress who didn't achieve all that much mainstream success), who wants to transition to hardcore porn. She also happens to be really, really gorgeous (in my opinion).

All the scenes she's done so far have been fairly amateurishly shot, so something done with a bit more professionalism would be nice. Maybe Lansky?

^Looking at the trailer, it occurs to me that she's lost a bit of weight. Also, one advantage of her having been a 'mainstream' actress at one point in time, it should make her porn acting look a bit more convincing?

Nice to see her film 'proper' porn with 'proper' companies, even if I can't work out for a second why she's chosen to go down this path, professionally.

Soooooooo happy to see that Maitland is shot for Greg Lansky's Blacked.com!!!!! Unprecedented!! Any chance she might go all the way with an anal Tushy.com scene...or twenty?? :-))))) A star is reborn. This is as big or bigger than when her agent Kendra Lust took the anal plunge. And that was HUGE!

[Link]

Britain is usually seen as being halfway between the continent and America on issues, and it seems to be the case here as well.

Bonne chance to you and your family.

Always feet n ass. In that order.

[Link]

Edited by - Chinaski on 5/18/2020 2:15:37 PM

[Link]

Edited by - Pitbull67 on 5/18/2020 4:14:39 PM

[Link]

I look at it like this: porn has a potential to be something really great, as an artform that affects the consumer (viewer) in a unique way. Any person with an average level of sensitivity can be drawn in to a painting, a movie, a novel or a piece of music. But porn can move you both mentally and physically. Mentally, with the sexual fantasies coming to life in front of your eyes, making you identify with the actors or actresses in the scene you're watching, giving you some sort of dream ride. Physically, with your body responding to the sexual heat in the scene, making you horny, making you jerk off, making you cum. It is a powerful artform.

No, I'm not talking about "art porn" or anything like that here, I hate pretentious indie/arthouse porn, I'm talking about the mainstream hardcore porn. The most popular porn flicks, companies, directors and stars. I am aware of the ongoing change in porn film culture, the shift from full-length films towards isolated (web-distributed) scenes, but I think that the porn film, as a medium, is still relevant (companies like Tushy and Private compile their scenes into full-length "films" anyway), just like the music industry is more song oriented now but people still care about albums.

So what's wrong with today's porn? If you, like me, prefer anal sex in porn, you should't complain too much, perhaps, because nowadays EVERY young beautiful porn actress does anal (sooner or later, depending on her career strategy), and the production quality is higher than ever - better lighting, better camera work, nicer-looking locations, and no male performer has had any wood problem since the advent of Viagra and Cialis around the year 2000. The sex is dirtier and the length of the scenes range from long to very long (not like the early 90's where a scene could be like 9 minutes long, and if there was a DP in it, you got one minute and one camera angle). Isn't all this very good?

I say no. Because I think people - including porn directors - confuse "heat" with "energy". Everyone who likes porn wants to see some sexual heat when they're watching it - we want to get turned on. I can't deny that there is a lot of energy in the porn scenes directed by Mason (and similar directors), but the problem is that this type of scenes has NOTHING BUT energy. What we, the porn consumers, get to see is nothing but a non-stop fuckfest. And I know that a lot of people enjoy this and prefer it over everything else. But this type of porn misses something - something essential, I believe.

What is missing? Well, think about it - what is it that these porn scenes actually show us? Pretty women (some are beautiful, most are just young and in good shape, which is not too bad) in mansions or all-white photo studios, meeting men who they give head and get fucked by, and the scene finish with the girl(s) covered in cum, smiling at the camera, and then fadeout. If you as a porn consumer are looking for "sex", you get it here, no problem. But that's just the thing - the porn scene does only that, it only presents some sex, nothing more and nothing less, and it is dull.

In real life, sex is more than sex. I'm not talking about love or romance here, just to be clear. I'm talking about being attracted to a person, trying to get close to her, succeeding in doing that, getting to a situation where you and her can have sex, and finally doing that. All the steps before the actual sex are important in building up the sexual tension - and it is the sexual tension that gives the ensuing sex its heat (at least a big portion of its heat). Sex in itself is never sexy - it is what comes before that can be sexy, intriguing, intoxicating.

Porn used to have that, because there used to be scripts. Not only in "feature film" porn - a genre that I hate, because the scripts are really silly and/or pretentious, and always tiresome, always superfluous - but also in less ambitious (and more sympathetic) "average" porn. Like the vignettes in Private Video Magazine or the classic Triple X series, or the wonderful Kelly the Coed series. Do yourself a favor - watch "Kelly the Coed 7: Sorority retreat" (from 2000) and notice how turned on you get when Monica Cameron and Sheila Rossi play two young students who are suddenly visited by three frat boys who have just been to a football game and are now drunk and horny. This simple setup makes all the difference for the feeling you get when you watch the sex. Two euro sluts fucked and DP'd by three American porn actors - we've seen it a million times, both before and after. But since this scene (as the whole film) has the ambition of creating erotic fiction - not just filmed sex - we as viewers are immediately drawn in much more. The sex becomes more exciting, tantalizing, hot.

Today's porn needs to get closer to that. Closer to fiction, which means closer to realism. I used to worship Greg Lansky for his Tushy work, because what I saw in his early productions there blew my mind - those scenes were beautifully made, had some sort of (very simple) plots and were focussed on anal sex. Everything I could dream of. But after a while, Lansky's style became increasingly mechanical and cold. The more of it I watched, the more I realized that I had been fooled: Lansky's Tushy scenes may have superior production values and they may avoid the tiresome high-energy, ultra-dirty Evil Angel/Jules Jordan/HardX type scenes, but they still lack heat. The porn actresses and porn actors in Lansky's scenes are no less robots than the ones in other porn films. They are going through the motions - they look good doing it, but they are really going through the motions. And the exaggerated yelling from the women is a major turnoff, at least for me.

It's not all Greg Lansky's (or Mason's, or Jules Jordan's) fault, though. I think that the level of professionalism and efficiency in today's porn industry has taken away some of porn's - dare I say it? - soul. It's just business, it's just work. The male performers work out, are in good shape, and use Cialis so they never have to worry about erection, which means that they never have to be actually horny. The female performers have perfect pubic hair removal, are well trained for ass stretching activities (including enema and a lot of warming up before every anal scene), have learned how to get gagged by a cock without throwing up or having a nervous breakdown, and have learned to scream and shout a lot during the sex acts, pretending (acting) that the giant cock in the butt actually hurts or feels good. These professionals meet and go to work, their bodies interact mechanically and predictably, the un-natural cock penetrate the un-natural asshole. It looks good on camera. But it is very far away from sex in real life, and it is very far away from erotic fiction, which plays with fantasies about real life.

By the way: half an hour of tease/ass worshipping/toy play before the sex starts is no good compensation. It makes you, the porn viewer, sexually frustrated and truly teased, and that may make the ensuing sex more gratifying. But it is still nothing but a porn actress doing some silly stuff, with or without her interacting with the camera guy. It makes me yawn and fast forward.

I must also add that I do not think that porn should go back to some "golden era". There is no truly golden era in porn - not yet, although there might be in the future. The period I like most is the mid-90's and its plethora of great anal sex and DP scenes shot in Europe - the prime years of people like Pierre Woodman, Rocco Siffredi, Christoph Clark (he was more talented as a performer than as a director) and Jean-Yves Le Castel (him too). It was a short period of time, because if you watch porn made just before that (like early 90's Magma, Private, Zane or Rosebud films), the production quality there is extremely poor, you can't hardly watch it. And if you watch porn made in the late 90's and the years after, you see a sad decline for the directors mentioned (it became cheaper and easier to produce porn films, so they started making cheaper and sloppier porn films) and the American directors inspired by them (with some nice exceptions).

I don't want new porn to look like old Private films. I want new porn to be better than Private ever was (which is not too high an aim; Private produced a lot of crap along with the gems). But I think that today's porn directors could learn something from the porn made in the 90's. There is a tension in a lot of the scenes from those years - not only because of the scripts and setups (I love them, though - I will never forget how the cute art student get ass fucked by Roberto Malone and his friends in Triple X #7) but because of the "wild west" feeling of making porn in a climate when a DP was still "a thing" and you never knew if the beautiful actress you are currently watching were soon to disappear from the porn scene forever (still miss you, Blondie). Still, it's a good thing that the porn industry is professional and "clean" now, it's good for the porn stars not least. But the more convenient and practical something is, the less edgy and exciting it gets.

Bring back believable and relatable scripts/setups, bring back the sexy realism (sexual fantasies with some versimilitude) that porn once had, but do it with today's production values. Shoot anal scenes without a foot on the woman's face or attempts at triple anal. Is that so much to ask for? Are there so few of the porn consumers who desire this?

[Link]

But, that's just me.

[Link]

By the way, Gore Gore Girl, I know that it is not "an authentic sign of orgasm".

[Link]

Also can't stand most of the initial "interviews" .. the same lame questions over and over again .. how old were you when you lost your virginity? do you enjoy giving head? are you ready to have 3 dicks up your ass? blah blah blah

[Link]

Cube

[Link]

Cube

[Link]

Scenes where performers in their 30's play 18 year old characters are a big no. I remember a scene last year I think where Abigail Mac was meant to be an 18 year old for crying out loud. Please don't think I'm age shaming her, Abi is an incredibly sexy woman in her 30's. That is more than enough basis for a great scene.

Another annoyance of mine is something I've noticed more in GG scenes. It's when one performer is supposed to be portraying a naïve, innocent virgin, then the clothes come off and she's got nipple piercings, a clit piercing, and the words "anal" and "slut" on her buttcheeks. Ok the last bit was an exaggeration but you get the point.

I'm also not a fan of 'fauxcest' in either bg or gf. It always sounds so laughably clunky when you get the inevitable "O can't, you're my mother" followed by "I'm only your stepmother".

Edited by - Muesliman84 on 6/13/2020 8:36:35 PM

[Link]

"Ughgghhh MmuHhGGghhh GgAAwwwgh" and his weird dick. Also Markus Dupree, both of them are the worst

[Link]

I mean, come on what happen to gender equality?

[Link]

Edited by - Pitbull67 on 6/14/2020 8:05:25 PM

[Link]