It's absolutely possible. Porn is already being shot in other places. You might want to read this post though and the two links in it regarding legal concerns with shooting porn outside California.
[Link]
| Author | Post |
|---|---|
pringles  All-Star Member 1351 Posts 2/08 |  Posted - Sep 27 2016 : 12:20PMIt's absolutely possible. Porn is already being shot in other places. You might want to read this post though and the two links in it regarding legal concerns with shooting porn outside California. [Link] |
| AggieGuy Member 357 Posts 7/15 | Posted - Sep 27 2016 : 7:41PM It is technically legal only to shoot porn in California and IIRC, New Hampshire. I would imagine if other state laws were challenged in court, they would be struck down on free speech grounds. Most states would likely not enforce the law because it would be a waste of time and money to fight it out in court. However, nothing would stop the states from turning around and imposing draconian "heath and safety" standards to keep porn production out. We already know the real goal of the AHF is to shut down all US porn production. They will simply go to each state and try this same shit again. Will probably happen in Florida and Nevada next year. [Link] |
| killbillvol69 All-Star Member ^Lucy Pinder 18634 Posts 4/08 | Posted - Sep 27 2016 : 9:53PM The Only Worker Prop 60 Helps is Michael Weinstein [Link] |
| kinguntermensch Senior Member 1260 Posts 7/14 | Posted - Sep 28 2016 : 3:35AM [Link] |
| killbillvol69 All-Star Member ^Lucy Pinder 18634 Posts 4/08 | Posted - Sep 28 2016 : 7:44AM [Link] |
| Goldstein All-Star Member "You have sacrificed nothing and no one." 3689 Posts 8/10 | Posted - Sep 28 2016 : 8:13AM Then, once a court ruling is decided, it will be appealed  Of course, if we actually elect Trump and the GOP retains the United States Senate, they will get to place a reactionary "Conservative" justice on the Supreme Court. THEN, we can repeat this all over again, in state after state, and the right-wingers will do everything they can to fast-track it to the Supreme Court. Of course, if a saner electorate elects Clinton, and she gets to appoint a left-of-center moderate/liberal to the Supreme Court as the "swing" 5th justice, the right-wingers will do everything they can to turn it into a "state's rights" issue -- and then repeat this all over again, in state after state [o\|] [Link] |
| pringles All-Star Member 1351 Posts 2/08 | Posted - Sep 28 2016 : 11:57AM "What unites them - and us - is the belief that Proposition 60 is not the right way to address the safety of this small group of workers. Not when the California Division of Occupational Health and Safety is working to develop safety standards specifically to protect adult-film performers from exposure to blood borne pathogens through bodily fluids." more at the link above [Link] |
| kinguntermensch Senior Member 1260 Posts 7/14 | Posted - Sep 28 2016 : 12:08PM [Link] |
| pringles All-Star Member 1351 Posts 2/08 | Posted - Sep 29 2016 : 4:45PM Cameron Bay (YouTube) Derrick Burts (YouTube) --- Here's the latest contribution totals from the Secretary of State as of 9/27/16: $2,887,830 AHF's Yes on 60 $ 348,071 FSC's No on 60 --- Here's the latest contributions to the No on 60 campaign: $15,948 California Democratic Party $10,000 Vivid $ 4,663 Treasure Island Media $ 1,000 Jeffrey Douglas (FSC Board Chair) $ 1,000 Robert Beban (COO, Meta Interfaces LLC) [Link] |
| pringles All-Star Member 1351 Posts 2/08 | Posted - Sep 30 2016 : 3:27PM --- Ventura County Star editorial board: Prop. 60 is poorly written; vote no "We already have a law - although it is not adequately enforced - to meet the health issues addressed here. This proposal is overly broad and creates bad law under the guise of doing good. We recommend a no vote on Proposition 60." --- The California Nurses Associaton has endorsed Prop 60. [Link] |
| pringles All-Star Member 1351 Posts 2/08 | Posted - Oct 4 2016 : 11:43AM AHF put just under $2 million into the Yes on 60 PAC in September. $3,787,830 AHF's Yes on 60 $369,703 FSC's No on 60 --- Prop. 60: Require adult film actors to use condoms (San Francisco Chronicle) San Francisco attorney Sandra Ribera Speed represents three performers who are suing Kink.com. --- Porn Star Visits Colleges to Decry Safe Sex Measure (L.A. Weekly) "Porn star Tasha Reign has had enough of the AHF's mission to make on-set sex safe. This month she's embarking on a college tour to let students know about Proposition 60, the initiative that would double down on regulations requiring prophylactics in California porn." Tasha's schedule: Today: UC Santa Barbara Monday: UC San Diego Oct. 11: Cal State Long Beach Oct. 18: UC Riverside Oct. 24: San Diego State University Oct. 25: TBA Oct 31: Cal State Northridge Nov. 1: TBA Nov. 7: TBA [Link] |
| pringles All-Star Member 1351 Posts 2/08 | Posted - Oct 7 2016 : 11:11AM --- The Santa Barbara Independent has endorsed Prop 60. "Really, it's come to this, a ballot initiative on regulating whether porn actors must wear condoms? The answer, obviously, is yes. Prop. 60 is on the ballot because the porn industry fled Los Angeles County when the supervisors there enacted a condom requirement on porn performers for health and safety reasons. Those health concerns are real. The porn industry says its customers, who spend $9 billion yearly on their products, don't like condoms. By making this requirement statewide, Prop. 60 puts the porn industry on notice that there's no place to hide - at least in California." --- Los Angeles Daily News: No to law on porn condoms, Prop. 60 --- Monterey County Herald: Voters should reject Prop. 60, requiring adult film performers to wear condoms - or else. "Proposition 60 is worse than the industry it ostensibly wants to clean up. Voters should reject it." --- Outsourcing porn: Would California initiative really protect adult film workers-or expose them to starker dangers? (Sacramento News & Review) Sacramento-area porn couple could be among those targeted by deputized condom cops --- FSC's Siouxsie Q Debates Prop 60 on KQED (Xbiz) She debated John Schwada, the communications director for the Yes on Prop 60 campaign. [Link] |
| kinguntermensch Senior Member 1260 Posts 7/14 | Posted - Oct 8 2016 : 9:48AM [Link] |
| Goldstein All-Star Member "You have sacrificed nothing and no one." 3689 Posts 8/10 | Posted - Oct 8 2016 : 9:54AM [Link] |
 | |
| pringles All-Star Member 1351 Posts 2/08 | Posted - Oct 8 2016 : 10:13AM AHF has only said they'll follow the industry to any states they relocate to. They've already done this to a limited extent in Florida and Nevada. Edited by - pringles on 10/8/2016 10:20:11 AM [Link] |
| kinguntermensch Senior Member 1260 Posts 7/14 | Posted - Oct 8 2016 : 12:38PM Is it possible that the industry moves to Canada over the next years? Or is all hope lost? [Link] |
| AggieGuy Member 357 Posts 7/15 | Posted - Oct 8 2016 : 12:42PM A literal ban is impossible, but like everything else, they're using government regulation and the courts to enact a defacto ban by making the business untenable. [Link] |
| kinguntermensch Senior Member 1260 Posts 7/14 | Posted - Oct 8 2016 : 12:55PM [Link] |
| AggieGuy Member 357 Posts 7/15 | Posted - Oct 8 2016 : 1:14PM However, making porn impossible to produce via regulations is a defacto ban and will likely not be blocked by the courts. [Link] |
| cubbiefanoc Member 474 Posts 4/15 | Posted - Oct 8 2016 : 11:07PM Prop 60: Why The Battle Doesn't Stop At California Does anyone know which adult producers are considering blocking the IPs of California residents if Prop 60 passes, per what Eric discusses in the article? [Link] |
| Philly30 Member 54 Posts 8/04 | Posted - Oct 8 2016 : 11:40PM From above "However, making porn impossible to produce via regulations is a defacto ban and will likely not be blocked by the courts." really? ok based on what?, like i said even the fear mongering article states Measure B is neutered But of course it is better that none of the lawsuits are necessary and the Prop gets defeated but i think we all know it will most likely pass Edited by - philly30 on 10/8/2016 11:45:53 PM Edited by - philly30 on 10/8/2016 11:47:33 PM Edited by - philly30 on 10/9/2016 12:03:15 AM [Link] |
| cubbiefanoc Member 474 Posts 4/15 | Posted - Oct 9 2016 : 1:02AM I am not a lawyer but I always thought you had to have a legal standing to file a lawsuit. How could a CA citizen who has not been damaged by a performer by not wearing a condom be able to file a lawsuit? It seems like the courts would strike that section from the proposition immediately. [Link] |
| LCF All-Star Member Non Prevalebunt! 10364 Posts 1/05 | Posted - Oct 9 2016 : 4:10AM In other words almost every righteous citizen in CA who is related or involved with AHF, will fill so many complaints that the system would hit badly everybody just to be left in peace does this make sense? Edited by - LCF on 10/9/2016 4:14:57 AM [Link] |
| kinguntermensch Senior Member 1260 Posts 7/14 | Posted - Oct 9 2016 : 9:21AM [Link] |
| pringles All-Star Member 1351 Posts 2/08 | Posted - Oct 9 2016 : 10:09AM I doubt either is even aware of Prop 60 and this has the potential to take the thread off topic. I think we should move on. [Link] |
| Goldstein All-Star Member "You have sacrificed nothing and no one." 3689 Posts 8/10 | Posted - Oct 9 2016 : 11:07AM [Link] |
| kinguntermensch Senior Member 1260 Posts 7/14 | Posted - Oct 10 2016 : 8:24AM [Link] |
| tintintin Senior Member 1230 Posts 8/07 | Posted - Oct 10 2016 : 3:43PM [Link] |
| pringles All-Star Member 1351 Posts 2/08 | Posted - Oct 10 2016 : 4:28PM Cal/OSHA to Discuss Adult Film Standards on Nov. 10 (Xbiz) The "Bloodborne Pathogens Exposure in the Adult Film Industry Advisory Meeting" will be held Thursday, Nov. 10, at 10 a.m., lasting until 3:30 p.m. at the Elihu Harris State Building, 1515 Clay St., 2nd floor, Room 1, in Oakland, Calif. [Link] |
| kinguntermensch Senior Member 1260 Posts 7/14 | Posted - Oct 10 2016 : 5:15PM [Link] |
| cubbiefanoc Member 474 Posts 4/15 | Posted - Oct 10 2016 : 10:46PM Edited by - cubbiefanoc on 10/10/2016 10:49:12 PM [Link] |
| kinguntermensch Senior Member 1260 Posts 7/14 | Posted - Oct 11 2016 : 3:27AM [Link] |
| kinguntermensch Senior Member 1260 Posts 7/14 | Posted - Oct 11 2016 : 6:54AM So they are safe or what? [Link] |
| pringles All-Star Member 1351 Posts 2/08 | Posted - Oct 11 2016 : 10:12AM Brazzers is based in Montreal. What matters is where the scenes were filmed. If they were filmed in California, Prop 60 and/or 5193 would apply. [Link] |
| cubbiefanoc Member 474 Posts 4/15 | Posted - Oct 11 2016 : 10:26AM [Link] |
| kinguntermensch Senior Member 1260 Posts 7/14 | Posted - Oct 11 2016 : 10:31AM [Link] |
| pringles All-Star Member 1351 Posts 2/08 | Posted - Oct 11 2016 : 4:08PM "we support better health care and testing regulations, and oppose criminalizing the sex industry" --- Here's the latest contribution totals from the Secretary of State as of 10/9/16: $4,587,830 AHF's Yes on 60 $388,469 FSC's No on 60 --- Recent contributions to the No on 60 campaign: $9,995 Mark Spiegler (Talent Agent) $5,000 AEBN $2,868 CyberNet Entertainment (Kink.com) $2,500 Michael Warner (Great Western Packaging) $2,000 William Dellara (Manager, Vivid Entertainment) $1,000 Homie LLC $1,000 Galactica Fusion Inc. $1,000 Steven Gallon (CEO, Grooby) $1,000 Alan Eigen (Producer) $ 861 Vivid Entertainment Also several thousand more from Treasure Island Media. [Link] |
| cubbiefanoc Member 474 Posts 4/15 | Posted - Oct 11 2016 : 6:30PM Edited by - cubbiefanoc on 10/11/2016 6:32:47 PM [Link] |
| whatsatelephonebill Senior Member 2935 Posts 10/11 | Posted - Oct 11 2016 : 8:19PM From this thread, it looks like they're spending their money on high-viewership TV ads. which I think is a pretty good idea on their part. They bought time during the 1st Presidential debate, and I wouldn't be surprised if they started buying time during sporting events as well (though it looks like the Dodgers and Giants may be knocked out the playoffs soon). Edited by - whatsatelephonebill on 10/11/2016 8:20:17 PM [Link] |
| cubbiefanoc Member 474 Posts 4/15 | Posted - Oct 11 2016 : 8:57PM [Link] |
| whatsatelephonebill Senior Member 2935 Posts 10/11 | Posted - Oct 11 2016 : 10:08PM I mean, it's possible that it didn't happen, or that it just wasn't on the channel you watched, but this is my source. [Link] |
| AggieGuy Member 357 Posts 7/15 | Posted - Oct 11 2016 : 10:10PM Edited by - aggieguy on 10/11/2016 10:11:13 PM [Link] |
| kinguntermensch Senior Member 1260 Posts 7/14 | Posted - Oct 12 2016 : 5:02AM [Link] |
| Goldstein All-Star Member "You have sacrificed nothing and no one." 3689 Posts 8/10 | Posted - Oct 12 2016 : 5:59PM He who has the gold makes the rules. [Link] |
| pringles All-Star Member 1351 Posts 2/08 | Posted - Oct 13 2016 : 3:04PM ""We challenge you to a debate - a performer versus the proponent - to help explain why you deserve a greater say in our sexual health than we do." --- Prop. 60 isn't needed to protect porn actors (Sacramento Bee) Op-ed by Chanel Preston and Jay Gladstein. Gladstein is an internal medicine/HIV specialist at UCLA School of Medicine and Cedars-Sinai Medical. --- Prop. 60 is needed to protect the health of porn actors (Sacramento Bee) Op-ed by Gary Richwald. He's the former director of the Los Angeles County STD Program. [Link] |
| cubbiefanoc Member 474 Posts 4/15 | Posted - Oct 14 2016 : 2:30AM [Link] |
| kinguntermensch Senior Member 1260 Posts 7/14 | Posted - Oct 14 2016 : 4:47AM [Link] |
| Mister Fahrenheit All-Star Member Meh 4655 Posts 10/13 | Posted - Oct 14 2016 : 10:59AM [Link] |
| pringles All-Star Member 1351 Posts 2/08 | Posted - Oct 14 2016 : 11:17AM I highly doubt it. California's voters guide is a record 224 pages this year. There are 17 propositions in it. You can read the Prop 60 Title, Summary and Analysis and Arguments and Rebuttals pages from the voters guide. Edited by - pringles on 10/14/2016 11:18:37 AM [Link] |
| cubbiefanoc Member 474 Posts 4/15 | Posted - Oct 14 2016 : 1:15PM [Link] |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |