Reviewers Recommend
Anal-Loving Babe Gets Her Round Ass Stretched OutAnal-Loving Babe Gets Her Round Ass Stretched Out - review by Captain Jack
Director: Vorman
Starring: Alberto Blanco, Catherine Knight. Read review
All Forums > Porn News - Press Releases > Porn News - Press Releases Forum Page 40 > Condoms in Porn... Measure B/Bill AB 1576/Prop 60 > Condoms in Porn... Measure B/Bill AB 1576/Prop 60 (page 11)
Page 11 of 18 First < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 > Last
AuthorPost
Gore Gore Girl All-Star Supporter
Doctor of the Erotic Arts

7238 Posts
1/09
Posted - Feb 22 2016 : 2:03PM
LCF All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Non Prevalebunt!
10364 Posts
1/05
Posted - Feb 22 2016 : 6:01PM
^
So apparently it wasn't just me
A consultant would be an expert or at least someone to be taken seriously.
But I see your point, there was a story to be told and the writer did it, but doing so he failed completely to explain both positions so that the reader could not form an opinion or at least have a clue of what was going on.
When i seek an article over a jury, I'd like to know what was they discussed and what were the positions as accurately as possible, the NYT article didn't do that.
for example you can either describe this funny man or tell us what he has to say , but keep in mind that an accurate description may take away any credibility from him
Albert-Einstein-398x505.jpg

Edited by - LCF on 2/22/2016 6:13:07 PM

morbidthoughts All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Big cats scare me but...
3628 Posts
1/03
Posted - Feb 22 2016 : 7:10PM
Gee, a board who was trying to impose paternalistic safety regulations without industry input was seen as condescending.
"I'm shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here!"
pringles All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

1351 Posts
2/08
Posted - Mar 9 2016 : 6:52PM
Cal/OSHA Fines James Deen Productions $78K (Xbiz)
LOS ANGELES — Cal/OSHA said it issued citations today to adult film production company Third Rock Enterprises Inc., also known as James Deen Productions, for multiple violations of state condom and other safety laws that the agency said exposed performers to sexually transmitted infections.
Cal/OSHA proposed penalties of $77,875 after probing a complaint about a James Deen Production film shoot in Woodland Hills, Calif., on Jan. 12.
Cal/OSHA said investigators found that producers did not protect performers through the use of condoms as required by California's bloodborne pathogens standard.
Additionally, Cal/OSHA said producers did not provide a vaccine or follow-up medical examination to staff who were potentially exposed to hepatitis B.
more at the link above
 
Goldstein All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

"You have sacrificed nothing and no one."
3689 Posts
8/10
Posted - Mar 9 2016 : 10:40PM
Drip... drip... drip...
kinguntermensch
Senior Member

1260 Posts
7/14
Posted - Mar 10 2016 : 6:03AM
I thought the porn biz won and condoms aren't a requirement?
pringles All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

1351 Posts
2/08
Posted - Mar 10 2016 : 8:31AM
^
That isn't what happened although much of the media incorrectly reported that.
5193.1 didn't pass, but 5193 is still in effect. 5193.1 sought to give the adult industry their own section. FSC argued for years that the existing regulations were meant for hospitals.
Condoms were already required by Cal/OSHA even before 5193.1. The recent ruling just means the adult industry won't be getting their own section in the bloodborne pathogens regulations for now.
pringles All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

1351 Posts
2/08
Posted - Mar 10 2016 : 2:03PM
Mister Fahrenheit All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Meh
4655 Posts
10/13
Posted - Mar 10 2016 : 3:55PM
^ You have to give it to Weinstein, this was a pretty savvy move. Deen has become one of the most polarizing figures in the industry so a lot of folks won't be quick to rally to his cause. And when it comes time to start rolling out ads for the ballot initiative, "Working to stop accused rapists from exposing vulnerable performers to bodily harm" will play pretty well. What a shit-show.
pringles All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

1351 Posts
2/08
Posted - Mar 24 2016 : 1:00PM
LA County Supervisors OK Settlement Over Measure B Suit (Xbiz)
LOS ANGELES — Los Angeles County officials yesterday signed off on a settlement with Vivid Entertainment, which challenged in a federal lawsuit the constitutionality of the Measure B requirement for porn performers to wear condoms.
The settlement was announced by the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors following a closed-door session of the board during their weekly Tuesday meeting, according to City News Service.
The suit was initiated after Vivid Entertainment sought to block implementation of the county’s 2012 Measure B ballot measure that was eventually approved by 56 percent of voters.
more at the link above
pringles All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

1351 Posts
2/08
Posted - Apr 5 2016 : 3:16PM
Vivid/AHF Settlement: Measure B Won't Be Enforced for 3 Years (AVN)
LOS ANGELES—Today, the final signatures were affixed to the settlement agreed upon between plaintiff Vivid Entertainment Group, defendant County of Los Angeles, and intervenors AIDS Healthcare Foundation (AHF) and various of its employees, and perhaps its most attractive feature is that the parties have agreed that Measure B will not be enforced in Los Angeles County for three years from the date the settlement takes effect.
more at the link above
FSC: Settlement Renders Measure B Unenforceable (Xbiz)
LA County to Study Ways to Enforce Measure B (Xbiz)
LOS ANGELES — Now that a settlement has been signed off over Los Angeles County’s Measure B ordinance, counsel for the county are exploring ways to enforce condom use during porn shoots.
“The department will need to determine an appropriate regulatory approach in light of the district court’s ruling that much of the department’s independent enforcement authority over these permits was unconstitutional,” said Robert E. Ragland, deputy counsel for the county, in a statement.
County officials haven’t offered any explanation on how long it will take to come up with terms of regulatory enforcement. However, the settlement calls for the county to conduct a health permit fee schedule within 12 months.
more at the link above
Measure B settlement (PDF)
pringles All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

1351 Posts
2/08
Posted - May 6 2016 : 6:22PM
Cal/OSHA Proposes Penalties Against Kink.com (Xbiz)
SAN FRANCISCO — Cal/OSHA's announcement this week to propose penalties of $146,600 against Kink.com for 13 violations of worker safety laws are the largest ever levied against an adult filmmaker.
It is the second time, Kink.com has faced proposed fines from Cal/OSHA. Both times were the result of complaints made by the AIDS Healthcare Foundation and its president, Michael Weinstein, the proponent of a statewide mandatory condom ballot initiative in California.
In a previous citation issued in 2014, Kink faced proposed fines of $78,000 that were eventually reduced to $27,000 after a performer in August 2013 chose not to use a condom, among other alleged worker violations.
With the $146,600 in fines made against Kink.com on Monday, Cal/OSHA investigators said that Kink.com did not require performers to use condoms during production of at least five films, all in violation of California’s bloodborne pathogens standard.
The condom-related violations found in the Nov. 9, 2015, inspection are classified as “willful serious” and carry the largest penalties, Cal/OSHA officials said.
more at the link above
pringles All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

1351 Posts
2/08
Posted - Jun 9 2016 : 3:33PM
Twenty-five or so industry people made the trip to Sacramento yesterday to speak against the November ballot initiative.
The group included Ela Darling, Tasha Reign, Venus Lux, Stefani Special, Isabel Dresler, Kitty Stryker, Siouxsie Q James, Verta, Jay Taylor, Brock Doom, and TarantinoXXX to name a few.
While the cameras went dark on the hearing (see third link), streaming audio was still available on the state website.
Adult Performers in Sacramento Today to Protest Adult Film Initiative (Xbiz)
SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Adult performers from across California headed to Sacramento today to attend a legislative hearing on the California Safer Sex in Adult Film Act.
The proposed ballot initiative would allow private citizens — including any viewer of adult video — to sue a performer if a condom is not visible in the film.
Adult Performers Testify Against Ballot Initiative's Privacy Violations (AVN/Mark Kernes)
Camera turns off on porn stars at California Capitol (Sacramento Bee)
Something unexpected happened Wednesday at the latest of a long list of routine ballot measure hearings at the Capitol: The porn stars showed up and the cameras went dark.
A joint legislative hearing on an initiative to require adult film actors to wear condoms was scheduled to begin at 3 p.m. on the California Channel’s live webcast. A slew of actors and actresses from the industry lined up to testify. But at the start of the hearing, the sergeant of arms announced that it would not be broadcast. The reason remains a mystery.
When asked who made the call, lawmakers and their staff swatted responsibility back and forth like a ping-pong ball.
more at the link above
AggieGuy
Member

357 Posts
7/15
Posted - Jun 9 2016 : 8:25PM
Check bank accounts and see who got the latest "campaign donation" from the AHF.
 
Mister Fahrenheit All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Meh
4655 Posts
10/13
Posted - Jun 10 2016 : 3:57PM
It is a little fishy that the cameras went dark. The thing is, it wasn't only the performers who were testifying against who were blacked out. The article says a former performer who is in favor of the mandate was also not shown on TV. Kind of bizarre all the way around.
Gore Gore Girl All-Star Supporter
Doctor of the Erotic Arts

7238 Posts
1/09
Posted - Jun 10 2016 : 4:16PM
That ballot initiative is nuts.
It did prompt me to facetiously wonder if, were it to be passed, they might add a stipulation that the suing party had to prove they paid for the content.
AggieGuy
Member

357 Posts
7/15
Posted - Jun 10 2016 : 8:05PM
^ Since the only ones who will be making reports would be Weinstein and his ilk, they'll easily spend the $$$ to subscribe to every single site to avoid such an accusation in order to continue their march toward outlawing porn all together.
pringles All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

1351 Posts
2/08
Posted - Jun 17 2016 : 4:57PM
Cal/OSHA to Form Advisory Committee on Adult Biz Regulations (AVN)
LOS ANGELES—Cal/OSHA, the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health, has taken a step that will be of considerable interest to members of the adult industry. The governmental body has announced that it will create a new advisory committee to shape new regulations for the adult industry. The Free Speech Coalition notes that the announcement of such an advisory committee, which would ostensibly include working adult performers, is a significant shift away from the historically adversarial approach taken by Cal/OSHA Division toward the adult industry.
At this month’s meeting of the Standards Board, a Cal/OSHA Division representative said that it had already reviewed a petition for regulation from the AIDS Healthcare Foundation, and expected to complete its review of a separate petition submitted by the Free Speech Coalition by early July. Once both reviews are complete, the Division stated it would begin to assemble the advisory committee.
more at the link above
pringles All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

1351 Posts
2/08
Posted - Jun 24 2016 : 1:45PM
APAC Calls on Weinstein, Requests Public Meeting (Xbiz)
LOS ANGELES — Adult film performers have requested that Michael Weinstein, the proponent of a controversial ballot initiative that would allow private citizens to sue adult film performers when a condom is not visible in an adult film, pull the initiative ahead of a crucial June 30 deadline.
Performers, led by Chanel Preston, president of the Adult Performer Advocacy Committee, are requesting a public meeting with Michael Weinstein on Tuesday, July 28, at 12 p.m., at the Andaz in West Hollywood. Members of the press are invited to attend, though performers reserve the right to conduct some discussions privately, if it will be more productive.
APAC's open letter to Weinstein in the link above
pringles All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

1351 Posts
2/08
Posted - Jul 1 2016 : 6:00PM
Condom Initiative Assigned 'Proposition 59' on Calif. Ballot (Xbiz)
SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Secretary of State Alex Padilla announced this afternoon that the Safer Sex in the Adult Film Industry Act that is slated for the Nov. 8 ballot will be labeled Proposition 59.
Edit: Corrected to Proposition 59.
Edited by - pringles on 7/2/2016 8:12:19 AM
Mister Fahrenheit All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Meh
4655 Posts
10/13
Posted - Jul 1 2016 : 6:18PM
^ So will there be any coordinated industry campaign against Prop. 60 or are they just betting that the lack of endorsements will carry the day?
whatsatelephonebill
Senior Member

2935 Posts
10/11
Posted - Jul 1 2016 : 6:43PM
^
If it's anything like Measure B, there will be one, but it will just be performers talking about it on social media until September, then it will be a half-assed media campaign, and then when they lose they'll complain about AHF having more money than them even though it's their fault for waiting until the last minute to actually take their fight to the public.
killbillvol69 All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

^Lucy Pinder
18634 Posts
4/08
Posted - Jul 1 2016 : 11:29PM
This will pass, because most people know nothing about this issue, so they see the word "safer" and they say "yup. Safer sounds good." And that will be it.
whatsatelephonebill
Senior Member

2935 Posts
10/11
Posted - Jul 1 2016 : 11:56PM
^
And that's why it's FSC's (and the porn industry in general's) job to actually get out there and inform people of what they're actually voting for. Not on social media, which may reach a few hundred thousand people online but only a few thousand that live in California, and, arguably, not even on national news. They need to be on the radio during the morning or afternoon rush hours. They need to be in the newspapers (and not in the op-ed section of the LA Times or whatever the main paper in San Francisco is, but as advertisements in the news (and maybe even the sports) section of the newspaper). They need to be on local news broadcasts and morning shows. They need to be on billboards. They need to be proactive and in person, and I can tell right now that they aren't planning on doing that.
Edited by - whatsatelephonebill on 7/1/2016 11:57:24 PM
 
pringles All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

1351 Posts
2/08
Posted - Jul 2 2016 : 8:10AM
I hope they didn't go to the printers yet. Now it's Prop 59.
UPDATED (Friday, 7 p.m.) — The Secretary of State’s office tonight issued a corrected list of proposition numbers for the legislative, initiative, and referendum measures. The "Safer Sex" initiative ballot item is now Proposition 59. The office originally published the measure this afternoon as Proposition 60.
Mister Fahrenheit All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Meh
4655 Posts
10/13
Posted - Jul 2 2016 : 12:27PM
^^ Even if the industry makes a full-court press, it will be a tough sell for them. People involved with porn are widely viewed by the public as degenerates. At best performers are viewed as naive, wayward souls who need protecting from vile, exploitative scumbags. At worst they're just dumb whores. Convincing the public that they are rational human beings who know their own interests and possess sexual agency is going to be an uphill battle. It won't just be the AHF they're going up against, but a mire of public prejudice.
Edited by - Mister Fahrenheit on 7/2/2016 12:28:21 PM
AggieGuy
Member

357 Posts
7/15
Posted - Jul 2 2016 : 12:31PM
^ Along with the entire attitude in California that the government must protect everyone from every fucking thing.
It's funny that California, one of the most liberal states in the US, is the one constantly doing everything they can to limit freedoms.
whatsatelephonebill
Senior Member

2935 Posts
10/11
Posted - Jul 2 2016 : 11:06PM
Truthfully, I think convincing the public that they're rational human beings should be the easier part. That just requires letting the public get to know some of them. There's dozens of performers, male or female, that you could put out there and let talk and once people actually hear them/get to know them, they'll believe that they're human beings that can make their own choices. That's not to say that it's easy, as it does require doing a lot of outreach and having performers put themselves out in a more coordinated way (i.e. not just a few national interviews, but actually getting out there specifically in many different areas of California [whether that be through radio, TV, or in person]).
To me, the harder part is convincing those people why the bill shouldn't be passed. Even outside of the idea that performers should be able to choose whether they want to wear condoms there are good reasons why this is a bad bill, but they need to get those good reasons out there and let everyone know them, not just the people who follow performers on Twitter.
pringles All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

1351 Posts
2/08
Posted - Jul 3 2016 : 12:09AM
Riograndeler
Senior Member

1033 Posts
11/08
Posted - Jul 3 2016 : 4:52AM
It seems the goal is to kill the porn industry in USA at all!
AggieGuy
Member

357 Posts
7/15
Posted - Jul 3 2016 : 12:18PM
^ That is exactly the goal.
pringles All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

1351 Posts
2/08
Posted - Jul 12 2016 : 2:04PM
killbillvol69 All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

^Lucy Pinder
18634 Posts
4/08
Posted - Jul 12 2016 : 2:08PM
^ If both the CA Democrats and Republicans make it widely known that they don't support the measure, it has a decent chance of being voted down.
The question is how vocal will they be about it/how much time will they spend talking about it, when there are so many other issues they'll want to talk about too.
Mister Fahrenheit All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Meh
4655 Posts
10/13
Posted - Jul 12 2016 : 2:18PM
^ I don't think either of the Parties are going to stand up for porno. It's going to be up to the FSC's PAC, Californians Against Worker Harassment, to publicize the opposition. Ads detailing the litany of opposition seem a good way to go.
Also, after watching that video I tried to find Californians Against Worker Harassment's website and came up with zip. It would be nice if they had a site up and running with testimonials from performers, a FAQ of sorts, and a way for people to contribute to the campaign.
 
Mister Fahrenheit All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Meh
4655 Posts
10/13
Posted - Jul 12 2016 : 2:38PM
Another tactic the FSC could use: Play up the fact that this law will lead to an explosion in frivolous lawsuits and line the pockets of greedy trial lawyers. According to this article:
Two years ago California doctors defeated Prop. 46, a ballot initiative that would have increased the medical malpractice award cap, and they did it in large part by appealing to voter disdain for frivolous lawsuits and trial lawyers. For decades American businesses have been priming the public to hate trial lawyers. So there's a ready-made narrative just waiting to be picked up that the FSC could exploit to drive up opposition. I typically hate the anti-trial lawyer rhetoric, but there's no doubt it can be effective. Might as well put it to good use.
pringles All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

1351 Posts
2/08
Posted - Jul 12 2016 : 3:53PM
Mister Fahrenheit All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Meh
4655 Posts
10/13
Posted - Jul 12 2016 : 4:24PM
^ Damn, it's not even a link on the first three pages when you Google, "Californians Against Worker Harassment." Isn't search engine rank determined in part by the number of links pointed at your website from other sites? The FSC should talk to it's members about linking to the website on their sites.
Well judging by the name of their PAC, it looks like they've zeroed in on making worker harassment the issue. We'll see how compelling that is to voters.
Edited by - Mister Fahrenheit on 7/12/2016 4:25:25 PM
whatsatelephonebill
Senior Member

2935 Posts
10/11
Posted - Jul 12 2016 : 5:30PM
^
You're right about search engine rank. And while performer sites would help, news sites would probably help even more. AVN and Xbiz definitely need to run stories/links on this, and they need to hit up every mainstream and
semi-mainstream blog they can about writing about it in some form.
pringles All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

1351 Posts
2/08
Posted - Jul 18 2016 : 12:45PM
I looked at the PAC funding for both sides yesterday.
AHF launched their statewide ballot initiative in November of 2014. They announced the FAIR (For Adult Industry Responsibility) PAC the same day. They've reported more than $1.6 million in contributions since then for use against the adult industry. All of the contributions have come from the AHF.
FSC didn't announce the Californians Against Worker Harassment PAC until late April of this year. Since then they've reported just $60,098 in contributions from just three donors -- $8,000 each from Kink and Evil Angel, and $44,000 from Wicked Pictures.
Too little, too late?
Mister Fahrenheit All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Meh
4655 Posts
10/13
Posted - Jul 18 2016 : 1:44PM
^ Definitely too little. So given the fact that the side with the deeper pockets typically wins on ballot initiatives, what's the industry's next step after it loses? Wait for Weinstein to file a civil lawsuit against a porn company and try to get it rejected on First Amendment grounds?
Here's an idea: Why not get ahead of Weinstein and have someone file their own lawsuit against their ideal defendants? Choose a married couple like Anikka Albrite and Mick Blue who own their own porn production company and shoot scenes together. Have them do a live camshow without condoms as soon as the ballot initiative is passed. Have someone bring a lawsuit against Mick and Anikka. I mean, for a lot of people it will be hard to believe that a married couple could be mandated by law to have to wear condoms when they're having sex.
whatsatelephonebill
Senior Member

2935 Posts
10/11
Posted - Jul 18 2016 : 4:39PM
I don't understand why they keep seeing this coming from so far away, yet keep waiting for so long to actually do something about it. Complaining on Twitter and issuing press releases is NOT doing something about it.
pringles All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

1351 Posts
2/08
Posted - Jul 19 2016 : 3:44PM
From March:
Update: James Deen Cal/OSHA Preliminary Hearing Set for September (AVN)
LOS ANGELES;A preliminary hearing for adult star James Deen in his fight against Cal/OSHA and the AIDS Healthcare Foundation has been set for September.
Deen has refused to accept the citations or pay the egregious fines accompanying the complaints filed against his company, James Deen Productions, by the AIDS Healthcare Foundation in September of 2015. Deen plans to continue his fight and go to trial if Cal/OSHA does not settle before or at the hearing.
more at the link above
pringles All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

1351 Posts
2/08
Posted - Jul 22 2016 : 8:41PM
Cal/OSHA to Weigh New FSC, AHF Petitions at Aug. 18 Hearing (Xbiz)
Adult entertainment stakeholders voiced their opinions yesterday at Cal/OSHA Standards Board&s monthly meeting over future proposals to further regulate adult film making in the state.
The meeting was held in Oakland at the Harris State Building Auditorium, the site of this past February&s dramatic Standards Board meeting where state-appointed officials effectively shot down the draft proposal & 5193.1, which would not only have required condoms for all filmed pornography in the state, but also barrier protection for eyes, skin, mouth and mucous membranes.
Since the meeting in February, both the Free Speech Coalition and the AIDS Healthcare Foundation, the longtime proponent of a number of proposals to further regulate porn production, have filed two petitions with the state relative to address the safety and health of workers in the adult film industry.
Petition 560, filed by the FSC, and Petition 557, filed by the AHF, both request new regulatory language for & 5193, the current California law.
The Standards Board will consider what actions to take on the petitions at the next meeting on Aug. 18 in Walnut Creek, Calif., Cal/OSHA spokeswoman Erika Monterroza told XBIZ.
more at the link above
Lone Wolf
Senior Member

LANA means ANAL :)
9658 Posts
4/11
Posted - Jul 23 2016 : 9:09AM
Have not followed the thread for a while & too lazy to read all posts.
What's the trend lately? Are the crazy condom fanatics winning?
Mister Fahrenheit All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Meh
4655 Posts
10/13
Posted - Jul 23 2016 : 2:00PM
^ There's going to be a statewide ballot measure in California in November. My money is on the pro-condom side to win. But I imagine it will be tied up in court for a bit after that, so it will be a while before it's implemented. If at all.
Lone Wolf
Senior Member

LANA means ANAL :)
9658 Posts
4/11
Posted - Jul 24 2016 : 7:13AM
^ thanks a lot for briefing me up.
pringles All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

1351 Posts
2/08
Posted - Jul 28 2016 : 7:05PM
Equality California Votes to Oppose Prop 60 (Xbiz)
Equality California (EQCA), which is billed as the nation’s largest statewide LGBTQ civil rights organization, has voted to oppose Proposition 60.
IEAU Endorses Prop 60 (!) (AVN)
The fledgling International Adult Entertainment Union (IEAU), which touts itself as "the only official union certified to represent adult film workers," has officially come out in favor of Proposition 60, the AIDS Healthcare Foundation-backed measure slated to appear on California's November voting ballot that would mandate the use of condoms in adult productions statewide.
Union founder Amanda Gullesserian, aka Phyllisha Anne, signed the Rebuttal to Argument Against Prop 60 included in the preliminary voter guide released Tuesday by the California Secretary of State's office and being mailed to every voting household in California prior to the November 8 general election.
Adult Performers Actors Guild (APAG) Issues Statement on Prop 60 (AVN)
The Adult Performers Actors Guild (APAG)—which is the chapter of the International Entertainment Adult Union (IEAU) representing adult performers—has issued a statement regarding its position on Proposition 60, the measure going before California voters this November that would mandate the use of condoms in adult productions statewide.
APAG vice president Alana Evans sent the statement to AVN with the memorandum that it had been approved by majority vote amongst Guild members. She told AVN that 15 members had voted upon the statement, and clarified that the "No" votes mentioned in the statement represented a vote against supporting Prop 60.
Melissa Hill: The founder of IEAU has been going rogue and has been speaking on behalf of APAG without board approval. All of the statements made by IEAU founder, ARE NOT with the approval of the board members and officers of either APAG or crew union local 424
Stefani Special: WTF!?!? There was NO dialogue... @phyllisha_anne just sold our safety to AHF!!
more at the links above
Mister Fahrenheit All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Meh
4655 Posts
10/13
Posted - Jul 28 2016 : 7:45PM
^ What a goddamn clusterfuck.
whatsatelephonebill
Senior Member

2935 Posts
10/11
Posted - Jul 28 2016 : 11:39PM
^
The porn industry continues to be its own worst enemy when it comes to regulations.
pringles All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

1351 Posts
2/08
Posted - Jul 29 2016 : 2:28PM
Way to go Phyllisha Anne. She started this mess.
FSC Calls on AHF to Withdraw Prop 60 Rebuttal (Xbiz)
The Free Speech Coalition issued a statement today that said that the AIDS Healthcare Foundation-backed pro-Proposition 60 campaign fraudulently claims union support for the ballot initiative.
It called on the AHF to immediately withdraw its rebuttal "and stop trying to mislead voters."
The claims are relative to a "rebuttal to opposition's argument" statement sent to the California Secretary of State's office for inclusion in the state voter pamphlet.
The text of the rebuttal specifically states that the fledgling IEAU, known as the International Entertainment Adult Union, which formally became a federally recognized union in December, supports Prop 60.
But, as the FSC said in its statement today, neither IEAU or its related entities who hold the sole authority to represent adult film worker IEAU-members - the APAG, or Adult Performers and Actors Guild, and the 424 Crew Union - had actually reviewed or voted to take a position on Prop 60.
more at the link above
Page 11 of 18 First < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 > Last



Jump To: