I wonder of any of you hate upside down sex scenes (where the woman is upside down, her head on the floor and legs up on a sofa). Realitykings does a lot of these. In the camera's view only the guy can be seen properly and the woman is upside down and her head is bent up against the floor and that spoils everything.
So if you believe people will steal no matter what, it sure seems futile to work towards making an excellent product with the goal being decreasing theft. Stormy Daniels has practically screamed over this - busting her ass to create stellar feature porn to have it STOLEN anyway. You're right. Quality means NOTHING when it comes to porn theft. They steal the good and the bad. Shouldn't the effort be put towards removing the keys from the ignition? Btw, I'm a paying fan and am a picky one. Quality means the world to me. I definitely consume far less because I am so selective. I am thoroughly convinced that there are people who care about creating quality porn and listening to their fans. Too bad you aren't seeing that. And yes, there are still people who exist with that old-school mentality of "make it and they will cum". Isn't Roy Karch still alive and kicking? You would literally have to bound me to a chair and hold my eyelids open with matchsticks to make me watch his shitty porn. I've even written so much in one of my reviews. In fact, one of the large purposes of ADT is to help consumers shift through all the shit and get to the gold. haha. In every industry, from handbags to hamburgers, if you truly want quality you have to reject a lot of inferior product. That's just the way things are and turning every porn show into a work of carnal art will not stop theft or decrease theft, if anything it'll incite those little fuckers to steal faster. It won't change thieves into a paying customer. So thanks duefuss, you've brought me around. Shitty porn or no shitty porn, people will steal. The answer lies in taking care of this mess by legal means. Yeah, yeah. I know OT. I'll shut up now. :)
I used to think it was a circus act until I met a girl who loved doing it so much she'd get back injuries from it, need spine adjustment, then do it again that night. I can't tell you how the physiology works, but for some women that position is a cumfest. There was a scene quite a while ago with Inari Vachs ending a gang bang this way and she seemed to be enjoying herself, umm a lot, and I found it very hot. My verdict: if the performers like doing it, great; if they don't, it's a forced circus act and I don't want them in my fantasy.
In no particular order. Quick cutting. Camera jumps from close-up of genitals, Then 5 seconds later zooms up to a close-up of her face, then backs off to a full body shot etc. It's a frigging porno, how are you suppose to wack off to a scene when the camera keeps jumping around. Big boob movies where the girl doesn't even take her bra off. Watermarks that intrude on the action. I don't have a big problem with watermarks, but the cameraman needs to take them into account when filming a scene.
One more. Ok so I live in a house with neighbors on both sides. It's summertime so I like to keep the windows open. I pop in a DVD and the scene starts out with an interview of a girl. I usually keep the volume on my TV at around 10, but since it is hard to hear her I crank it up to 25. Fast forward to the action and suddenly she is loudly screaming and moaning like crazy. I bet you could hear it half way down the block. I can only imagine what the neighbors would think if I lived in an apartment.
I dislike that open for/to the camera is the #1 inviolate operating principle of every porn studio. When someone is looking to find the reason why there is a profit killing sameness across studios and genre look to open for the camera as the culprit. Let them fuck. Direct the camera operator. Instruct these professional sex workers regarding what you want to capture then allow them professional space to express your instruction. I'd love to see a porn star with a bit of perspiration on her brow and a look of intense concentration on her face as she bring her personality and sexuality to the screen. Even if she doesn't have an orgasm. Any directors reading this post and thinks faster or more athletic movements/positions is the answer is missing the point. Porn is fantasy fucking isn't.
Facials. I never had a big issue with them in the past, but enough is enough already. Kaylynn's 2 newest comeback scenes have turned me and caused me to hate them. In both scenes she gives very passionate performances, and tells the guy she wants him to cum inside of her, in one he says no, in another there's a cut in which the director obviously tells her to start talking about "how badly" she wants the cum on her face instead. both hot scenes ruined for me by the directors obsession with a facial.
^oh crap. That is sad news. What are those unwatchable titles? I'll have to wait a bit longer for her next comeback.
[Link]
trout bum Deactivated User
"I'm Not Here To Suck My Own Cock!" 2145 Posts 5/10
Posted - Jul 30 2010 : 11:23PM
Although I love to watch girls get drilled in the ass by a big dick, for me It's huge downer for a guy to pull out and see a real closeup of a huge gapping raw looking asshole. Not very appealing in my mind. A freshly fucked pussy is a different matter. A least it looks happy but seeing a raw ugly looking asshole kills the scene for me.
If there's one thing I don't like, it's not just WEAK cumshots (though that's pretty frustrating), it's when YOU KNOW that the man already has produced a better one earlier in the scene. Let me tell you what I'm talking about (sorry if this is very 'ethnic-centred', that's just what we watch in my part of the world: I always enjoyed watching scenes with Vanessa Blue and Lexington Steele. There was one that they filmed in a bar and Lex's cumshot was sort of okay at the end. But not long after watching the film, I was looking at pictures/stills from the same movie, and it showed clearly that Lex had absolutely plastered Vanessa with cum! But they didn't show THAT one, just the weak one at the end. Then, in more recent times, a threesome involving some man I don't know, and Miosotis (biggest tits) and Cherokee D'Ass (biggest ass). Same thing, when you watch the film, the cumshot at the end is pathetic. But look at the picture stills and it shows a much bigger and better cumshot DID take place and they just chose not to show it. Robbery if you ask me!
I remember seeing a TV show about home security where the advice agreed with duefuss. Few thieves care what they steal; most thieves just want to steal *something*. A thief coming through your neighbourhood intent on breaking into a house will not steal from the most difficult place to steal from. They will go past the house with secure windows and find the house with worn out locks. An opportunist trying to break into a car on the street will not try to break into the new BMW with an alarm, they'll go for the older common model with no alarm. It's rare for top brands to be stolen or high-value houses to be broken into simply because thieves don't want to get caught or waste time. 95% of thieves take easy over valuable. Reminds me of the old joke. Two guys go fishing for a few days. One night a bear in a bad mood storms into their camp and starts tearing everything up. The guys jump out of their tent, but one goes back in and quickly starts putting his running shoes on. "What the fuck are you doing?" screams his barefoot mate, "The bear doesn't care about your fashionable footwear!" His buddy says "No, it just cares which one of us runs slower!" And on the second point, 'Hear Hear' as they say in Blighty. 'Too right', as they say in Aus. As porn becomes more acceptable to the broader community, their standards on violence against women become more and more significant. The argument for a long time has been that if you can show Hollywood movies dismembering people etc, then people having sexual fun with each other should be legal, and most of the community clearly accepts that. But they don't accept that real slapping and beating people should be seen as fun, and definitely not in a sexual context. The beandicks who try to 'push the envelope' in that direction should just quietly get the therapy they need rather than fuck up the porn scene for everyone else.
[+ absoultely fucking hate the quack quack blowjob and drool. It's so unbelievably unerotic and obnoxious. I'd like to give 40 lashes to the moron who first thought this would be a good idea in a porn flick [/quote] lol sorry man but I have to respectfully disagree... [/quote] ============= Wow. Seriously, what is appealing about hearing some gal imitate Donald Duck? I don't mind the 70s slurping blowjob, but the quacking? Is it b/c I'm old now and not on FAcebook? lol
REmember we are Mooks to those in the porn business. Wallets to be separated, by any means necessary, of our cash. Just like Wall Street, BP and the Auto industry. And then the pornographers cry bitter tears over tube site theft.
when I find a few good scenes and I jerk da pud so often and so hard that I break skin and then the strokin' gets painfull. Oh the peaks and valleys of wankin' Edited by - screwcap on 8/3/2010 5:43:17 PM
"I'm Not Here To Suck My Own Cock!" 2145 Posts 5/10
Posted - Aug 3 2010 : 10:46PM
I hate it when guy is fucking away and when its ready for the pop shot he pulls out and has to jerk himself off for what it seems like forever before he cums. For gods sake, a least let the girl get them off. If he can can shoot on command, then he should find another line of work.
Yeah reverse cowgirl is largely a shitty position chosen simply for the fact that it shows penetration well. In the 90s it was a bit better because they filmed it at a different angle and it looked a lot more flattering to the female. The way they shoot it now is horrendous.
I'm going to stab you in the throat with a spork!!! 1048 Posts 12/06
Posted - Aug 23 2010 : 8:09PM
I have to disagree, or at least say it might also depend on the girl...some girls just look bad in that position... for me, I hate seeing watermarks in my movies...that and unskippable piracy warnings
In missionary, when the cameraman shoots from underneath, between the guy's legs. It's such a horrible fucking shot that for some reason is very prevalent. The guy's ass takes up half the fucking screen. And that shot isn't even necessary to capture the penetration; it can be captured by shooting from above, and then you can actually see the girl's face and body as well. Another thing about missionary- that position is great for being able to see the girl's tits shake and bounce around. But oftentimes the dude's hands will be all over them the whole goddamn time, and you can't see them bouncing. I find that pretty annoying. Poorly shot doggy positions. Doggy looks best when the girl's legs are together, and her ass is arched up in the air. But a lot of the time doggy is shot with the girl's back completely straight, the guy hunched over her so you can't even see her ass, while she has one leg on the floor. The way the opening teases are shot in a lot of Christoph Clark movies. There will be some really hot girl shaking her ass or whatever, and THEN THERE WILL BE A CUT TO A CLOSEUP SHOT OF SOME DUDE JERKING OFF! What they fuck?!? Why would I want to jerk off to some other dude jerking off? Michael Stefano going "ohhh mama" a million times during a scene. Michael Stefano repeatedly asking the girl some rhetorical question while he's fucking her, like "why are you so sexy baby? why are you so sexy baby? why are you so sexy baby?" Lesbian scenes being really lame and boring. I've been trying to watch more lesbian porn lately just because I'm getting so tired of egotistical male performers, but so much of it is incredibly boring. I'd like to see more stuff like Jake Malone's "bitchcraft" series. Edited by - htb066 on 8/24/2010 1:27:00 PM
My brother developed eczema on his dick (which I guess is one of the most common places to get it). Dermatologist asked him his masturbation frequency. Bro answered, "Daily. Morning noon and night". Doc asked him if he used lubbrication or "dry". Bro said, "Dry". Doc told him to use lube and lo and behold his eczema went away. All that friction itched up a hot spot TMI!
good question.. so: 1. Cheapest,fast-food production. Which means, I don't like way which Industry works. Non-stop production, without any reason, any plans for future.. for expl. any difference between Barely Legal 40 and Barely Legal 78? Any reason to make this features? To be specific to many features decrease their quality - which means final product is bad. 2. Pornstars. This is a thing which I don't understand. Why girl who perform in a few features people call a pornstar? I think you must deserve for this. When you say "pornstar" I understand you talk about J. Jameson, Janine, Asia Carrera .. but not about porn starlet. 3. Brand Most present woman's in porn don't care about brand. I talk about their names. For expl. "Alicia Wilson or Veronica Lange, Simona Giglio, Claudia Consuelo or Manuela Mazza or Elisabetta Del Garda, Sylvie, Cynthia Nupp, Simone Gold, Henni, Dimony, Diamond, Simona, Simona Diamond, Simone Simmons, Henrietta, Henriette, Henriet, Henriet Simony, Heny, Anna Karin, Simone Diamond, Simona Banfi, Henrietta Hequi" , yeap.. this is Simone Diamond's aliases.. good way to build brand? I don't think so. Compare to Jenna Jameson (always under this name except "Dinner Party" as a Daisy} etc.. I think most girls don't take a serious job in Industry.. just a temporary job to pay bills. Or, I'm wrong. Second thing is wrong name.. Krysta Now: Well, in my first six movies I was just "Krysta." You know, but then in order to differentiate myself from the 76 other Krystas in the business, I added the "Now." - quote from "Southland Tales" 2006 yeap.. how many we can find out Lexi's, Diamond's, Gold's etc. in Industry? To many :) 4. No Jenna Jameson. yeap.. :) I don't see nobody who can replace Jenna in Industry now. In 2006 I was almost sure that Jesse Jane take her's place. But no. Unfortunately. 5. Style Which means.. (a part time reference to point 1.} I don't see to any girls in Industry create own style. {except Belladonna - when you watch dirty porn in bathroom, you can be almost sure that's is her.) khem.. I'm perhaps wrong.. I forgot about Kayden Kross. Anyway.. messy make-up, bad hair, cheap cloths.. you can find in almost every porn production. We are very close to next point which is.. 6.Tatoo and piercing included. I really don't know why a lot girls want to look like Denis Rodman. Human body is beautiful enough and is no need to something extra.. lastest days exmpl. is Delta White.. She's really beautiful woman, I see her last time ( I belive Kilergram production). What a mess.. Why? 7. No boob, no job. True? If you look at Jenna Haze - it's definitely no true. I think a lot of woman are force to enlarge boobs. Sometimes is way to nowhere.. Why? expl. "Fresh Meat 27" Bridgette B. and Tiffany Tyler scene. Bridgette B. looks amazing, stunning and when guy comes up, take off her's corset... and.. Bridgette's boobs .. bang! on the floor..
8. Boys maybe I have bad luck.. but when I watch latest production I always see same guys.. Yes. I know, this job is very hard.. but I don't see no one who can replace or compete with Tommy Gun, Scott Nails, Mick Blue etc. Why? 9. Evan Stone yess. .. this is my personal point. Why? "In this year we have 15 nominee and I fuck all of them" - Evan Stone in AVN Awards. My personal red card for him. 10. Box office No explanation.. but someone can tell me why Montana F. feature is No.1 in Adult DVD Empire? Maybe is a lots of people who want to see ass with pustules. 11. This is no .. XXX series yes.. stop it. please. I'm afraid to see some day "This is no Bonanza XXX movie" with: Tommy Gunn as a Adam Cartwright Ron Jeremy as a Ben Cartwright Mick Blue as a Joseph 'Little Joe' Cartwright . Look scary? Should be :) uff.. the end
pornography wasn't sex but fantasies of an impossibly hospitable world 12377 Posts 9/07
Posted - Aug 25 2010 : 3:38AM
I very much agree with this, the rate of production in porn since the late 80s is simply ridiculous, it's hard on the performers and even the best directors have to repeat themselves which can lead to loss of freshness and inspiration.
Out of all the things, and there are quite a few... The thing I dislike probably the most... Is the horrible perspectives directors seem to shoot most frequently in. Take some of the hottest girls in the world... Get them to shoot sex scenes... But do it in a way where the feminine form is not highlighted. Like nothing but penetration shots - or nothing but cowgirl but rear camera action. Cowgirl is beautiful - but IF and only IF it is shot where you can see the front of the woman... Her boobs moving around... The curves of her torso. Instead directors like long shots of basically her ass and penetration... With very brief profile shots... then of course, back to seeing her back and ass. Really infuriates me how directors could ruin such great opportunities. (Same goes for other positions, where there are shots that would highlight the womans body, but they are completely ignored.)
Studs who have a routine and stick to it no matter what, scene after scene, year after year it's boring even if they can do the job well. I won't mention names but I avoid these guys like the plague, for me porn is best when viewing it for the first time and if you have not seen the scene but know what routine is coming well forget it cos i'm not interested cos it's boring,,,just change it up for fuck sake.,,,,,sigh loudly and breath,,,,.
I hate it how most scenes add pussy eating as something mandatory instead of making it very hot. Like nibbling pussy lips, swirling the tongue over the clit and the girl's on the edge of losing it. The guys just licking in the same boring rhythmic motion is not arousing. Now that I think of it, the same goes for blow-jobs. I hate it when she bobs her head up and down like she's digging for oil and I hate skull-fucking and gagging. For gods sake show me a girl who can really suck! Swirl the tongue over the head, deep-throat without gagging, lick the shaft. Drive the guy insane! Another thing I hate: complete silence except the occasional moan. It's not realistic to be completely silent for 20 minutes. I want to hear them arouse one another with good dirty talk (which doesn't have to be trash talk). About the remark about only seeing the ass and back in a cowgirl scene: I personally don't mind that, but I agree if that's the only thing you see it could be a bit repetitive. American Anal Sluts features basically only reverse cowgirl scenes but is IMO insanely hot. If only they didn't use that awful speculum, though.
[Link]
ocdude Deactivated User
196 Posts 8/10
Posted - Aug 25 2010 : 4:13PM
Cowgirl - when shot from behind the female. I don't want to see her ass - I want to see her face as she experiences pleasure. I want to see her breasts. Show me the front side of her Guys who are ready to lose it - then pull out and have to spend the next 60 secons jerking themselves off before they cum. Just loses all the energy of the scene. Here we have some guy fucking some babe and he says he is cumming - then pulls out - we get a change of camera angle (we all know what that means) and for the next 60 seconds he is jerking himself off while she is on her knees - mouth open - waiting. And waiting. And waiting. And waiting. And.........
Gravity as Curved Space: Bootymeister's Theory of General Relativity 1589 Posts 11/08
Posted - Aug 25 2010 : 9:01PM
Male saliva. I hate its appearance in porn. Seriously, it is the only thing wrong with some scenes. Some guys are non-stop saliva factories. I fast-forward through all the time. Sometimes, after the guy is done playing with his saliva, there is an ugly gerb left in some otherwise appealing part of the girl's body, like the pelvic area, ass or thigh. I have seen way too much of it, sometimes I can fast-forward just before the dude starts pouring saliva out his mouth and save my self the disgust. Who is the genius who figured out the gross public demand for male saliva in all of its glorious modes of delivery?
Edited by - bootymeister on 8/25/2010 9:01:52 PM
[Link]
Luke Lake Deactivated User
878 Posts 8/10
Posted - Sep 2 2010 : 5:04AM
- Music During Sex - Guys Foot on Girls Face - Face Slapping - Anal Movies with Vaginal - Gonzo - The "C" Word - The "N" Word
I just watched Hand Job Winner 7. The movie is so/so, but there's one good scene in it featuring Kagney Linn Karter. The hottest part is where she's slowly jerking some guy and french kisses him while at the same time he fondles with her very nice boobs, all captured in frontal total view. It's totally freaking awesome!! Then the next shot... a close up of the guys cock. WHAT THE F*CK?!! I don't want to see that?! What is that idiot director thinking? May he die in hell. Edited by - robocop on 9/4/2010 6:09:21 AM
Another thing I dislike about porn and I'm really beginning to hate: porn not living up to the titles. Examples: - The "Suck it Dry" series. You would expect that the guy comes in the girls mouth and she sucks it dry, but it's not so. All cumshots are birdy-style facials. "Semen Sippers"; same thing. No one is sipping up semen. It's yet again birdy-style facials. - "I fucked your sister in the butt". You would expect some small storyline where two sisters or a brother and a sister are present, one of them leaves and the sister is fucked in the butt. Or the girl mentions that her sister can be home any minute and they need to hurry. Or the sister is silently watching in the doorway. No siree. It's just your regular old suck & fuck movie. No mention of a sister whatsoever. - "Wanna Fuck My Daughter Gotta Fuck Me First". You would expect something like a boyfriend who has to fuck the mother first to get approval to fuck her daughter. Nope. Nothing like that. I've only seen nr. 7 and in there the stepfather teaches the girl how to suck cock and then mother, daughter and stepfather have a threesome. It's still a hot scene but it's nothing like the title proclaims. - "Deliveries in the Rear". You would expect that guys pop their load in the girl's ass. But nope. Just facials. Edited by - robocop on 9/6/2010 3:22:32 AM
Yeah uh-huh sure... and I guess conspiracy is just a theory. 252 Posts 12/09
Posted - Sep 4 2010 : 11:51AM
GET SOME DAMN PEOPLE WHO KNOW HOW TO WORK THE FUCKIN' CAMERA!!! I hate those stupid long drawn-out close-ups of the guy's dick goin' in and out. One minute should be long enough, damn!!!
Posted - Jul 27 2010 : 10:40AM
