All Forums > Porn News - Press Releases > Porn News - Press Releases Forum Page 40 > Condoms in Porn... Measure B/Bill AB 1576/Prop 60 > Condoms in Porn... Measure B/Bill AB 1576/Prop 60 (page 2)
Page 2 of 18 First 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 14 > Last
AuthorPost
killbillvol69 All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

^Lucy Pinder
18634 Posts
4/08
Posted - Sep 21 2012 : 11:46PM
Who/what exactly is the "No on Government Waste Committee"? What do they do other than what they're doing right now with Measure B? Do they exist only in California or is it a Federal thing?
Google is of no help.
pornlaw
Member

578 Posts
10/05
Posted - Sep 22 2012 : 4:53PM
They are only in California and were organized to fight Ballot Measure B.
They are made up of a coalition of parties - the FSC, VICA, Manwin.
They are staffed by;
This is what I found out about James Lee --> http://adultbizlaw.com/?p=947
I havent researched Burnside or GSSR...
Michael
Goldstein All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

"You have sacrificed nothing and no one."
3689 Posts
8/10
Posted - Sep 22 2012 : 6:03PM
twocentsworth would seem to be an alt-ID (or new-ID for a "former" member), created solely to post anonymously in this thread and the Syphilis thread.
Arguing nonsense with true industry insiders who know what they're talking about, would just be a bonus, as far as no-cents (i.e. no sense) is concerned.
Thank you for your important contributions to our little community, Michael.
4theheart
Senior Member

pornologist
3102 Posts
8/01
Posted - Sep 22 2012 : 6:27PM
former member "lookyhere" dunno just guessing
 
killbillvol69 All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

^Lucy Pinder
18634 Posts
4/08
Posted - Sep 22 2012 : 8:58PM
Thanks for the info about the no waste committee pornlaw.
pornlaw
Member

578 Posts
10/05
Posted - Sep 23 2012 : 12:06PM
Glodstein & Killbill - thank you ! I try to get out information so people can be informed...
Here's two new videos from the No on Govt Waste Committee...
Videos: No on Ballot Measure B starring Steven St. Croix -
Two videos on why you should vote No on "Condoms in Porn!"
http://adultbizlaw.com/video-no-on-ballot-measure-b-steven-st-croix/
Michael
valo
Senior Member

1854 Posts
9/07
Posted - Sep 23 2012 : 8:16PM
Michael, these are great articles and videos being posted on adultbizlaw.com
They are very informative and explain whats going on. The voters need to know the facts and know the real agenda of AHF. All this should be used by the committee to get the word out and inform people. I hope all these articles and vids will be sent to every news station, newspaper, and news website in the county. Try and get these so called journalists to do a story on this for tv or a newspaper.
pornlaw
Member

578 Posts
10/05
Posted - Sep 23 2012 : 9:24PM
Thank you...
I know that local LA news reads my blog. I have been interviewed & linked to in the past by HuffPo, Daily Beast, Daily Dot, LA Weekly, CNBC ect et al...So they know its there. If they want to interview me they will contact me. I cant force that...
AHF told me they read my blog as well...
So hopefully it will get more exposure in the coming month and will be used as a reference/research source for local media/news but they will probably go to FSC/No on Govt Waste to get their side.
Im just trying to inform without bias or an agenda. I am against Prop 35 and Ballot Measure B but I try to educate first and convince second.
Michael
AdultBizLaw.com
pornlaw
Member

578 Posts
10/05
Posted - Sep 25 2012 : 1:11PM
pornlaw
Member

578 Posts
10/05
Posted - Sep 26 2012 : 9:45PM
pornlaw
Member

578 Posts
10/05
Posted - Sep 28 2012 : 12:59PM
pornlaw
Member

578 Posts
10/05
Posted - Sep 29 2012 : 2:25PM
4theheart
Senior Member

pornologist
3102 Posts
8/01
Posted - Sep 30 2012 : 9:09PM
4theheart
Senior Member

pornologist
3102 Posts
8/01
Posted - Oct 1 2012 : 12:46PM
 
pornlaw
Member

578 Posts
10/05
Posted - Oct 1 2012 : 3:19PM
LCF All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Non Prevalebunt!
10364 Posts
1/05
Posted - Oct 1 2012 : 4:37PM
I live in Europe so I don't know I was wondering considering the matter at hand , is this ballot debated on TV? Are voters really informed?
RandomPrecision
Senior Member

Enjoy!
8175 Posts
3/06
Posted - Oct 2 2012 : 10:02AM
Most people in this country probably don't even know about this. And they probably won't until it passes and they start wondering what the hell ruined their porn.
pornlaw
Member

578 Posts
10/05
Posted - Oct 2 2012 : 6:25PM
InFamous
Deactivated User

1051 Posts
2/12
Posted - Oct 2 2012 : 6:55PM
jordy
Deactivated User

16 Posts
9/12
Posted - Oct 2 2012 : 8:24PM

Edited by - Jonny Jay on 10/3/2012 1:42:12 PM
LCF All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Non Prevalebunt!
10364 Posts
1/05
Posted - Oct 3 2012 : 12:54PM
mod edit: Only editing as the poster above is now deactivated, preventing any encouragement for his return. In no way is this edit a reflection on what you wrote, thank you.
Edited by - Jonny Jay on 10/3/2012 1:46:10 PM
pornlaw
Member

578 Posts
10/05
Posted - Oct 3 2012 : 5:38PM
4theheart
Senior Member

pornologist
3102 Posts
8/01
Posted - Oct 3 2012 : 10:24PM
pornlaw, this avn article claims that Measure B in addition to mandating condoms, would also mandate additional protective measures, and I was just wondering if it is true?
"Under Measure B, it would require adult film producers to provide, and to insure their employees actually use, "appropriate ... equipment such as, but not limited to, gloves, gowns... face shields or masks and eye protection... mouthpieces... pocket masks, or other ventilation devices" where "reasonably anticipated skin, eye [or] mucous membrane... contact with potentially infectious materials" such as "semen, vaginal secretions... saliva... [or] any other body fluid" might occur. You know, like kissing..."
Would this mean things like condoms for blowjobs? Female Condoms for cunnilingus? Goggles for facial popshots? Heck could a popshot land on any part of exposed skin at all? These would basically be OSHA guidelines for a lab am I right? Has weinstein talked about this? It would seem this is the avenue you may want to take or question if this is indeed true. Or if it is true an effective ad may be to have a billboard showing a man and woman embracing while donning the full protective regalia. Either way, regardless of one's position on the measure, I do hope the underlying facts are presented to voters, whatever they may be.
pornlaw
Member

578 Posts
10/05
Posted - Oct 3 2012 : 11:58PM
Ballot Measure B makes references to the Cal-OSHA reg section 5193 that does actually require all those things...
Though Cal-OSHA has proposed revised regs that only reference gloves and eye protective gear (in addition to condoms and dental dams). Not sure if that means googles or not.
And yes condoms would be required for BJs under the old Cal-OSHA regs but not the proposed new ones - if certain testing requirements are met.
So quite honestly B is very confusing but the AVN article you read is factual/legally correct.
Michael
 
pornlaw
Member

578 Posts
10/05
Posted - Oct 5 2012 : 12:59PM
Ballot Measure B – Get The Facts: The Proposed Law, Ballot Language and Voter Guide's For and Against Language
http://adultbizlaw.com/?p=1646
Michael
pornlaw
Member

578 Posts
10/05
Posted - Oct 6 2012 : 1:15PM
Weinstein, AHF and Misinformation about Condoms in Nevada Brothels
You cant compare brothels to porn production.
http://adultbizlaw.com/?p=1669
Michael
pornlaw
Member

578 Posts
10/05
Posted - Oct 11 2012 : 5:36PM
RandomPrecision
Senior Member

Enjoy!
8175 Posts
3/06
Posted - Oct 12 2012 : 8:11PM
Where are all the abortion rights activists on this right to choose?
Edited by - randomprecision on 10/12/2012 8:11:49 PM
pornlaw
Member

578 Posts
10/05
Posted - Oct 16 2012 : 12:10PM
Court Rules City Imposed Permits Violates First Amendment
This case can be used to fight Ballot Measure B !
http://adultbizlaw.com/?p=1967
Michael
danl
Member

436 Posts
3/05
Posted - Oct 17 2012 : 7:26PM
Don't suppose anyone knows or even cares, but when I have not sent out forum "rants" to adult film directors for their continual refusal to recognize the sexual "charge" a great many men get, just in seeing sexy, shapely porn stars, dangling long, smoldering cigarettes between their luscious lips, in both porn feature and gonzo productions, I coined the term "con-dumb," long before it became a "button slogan" by the adult film industry.
Should anyone care to check this fact, go to the many posts I made, looooong loooong ago, when the proposed mandate was in its "infancy," so to speak.
I am pretty sure, then, that "condumb, was "picked up" by "some" industry "movie and shaker," who claimed it as his OWN, after reading one of my rants, in which I wrote, "it is just plain stupid,for what I like to call, CONDUMBS, to be required on male adult film performers,already tested more often than lab rats at UCLA."
As for the "borrowing," thats ok with me, just as long as one of the most LUDRICOUS proposals ever made by the County of Los Angeles is soundly defeated, and I can always take great pride in knowing that MY coined term may have played some part in its demise.
4theheart
Senior Member

pornologist
3102 Posts
8/01
Posted - Oct 17 2012 : 9:03PM
The latimes endorsement page recommends voting No on Measure B link
pornlaw
Member

578 Posts
10/05
Posted - Oct 18 2012 : 1:06AM
I think they picked it up from an article written by Leya Falcon...
http://www.xcritic.com/blogs/blog.php?blogID=3365
Michael
Jamie Gardner
Member

demicomix.com Carnal Comics - True Stories of Adult Film Stars
105 Posts
6/04
Posted - Oct 18 2012 : 1:15PM
danl
Member

436 Posts
3/05
Posted - Oct 19 2012 : 7:24PM
"Great," at least I now know, who "borrowed" the term from me, since my posts here on this forum, using the term, "condumb," predate Ms Falcon's article, by quite a bit, should you want to check, "porn law," and btw, I like your input on proposed measure B, and the negative effect it would have throughout the adult film industry, if passed--Certainly, the business will survive, but, imho, it will be just the "beginning" of a long train of restrictions on the people producing and making adult films, designed to eventually, drive the industry out of LA County, entirely.
 
InFamous
Deactivated User

1051 Posts
2/12
Posted - Oct 20 2012 : 11:36PM
^
No just not condom in porn but for G/G movies too,here what you can find out. Now that bout blowbangs, creampies, cuckold, or ever footjob scenes too.

Edited by - Infamous on 10/20/2012 11:43:03 PM

RandomPrecision
Senior Member

Enjoy!
8175 Posts
3/06
Posted - Oct 21 2012 : 6:29AM
I don't suppose I can apply for a refund on all the money I spent on her movies.
pornlaw
Member

578 Posts
10/05
Posted - Oct 26 2012 : 12:08PM
RandomPrecision
Senior Member

Enjoy!
8175 Posts
3/06
Posted - Oct 26 2012 : 2:40PM
It's amazing to me that what two consenting adults choose to do with each other sexually is even a debate in this country.
Or I should say that what is really interesting is the fact that they can ban basically anything. It just depends on how they package and sell the ban. They're not calling it "censorship". They'll call it "workplace safety" and they know all the little drones of the world will fall right in line regardless of what they say they believe regarding censorship, free speech and sexual freedom.
Everything has a backdoor (no pun intended). If anything, the human mind is much easier to hack than any kind of computer software. You start with the really stupid people (of which there are many), push all the right buttons and their bleating will eventually drown out the "debate". Anyway, this is your sexual freedom being eroded. Enjoy.
Edited by - randomprecision on 10/26/2012 2:48:30 PM
Savoy All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Sucker for Sinners
1844 Posts
12/06
Posted - Nov 7 2012 : 12:22AM
Now what?
mapofhawaii
Senior Member

1050 Posts
3/06
Posted - Nov 7 2012 : 1:41AM
So, has it been reported whether this passed or not?
Savoy All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Sucker for Sinners
1844 Posts
12/06
Posted - Nov 7 2012 : 2:05AM
Measure B has passed.
mapofhawaii
Senior Member

1050 Posts
3/06
Posted - Nov 7 2012 : 2:10AM
Really? So, I guess the porn business will move out of California huh? Great job killing business.
RandomPrecision
Senior Member

Enjoy!
8175 Posts
3/06
Posted - Nov 7 2012 : 2:19AM
What now? Is that supposed to be a rhetorical question? I would say you should go and drown your sorrows with a 32 ounce soda but we don't want to give them anymore ideas.
mharris127
Senior Member

1844 Posts
8/09
Posted - Nov 7 2012 : 2:30AM
I bet a couple of porn executives are closing on homes in Belvedere (about 15 miles northeast of San Francisco) tomorrow. Anyone selling a house in southern Marin just increased their price by $100K!
Edited by - mharris127 on 11/7/2012 2:30:43 AM
EthanConner
Member

319 Posts
11/07
Posted - Nov 7 2012 : 6:31AM
Fuuuuuuuuuuck! Porn is gonna suck soooo bad now!
And so much for my impregnation fetish getting up there done by the right pairings! :(
And no more cream pie porn. Damn. Cream Pies been my fav since I saw Candace Von do one.
Edited by - EthanConner on 11/7/2012 6:44:34 AM
EthanConner
Member

319 Posts
11/07
Posted - Nov 7 2012 : 6:42AM
I wonder if straight porn or 3sum porn will even sell now?
I must not be the only one who gets turned off by a scene where the guy wears a condom.
David Starsky
Senior Member

We're gonna take it outside and I'm gonna show you what it's like!
1660 Posts
2/06
Posted - Nov 7 2012 : 7:23AM
The results are not actually all in yet. Currently 55.98% - 44.02% for Yes with 89% Precincts reported.
Does it need 55% to pass?
EthanConner
Member

319 Posts
11/07
Posted - Nov 7 2012 : 9:52AM
I wish I could have voted.
and to answer ur question, I sadly assume Yes it only needs 55% to pass because anything 51% or more is more than half. And more than half is always the majority.
aclayfan All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

5059 Posts
8/11
Posted - Nov 7 2012 : 10:23AM
1st, it was always going to pass. Do you think the voters are going to study the details of every ballot measure? It sounds perfectly reasonable to Joe and Jane Public. 2nd, let's see how things play out before everybody in pornland loads up the moving van. It's definitely bad news, how bad remains to be seen.
Anomander Rake
Member

186 Posts
6/09
Posted - Nov 7 2012 : 10:46AM
seems unconstitional to me, I think if they fight it in court they might have a good chance.
How can you go in someone's house or other private property and tell them if they are having sexy with a video camera with an intent to distribute then they have to wear a condom?
What if someone is fucking and records it with their iphone? If they put it on the internet, have they then broken the law?
Also it seems impossible to inforce. Keep it on a closed set on private property and say you shot in San Deigo. You think police will really spend their time looking for porn shoots?
Edited by - Anomander Rake on 11/7/2012 10:55:05 AM
Page 2 of 18 First 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 14 > Last



Jump To: