We wouldn't expect to see anything in there about testing. Testing isn't required by any government authority. Testing exists because of industry self-regulation. The government position has been that testing isn't prevention. The industry realizes the value and effectiveness of testing. Performers need to keep testing regardless of whether or not condoms are used. Nobody is stopping the industry from doing that. Wicked's contract girls still get tested just like everyone else even though condoms are required for their productions.
the debate they had for "safer environment" sucks. I mean it's not like porn producers/directors FORCE guys to wear condoms or force girls to only fuck guys WITHOUT a condom. The girl was always able to choose whether or not she wanted to fuck a guy with a condom or not. And the only people they would be hurting are themselves (the two people in the scene) Porn might as well be nothing but blow up dolls with Prop B passing! We already have Disney for things G rated and Nickelodeon for things PG 13 rated! Don't need prop b to make porn a PG 13 rated thing!
This is taken as a serious blow, rightly so, by the porn industry. "The effect would be simply to have no scenes, or much, much fewer scenes shot in Los Angeles,' John Stagliano , also known as 'Buttman' who owns Evil Angel , one of the nation's top porn production companies, told Buzz Feed before the measure’s passing." With the measure's passing Mr Stagliano said he expects some scenes to go underground while he personally expects 'to just shoot in other places.' I really hope production goes somewhere else, in other states, where it's still allowed to shoot porn as we like it. Porn watchers prefer scenes with NO condoms and will surely start looking for alternatives, mostly from the eastern countries (Czech, Hungary ...etc), if ever US porn industry starts complying with this regulation. Read the full article: Condoms in Porn
http://www.buzzfeed.com/kateaurthur/porn-king-says-vote-no-on-la-condoms-proposition-7xtm I know money is money is money, but there's something to be said about Stagliano's position, especially with this quote:This is someone who has the disease. This is someone who's married to one of the few women in the past 2 decades who has actually had what this law is supposed to be trying to prevent actually happen to them. I would argue that he, nearly above anyone else, knows what the consequences are if the industry's methods don't work. And he still comes down as against Measure B. Edited by - whatsatelephonebill on 11/8/2012 10:46:22 PM
I read in an article that New Hampshire is the only other state where filming porn is legal. Is that true? Isn't Amateur Allure shot in Arizona? I know FTV is, which is only solo and g/g, but it's still porn.
Isn't there at least one other web site based in Arizona? I'm pretty sure that guy covers his face in his videos but I doubt that would be enough to conceal his identity if they really wanted to make something out of it. Anyway, everyone else who has money in this country puts it to use making things go their way. I don't see why the porn business shouldn't. Edited by - randomprecision on 11/8/2012 11:55:55 PM
Only in California and New Hampshire is it legal, and both those took rulings from their respective State Supreme Courts to make it so (State vs. Freeman for CA, State vs. Theriault for New Hampshire). In any other state you can be arrested (probably for pandering/solicitation), it's just that the law enforcement there is choosing not to do so, possibly because they don't want another Freeman case making their state a legal porn haven (since someone has to be charged in the first place to get it up to the Supreme Court level).
A good read that answers some questions moving forward. Free Speech Summit Discusses What's Ahead for Measure B (AVN) BEVERLY HILLS—It was standing room only at the Free Speech Coalition Summit for this afternoon's information and strategy session regarding L.A. County Measure B, the so-called "Safer Sex in the Adult Film Industry" law, which was passed by a 55-44 percent vote on Tuesday.
Edited by - Anomander Rake on 11/7/2012 10:55:05 AM [/quote] 1. Not at all, the judge would throw it out by saying "It was a legal referendum the people have spoken" [/quote] Don't believe this is correct. Many State Props have been over turned by the Courts. Last one I can remember was Prop. 187.
#SDNY he's all yours. -- Michael Steele 5110 Posts 3/03
Posted - Nov 9 2012 : 4:55AM
From that article: Lee put the loss in perspective. While noting that "We were underfunded," in part because active fundraising for the No on Measure B campaign began just under three weeks ago, he nonetheless reported that among the non-absentee voters, the campaign's radio and TV ads, and the broadcast debates between Lee and representatives of AIDS Healthcare Foundation (AHF), reduced an early polling of 28 percent in favor of Measure B to just a 7.8 percent positive result when voters actually went to the polls and voted. "In eight days, we shaved 20 points," Lee stated, and lauded those activists present by noting, "You were able to speak as a unified industry as you've never done before." So, less than three weeks before the election, it occurs to this brain trust that maybe they should try to do some fund-raising. Where they're facing an initiative which has the potential to seriously fuck up the way they do business, and which is being promoted by just one individual busybody asshole. Unbelievable. Is everybody in porn just chronically incompetent, or is there so little money in it anymore that they don't even care? At that point, Vivid Entertainment's Steve Hirsch pointed out that the fight against Measure B, no matter what form(s) it takes, will require lots and lots of donations from adult industry members and supporters to prevent what he termed "our worst nightmare." Hey, great job realizing that now that the horse is already out of the barn, Hirsch. Maybe if you'd spent a little of that phony "stolen" "celebrity" sex tape money before the election, you wouldn't be facing this nightmare now.
Yeah, right. Ever heard of chipping away? The current free speech advocates might be pathetic compared to what we had in the past but it's still a pretty big chunk of freedom to take it all out at once. If they don't get everything they want this time, they'll keep at it until they do. If they want to ban unprotected anal and vaginal sex, you'd better believe they want to ban unprotected sex altogether. And they will get what they want because there's clearly more going on here than meets the eye.
^ That's OK. I was just being aggressive for the sake of it. It wasn't personal. When it comes to this topic, I don't even try to be reasonable or friendly. But I have no idea who you are or what you actually believe so I was responding more to your post than to you personally.
Measure B is taking the Adult Industry's right to self-regulation away. There's nothing about monthly testing in it because the proponents of Measure B don't believe in monthly testing. They believe in their condoms only policy. They tell us about the high rates of STDs among performers but fail to mention that the majority of the most serious cases (i.e. HIV) are among performers in gay porn which mostly mandates condom usage instead of monthly testing. The industry as a whole needs to get real on the issue of straight and gay porn as well, and stop pretending they are two distinct and separate industries. They are not. There are far too many male performers who do straight and gay (as well as shemale and bisexual) work for this to be the case. Edited by - Geri on 11/19/2012 10:19:57 AM
Great to have a lawyer present. How "bad" are the fines? Can you "build" that into the cost of doing business? Or is there escalating penalties for repeat citations?
I think AHF and the City of Los Angeles is certainly trying to run porn out of town like the city did in the 70's and early 80's with their police raids and prosecution of anyone even uttering the word porn in their jurisdiction. I suspect they will succeed this time. By March 2013 most if not all of porn will relocate to San Francisco (just like last time) and porn will continue as-is from its new location. This law is just too expensive for the industry to fight. I do believe that SF and Marin County are too liberal to support a condom mandate there but San Mateo, Alameda and Santa Clara counties might support one, pigeon-holing the industry in a 60 mile by about 35 mile (at its widest point in Marin) landmass. Any state-wide initiative would have to go through the State Assembly where it would likely be DOA (it would be too arduous a task for AHF and Shelley Lubben's flunkies to get the necessary number of signatures to get a state-wide ballot initiative). Michael (pornlaw), I would start looking for a house in Tiburon or Belevedere if I were you. It looks like you will be moving along with the rest of porn. Once John Stagliano, Christian Mann, Larry Flynt, Fabian the Felon et. al. start buying prices will skyrocket!
Click to expand
Why do you think the industry will re-locate North to San Francisco? Pretty expensive up there. Wouldn't it be closer and cheaper to relocate to Vegas where there is already a sort of Underground Railroad of major strip joints. Starlet comes into town, dances for a week, gets a cheap hotel room, film a few scenes and come back home to SoCal. I knew a girl who paid her way through Grad School in Utah doing this. (Stripping not porn): Fly in once a month, work a good week, very inexpensive to stay (decent, off strip hotels go for about $20 a day, $40 on the weekend), fly home, see ya next month. This was before the Great Recession but the money was so good and profitable, she did it a few years after she graduated.
I think running away is a bad idea. It will follow them. Because as I said, I don't think their only problem is AHF. My gut just tells me there's more to this than that. I think they either have to stay and fight it or capitulate and watch what's left of their business wither away. Just about anywhere they might try to go is going to be aware that they are there. You can't run a major porn business without drawing some attention. Even if they manage to move somewhere where it's technically legal, these people are going to follow them and do exactly the same thing. Edited by - randomprecision on 11/9/2012 2:25:00 PM
Except they aren't employees. They are independent contractors. But I concede your point. Porn stars fucking without condoms would be complicit in violating a law they know requires condom usage. Do they get a citation too?
Well, I'm just going to say right now that I'm going to go try to get a job as a pilot and demand that they hire me and not make me fly because flying is still a little bit dangerous. I need a law that says pilots don't have to fly otherwise I won't get any work.
Other Potentially Infectious Materials per Cal/OSHA: "Semen and vaginal fluid are always considered OPIM. Any other body fluid is considered OPIM if it's visibly contaminated with blood. Saliva is considered OPIM in connection with dental procedures because these procedures routinely cause saliva to be contaminated with blood."
Can't even do that anymore with the Nanny STate trying to limit the size of beverage consumption. Between Obummer using his "mandate" to raise Social Security to 67 and this ridiculous porn bill. This progressive is ready to chuck it all and move to Canada. As a life long liberal, I'm sick of "liberalism"
torris wrote: [/quote] Except they aren't employees. They are independent contractors. But I concede your point. Porn stars fucking without condoms would be complicit in violating a law they know requires condom usage. Do they get a citation too? [/quote]torris, the State sees them as employees. some producers,(that I know personally) have been dragged through hearings where they tried to prove to the state otherwise. the State of California said "absolutely not, now pay your fine PLUS penalties for challenging us, thank you." it's like when the NBA or NFL hits a player w/a ridiculous fine for something that's equally ridiculous; they can pay to keep playing or bounce to Italy or Canada to keep playing (respectively). it's the states ballpark and they make the rules, end of story. now in regards to companies that use payroll; payroll companies are few and far between that will handle a known XXX producer/company, because of the presumed extra risk to employees, but they are out there. when I worked for Vince and briefly for New Sensations, they both had payroll systems in place, but that can add 20% or more to ones overall costs and most cant or wont, float that. Im sure that w/the prop.B ordinance in place, payroll providers might insist their xxx producers under them comply with it since there's no way around that type of requirement w/the whole process having to be legit and above board on every level. otherwise they (payroll companies) wont take their business. again, that's speculation on my part from my experiences in XXX these past 11 years and having worked for people and companies that did cut payroll checks (w-4 system, not w-9). the real laughable thing about how all of this was drawn up is AHF and the $$$ behind it duped the city into believeing that people were actually going to pay for these required film permits which NO ONE will. and should someone get busted that's incorporated, they'll use the corporate veil and fold the company w/out paying the fines. it's all couch porno from here, and how are they going to prove where that couch was in regards to city and county lines when it was shot. XXX is being forced back into rogue waters, which is fine w/me since that will hinder companies like Manwin/Brazzers. and I'm ALL for that since those are the cats that are REALLY destroying XXX, and not just w/the tubesites,..but thats another story. enough for now, Im gonna go play some afternoon hockey,..lates, Von S. Edited by - von_swine on 11/9/2012 7:24:00 PM Edited by - von_swine on 11/9/2012 7:26:12 PM
Anyone who has been paying attention long enough knows "moving forward" is liberal code for "we're doing this shit and we don't care what you think". Libertarians don't use this term. I don't know a single one who does. Everyone I've heard using it was a liberal.
Watch MSNBC for a week solid and count how many times you hear "moving forward". You probably won't be able to keep track. Edit - Also, you can call it "bitter" if you like. I choose not to be quite so PC and call it "Fucking pissed off!" It kind of comes out a little differently depending on how you word it. And you bet I'm pissed off. One of the main reasons I supported the Democrats was because I felt they would be much friendlier to the porn business and it's customers. If this isn't a reason to be angry, I don't know what is. Edited by - randomprecision on 11/12/2012 2:35:57 AM
Considering Orange County is the most conservative in the state I doubt porn would be non-condom there long, they would run porn out like LA County just did. Ventura County (the other side of LA) would also probably have kittens if porn moved in as well. I predict that porn will move to San Francisco and Marin County by March 2013. I bet the big wigs of porn have already called realtors to look for nice mansions in Belvedere/Tiburon and Mill Valley/Ross/Greenbrae and production facilities throughout San Francisco and Marin County. LA County just fucked up not thinking their decisions through before making them, they have wanted to run porn out of town for decades but they didn't realize that porn was a significant part of their tax revenue before actually doing it!
I understand the safety involved here.... or at the very least, the thought of it; however, I just don't like it being forced upon the industry. I hope there are several producers willing to relocate to Nevada because of this news.
Back in the day, I was fine calling myself a liberal because I believed that even though some of their ideas were a little creepy, they were good people and they knew where to stop. I ignored the people who said there was nothing to stop regulations once they start. Of course there was! Common sense! Well, so much for that.
Nevada already has licensing, condom regulations and weekly testing for sex workers. Yes, porn performers are sex workers no matter how you try to spin it. New Hampshire is technically an option but for some reason I don't imagine Larry Flynt mounting a snow plow to his electric wheelchair so he can clear the two feet of "partly cloudy" off of his driveway. Ditto for John Stagliano, Fabian Thylmann, Shy Love, Mark Speigler, Christian XXX and Tony Malice, they would not adjust well to all of that "partly cloudy" falling on their driveways and mucking up their drives to work for three months out of the year. "Partly Cloudy" means snow as usually when the worst storms come it is unexpected even by the weatherman. Of course if porn did move to New Hampshire Steph and Drew (being the hardy Maine residents that they are) can charge $500 a head for classes teaching how to deal with New England winters and make a mint selling shovels, snow blowers, road salt (in 50 pound bags) and four wheel drive trucks at a fifty per cent markup. I still put my money on porn moving to San Francisco and Michael Weinfuck's attempt to force porn to use condoms anywhere in California to fail miserably. San Francisco may be cool and rainy but it seldom snows there and Marin is a very nice place to live (if you can afford $800K for a house).
[Link]
InFamous Deactivated User
1051 Posts 2/12
Posted - Nov 13 2012 : 2:46PM
Well Brazzers shot in Vegas so they don't ever have condom scenes in them.
I watch MSNBC all the time; pretty much every day. I have no idea what you are talking about. Their tagline is "lean forward" which is stupid, and pretty much all the hosts avoid using it or anything like it, presumably from embarrassment. I can honestly say I have zero recollection of this term ever being used; I will pay attention this week and see if I hear it. That said; porn in general is always, ALWAYS at risk from politicians from all stripes. Republicans love using porn as a whipping boy to play to their moralistic base. Democrats have often been opposed to Porn because it supposedly subjugates women (though these arguments have been undercut considerably in recent years and there doesn't seem to be any more Andrea Dworkin-types on the public stage). The biggest problem--and this goes for Libertarians too--is that there are no political advocates for porn. So it is forever subject to the whims of whomever decides to put it in their crosshairs and is never defended by those that think the govt. should stay of of the porn-regulating business.
I can assure you that the use of the words "moving forward" has nothing to do with what you think. I just tried to capture the idea of whats next in regards to production and to calm fears within the industry.
Long Beach is one of the cities in LA County that has their own health department. Long Beach on Measure B City officials said they don’t expect to be left out of Measure B and that they will be scheduling talks with county officials to make sure they are included in the conversation. “The statement of Measure B is to create an enforcement mechanism with the County Health inspecting,” said Tom Modica, director of government affairs. “We believe this applies countywide and should be administered countywide.” Modica noted that Long Beach voters specifically voted to implement Measure B with 53% in favor. “There are certain things we do as a health department, but there are plenty of serviced LA County provides that we do not,” he added.
I say the Porn Industry should be careful not to be complancent at all.When someone tries to bully you or make your life difficult,then it's time for your claws to come out.A small crack in the wall should be dealt with quickly or else risk a possible disaster in the making.
Why do you think the industry will re-locate North to San Francisco? Pretty expensive up there. Wouldn't it be closer and cheaper to relocate to Vegas where there is already a sort of Underground Railroad of major strip joints. Starlet comes into town, dances for a week, gets a cheap hotel room, film a few scenes and come back home to SoCal. I knew a girl who paid her way through Grad School in Utah doing this. (Stripping not porn): Fly in once a month, work a good week, very inexpensive to stay (decent, off strip hotels go for about $20 a day, $40 on the weekend), fly home, see ya next month. This was before the Great Recession but the money was so good and profitable, she did it a few years after she graduated.
Click to expand
The industry faced a similar issue in the 70's and 80's with LA County arresting and charging anyone who even dared to say the word porn in their county. The industry responded by moving to San Francisco then and I think history will repeat itself here. Also, porn in SF is legal and it is not in Las Vegas (or Arizona for that matter). I don't think most of the people in the biz today want to take a chance on serious state prison time by moving to a state where prostitution laws encompass the making of porn. There is also a reasonable amount of porn already made in SF and the government isn't trying to run it out unlike LA.
Regarding there being absolutely nothing at all about regular STI testing in Measure B, Nica Noelle wrote this on another forum which shows she is very concerned about this issue: "Wanting to maintain the right not to use condoms is both a free speech/expression issue (yes, a legitimate one - sorry) and it's also a safety issue. Condoms would likely do away with our testing system, which is very important to us. Condoms break, especially during the rigors of some b/g scenes, and should that happen we'd have no knowledge of the sexual health of our costar - including whether they were HIV positive. Additionally - condoms do not protect against STIs like syphillis and herpes. Which means, a performer could do a condom scene with a costar who has syphillis and contract it and be none the wiser unless and until symptoms began affecting him or her. And even then, no one would be able to trace the occurrence or hope to contain it. Still sound safer to you? G/G scenes are very low risk and dental dams would be absolutely absurd. Sinn Sage, one of the most prolific girl/girl only performers of the last several years, has never gotten any kind of STI, and for the record, neither have I. (And I have done some b/g scenes, as well as had off-camera non-condom sex with fellow sex workers. Not one STI in all the years I've been here.) I'm sure many other performers have not had any STI's either. However, we do feel our system can be improved upon, and many of us would like to add swabbing (of the throat and anus) to our talent STI panel, and also increase the mandatory testing period to every two weeks rather than once a month. Also, I happen to have a severe (possibly allergic) reaction to latex condoms and their substitutes, with the exception of lambskin (lambskin prevents pregnancy but not STIs.) I can't use them without developing an excruciatingly painful, debilitating UTI that requires an immediate round of strong antibiotics to cure. I have no idea why, but that's the situation for me, and I have years of medical documentation to prove it. So if I were a top b/g performer whose primary source of income was from performing, I would be forced into early retirement and lose my only source of income. What I'm trying to say is, this is a very complicated, multi-layered issue. The measure passed only because most people had Imperator's reaction, which was "Condoms make things safer = safer is good! No brainer!" And actually it's FAR from a cut and dried issue. Too bad people don't research things before they form opinions and vote on them, especially when it affects the lives and health of people they know nothing about. " NB: "Condoms would likely do away with our testing system, which is very important to us."
Who actually voted for Measure B and who voted against? "Of the men surveyed, 61 percent said they opposed requiring condoms in porn, while 63 percent of women surveyed backed the requirement. Among the different ethnic groups, blacks gave it the highest level of support at 69 percent, while only 41 percent of whites supported Measure B, according to the exit polling. Latinos stood at 62 percent support, Asians at 56 percent. " http://www.dailynews.com/news/ci_21960399/exit-polls-spotlight-l-liberal-bastion-and-san "The biggest wedge issue between Los Angeles women and men in last week's election wasn't over Obama versus Romney. It was the question of whether to require that male actors wear condoms in adult films produced in Los Angeles County. Exit polling conducted on election day by the Center for the Study of Los Angeles at Loyola Marymount found that the 56 percent approval that Measure B won countywide doesn't tell the whole story. It turns out that in the exit poll questionnaires, 63 percent of women supported Measure B. But 61 percent of men said they opposed imposing the condom requirement, according to a Daily News story. That is two starkly different mindsets. The exit polls also found a big split by race and ethnic group, per the DN: Whites only supported the measure at a rate of 41 percent, while 56 percent of Asians said yes to mandatory condoms in porn, 62 percent of Latinos agreed and 69 percent of blacks said they voted yes." Source: http://www.laobserved.com/archive/2012/11/now_thats_a_gender_gap.php Also: "This we know already: about 244,000 voters who cast ballots in the presidential race didn't make a choice on Measure B." Well it's nice to know that quite possibly nearly a quarter of a million eligible Californian voters were intelligent enough to realize that it's absolutely none of the general public's damned business to be voting on such a complex health and safety issue concerning an industry they do not work in. Edited by - Geri on 11/18/2012 3:29:49 PM
"You have sacrificed nothing and no one." 3689 Posts 8/10
Posted - Nov 18 2012 : 1:09PM
If those 244,000 voters "were intelligent enough to realize that it's absolutely none of the general public's damned business to be voting on such a complex health and safety issue," they should have voted NO. A "No" vote would have been to defeat LA County Ballot Measure B (Condoms in Porn) -- which, in effect, means "leave them alone/it's none of our business" (i.e. the status quo). In this case, leaving the vote on Measure B blank fails to be the neutral position.
No, your argument is ridiculous. Staying neutral means abstaining, not preserving the status quo. If they feel that it's none of their business to vote on, then the logical step is not to vote.